In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
Bölümden 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
71 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
285 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
166 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
127 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
354 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
172 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
101 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
75 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
83 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
302 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
189 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
84 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
192 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
57 Görüntüleme Sayısı
Capital Budgeting
63 Görüntüleme Sayısı
See More
JoVE Hakkında
Telif Hakkı © 2020 MyJove Corporation. Tüm hakları saklıdır