In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
Du chapitre 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
71 Vues
Capital Budgeting
285 Vues
Capital Budgeting
166 Vues
Capital Budgeting
128 Vues
Capital Budgeting
363 Vues
Capital Budgeting
175 Vues
Capital Budgeting
101 Vues
Capital Budgeting
76 Vues
Capital Budgeting
83 Vues
Capital Budgeting
303 Vues
Capital Budgeting
194 Vues
Capital Budgeting
84 Vues
Capital Budgeting
194 Vues
Capital Budgeting
57 Vues
Capital Budgeting
64 Vues
See More