In capital budgeting, selecting between mutually exclusive projects means choosing one option from a set of options, as both cannot be pursued simultaneously. This decision significantly impacts the company's future growth and financial health.
For example, an automobile company deciding between Project A, which generates $20,000 annually for seven years, and Project B, which generates $30,000 annually for five years, may use the Net Present Value (NPV) method. After discounting future cash flows at 8%, Project A has an NPV of approximately $4,000, while Project B yields a higher NPV of approximately $20,000, making Project B the preferable option.
When projects are mutually exclusive, selecting one precludes the other. In contrast, independent projects can be undertaken concurrently. For instance, owning a corner lot requires a choice between building a gas station or an apartment, but not both.
In such scenarios, the project with the highest NPV should be chosen, as it maximizes shareholder value. Relying solely on the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) can be misleading, so prioritizing NPV ensures the best long-term financial decision.
From Chapter 7:
Now Playing
Capital Budgeting
87 Views
Capital Budgeting
309 Views
Capital Budgeting
179 Views
Capital Budgeting
153 Views
Capital Budgeting
447 Views
Capital Budgeting
188 Views
Capital Budgeting
119 Views
Capital Budgeting
89 Views
Capital Budgeting
96 Views
Capital Budgeting
331 Views
Capital Budgeting
211 Views
Capital Budgeting
99 Views
Capital Budgeting
210 Views
Capital Budgeting
79 Views
Capital Budgeting
83 Views
See More
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved