Multicopter Aerodynamics: Characterizing Thrust on a Hexacopter

Overview

Source: Prashin Sharma and Ella M. Atkins, Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Multicopters are becoming popular for a variety of hobby and commercial applications. They are commonly available as quadcopter (four thrusters), hexacopter (six thrusters), and octocopter (eight thrusters) configurations. Here, we describe an experimental process to characterize the multicopter performance. A modular small hexacopter platform providing propulsion unit redundancy is tested. The individual static motor thrust is determined using a dynamometer and varying propeller and input commands. This static thrust is then represented as a function of motor RPM, where the RPM is determined from motor power and control input. The hexacopter is then mounted on a load cell test stand in a 5’ x 7’ low-speed recirculating wind tunnel, and its aerodynamic lift and drag force components were characterized during flight at varying motor signals, free-stream flow speed, and angle of attack.

A hexacopter was selected for this study because of its resilience to motor (propulsion unit) failure, as reported in Clothier1. Along with redundancy in the propulsion system, the selection of high-reliability components is also required for safe flight, particularly for missions over-populated regions. In Ampatis2, the authors discuss the optimal selection of multicopter parts, such as motors, blades, batteries, and electronic speed controllers. Similar research has also been reported in Bershadsky3, which focuses on the proper selection of a propeller system to satisfy mission requirements. Along with redundancy and reliability of components, understanding vehicle performance is also essential to assure flight envelope limits are respected and to select the most efficient design.

Procedure

This protocol characterizes hexacopter thrust and aerodynamics. For this experiment, we used commercially available, off-the-shelf components for the hexacopter, and the details are provided in Table 2. For the flight controller, we selected an open-source autopilot, Librepilot,9 as it provided flexibility to control individual motor commands issued to the hexacopter.  

The test stand for mounting the load cell and hexacopter was fabricated in-house using laminated plywood

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Results

Dynamometer Tests

In Figures 5-6, the plots illustrate the variation of thrust and torque, respectively, with increasing motor RPM. From these plots, the minimum motor RPM required for the multicopter to hover can be determined. A plot showing data from multiple propellers can be obtained from Sharma12. Further, the quadratic relations between thrust vs. RPM and moment vs. RPM can be clearly observed, which are described in Equations (1) and (2). Using this

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Application and Summary

Here we describe a protocol to characterize the aerodynamic forces acting on a hexacopter. This protocol can be applied to other multirotor configurations directly. Proper characterization of aerodynamic forces is needed to improve control design, understand flight envelope limits, and estimate local wind fields as in Xiang13. The presented protocol for determining motor RPM based on power consumption and throttle command has direct applications to estimate RPM and thrust when low-cost electronic speed control

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

References
  1. Clothier, R.A., and Walker, R.A., “Safety Risk Management of Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” Handbook  of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Springer, 2015, pp. 2229–2275.
  2. Ampatis, C., and Papadopoulos, E., “Parametric Design and Optimization of Multi-rotor Aerial Vehicles,” Applications of Mathematics and Informatics in Science and Engineering, Springer, 2014, pp. 1–25. 

  3. Bershadsky, D., Haviland, S., and Johnson, E. N., “Electric Multirotor UAV Propulsion System Sizing for Performance Prediction and Design Optimization,” 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., 2016.
  4. Bangura, M., Melega, M., Naldi, R., and Mahony, R., “Aerodynamics of Rotor Blades for Quadrotors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.00733, 2016
  5. Ducard, G., and Minh-Duc Hua. "Discussion and Practical Aspects on Control Allocation for a Multi-rotor Helicopter." Conf. on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics, 2011.
  6. Powers C., Mellinger D., Kumar V. “Quadrotor Kinematics and Dynamics” In: Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Springer, 2015
  7. McClamroch, N. Harris. “Steady Aircraft Flight and Performance.” Princeton University Press, 2011.
  8. Quan, Q., “Introduction to Multicopter Design and Control”, Springer Singapore, 2017.
  9. LibrePilot, https://www.librepilot.org/site/index.html
  10. Foster, J. and Hartman, D., “High-Fidelity Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aircraft System Simulation Development for Trajectory Prediction under Off-Nominal Flight Dynamics,” Proc. Air Transportation Integration & Operations (ATIO) Conference, AIAA, 2017. 
  11. Russell, Carl R., et al. "Wind Tunnel and Hover Performance Test Results for Multicopter UAS Vehicles," 2016.
  12. Sharma, P. and Atkins, E., “An Experimental Investigation of Tractor and Pusher Hexacopter Performance,” Proc. AIAA Aviation Conference, AIAA, June 2018. (to appear)
  13. Xiang, X., et al. "Wind Field Estimation through Autonomous Quadcopter Avionics." 35th AIAA/IEEE Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), IEEE, 2016.
  14. Kamel, M., et al. "Model Predictive Control for Trajectory Tracking of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles using Robot Operating System." Robot Operating System (ROS). Springer, Cham, 2017, 3-39.
Tags
MulticoptersAerodynamicsThrustHexacopterRotorsPitch ControlFlight ControlPropellersHoverAttitudeAxesPitch AxisRoll AxisYaw AxisThrust DifferentialForward MovementSide to side MovementYaw ControlHeading Angle

跳至...

0:01

Concepts

3:01

Dynamometer Experiment

4:18

Static Text

5:51

Dynamic Thrust Test

7:57

Results

此集合中的视频:

article

Now Playing

Multicopter Aerodynamics: Characterizing Thrust on a Hexacopter

Aeronautical Engineering

9.0K Views

article

模型飞机的空气动力学性能:DC-6B

Aeronautical Engineering

8.1K Views

article

推进器特性:音高、直径和叶片数在性能上的变化

Aeronautical Engineering

26.0K Views

article

机翼行为:克拉克Y-14翼上的压力分布

Aeronautical Engineering

20.8K Views

article

Clark Y-14 翼性能:高提升设备的部署(片和板条)

Aeronautical Engineering

13.2K Views

article

湍流球法:评估风洞流量质量

Aeronautical Engineering

8.6K Views

article

交叉圆柱流:测量压力分布和估计阻力系数

Aeronautical Engineering

16.0K Views

article

喷嘴分析:沿聚合和融合分流喷嘴的马赫数和压力的变化

Aeronautical Engineering

37.6K Views

article

施利伦成像:一种可视化超音速流特性的技术

Aeronautical Engineering

11.2K Views

article

水隧道中的流量可视化:在三角洲翼上观察前沿涡流

Aeronautical Engineering

7.8K Views

article

表面染料流可视化:观察超音速流中条纹模式的定性方法

Aeronautical Engineering

4.8K Views

article

皮托静态管:测量气流速度的设备

Aeronautical Engineering

48.4K Views

article

恒温测量:研究湍流边界层流的工具

Aeronautical Engineering

7.1K Views

article

压力传感器:使用皮托静态管进行校准

Aeronautical Engineering

8.4K Views

article

实时飞行控制:嵌入式传感器校准和数据采集

Aeronautical Engineering

10.0K Views

JoVE Logo

政策

使用条款

隐私

科研

教育

关于 JoVE

版权所属 © 2025 MyJoVE 公司版权所有,本公司不涉及任何医疗业务和医疗服务。