A Standardized Method for the Analysis of Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells and Their Fenestrations by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Podsumowanie

The fenestrated liver sinusoidal endothelial cell is a biologically important filter system that is highly influenced by various diseases, toxins, and physiological states. These changes significantly impact on liver function. We describe methods for the standardisation of the measurement of the size and number of fenestrations in these cells.

Streszczenie

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are the gateway to the liver, their transcellular fenestrations allow the unimpeded transfer of small and dissolved substances from the blood into the liver parenchyma for metabolism and processing. Fenestrations are dynamic structures - both their size and/or number can be altered in response to various physiological states, drugs, and disease, making them an important target for modulation. An understanding of how LSEC morphology is influenced by various disease, toxic, and physiological states and how these changes impact on liver function requires accurate measurement of the size and number of fenestrations. In this paper, we describe scanning electron microscopy fixation and processing techniques used in our laboratory to ensure reproducible specimen preparation and accurate interpretation. The methods include perfusion fixation, secondary fixation and dehydration, preparation for the scanning electron microscope and analysis. Finally, we provide a step by step method for standardized image analysis which will benefit all researchers in the field.

Wprowadzenie

The liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) are highly differentiated endothelial cells that line the wall of the hepatic sinusoid. LSECs are perforated with fenestrations that are non-diaphragmed, transcellular pores 50-250 nm in diameter. Up to 20% of the surface of LSECs is covered by fenestrations, which are usually in groups of tens to hundreds called sieve plates^1-3 (Figure 1). Fenestrations allow transfer of plasma and nanosubstrates between blood and hepatocytes, creating a highly efficient ultrafiltration system. Fenestrations are dynamic structures - both their size and/or number can be altered in response to various physiological states, drugs, and disease. For example, fenestrations are larger in the fasted than in the fed state⁴; 2-di-iodoamphetamine increases fenestration number;^5,6 and a reduction in size and number of fenestrations per cell occurs in ageing and many disease states^7-13. Accurate measurement of the size and number of fenestrations is important for understanding how LSEC morphology is influenced by various disease, toxic, and physiological states; their impact on liver function; and for developing fenestration-modulating therapeutic interventions¹.

The study of fenestrations is difficult. The diameter of fenestrations lies below the resolution of conventional light microscopy, so previously only observation using electron microscopy both in intact liver tissue or cultured LSECs has been possible. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) has most frequently been used to study fenestration size, frequency and porosity (the percentage of LSEC membrane that is perforated by fenestrations) because SEM allows for the observation of large areas of the endothelial surface and measurement of thousands, if not tens of thousands of fenestrations. Despite its utility, the results which are reported from SEM-based studies for LSEC parameters such as fenestration size, number, frequency and porosity vary widely in the literature (Table 1).

Fenestrations and sieve plates are fragile structures that contract, break, dilate or coalesce during specimen preparation, thus careful processing is needed to preserve their integrity. Elevated perfusion pressure¹⁴; incorrect osmolarity of the fixative and buffers¹⁵; inadequate fixation or fixation time; and speed of post-fixation dehydration and drying are all areas of processing for SEM that may produce artefacts that interfere with preservation of ultrastructure (Figure 2). Loss of fenestrations (‘defenestration’) and fenestration shrinkage can occur as a result of poor fixation, resulting in reduced fenestration diameter and cell porosity. Methods to improve the preservation of specimens for SEM analysis have been described previously ^15-17 and will be discussed here with additional tips on how to improve specimen preservation. The main goals of the specimen preservation are to remove blood from the sinusoids so that the surface of the LSEC can be visualized and to avoid LSEC damage from either high pressure or delayed fixation. Whole liver perfusion of fixative via the portal vein is the preferred method for liver fixation. As described in detail elsewhere^16,18 perfusion must be undertaken at low pressure (eg 10 cm of H₂0) to avoid pressure-related perfusion artefacts and damage to the LSEC, typically manifested as large gaps within in the cell membrane. However, reasonable fixation can often be obtained using needle perfusion of liver biopsies from humans and animals, as described in detail elsewhere¹⁹. This technique involves directly injecting fixative into the tissue until blood is flushed out of the sample and the tissue is firm and fixed. Fixation of samples for electron microscopy needs to be performed as quickly as possible following cessation of blood flow to prevent ultrastructural changes occurring as a result of the livers extremely rapid autolytic processes.

We also present a method of image analysis that minimizes the inclusion of artefacts, and standardizes the measurement of fenestrations. Variation in the selection of sinusoids for micrographs, image analysis of artefacts, and measurement of cell area for porosity and fenestration frequency have led to major discrepancies in published results. A standardized approach for evaluation and measurement of fenestrations and the minimum requirements for data presentation have not been clearly addressed in the literature previously^4,10,20-31.

Protokół

NOTE: All procedures involving the use of animals are carried out according to the local legislation. Our work is approved by the Sydney Local Health District Animal Welfare Committee. The allowed procedures are described in the project license documentation and follow guidelines that ensure the welfare of the animal at all times. Ensure adherence to the legislation on animal experimentation of the country where the work is performed.

1. Protocol for Preparing EM Fixative

1. For 100 ml of fixative, prepare paraformaldehyde by adding 2 g of paraformaldehyde powder to 25 ml distilled water in a conical flask, heat to 65 ºC, stirring constantly with a magnetic stirrer.
   NOTE: Glutaraldehyde, paraformaldehyde and sodium cacodylate buffer are all hazardous substances and must always be handled in fumehood.
2. Heat at 65 ºC for 2 min then allow to cool. If needed, add sodium hydroxide solution dropwise while stirring to clear solution completely.
   NOTE: sodium hydroxide is hazardous, handle with care.
3. Add 10 ml of EM grade stock glutaraldehyde, 50 ml of 0.2 M sodium cacodylate buffer and 2 g of sucrose and stir with magnetic stirrer. Add 2 ml of 1.0 M CaCl₂.
4. Adjust to pH 7.4 prior to making solution up to 100 ml with distilled water. The final fixative contains 2.5 % glutaraldehyde, 2 % Paraformaldehyde, 2 mmol CaCl₂, 2 % Sucrose in 0.1 M  cacodylate buffer. Ensure that the total Osmolality is 440 mOsmol/L. Use within 24 hr of preparation.

2. Perfusion Fixation of Liver

1. Warm perfusion buffer and fixative to 35 - 37 ºC. The correct temperature of the exsanguination buffer and fixative helps to ensure tissue integrity.
2. Anaesthetize the animal with a single intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg Ketamine and 5 mg/kg Xylazine.
3. Once the animal is under deep anaesthesia, assessed by hind limb withdrawal and tail pinch, a Y incision is made with blunt ended scissors in the animal’s abdomen to expose the liver and portal vein.
   NOTE: Ensure that equipment is clean to avoid contamination of specimens with microorganisms and general debris which will be readily seen on SEM.
4. Tie two very loose sutures around the portal vein one proximal to the liver, the other more distally to the liver.
5. Cannulate the portal vein with an appropriately sized IV cannula (18 G for rats, 22 G for mice).Tighten sutures to secure cannula.
6. Commence perfusion with phosphate buffered saline warmed to 37 ºC, and at a pressure of 10 cm of H₂0. Between 5 and 20 ml of PBS is usually required to exsanguinate the liver.
   NOTE: Do not to allow air bubbles to enter the liver through the tubes connected to the cannula as they induce artefacts secondary to embolization and pressure; Damage to the hepatocytes, sinusoids and LSEC fenestrations occurs if the perfusion pressure is too high.
7. Sever the abdominal and thoracic vena cava to allow the buffer to exit freely from the liver. This prevents high back-pressure damage to LSECs.
8. Once the liver is free of blood, replace PBS with EM fixative and perfuse for approximately 5 minutes, until the liver is hardened and very pale.
9. Discontinue perfusion and cut the fixed liver into 1 - 2 mm³ blocks using a sharp scalpel.
10. Post-fix tissue in EM fixative for 24 - 72 hr at 4 ºC.
    NOTE: In general, underfixation causes more artefacts than overfixation.
11. Change fixative following post-fix period to 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for storage at 4 ºC.
    NOTE: Specimens stored in this way will be preserved for a significant period of time (up to 12 months), however timely secondary fixation and examination is recommended for best results.

3. Needle Perfusion

NOTE: Needle fixation is a variant of perfusion fixation that involves injection of fixative directly into biopsied liver tissue. The aim is for fixative to be flushed through the blood vessels in order to exsanguinate them and expose all of the tissue block to fixative. Care must be taken to keep the injecting pressure low to avoid pressure injury^18,19.

1. Remove a small piece of liver from the animal or subject and rinse in saline to remove blood and debris.
2. Draw the normal saline into syringe fitted with a fine gauge needle (typically an insulin syringe).
3. Inject the saline very slowly into the liver until blood is flushed out of the tissue. Multiple injections may be required.
4. Draw the EM fixative into another syringe fitted with a fine gauge needle (typically an insulin syringe).
5. Inject the fixative very slowly into the liver until it becomes hard and tan in colour. Multiple injections may be required.
6. Cut the fixed liver into 1 - 2 mm³ blocks using a sharp scalpel. Incubate in EM fixative for 24 - 72 hr 4 °C. Wash 3 times in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer before commencing secondary fixation.

4. Preparation for Scanning Electron Microscopy

1. Wash sample 3 times in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. To fix lipids, post fix the sample in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 2 hr.
   NOTE: Complete washing is very important as glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide cross react and generate artefacts on SEM.
2. Rinse the samples in increasing concentrations of ethanol to commence dehydration. First rinse in 50 % ethanol for 5 minutes; then 3 times for 5 min with 70% ethanol; rinse 3 times for 5 min with 90% ethanol; rinse 2 times for 5 min in 100 % ethanol; and finally rinse 2 times for 10 min in 100% ethanol (molecular sieve).
3. Remove all ethanol from the samples and replace with hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) in fumehood and leave for 10 min. Remove HMDS from the tissue samples and allow to evaporate.
   NOTE: HMDS is highly hygroscopic when cold therefore allow to reach RT before using for final dehydration step.
4. Optionally, mount the samples immediately or place them into a desiccator until ready to mount for SEM.

5. Mounting

NOTE: Correct specimen mounting will maximize the number of clearly delineated sinusoids available for analysis under SEM.

1. Label the base of the metal SEM stubs and apply double-sided conductive carbon tape to the top of the stubs.
2. Visualize samples using a dissecting microscope to identify the surface with the best sinusoids for subsequent SEM. Place that surface upwards onto the carbon tape surface of the stub.
3. Stick specimens firmly to the stub, specimens are now ready for sputter coating.

6. Coating

NOTE: Coating the specimen with a fine film of conductive metal (gold or platinum) in a sputter coater grounds the specimen and protects it from damage from the electron beam. If the coating is too thick structures of interest may be obscured.

1. Place stubs into the vacuum chamber of automatic fine sputter coater, set mode to rotation and automatic sputter coating for 45 sec. Use platinum coating for finer detailing, however gold is also suitable.
2. Apply a thin layer of carbon paint to the external surfaces of the mounted liver specimens, taking care not to coat the sinusoidal surfaces.
3. Once the specimens are coated with platinum and carbon paint has dried they are ready for observation on the SEM. Samples can be stored in a desiccator.

7. Using the Scanning Electron Microscope

1. Place specimens into scanning electron microscope and return microscope to vacuum.
2. Using standard microscope operating procedures for visualisation of specimens by commencing at a low magnification, gradually increasing magnification.
3. Ensure the microscope is adjusted appropriately for working distance, spot size and astigmatism.
4. Check for fixation integrity. If the LSEC is mostly free from gaps and contains fenestrations measuring 30 - 250 nm diameter this would generally indicate that specimen preparation has been successful.
5. If the sinusoids are full of gaps or devoid of fenestrations the specimen preparation has not been successful or there is significant pathology. In this case, slice the sample with a very fine razor blade, and the cut surfaces recoated and analysed for successfully fixed sinusoids.
6. At approximately 15,000-20,000 × magnification select flat LSEC surfaces that are free of debris with good fixation and where the fenestrations are clearly visible (typically containing at least 10 fenestrations).
7. Save images of at least 10 sinusoids per liver, from different areas of the blocks, using at least two blocks per liver. Sampling 10 micrographs at 15,000 - 20,000 × magnification per animal is generally sufficient for the quantification of fenestrations to be representative of the entire liver.

8. Analysis

NOTE: ImageJ software which can be downloaded free from the NIH is utilized to quantify fenestration diameter and frequency (www.imagej.nih.gov/ij).

1. Open Image J and set the scale using the scale bar embedded in the picture (Screen shot 1).
2. Using the polygon tool in ImageJ, trace around the entire flat area of the LSEC including fenestrated and defenestrated areas. Don’t just trace the sieve plates as this will falsely inflate porosity. Exclude any large pieces of debris that are on the cell surface that might be obscuring fenestrations.
3. To measure fenestration diameter, trace a line through the longest diameter of each fenestration by selecting the line tool, and press “m” to measure the line, and “d” (draw) to permanently draw the line on the picture. This line is defined as the fenestration diameter. The length of the line will now be available in the results box of ImageJ (Screen shot 2).
4. Measure all gaps which are larger holes in the LSEC cytoplasm over 250 nm, as well as fenestrations. Gaps are often artefacts reflecting poor perfusion or fixation, however gaps also can occur as a result of disease and toxicity. The data for gaps will be excluded from calculation of fenestration parameters later in the analysis.
5. The area of gaps that are not circular should be calculated by tracing around the gaps and calculating their area on ImageJ.
6. Paste the data from the results box in ImageJ into an EXCEL spreadsheet for further analysis.

9. Calculations

1. Average fenestration diameter = average of all fenestration diameters (not including gaps, where gaps are ≥ 250 nm).
2. Fenestration area = πr², where r, the radius, is calculated from the individual fenestrations diameter (r=d/2), not including gaps.
3. Porosity (%) = (Σ (πr²)/total area analyzed - Σ (area of gaps  =)) (µm²)) × 100.
4. Fenestration frequency = total number of fenestrations/ (total area analyzed-Σ (area of gaps) (µm²).

10. Presentation of Fenestration Data

NOTE: Whenever possible, publications including quantification of fenestration data should include the following information

1. Fenestration diameter, with a statement confirming what boundary diameters where used to define fenestrations (typically between 50 - 250 nm), Fenestration frequency (number/µm²) and porosity (%).
2. A statement confirming whether gaps have been included in the analysis, frequency distribution graph of fenestration diameter and the number of livers, blocks, images and fenestrations should be included in the analysis.

Wyniki

Initial visualization at low magnification by scanning electron microscopy reveals a flat surface of the liver specimen with an exposed area large enough to observe many large liver vessels and sinusoids (Figure 1A). Ensuring correct liver block placement on the mounting stub is essential for obtaining clear images of the sinusoids and the Glisson’s capsule of the liver should be avoided for this reason (Figure 1B). Increasing the magnification allows closer inspection of the dense...

Dyskusje

The ability to accurately and reproducibly measure the status of the liver sinusoidal endothelium is an important step in understanding the biology of these highly specialized cells. Newer techniques such as structured illumination microscopy³², atomic force microscopy³³ and d-STORM (direct Stochastic Optical Reconstrucion Microscopy) ³⁴ will impart important information regarding the morphology of these cells in vitro but SEM remains the primary methodology to visualize and...

Materiały

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Name of material	Company	Catalogue Number	Comments
EM grade Glutaraldehyde	ProSciTech	C001	Store stock at -20 C until needed, avoid refreeze
Paraformaldehyde powder	Sigma Aldrich	158127	Always prepare Paraformaldehyde fresh
Sodium Cacodylate powder	Sigma Aldrich	C0250	Prepare 0.2 M stock, pH 7.4 by dissolving powder in dH2O, used mostly at 0.1 M by preparing 1:2 dilution
Calcium Chloride	Sigma Aldrich	C1016	Prepare 1 M CaCl2by dissolving powder in dH2O
Osmium tretroxide	ProSciTech	C011	Wash ampoules in weak acid prior to use to avoid contamination. Prepare 2 % stock in glass bottle
Ethanol- Absolute	Sigma Aldrich	459836	100 % Ethanol must be high grade and stored with Molecular Sieve
Other grades of Ethanol	Labtech	EL5	Prepare graded Ethanols with dH2O
Hexamethyldisilazane	Sigma Aldrich	52619	Allow to reach room temperature before use
Cannulas	Terumo	TSROX1832C, TSROX2225C, TSROX2419C	18 G is suitable for most rats, 22 G is suitable for most mice, but it is good to have a few 24 G on hand in case of very small mice
Conductive Carbon tape	ProSciTech	IA0201
Carbon Paint	ProSciTech	I003
Ketamine			Must be optained under licence
Xylazine			Must be obtained under licence
Molecular Sieve	Sigma Aldrich	208647	Removes water from the 100 % Ethanol