In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
Du chapitre 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
57 Vues
Capital Budgeting
245 Vues
Capital Budgeting
128 Vues
Capital Budgeting
97 Vues
Capital Budgeting
293 Vues
Capital Budgeting
145 Vues
Capital Budgeting
85 Vues
Capital Budgeting
52 Vues
Capital Budgeting
69 Vues
Capital Budgeting
270 Vues
Capital Budgeting
149 Vues
Capital Budgeting
54 Vues
Capital Budgeting
163 Vues
Capital Budgeting
39 Vues
Capital Budgeting
46 Vues
See More