In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
From Chapter 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
58 Views
Capital Budgeting
248 Views
Capital Budgeting
129 Views
Capital Budgeting
98 Views
Capital Budgeting
301 Views
Capital Budgeting
145 Views
Capital Budgeting
85 Views
Capital Budgeting
55 Views
Capital Budgeting
72 Views
Capital Budgeting
279 Views
Capital Budgeting
156 Views
Capital Budgeting
59 Views
Capital Budgeting
175 Views
Capital Budgeting
41 Views
Capital Budgeting
46 Views
See More
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved