In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
장에서 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
39 Views
Capital Budgeting
153 Views
Capital Budgeting
83 Views
Capital Budgeting
66 Views
Capital Budgeting
203 Views
Capital Budgeting
115 Views
Capital Budgeting
67 Views
Capital Budgeting
32 Views
Capital Budgeting
50 Views
Capital Budgeting
108 Views
Capital Budgeting
116 Views
Capital Budgeting
37 Views
Capital Budgeting
23 Views
Capital Budgeting
25 Views
Capital Budgeting
30 Views
See More
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. 판권 소유