A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
The protocol presents a novel stepwise approach to producing a pinna-edge biopsy (PEB) in post-natal day (PND) 7 mice for the purpose of identification and simultaneous genotyping.
Identification and genotyping of mice is often an essential part of many in vivo scientific studies. Several methods have been described for identification and genotyping in weaned mice; however, to date, there are far fewer techniques described for pre-weanling mice. Pinna Edge Biopsy (PEB) is a method of identification with subsequent use of tissue for genotyping. This article describes and provides video instruction on a stepwise approach to PEB on post-natal day (PND) 7 mice. Eight different patterns of pinna biopsy location and technique are outlined which have been shown to sustain into adulthood for identification. This article also discusses ways to optimize the PEB and shows the benign effect this technique has on the growth and development of the pups, with all mice showing appropriate weight gain without any morbidity or mortality throughout the study. This technique will provide investigators with a method for mouse identification at an age where there are few identification and genotyping methods available.
In certain scientific studies, the method to identify and simultaneously genotype a mouse can be crucial. When using a mouse model, there are several commonly used methods that have been developed to genotype and identify animals at the same time (e.g., ear punching, ear tagging), and other methods that only identify animals (e.g., tattooing, subcutaneous transponder implantation, marker or dye application) or only genotype animals (e.g., tail biopsy)1,2. Most of these techniques are intended to be performed at the time of weaning. Techniques to simultaneously identify and genotype in younger, pre-weanling animals are fewer1,2,3,4.
To assist work that requires identification and genotyping of mice at younger ages, a study was performed to validate PEB as a reliable identification and genotyping method for PND 7 pups and compare it to the use of PEB in mice weaned at PND 215. As this study details, horizontal and vertical pinna slices were selected because a prior study using PND 7 pup carcasses found pinna patterns created using PEB were clear, quick, provided a variety of pattern combinations, identifiable, and the tissue was easy to remove5. Other methods, such as ear punches and ear notches, were also explored, but there was not enough surface area on PND 7 pups for the creation of complete circular punches or notches. This preliminary work led the referenced study to test these patterns in live PND 7 mice5. This study showed that the tissue size retrieved from the biopsy of the ear pinna can be used for successful genotyping. The PEB patterns were also intact as mice aged to PND 63, regardless of when the pinna was biopsied at PND 7 or PND 215.
The goal for the development of this technique is to provide a simultaneous identification and genotyping method for animals aged PND 7 to 14 that, according to current literature, do not have a method available. The current article, accompanied by the guided video, illustrates how to perform an ear biopsy at the pinna edge of a 7-day mouse's ear to simultaneously identify and retrieve a sufficient quantity of tissue for PCR genotyping. There are eight different biopsy combinations and one with no biopsy for a total of nine pinna patterns available for use to identify individual mice. Tips on performing pinna biopsies are further discussed to maximize success for the clear identification of the various pinna patterns in PND 7 pups.
All procedures outlined in the protocol were performed in compliance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals6 and approved by the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The identification method described below has been tested in C57BL/6NCrl mice of both sexes5. This method has not been used in other strains, stocks, or transgenics. Pinna biopsy identification may not be suitable for mice that have an increased healing capacity (e.g., MRL mouse strain)7.
1. Mouse pup restraint
2. Selection of pinna biopsy pattern
3. Pinna edge biopsy
Figure 1 illustrates a manual method of gently restraining PND 7 mice so their ears are visible for manipulation. The restraint uses the thumb and index finger to grasp the excess skin of the scruff. The amount of skin grasped depends on the animal's age, with less tissue available in smaller animals.
The PEB patterns listed in Figure 2 have been tested to be identifiable up to PND 63 and anecdotally have been seen to last fo...
Significance with respect to existing methods
Previous articles have stated that for PND 14 animals and younger, their pinna may not be suitable for manipulation because of the small size2,3. While existing ear identification systems such as ear punch biopsies, ear notching, or ear tags can perform both identification and genotyping, they may require larger pinnae and, thus, older mice for identification. This novel method of PEB offer...
The authors do not have anything to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Drs. Lori S Palley and Donna M Jarrell, the authors of the original paper in this work, for their contributions.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Dissection scissors | Kent Scientific | INS600393-G | 10 cm long |
McPherson-Vannas Scissors | Kent Scientific | INS600124 | 8 cm long |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved