In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
来自章节 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
69 Views
Capital Budgeting
279 Views
Capital Budgeting
157 Views
Capital Budgeting
123 Views
Capital Budgeting
346 Views
Capital Budgeting
169 Views
Capital Budgeting
99 Views
Capital Budgeting
72 Views
Capital Budgeting
83 Views
Capital Budgeting
298 Views
Capital Budgeting
186 Views
Capital Budgeting
78 Views
Capital Budgeting
191 Views
Capital Budgeting
56 Views
Capital Budgeting
62 Views
See More
版权所属 © 2025 MyJoVE 公司版权所有,本公司不涉及任何医疗业务和医疗服务。