A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
The proposed protocol includes guidelines on how to avoid contamination with endotoxin during the isolation of extracellular vesicles from cell culture supernatants, and how to properly evaluate them.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a heterogeneous population of membrane vesicles released by cells in vitro and in vivo. Their omnipresence and significant role as carriers of biological information make them intriguing study objects, requiring reliable and repetitive protocols for their isolation. However, realizing their full potential is difficult as there are still many technical obstacles related to their research (like proper acquisition). This study presents a protocol for the isolation of small EVs (according to the MISEV 2018 nomenclature) from the culture supernatant of tumor cell lines based on differential centrifugation. The protocol includes guidelines on how to avoid contamination with endotoxins during the isolation of EVs and how to properly evaluate them. Endotoxin contamination of EVs can significantly hinder subsequent experiments or even mask their true biological effects. On the other hand, the overlooked presence of endotoxins may lead to incorrect conclusions. This is of particular importance when referring to cells of the immune system, including monocytes, because monocytes constitute a population that is especially sensitive to endotoxin residues. Therefore, it is highly recommended to screen EVs for endotoxin contamination, especially when working with endotoxin-sensitive cells such as monocytes, macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, or dendritic cells.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), according to the MISEV 2018 nomenclature, are a collective term describing various subtypes of cell-secreted membranous vesicles that play crucial roles in numerous physiological and pathological processes1,2. Moreover, EVs show promise as novel biomarkers for various diseases, as well as therapeutic agents and drug delivery vehicles. However, realizing their full potential is difficult as there are still many technical obstacles related to their acquisition3. One such challenge is the isolation of endotoxin-free EVs, which has been neglected in many cases. One of the most common endotoxins is lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is a major component of gram-negative bacterial cell walls and can cause an acute inflammatory response, owing to the release of a large number of inflammatory cytokines by various cells4,5. LPS induces a response by binding to LPS binding protein, followed by interaction with the CD14/TLR4/MD2 complex on myeloid cells. This interaction leads to the activation of MyD88- and TRIF-dependent signaling pathways, which in turn triggers the nuclear factor kappa B (NFkB). Translocation of NFkB to the nucleus initiates the production of cytokines6. Monocytes and macrophages are highly sensitive to LPS, and their exposure to LPS results in a release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-12, CXCL8, and TNF-α)7,8. The CD14 structure enables the binding of different LPS species with similar affinity and serves as a co-receptor for other toll-like receptors (TLRs) (TLR1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 9)6. The number of studies being conducted on the effects of EVs on monocytes/macrophages is still increasing9,10,11. Especially from the perspective of studying the functions of monocytes, their subpopulations, and other immune cells, the presence of endotoxin and even their masked presence in EVs is of great importance12. The overlooked contamination of EVs with endotoxins may lead to misleading conclusions and hide their true biological activity. In other words, working with monocytic cells requires confidence in the absence of endotoxin contamination13. Potential sources of endotoxins can be water, commercially obtained media and sera, media components and additives, laboratory glassware, and plasticware5,14,15.
Therefore, this study aimed to develop a protocol for the isolation of low endotoxin-containing EVs. The protocol provides simple hints on how to avoid endotoxin contamination during EVs isolation instead of removing endotoxins from EVs. Previously, many protocols have been presented on how to remove endotoxins from, for example, engineered nanoparticles used in nanomedicine; however, none of them are useful for biological structures such as EVs. The effective depyrogenation of nanoparticles can be carried out by ethanol or acetic acid rinsing, heating at 175 °C for 3 h, γ irradiation, or triton X-100 treatment; however, these procedures lead to the destruction of EVs16,17.
The presented protocol is a pioneering study focused on avoiding endotoxin impurities in EVs, unlike previous studies on the effect of EVs on monocytes9. Applying proposed principles to laboratory practice may help to obtain reliable research results, which can be crucial when considering the potential use of EVs as therapeutic agents in the clinic12.
1. Preparation of ultracentrifuge tubes
2. Preparation of EV-depleted low-endotoxin fetal bovine serum (EE-FBS)
3. Cell culture
4. Isolation of EVs from cell culture supernatants
5. Specific markers detection by western blotting
6. Measurement of endotoxin level by Limulus Amebocyte Lysate test (LAL)
7. Detection of prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene in EV samples
8. Determination of effective LPS concentration for stimulation in human monocyte model
A prerequisite or obligatory step for this protocol is the exclusion of possible endotoxin contamination from reagents. All the reagents being used, such as FBS, DMEM, RPMI, PBS, and even ultracentrifuge tubes, must be endotoxin-free (<0.005 EU/mL). Maintaining the regime of no endotoxin contamination is not easy as, for example, the regular/standard serum for cell culture can be its rich source (0.364 EU/mL; see Table 1).
Although this protocol was developed to isolate EV...
In the last few years, methods for proper EVs isolation have become increasingly important, enabling their further reliable analyses, for example, in the context of obtaining reliable omics and functional data24. Based on previous research experience, it seems that not only the type of isolation method, but also other conditions during this procedure may be important. The use of EV-depleted FBS is widely recognized as a necessity25,26; how...
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.
This work was supported by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant number 2019/33/B/NZ5/00647. We would like to thank Professor Tomasz Gosiewski and Agnieszka Krawczyk from the Department of Molecular Medical Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College for their invaluable help in the detection of bacterial DNA in EVs.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Alix (3A9) Mouse mAb | Cell Signaling Technology | 2171 | |
1250ul Filter Universal Pipette Tips, Clear, Polypropylene, Non-Pyrogenic | GoogLab Scientific | GBFT1250-R-NS | |
BD FACSCanto II Flow Cytometr | BD Biosciences | ||
CBA Human Th1/Th2 Cytokine Kit II | BD Biosciences | 551809 | |
CD9 (D8O1A) Rabbit mAb | Cell Signaling Technology | 13174 | |
ChemiDoc Imaging System | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | 17001401 | |
DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium) | Corning | 10-013-CV | |
ELX800NB, Universal Microplate Reader | BIO-TEK INSTRUMENTS, INC | ||
Fetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | 16000044 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum South America Ultra Low Endotoxin | Biowest | S1860-500 | |
Gentamicin, 50 mg/mL | PAN – Biotech | P06-13100 | |
Goat anti-Mouse IgG- HRP | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-2004 | |
Goat anti-Rabbit IgG- HRP | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-2005 | |
Immun-Blot PVDF Membrane | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | 1620177 | |
LPS from Salmonella abortus equi S-form (TLRGRADE) | Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. | ALX-581-009-L002 | |
Mini Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer Cell | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | 1703930 | |
Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis | Malvern Instruments Ltd | ||
NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer (4X) | Invitrogen | NP0007 | |
NuPAGE Sample Reducing Agent (10x) | Invitrogen | NP0004 | |
Parafilm | Sigma Aldrich | P7793 | transparent film |
Perfect 100-1000 bp DNA Ladder | EURx | E3141-01 | |
PierceTM Chromogenic Endotoxin Quant Kit | Thermo Scientific | A39552 | |
PP Oak Ridge Tube with sealing caps | Thermo Scientific | 3929, 03613 | |
RPMI 1640 | RPMI-1640 (Gibco) | 11875093 | |
SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler | Applied Biosystem | A24811 | |
Sorvall wX+ ULTRA SERIES Centrifuge with T-1270 rotor | Thermo Scientific | 75000100 | |
Sub-Cell GT Horizontal Electrophoresis System | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | 1704401 | |
SuperSignal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate | Thermo Scientific | 34577 | |
SW480 cell line | American Type Culture Collection(ATCC) | ||
SW480 cell line | American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) | ||
Syringe filter 0.22 um | TPP | 99722 | |
Trans-Blot SD Semi-Dry Transfer Cell | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. | 1703940 | Transfer machine |
Transfer pipette, 3.5 mL | SARSTEDT | 86.1171.001 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved