This work was supported by NIH grants CA163640, CA166590, and AG041250 to LC.

The procedures described below have been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Ohio State University.
1. Preparation of Enriched Environment Prior to Housing Mice
<ol>
	<li>Cleaning and maintaining instruments.
	<ol>
		<li>Run the large enrichment bin (120 cm x 90 cm x 76 cm) through a cage wash. A typical Animal Facility cage wash protocol includes 5 to 6 washing cycles, with the last cycle reaching 82 &#186;C. The whole washing should take approximately 40 min. Air-dry the bin.
		<ol>
			<li>If the large enrichment bin, and any other housing instruments, cannot be sent through cage wash, then spray and wipe down the inside of the bin with sporicidal disinfectants following the manufacturer&#8217;s instructions. Wipe off the bin with a tap water soaked paper towel or 30% ethanol and dry with a paper towel to get rid of any scent from the previous disinfectant.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Use plastic tubing, igloos with saucer type wheels, and other various plastic hutch-like toys in the EE. Wash these toys through a cage wash. If you do not have access to a cage wash follow step&#160;1.1.1.1.</li>
		<li>Use metal running wheels in the EE. Wash wheels through a cage wash. If the paint on the wheels starts to fade so that the wheel becomes noisy when the animals run on it, apply a small amount petroleum jelly to where the wheel and axel connect.</li>
		<li>Use wooden logs in the EE. Clean the logs by removing any bedding or other debris by hand. Then sterilize the logs by autoclaving them on a dry cycle or textile cycle, which reaches a temperature of 121 &#186;C for 15 min.</li>
		<li>Use cages between dimensions of 29 cm x 18 cm x 12.5 cm and 30.5 cm x 19 cm x 14 cm to hold a feeding and drinking wire rack.Cut a hole at least 5 cm in diameter out of the front-bottom of the cage for mice to go in and out of from the EE. Clean these feeding cages through cage wash.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Setting up the environment
	<ol>
		<li>Pour &#188;-inch corn cob laboratory animal bedding into the large enrichment bin. Cover the entire floor surface of the bin to a depth of 2-2.5 cm with bedding.</li>
		<li>Place two or three logs in one corner of the bin.&#160;Place logs in the corner to sequester an area of about 1,225 cm2. In the area sequestered by the logs, place three igloos with saucer wheels on top. Make sure the wheels are not touching the walls of the bin, the logs, or each other, so that there is enough room for the wheels to spin freely.</li>
		<li>Piece together the plastic tubing so that multiple arms branch out from the centeral connecting piece. Place this tubing in the middle of the bin.</li>
		<li>At two corners of the bin, place one feeding cage each filled with the same bedding as the bin, and the hole in the front of the feeding cage should be facing towards the center of the bin. On top of these feeding cages a clean food and water wire should be placed to hold food and water. Do not place any lid on the cage. Put food and water in the cage wires.</li>
		<li>Place three metal wheels in the bin, though not all next to each other. The three different types of wheels are one 11.5 cm wheel, one 20.5 cm wheel, and one 28 cm wheel. Then place 4-5 more plastic hutch-like toys or tunnels throughout the enrichment bin.</li>
		<li>Cover the bin with micro-isolator filter paper. Use binder clips to clip the filter paper to the bin.</li>
		<li>Novelty is important to EE. Use this setup as the framework of the EE and vary the placement of aforementioned cages, objects, and toys to create a novel environment for the animals.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Housing the Animals
<ol>
	<li>Breed animals for experiments in regular laboratory housing and not EE. Optionally, place the animals in EE as early as 21 days of age upon weaning. Genotype and ear punch/tag animals prior to EE housing.</li>
	<li>When placing animals into the enrichment bin from a standard cage, place the cage in the bin on its side so that the animals can move freely from the standard cage to the enrichment bin. Do not allow the nesting materials to be transferred into the enrichment bin.</li>
	<li>House 10-20 animals of the same age, gender, and genetic strain in the EE.</li>
</ol>
3. Maintaining the Environment and Observing the Mice During Studies
<ol>
	<li>Daily
	<ol>
		<li>Quietly observe the animals for signs of illness or distress. If necessary, gently handle the animals to further inspect health conditions. Record abnormal observations and consult a health technician or veterinarian staff if the animal displays conditions that require removal from the experiment.</li>
		<li>Provide topical treatment with triple anti-biotic ointment for small wounds or scabs. If an animal needs to be removed due to a chronic illness or injury, remove the animal from the experiment for euthanasia. If animals meet early removal criteria for the overseeing animal research care committee or veterinarian, do not return animals back to EE.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Twice a Week
	<ol>
		<li>Check the feed and water levels. Ensure that feed and water will last for the next 3-4 days. Straighten up running wheels and enrichment toys so that they are spread out and can be used by mice. Replace any that are too dirty.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Weekly
	<ol>
		<li>Replace water bottles with clean water bottles. Rearrange enrichment devices in a manner that follows the setup in Section&#160;1.2. yet is different from the setup of the previous week.&#160; 
		&#8203;NOTE: If an experiment requires the animals to be removed from the enriched environment for an activity (recording body weight, blood draw, behavior test, etc.) it is best to rearrange the environment while the animals are away from the enrichment bin.</li>
		<li>Clean the feeding cages in the EE by hand or send it through cage wash as detailed in Section&#160;1.1.5. Replace the wire racks that hold the food and water with clean wire racks as well.</li>
		<li>Follow the instruction in Section&#160;2.2. when placing the animals back in enrichment. Spot check the rest of the large enrichment bin and clean, if necessary, by scooping out dirty litter and spreading down new clean bedding.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Bi-weekly
	<ol>
		<li>While performing the weekly husbandry, clean the toys by hand or send&#160;through cage wash as detailed in Section&#160;1.1.2. If needed, place the mice in a standard micro-isolator cage for the time required to clean.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Monthly
	<ol>
		<li>Clean the majority of the litter out by moving enrichment toys and feeding cages and scooping out the litter. Replace with fresh litter. Ensure that there is one inch of bedding in all areas of the cage. If needed, place the mice in a standard micro-isolator cage for the time required to clean.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Every Three Months (or At End of Experiment)
	<ol>
		<li>Remove all bedding and toys and clean and disinfect the enrichment bin as described in Section&#160;1.1.1. If the experiment is ongoing, replace with new bedding, feeding cages, assortment of toys and then return the mice to the bin.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Disinfect the entire enrichment bin more frequently than every three months if required by the research institution in which the EE is housed. If this is necessary and another large enrichment container is available, set up the additional enrichment container as detailed in Section&#160;1.2. and transfer the animals to the new container, while the previous one is being cleaned.</li>
</ol>
4. Control Housing Conditions
<ol>
	<li>House animals in the control group in micro-isolator cages of dimensions 30.5 cm x 19 cm x 14 cm. Include a wire rack in the cage for holding food and a water bottle, if the cage is not hooked up to a automatic watering system.</li>
	<li>Provide the same corn cob bedding in the control cage as is in the EE. Provide a 4 cm x 4 cm nestlet for the mice to make a nest out of.</li>
	<li>Replace and/or clean the cages, feeding wires, food and water once a week. Clean cages and wire racks through cage wash or as detailed in Section&#160;1.1.1.1. Clean the cages more often if animals urinates more frequently or if the drinking water leaks onto the bedding.</li>
	<li>Monitor the health of the animals in control housing daily. Assure the animals have plenty of food and water.</li>
	<li>House 3~5 mice of the same gender in regular mouse cage. Do not provide any toy, tube, or hutch in the cage.</li>
	<li>Institutional laboratory animal care facility health and laboratory technicians may provide husbandry for these control mice.</li>
	<li>Keep animals on a 12 hr light/dark cycle as is for the mice in EE.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Cao, L., During, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=What+is+the+brain-cancer+connection.">What is the brain-cancer connection.</a> Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 331-345 (2012).</li><li>Nithianantharajah, J., Hannan, A. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Enriched+environments,+experience-dependent+plasticity+and+disorders+of+the+nervous+system.">Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system.</a> Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 697-709 (2006).</li><li>Milsum, J. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+model+of+the+eustress+system+for+health/illness.">A model of the eustress system for health/illness.</a> Behav. Sci. 30, 179-186 (1985).</li><li>Selye, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Stress Without Distress. , (1974).</li><li>Krech, D., Rosenzweig, M. R., Bennett, E. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effects+of+environmental+complexity+and+training+on+brain+chemistry.">Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry.</a> J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 53, 509-519 (1960).</li><li>Rosenzweig, M. R., Krech, D., Bennett, E. L., Diamond, M. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effects+of+environmental+complexity+and+training+on+brain+chemistry+and+anatomy:+A+replication+and+extension.">Effects of environmental complexity and training on brain chemistry and anatomy: A replication and extension.</a> J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55, 429-437 (1962).</li><li>Frick, K. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Effects+of+Environmental+Enrichment+on+Spatial+Memory+and+Neurochemistry+in+Middle-Aged+Mice.">Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Spatial Memory and Neurochemistry in Middle-Aged Mice.</a> Learn. Mem. 10 (3), 187-198 (2003).</li><li>Dellen, A., Blakemore, C., Deacon, R., York, D., Hannan, A. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Delaying+the+onset+of+Huntington&#8217;s+in+mice.">Delaying the onset of Huntington&#8217;s in mice.</a> Nature. 404, 721-722 (2000).</li><li>Spires, T. L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Environmental+enrichment+rescues+protein+deficits+in+a+mouse+model+of+Huntington&#8217;s+disease,+indicating+a+possible+disease+mechanism.">Environmental enrichment rescues protein deficits in a mouse model of Huntington&#8217;s disease, indicating a possible disease mechanism.</a> J. Neurosci. 24 (9), 2270-2276 (2004).</li><li>Jankowsky, J. L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Environmental+enrichment+mitigates+cognitive+deficits+in+a+mouse+model+of+Alzheimer&#8217;s+disease.">Environmental enrichment mitigates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer&#8217;s disease.</a> J. Neurosci. 25 (21), 5217-5224 (2005).</li><li>Westood, J. A., Darcy, P. K., Kershaw, M. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Environmental+Enrichment+does+not+impact+on+tumor+growth+in+mice.">Environmental Enrichment does not impact on tumor growth in mice.</a> F1000Research. 2, 140 (2013).</li><li>Cao, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=VEGF+links+hippocampal+activity+with+neurogenesis,+learning.">VEGF links hippocampal activity with neurogenesis, learning.</a> Nat. Genet. 36 (8), 827-835 (2004).</li><li>Young, D., Lawlor, P. A., Leone, P., Dragunow, M., During, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Environmental+enrichment+inhibits+sponta-+neous+apoptosis,+prevents+seizures+and+is+neuroprotective.">Environmental enrichment inhibits sponta- neous apoptosis, prevents seizures and is neuroprotective.</a> Nat. Med. 5 (4), 448-453 (1999).</li><li>Cao, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Environmental+and+genetic+activation+of+a+brain-adipocyte+BDNF/leptin+axis+causes+cancer+remission+and+inhibition.">Environmental and genetic activation of a brain-adipocyte BDNF/leptin axis causes cancer remission and inhibition.</a> Cell. 142 (1), 52-64 (2010).</li><li>Cao, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=White+to+brown+fat+phenotypic+switch+induced+by+genetic+and+environmental+activation+of+a+hypothalamic-adipocyte+axis.">White to brown fat phenotypic switch induced by genetic and environmental activation of a hypothalamic-adipocyte axis.</a> Cell Metab. 14 (3), 324-338 (2011).</li></ol>

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The robust effects of EE on gene expression in the brain, decreased adiposity and cancer growth in mice depend heavily on the researcher&#8217;s ability to maintain the novel environment and handle the animals in a manner that promotes physical activity, social interaction, and cognitive challenges, yet does not distress the animals. There are two most important procedural steps to remember. First, remember to change the placement of the toys, objects, and cages every week. Even though the toys and objects might be the same from the previous week, the mice perceive the environment as novel. Change the toys and objects themselves with different ones every other week. Second, remember to keep the environment clean. If the soiled bedding does not get removed, the increased nitrogen levels may be a stressor to the animals.
In addition, there are many techniques to note in this EE protocol. The use of different or unique toys and different designs of plastic tube mazes is encouraged. The environment can be challenging but should not pose a threat to the animals&#8217; health. Moreover, beware of toys that are dysfunctional, because the dysfunctional toys increase the risk of mouse limbs getting caught, or might be toxic to the animals if consumed by chewing on it. One constant to the EE is the use of three saucer wheels on top of igloos, sequestered to a corner or side of the bin by 2-3 logs. This setup of running saucers behind the logs has been present in all our enrichment studies. In terms of the use and placement of the other objects, the description of the layout above is a foundational blue print of the EE setup. Variation of the setup with this foundational framework of plastic tubing, running wheels, running saucers, cages and logs should provide a sufficient novel environment to reproduce the reported results.
If working with transgenic animals that have diabetes or other metabolic diseases, pay close attention to the food and water consumption to assure that the animals do not run out of food and water. If the animals have diabetes, they will urinate more, so the bedding of the EE housing may need to be spot checked and cleaned more frequently. The places in the EE housing that need bedding removed most often are the corners. Remember to adjust the wheels and other toys, so that they can be used by the animals. The animals are capable of running saucer wheels into the bedding and knocking running wheels over. If the animals are young, 3 to 5 weeks of age, they might dig under the cages in the EE and hide together under there, leaving the researcher clueless as to where the animals are. When removing soiled bedding, replacing toys, or cleaning cages, it is suggested to put the animals in a clean standard cage so as not to stress them out while adjusting their environment. It is easier to get all the animals in one cage if they have fewer places to hide in the environment. Therefore, removing toys prior to sequestering the animals in a cage makes the process easier. Furthermore, do not place more than 5-6 animals in a single standard cage while waiting for the cleaning or adjusting their EE environment. The male animals in EE can be aggressive particularly when EE is initiated in adulthood. Therefore, it is important to observe the environment for any wounded or dead animals.
In addition, the typical number of animals we house in EE for this large size of container is 10-20 mice. The number of animals other researchers use for EE vary, using around 10 or less mice, and the size of the cage or bin should be taken into consideration when determining the number of animals to house in EE. Having too many animals in a living environment can lead to aggression in male mice. The mice we have housed in EE have been of C57BL/6 backgrounds. Mice of other strains may be more or less aggressive, or more prone to health issues in this EE setup. This should be taken into consideration in determining the husbandry plan for the mice and the enriched environment.
Four weeks EE housing is sufficient to induce decrease of adiposity, drop of leptin level, and inhibition of B16 melanoma growth. Longer EE can lead to stronger effects on metabolism and cancer inhibition. If mice undergo surgical procedures during or before exposure to EE, they may be housed with sutures intact. Whether or not animals respond well to this particular EE setup with surgical staples or catheters intact has not been studied. Furthermore, we are currently investigating how this particular EE affects the lifespan or healthspan of aged animals. Preliminary data suggest that female C57BL/6 mice, 10 months of age, respond to EE similarly to young mice. One limitation of the EE housing is accommodating such a large bin in animal facility space, and preferentially in a gender specific room. Thus future studies on the effects of EE on a smaller scale, as well as finding toys that are easy to clean, endure high temperature cleaning and are safe to the animals health, will improve the applications of the EE in metabolic and cancer research.

Environmental enrichment (EE) is an experimental paradigm used to explore the effects of a complex and challenging environment that does not stress the animals1. EE is an animal housing technique composed of increased space, physical activity, and social interactions, which in turn increases sensory, cognitive, motor, and social stimulation2. Igloos, running wheels, saucer wheels, tube mazes, and other objects in the housing environment foster this sensory cognitive, social, and motor stimulation by promoting exploration and interaction. The layout of the objects in the enclosure changes regularly to present a novel environment, to which the mice are forced to adapt. This strategy offers mild and brief challenges that induce a beneficial, benign, and healthy adaptive response, known as eustress, as opposed to a more aversive, hostile environment or maladaptive distress3,4. By promoting eustress and limiting harmful distress, mice show a variety of favorable phenotypes.
EE is a reliable experimental model with a wide range of applications, while being devoid of elements traditionally thought of as stressful1. The effects of EE on rodents have been studied for more than half a century. In the early 1960s studies showed that cortical cholinesterase levels decreased and subcortical cholinesterase levels increased in rats that were housed in environments with increased living space, increased number of rats, and a variety of wooden toys, mazes, and platforms5,6. In addition, EE is associated with many adaptive changes in the brain, behavior, and metabolism in mice of different ages and genetic backgrounds. Therefore, EE is a useful paradigm for a broad scope of experiments studying the effects of the environment on mice. EE effects can be observed in mice as quickly as one-week exposure, and can be seen in animals as old as eighteen months7. EE is often used in neuroscience and neurobehavioral experiments to study recovery of function, learning and memory2. Moreover, EE has considerable impact on the phenotype of a variety of toxin induced and transgenic animal models of human neurological diseases including Huntington&#8217;s disease, Alzheimer&#8217;s disease, Parkinson&#8217;s disease, Epilepsy, Stroke, and more2.
However, over the years there has been inconsistency with the enrichment design making comparisons between studies from different laboratories difficult. For example, each of the studies on the EE effects relative to human neurological diseases referred to above had varying parameters to the enrichment. The study on Huntington&#8217;s disease housed 4-6 mice in large cages (44 x 28 x 12.5 cm3) containing cardboard boxes, tunnels, and sheets, as well as wooden and plastic objects that were changed every two days8,9. One of the studies done on Alzheimer&#8217;s housed 20 mice in a larger cage (1 m3) containing 2 running wheels, plastic tubes, cardboard boxes and nesting material that were changed or rearranged weekly10. Many setups of EE have similar themes such as objects to run on or hide in, yet the number of mice per EE housing, the living area, and the period of changing the environment vary much.
The inconsistent designs of EE have led to failed replication of EE effects. Our data on cancer and metabolism together suggest that the combination of stimulations provided in the following detailed EE housing protocol lead to significant anti-cancer and anti-obesity effects14,15. However, the difference of EE settings adopted by different labs might influence the outcomes of EE, as is seen in one failed attempt to reproduce EE effects on the growth of specific cancer tumors implanted in mice11. The different results could be due to a variety of reasons ranging from different growth rates of the tumor cell cultures to the type of detergent used for cleaning housing equipment11. In order to replicate the results seen in our experiments, a particular design of enrichment and animal husbandry is required. The following procedure details the EE housing that will allow other researchers to successfully replicate our efficacious enrichment model.

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Large enrichment bin (120cm x 90cm x 76cm)</td>
			<td>Custom made.</td>
			<td>Custom made.</td>
			<td>Made of polypropylene. Edges of the bin are 1.5cm thick.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Large enrichment bin alternative (120cm x 110cm x 76cm)</td>
			<td>Global Industrial</td>
			<td>155202</td>
			<td>If necessary, this bin works as an alternative to the one above.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Habitrail Mini tubes</td>
			<td>Habitrail</td>
			<td>62720; 62705; 62725; 62715; 62054</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Plastic igloos with saucer wheels</td>
			<td>Bio Serv</td>
			<td>K3327; K3250</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Metal Running Wheels</td>
			<td>Super Pet</td>
			<td>61392; 61394; 61396</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Manzanita Wood Gnawing Sticks, 3&#34;</td>
			<td>Bio Serv</td>
			<td>W0016</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Mouse Tunnels</td>
			<td>Bio Serv</td>
			<td>K3322</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Mouse cages that go in the large EE bin.</td>
			<td>Lab Products Inc</td>
			<td>10027 Mouse Cage</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cage Klenz 180 Alkaline Cage Wash Detergent, Cage Klenz 250 Acid Detergent</td>
			<td>Steris Life Sciences</td>
			<td>1K1802; 1K2502</td>
			<td>These detergents are used in the cage wash for the toys, large enrichment bins, and cages.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sporklenz</td>
			<td>Steris Life Sciences</td>
			<td>6526Q8</td>
			<td>Alternative sporicide/disinfectant to washing toys, bins, and cages in cage wash.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bed-O-Cobs 1/4&#34; bedding</td>
			<td>The Andersons, Inc.</td>
			<td>4B</td>
			<td>Corn cob bedding is 1/4&#34; in diameter.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nestlets for control housed mice</td>
			<td>Ancare</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Cotton squares</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

a protocol for housing mice in an enriched environment

Environmental enrichment (EE) is a housing environment for mice that boosts mental and physical health compared to standard laboratory housing. Our recent studies demonstrate that environmental enrichment decreases adiposity, increases energy expenditure, resists diet induced obesity, and causes cancer remission and inhibition in mice. EE typically consists of larger living space, a variety of &#8216;toys&#8217; to interact with, running wheels, and can include a number of other novel environmental changes. All of this fosters a more complex social engagement, cognitive and physical stimulations. Importantly, the toy location and type of toy is changed regularly, which encourages the mice to adapt to a frequently changing and novel environment. Many variables can be manipulated in EE to promote health effects in mice. Thus these approaches are difficult to control and must be properly managed to successfully replicate the associated phenotypes. Therefore, the goal of this video is to demonstrate how EE is properly set up and maintained to assure a complex, challenging, and controlled environment so that other researchers can easily reproduce the protective effects of EE against obesity and cancer.

EE affects growth factor expression, increases neurogenesis and survival of cells within the central nervous system (CNS)12,13. More recent studies have shown that this technique of EE leads to a remarkable suppression of cancer growth in three mouse cancer models including B16 melanoma, MC38 colon cancer and APCmin/+ mouse that contains a germline mutation and is highly susceptible to spontaneous adenoma formation in the intestines14. The results in Figure 2 confirm the suppression of B16 melanoma tumor growth implanted in mice exposed to EE for 5 weeks(~80% decrease of tumor mass). Cancer growth suppression was even observed in mice when EE was initiated after the tumor had been established14. EE resulted in greater inhibition of melanoma growth in the high fat diet induced obesity mice (~70% decrease of tumor mass) than that in mice of normal weight (~50% decrease of tumor mass)14. EE induced signature changes in the serum biomarkers including robust drop of leptin, decrease of IGF-1, and increase of adiponectin levels14.
In addition, this technique of EE decreases adiposity, increases energy expenditure, leads to resistance against diet-induced obesity, and induces a white to brown fat phenotypic switch by activating the hypothalamic-sympathoneural-adipocyte axis15. The decrease in adiposity was seen as early as six days exposed to EE (Figure 3A, B) and again confirmed in animals exposed to EE for four weeks (Figure 3C, D). It is also important to note that, one, the anti-cancer and anti-obesity effects associated with EE cannot be accounted by physical activity alone, and, two, the EE effects can be reproduced by overexpression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the hypothalamus14,15.
<img alt="Figure 1" src="/files/ftp_upload/52874/52874fig1.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Enriched environment bin set up. The enriched environment has an area of 120 cm x 90 cm and includes two modified cages, running wheels, igloos with saucer wheels, plastic tubing, wooden logs, and other plastic enrichment toys.
<img alt="Figure 2" src="/files/ftp_upload/52874/52874fig2.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Enriched environment reduces tumor growth in C57BL/6 male mice. Three week old male mice were house in EE or control cages for 5 weeks prior to tumor inoculation. B16 melanoma tumor weights at 17 days after inoculation of 105 cells per animal subcutaneously above the right flank (n = 10 per group. Student&#8217;s t-test, * p &#60;0.05).
<img alt="Figure 3a" src="/files/ftp_upload/52874/52874fig3a.jpg" /> 
<img alt="Figure 3b" src="/files/ftp_upload/52874/52874fig3b.jpg" /> 
<img alt="Figure 3c" src="/files/ftp_upload/52874/52874fig3c.jpg" /> 
<img alt="Figure 3d" src="/files/ftp_upload/52874/52874fig3d.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: Enriched environment decreases adiposity in C57BL/6 male mice. Three week old mice were subjected to EE; one group for 6 days, another for four weeks. (A) Six days in EE decreased fat pad weights (n = 5 per group. Student&#8217;s t-test, *p &#60;0.05). (B) Six days in EE decreased fat pad weights relative to body weight (n = 5 per group. Student&#8217;s t-test, *p &#60;0.05). (C) Four weeks in EE decreased fat pad weights (n = 5 per group. Student&#8217;s t-test, *p &#60;0.05). (D) Four weeks in EE decreased fat pad weights relative to body weight (n = 5 per group. Student&#8217;s t-test, *p &#60;0.05). BAT: brown adipose tissue, IWAT: inguinal white adipose tissue, EWAT: epididymal white adipose tissue, RWAT: retroperitoneal white adipose tissue.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about A Protocol for Housing Mice in an Enriched Environment at JoVE.com

A Protocol for Housing Mice in an Enriched Environment

Environmental enrichment for mice requires a complex and challenging setup, as well as comprehensive husbandry and handling techniques to assure robust metabolic and anti-cancer effects in the mice. This protocol provides detailed procedures to reproduce the above mentioned effects in mice.

Environmental enrichment (EE) is a housing environment for mice that boosts mental and physical health compared to standard laboratory housing. Our recent ...

a-protocol-for-housing-mice-in-an-enriched-environment

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

17.9K vues.  The Ohio State University. Environmental enrichment for mice requires a complex and challenging setup, as well as comprehensive husbandry and handling techniques to assure robust metabolic and anti-cancer effects in the mice. This protocol provides detailed procedures to reproduce the above mentioned effects in mice.

Vidéo: A Protocol for Housing Mice in an Enriched Environment

Two-photon Calcium Imaging in Mice Navigating a Virtual Reality Environment

In recent years, two-photon imaging has become an invaluable tool in neuroscience, as it allows for chronic measurement of the activity of genetically identified cells during behavior1-6. Here we describe methods to perform two-photon imaging in mouse cortex while the animal navigates a virtual reality environment. We focus on the aspects of the experimental procedures that are key to imaging in a behaving animal in a brightly lit virtual environment. The key problems that arise in this experimental setup that we here address are: minimizing brain motion related artifacts, minimizing light leak from the virtual reality projection system, and minimizing laser induced tissue damage. We also provide sample software to control the virtual reality environment and to do pupil tracking. With these procedures and resources it should be possible to convert a conventional two-photon microscope for use in behaving mice.

Here we describe the experimental procedures involved in two-photon imaging of mouse cortex during behavior in a virtual reality environment.

In recent years, two-photon imaging has become an invaluable tool in neuroscience, as it allows for chronic measurement of the activity of genetically ...

The Modified Hole Board - Measuring Behavior, Cognition and Social Interaction in Mice and Rats

This protocol describes the modified hole board (mHB), which combines features from a traditional hole board and open field and is designed to measure multiple dimensions of unconditioned behavior in small laboratory mammals (e.g., mice, rats, tree shrews and small primates). This paradigm is a valuable alternative for the use of a behavioral test battery, since a broad behavioral spectrum of an animal&#8217;s behavioral profile can be investigated in one single test.
The apparatus consists of a box, representing the &#8216;protected&#8217; area, separated from a group compartment. A board, on which small cylinders are staggered in three lines, is placed in the center of the box, representing the &#8216;unprotected&#8217; area of the set-up. The cognitive abilities of the animals can be measured by baiting some cylinders on the board and measuring the working and reference memory. Other unconditioned behavior, such as activity-related-, anxiety-related- and social behavior, can be observed using this paradigm. Behavioral flexibility and the ability to habituate to a novel environment can additionally be observed by subjecting the animals to multiple trials in the mHB, revealing insight into the animals&#8217; adaptive capacities.
Due to testing order effects in a behavioral test battery, na&#239;ve animals should be used for each individual experiment. By testing multiple behavioral dimensions in a single paradigm and thereby circumventing this issue, the number of experimental animals used is reduced. Furthermore, by avoiding social isolation during testing and without the need to food deprive the animals, the mHB represents a behavioral test system, inducing if any, very low amount of stress.

This protocol describes the modified hole board, which is a behavioral test set-up that comprises the characteristics of an open field and a traditional hole board. This set-up enables the differential analysis of unconditioned behavior of small laboratory mammals as well as the analysis of cognitive abilities.

This protocol describes the modified hole board (mHB), which combines features from a traditional hole board and open field and is designed to measure ...

Morris Water Maze Test: Optimization for Mouse Strain and Testing Environment

The Morris water maze (MWM) is a commonly used task to assess hippocampal-dependent spatial learning and memory in transgenic mouse models of disease, including neurocognitive disorders such as Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. However, the background strain of the mouse model used can have a substantial effect on the observed behavioral phenotype, with some strains exhibiting superior learning ability relative to others. To ensure differences between transgene negative and transgene positive mice can be detected, identification of a training procedure sensitive to the background strain is essential. Failure to tailor the MWM protocol to the background strain of the mouse model may lead to under- or over- training, thereby masking group differences in probe trials. Here, a MWM protocol tailored for use with the F1 FVB/N x 129S6 background is described. This is a frequently used background strain to study the age-dependent effects of mutant P301L tau (rTg(TauP301L)4510 mice) on the memory deficits associated with Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. Also described is a strategy to re-optimize, as dictated by the particular testing environment utilized.

This manuscript describes a Morris water maze (MWM) protocol tailored for use with a commonly used mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. The MWM is widely used in transgenic mouse models. Implementation of a procedure sensitive to the background strain of the mouse model is essential for detecting group differences.

 The Morris water maze (MWM) is a commonly used task to assess hippocampal-dependent spatial learning and memory in transgenic mouse models of disease, ...

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment

An evaluation method that includes continuous activities in a daily-living environment was developed for Wearable Mobility Monitoring Systems (WMMS) that attempt to recognize user activities. Participants performed a pre-determined set of daily living actions within a continuous test circuit that included mobility activities (walking, standing, sitting, lying, ascending/descending stairs), daily living tasks (combing hair, brushing teeth, preparing food, eating, washing dishes), and subtle environment changes (opening doors, using an elevator, walking on inclines, traversing staircase landings, walking outdoors). 
To evaluate WMMS performance on this circuit, fifteen able-bodied participants completed the tasks while wearing a smartphone at their right front pelvis. The WMMS application used smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope signals to classify activity states. A gold standard comparison data set was created by video-recording each trial and manually logging activity onset times. Gold standard and WMMS data were analyzed offline. Three classification sets were calculated for each circuit: (i) mobility or immobility, ii) sit, stand, lie, or walking, and (iii) sit, stand, lie, walking, climbing stairs, or small standing movement. Sensitivities, specificities, and F-Scores for activity categorization and changes-of-state were calculated.
The mobile versus immobile classification set had a sensitivity of 86.30% &#177; 7.2% and specificity of 98.96% &#177; 0.6%, while the second prediction set had a sensitivity of 88.35% &#177; 7.80% and specificity of 98.51% &#177; 0.62%. For the third classification set, sensitivity was 84.92% &#177; 6.38% and specificity was 98.17 &#177; 0.62. F1 scores for the first, second and third classification sets were 86.17 &#177; 6.3, 80.19 &#177; 6.36, and 78.42 &#177; 5.96, respectively. This demonstrates that WMMS performance depends on the evaluation protocol in addition to the algorithms. The demonstrated protocol can be used and tailored for evaluating human activity recognition systems in rehabilitation medicine where mobility monitoring may be beneficial in clinical decision-making.

A standardized evaluation method was developed for Wearable Mobility Monitoring Systems (WMMS) that includes continuous activities in a realistic daily living environment. Testing with a series of daily living activities can decrease activity recognition sensitivity; therefore, realistic testing circuits are encouraged for valid evaluation of WMMS performance.

An evaluation method that includes continuous activities in a daily-living environment was developed for Wearable Mobility Monitoring Systems (WMMS) that ...

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

An unusual sensory space is one of the effective tools to uncover the mechanism of adaptability of humans to a novel environment. Although most of the previous studies have used special spectacles with prisms to achieve unusual spaces in the visual domain, a methodology for studying the adaptation to unusual auditory spaces has yet to be fully established. This study proposes a new protocol to set-up, validate, and use a left-right reversed stereophonic system using only wearable devices, and to study the adaptation to left-right reversed audition with the help of neuroimaging. Although individual acoustic characteristics are not yet implemented, and slight spillover of unreversed sounds is relatively uncontrollable, the constructed apparatus shows high performance in a 360&#176; sound source localization coupled with hearing characteristics with little delay. Moreover, it looks like a mobile music player and enables a participant to focus on daily life without arousing curiosity or drawing attention of other individuals. Since the effects of adaptation were successfully detected at the perceptual, behavioral, and neural levels, it is concluded that this protocol provides a promising methodology for studying adaptation to left-right reversed audition, and is an effective tool for uncovering the adaptability of humans to a novel environments in the auditory domain.

The present study proposes a protocol to investigate the adaptation to left-right reversed audition achieved only by wearable devices, using neuroimaging, which can be an effective tool for uncovering the adaptability of humans to a novel environment in the auditory domain.

An unusual sensory space is one of the effective tools to uncover the mechanism of adaptability of humans to a novel environment. Although most of the ...

The Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Protocol for Inducing Anhedonia in Mice

Depression is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition, only partially addressed by current pharmacotherapies. The lack of response to treatment by many patients prompts the need to develop new therapeutic alternatives and to better understand the etiology of the disorder. Pre-clinical models with translational merits are rudimentary for this task. Here we present a protocol for the unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) method in mice. In this protocol, adolescent mice are chronically exposed to interchanging unpredictable mild stressors. Resembling the pathogenesis of depression in humans, stress exposure during the sensitive period of mice adolescence instigates a depressive-like phenotype evident in adulthood. UCMS can be used for screenings of antidepressants on the variety of depressive-like behaviors and neuromolecular indices. Among the more prominent tests to assess depressive-like behavior in rodents is the sucrose preference test (SPT), which reflects anhedonia (core symptom of depression). The SPT will also be presented in this protocol. The ability of UCMS to induce anhedonia, instigate long-term behavioral deficits and enable reversal of these deficits via chronic (but not acute) treatment with antidepressants strengthens the protocol&#39;s validity compared to other animal protocols for inducing depressive-like behaviors.

Here we present the unpredictable chronic mild stress protocol in mice. This protocol induces a long-term depressive-like phenotype and enables to assess the efficacy of putative antidepressants in reversing the behavioral and neuromolecular depressive-like deficits.

Depression is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition, only partially addressed by current pharmacotherapies. The lack of response to treatment by ...

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

We present a protocol designed to measure the neural correlates of reward in children. The protocol allows researchers to measure both reward anticipation and processing. Its purpose is to create a reward task that is appropriate for young children with and without autism while controlling reward properties between two conditions: social and nonsocial. The current protocol allows for comparisons of brain activity between social and nonsocial reward conditions while keeping the reward itself identical between conditions. Using this protocol, we found evidence that neurotypical children demonstrate enhanced anticipatory brain activity during the social condition. Furthermore, we found that neurotypical children anticipate social reward more robustly than children with autism diagnoses. As the task uses snacks as a reward, it is most appropriate for young children. However, the protocol may be adapted for use with adolescent or adult populations if snacks are replaced by monetary incentives. The protocol is designed to measure electrophysiological events (event-related potentials), but it may be customized for use with eye-tracking or fMRI.

This protocol is designed to measure reward anticipation and processing in young children with and without autism. Specifically, the protocol is designed to study the neural correlates of reward during social and nonsocial conditions while controlling for reward between conditions.

We present a protocol designed to measure the neural correlates of reward in children. The protocol allows researchers to measure both reward anticipation ...

A Conditioned Place Preference Protocol for Measuring Incubation of Craving in Rats

A major cause of repeated relapses is a craving for the drug. Drug craving increases progressively during the abstinence period, a phenomenon termed incubation of drug craving. Here, we describe a morphine conditioned place preference (CPP) protocol for measuring the incubation of craving in rats. In this protocol, a CPP paradigm mainly employing somatosensory cues is used to establish a long-term reward memory of morphine. A three-chamber CPP box that differs in the texture of the chamber floor is constructed. First, the animals are tested for their baseline preference to the two side chambers for three consecutive days. Then, they are injected intraperitoneally with morphine/saline and put into their non-preferred/preferred chamber for 45 min. After 6 days of conditioning, their preference to the side chambers is tested for 15 min at different time points after the last conditioning session. With this paradigm, the reward memory of morphine could last for at least 18 days. To test whether the above-mentioned protocol can model increased craving, the number of entrances into the two side chambers are counted during the abstinence period. The results show that the entrances increased, suggesting that the CPP paradigm could mimic the incubation of craving. Future studies can employ this model to study neural mechanisms underlying long-term memory and incubation of craving.

Here, a morphine conditioned place preference (CPP) protocol is described to measure incubation of craving in rats.

A major cause of repeated relapses is a craving for the drug. Drug craving increases progressively during the abstinence period, a phenomenon termed ...

Low-cost Protocol of Footprint Analysis and Hanging Box Test for Mice Applied the Chronic Restraint Stress

Gait disturbance is frequently observed in patients with movement disorders. In mouse models used for movement disorders, gait analysis is important behavioral test to determine whether the mice mimic the symptoms of patients. Motor deficits are often induced by stress when no spontaneous motor phenotype is observed in the mouse models. Therefore, gait analysis followed by stress loading would be a sensitive method for evaluating the motor phenotype in mouse models. However, researchers face the requirement of an expensive apparatus to obtain quantitative results automatically from gait analysis. For stress, stress loading by simple methods without expensive apparatuses required for electric shock and forced running is desirable. Therefore, we introduce a simple and low-cost protocol consisting of footprint analysis with paper and ink, hanging box test to evaluate motor function, and stress loading defined by restraint with a conical tube. The motor deficits of mice were successfully detected by this protocol.

The low-cost protocol consisting of footprint analysis and hanging box test after restraint stress is useful for evaluating the movement disorders of mouse model.

Gait disturbance is frequently observed in patients with movement disorders. In mouse models used for movement disorders, gait analysis is important ...

A Chronic Immobilization Stress Protocol for Inducing Depression-Like Behavior in Mice

Depression is not yet fully understood, but various causative factors have been reported. Recently, the prevalence of depression has increased. However, therapeutic treatments for depression or research on depression is scarce. Thus, in the present paper, we propose a mouse model of depression induced by movement restriction. Chronic mild stress (CMS) is a well-known technique to induce depressive-like behavior. However, it necessitates a complex procedure consisting of a combination of various mild stresses. In contrast, chronic immobilization stress (CIS) is a readily accessible chronic stress model, modified from a restraint model that induces depressive behavior by restricting movement using a restrainer for a certain period. To evaluate the depressive-like behaviors, the sucrose preference test (SPT), the tail suspension test (TST), and the ELISA assay to measure stress marker corticosterone levels are combined in the present experiment. The described protocols illustrate the induction of CIS and evaluation of the changes in behavior and physiological factors for the validation of depression.

This article provides a simplified and standardized protocol for induction of depressive-like behavior in chronically immobilized mice by using a restrainer. In addition, behavior and physiological techniques to verify induction of depression are explained.

Depression is not yet fully understood, but various causative factors have been reported. Recently, the prevalence of depression has increased. However, ...