A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This protocol describes the creation of a randomized transfection layout using an automated liquid handler, a protoplast isolation protocol for etiolated maize leaf, and a 96-well transfection procedure using a liquid handler.
The field of plant biotechnology has witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years, revolutionizing the ability to manipulate and engineer plants for various purposes. However, as research in this field increases in diversity and becomes increasingly sophisticated, the need for early, efficient, dependable, and high-throughput transient screening solutions to narrow down strategies proceeding to stable transformation is more apparent. One method that has re-emerged in recent years is the utilization of plant protoplast, for which methods of isolation and transfection are available in numerous species, tissues, and developmental stages. This work describes a simple automated protocol for the randomized preparation of plasmid within a 96-well plate, a method for the isolation of etiolated maize leaf protoplast, and an automated transfection procedure. The adoption of automated solutions in plant biotechnology, exemplified by these novel liquid handling protocols for plant protoplast transfection, represents a significant advancement over manual methods. By leveraging automation, researchers can easily overcome the limitations of traditional methods, enhance efficiency, and accelerate scientific progress.
Plant protoplast transfection, the introduction of foreign genetic material into plant cells devoid of cell walls, is a pivotal technique and, in the last half a century, encompasses numerous species in support of plant biotechnology research. However, the utilization of these methods can be painful and limited in scope, even with millions of protoplasts produced per isolation. Traditional methods of plant protoplast transfection are often laborious, time-consuming, prone to variability, and technically demanding, leading to niche systems with low reproducibility1. However, the potential introduced by automated solutions in recent years illuminates the possibility of breathing new life into this 60-year young technique2,3. With the potential of automating crucial but repetitive steps such as material preparation, poly-ethylene glycol (PEG) incubation, and subsequent transfection reagent dispensing, researchers can significantly reduce the physical handling requirements and other potential sources of human error4. Furthermore, the precise control and uniformity offered by automated liquid handling systems ensure consistent and reproducible transfection results.
While protoplast isolation is a meticulous process that involves chopping, digestion, incubation, filtration, and centrifugation, the transfection portion of these protocols is tailor-made for automated liquid handlers. The procedure for most protoplast transfection protocols is PEG-mediated, and mixing the isolated protoplast in the presence of PEG and purified plasmid DNA for a specified duration at a precise concentration (dependent on the species and tissue) allows these cells to take in the plasmid DNA5. This transfection is followed by a series of wash steps, culminating in an overnight incubation6. After the incubation period, if everything was designed and delivered properly, the experiment results in the expression of the component of interest and/or the potential of evaluating different regulatory components7. All the aspiration, dispensing, and agitation/mixing steps associated with this procedure would normally be handled by a manual pipette. Executing such a protocol by hand, one individual reaction at a time, is laborious and introduces unnecessary variation between samples while also limiting the capacity that can be evaluated at any given time. Automated protocols for the manipulation of mammalian or insect cells and chemical synthesis in the pharmaceutical industry have been in practice for several years4,8,9. Protoplast utilization and protocols involving the automated liquid handling of plant materials are on the rise10,11,12,13.
The adoption of automated liquid handling protocols for plant protoplast transfection holds great promise for research applications. Researchers can explore larger genetic libraries, screen for specific gene functions at an accelerated pace, and investigate complex genetic interactions related to plant stress more comprehensively14. The scalability of automated approaches utilizing 96-well pods combined with fluorescence screening enables high-throughput experimentation and allows scientists to rapidly generate data and insights that can fuel advancements in plant biotechnology11. However, with this increase in throughput, leading to the generation of hundreds, if not thousands of data points, there must be additional quality control that accounts for any sources of error that may confound results15. One element that has been identified as a contributing factor across numerous scientific disciplines is the edge effect. Some mitigating strategies will suggest the best plate to use or fill inter-well space or the outermost wells with water to combat this phenomenon16,17. However, these strategies add time, and if a specific disposable is unavailable, the only option is to settle for less or postpone. Alternatively, looking at strategies that account for this effect via a blocking scheme makes no sacrifice of throughput or delay to execution.
This etiolated maize leaf protoplast protocol and its two automated methods illustrated in Figure 1 seek to address the variability inherent to protoplast experiments by automating multiple portions of the canonical protoplast method, the allocation of plasmid material to the vessel used for transfection, and the transfection itself. These methods are demonstrated for the etiolated maize leaf protoplast platform as it is a well-characterized, simple, and efficient protoplast platform. All the steps detailed within are immediately accessible to protoplast transfection protocols, which utilize similar or the same buffer solutions. However, special attention to the unique characteristics of protoplast source tissue and species should be considered before the adoption of these techniques. These improvements through automation simplify the preparation of material for individual experiments and significantly improve the throughput, from one-by-one sequential transfection to 96 transfections handled simultaneously. This work will also show justification for the utilization of randomized incomplete blocks to account for plate positional bias.
1. Transfection plate creation
2. Etiolated maize leaf protoplast isolation
3. Automated protoplast transfection
NOTE: Steps 3.6 through 3.15 are managed completely by the automated liquid handler, except for the two user pauses at steps 3.10 and 3.13, which require manual centrifugation. Relevant screenshots that follow along with this automated protocol can be found in the supplement, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 3, Supplementary Figure 4, and Supplementary Figure 5.
To obtain observational data supporting that edge effects may be affecting the response measurements; a pilot study was conducted to confirm those suspicions. For this study, the above methods were applied to three replicate 96-well plates with only a single treatment level; all protoplasts were transfected using pSYN1125019, a plasmid that constitutively expresses ZsGreen, with the goal of showing there exist systematic differences in response level for units on the edge of the plate as compared ...
This manuscript describes a protocol for automating transfection plate creation and etiolated maize leaf protoplast isolation with an automated transfection. For the successful completion of the transfection plate creation portion of the protocol, it requires an automated liquid handling robot that is fitted with an 8-channel pod. For the transfection protocol, a 96-well pod is recommended for full and uniform 96-well plate transfection. The transfection method can be completed using an 8-channel pod, but special co...
All authors are employed by Syngenta, an international agricultural biotechnology company, routinely employing transformation technology for the generation of transgenic (GM) trait products.
The authors would like to thank the many scientists at Syngenta who support this work and our team daily. Special recognition must be given to the family and friends whose often-unseen support is crucial to the continued success of the Transient Assay Team.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
(2)β-mercaptoethanol | Sigma | M6250 | |
2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) monohydrate | Sigma | 69892 | |
50mL centrifuge tubes with flat cap sterile | Fisher | 22-010-064 | |
96 Well Optical Btm Plt PolymerBase Black w/Lid Cell Culture Sterile PS .4mL Well | Fisher | 12-566-70 | |
Axygen Biomek FX/NX Robotic Tips, non-sterile, Wide Bore | Fisher | 14-222-096 | |
Axygen Robotic Tips 30uL filter, sterile, racked | Fisher | 14-222-103 | |
Bel-Art SP Scienceware Lab Companion Round Style Vacuum Desiccators | Fisher | 08-648-10 | |
Bemis 2 IN. X 250 Ft. Roll Laboratory Parafilm | Fisher | 13-374-16 | |
Biomek FXP | Beckman Coulter | 902508 | |
Calcium chloride dihydrate | Sigma | C5080 | |
Chemglass Life Sciences Disposable Hemocytometer | Fisher | 50-131-1352 | |
Clorox Germicidal Bleach, Concentrated | Fisher | NC1871274 | |
Corning Microplate Aluminum Sealing Tape | Fisher | 07-200-684 | |
Corning 96-Well assay Blocks, 2mL, 96 well standard | Fisher | 07-200-701 | |
DL-Dithiothreitol (DTT) | Sigma | 10197777001 | |
D-Mannitol | Sigma | M9546 | |
Fisherbrand 60mL Plastic Syringe | Fisher | 14-955-461 | |
Fisherbrand Sterile Cell Strainer 40um | Fisher | 22-363-547 | |
Fisherbrand Petri Dishes with Clear Lid, Stackable, 100 mm x 25 mm, Case of 325 | Fisher | FB0875711 | |
Magnesium chloride hexahydrate | Sigma | M2670 | |
Millex Syringe-driven Filter Unit Sterile 33mm PES .22um | Fisher | SLGPR33RS | |
Millex Syringe-driven Filter Unit Sterile 33mm PVDF.45um | Fisher | SLHAR33SS | |
MillliporeSigma Steriflip Sterile Disposable Vacuum Filter Units 50mL PES | Fisher | SCGP00525 | |
Poly(ethylene glycol) 4000 | Sigma | 81240 | |
Redi-Earth Plug & Seedling Mix | Wyatt Quarles | GP92747 | |
Regular Duty Single Edge Razor Blades steel back .009RD | Fisher | 12-640 | |
Research Products International Corp Cellulase RS | Fisher | 50-213-232 | |
Research Products International Corp Macerozyme R-10 | Fisher | 50-213-444 | |
Sodium chloride | Sigma | S7653 | |
Tray Insert - 36 Cell - 6x6 Nested | Hummert | 11635000 | |
Tween-20 | Sigma | P1379 | |
VACUUBRAND ME1 Vacuum Pump, 100-120V, 50/60 Hz, US plug | VWR | 97058-164 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved