In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
Del capítulo 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
69 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
277 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
157 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
121 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
340 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
166 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
97 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
72 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
83 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
298 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
186 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
77 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
191 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
55 Vistas
Capital Budgeting
62 Vistas
See More
ACERCA DE JoVE
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Todos los derechos reservados