Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
High throughput small inhibitory RNA screening is an important tool that could help to more rapidly elucidate the molecular mechanisms of chemical cornea epithelial injury. Herein, we present the development and validation of exposure models and methods for the high throughput screening of hydrogen fluoride- and chloropicrin-induced cornea epithelial injury.
Toxicant-induced ocular injury is a true ocular emergency because chemicals have the potential to rapidly inflict significant tissue damage. Treatments for toxicant-induced corneal injury are generally supportive as no specific therapeutics exist to treat these injuries. In the efforts to develop treatments and therapeutics to care for exposure, it can be important to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms of these injuries. We propose that utilization of high throughput small inhibitory RNA (siRNA) screening can be an important tool that could help to more rapidly elucidate the molecular mechanisms of chemical cornea epithelial injury. siRNA are double stranded RNA molecules that are 19-25 nucleotides long and utilize the post-transcriptional gene silencing pathway to degrade mRNA which have homology to the siRNA. The resulting reduction of expression of the specific gene can then be studied in toxicant exposed cells to ascertain the function of that gene in the cellular response to the toxicant. The development and validation of in vitro exposure models and methods for the high throughput screening (HTS) of hydrogen fluoride- (HF) and chloropicrin- (CP) induced ocular injury are presented in this article. Although we selected these two toxicants, our methods are applicable to the study of other toxicants with minor modifications to the toxicant exposure protocol. The SV40 large T antigen immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line SV40-HCEC was selected for study. Cell viability and IL-8 production were selected as endpoints in the screening protocol. Several challenges associated with the development of toxicant exposure and cell culture methods suitable for HTS studies are presented. The establishment of HTS models for these toxicants allows for further studies to better understand the mechanism of injury and to screen for potential therapeutics for chemical ocular injury.
Toxicant-induced ocular injury is a true ocular emergency because chemicals have the potential to rapidly inflict significant tissue damage. Unfortunately, treatments for toxicant-induced corneal injury are only generally supportive as no specific therapeutics exist to treat these injuries. The current treatment strategy is non-specific and primarily includes topical therapeutic treatments such as lubricants, antibiotics, and cycloplegics followed by anti-inflammatories (e.g., steroids) once the cornea has re-epithelialized1,2. Despite the best current therapeutic treatment options available, long-term prognosis is generally poor due to progressive corneal clouding and neovascularization2,3.
Animal models have traditionally been used to investigate chemical toxicity and understand mechanisms of injury. However, animal studies are time consuming and expensive. There are also efforts to reduce animal testing. For example, REACH legislation (EC 1907/2006) in the European Union has provisions intended to reduce animal testing. The provisions include a requirement that companies share data in order to avoid animal testing and obtaining approval from the European Chemicals Agency prior to performing proposed tests on animals. Under the provisions of REACH, animal testing should be a last resort. There is also the European Cosmetics Regulation (EC 1223/2009) that phased out the testing of cosmetics in animals. When animal studies are conducted, they are guided by the principles of 3Rs (Refinement, Reduction, and Replacement), which provide a framework for performing more humane animal research, reducing the number of animals used, and using non-animal alternatives where possible. For these reasons, the field of toxicology has sought to adopt in vitro assays that can provide insight into molecular mechanisms of toxicity and can be done in higher throughput4. This is a functional toxicology approach where toxicants are defined by their function rather than solely by their chemistry. Taken a step further, functional toxicogenomics seek to understand the role(s) that specific genes play in the effects of toxicants5. With the application of siRNA technology, screens to investigate gene function in the molecular and cellular responses to toxicants can be done at high throughput. siRNA are double stranded RNA molecules that are 19-25 nucleotides long that take advantage of the post transcriptional gene silencing pathway present in all mammalian cells6. These are synthetically made and designed to target a specific gene. When introduced into a cell, the siRNA is processed and one strand, the guide strand, is loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The siRNA directs the RISC to a complementary region in an mRNA molecule, and the RISC degrades the mRNA. This results in the reduction of expression of the specific gene. The resulting reduction of expression of the specific gene can then be studied in toxicant exposed cells to ascertain the function of that gene in the cellular response to the toxicant. Such an approach has been used to further understand the mechanisms of ricin susceptibility and the AHR-dependent induction of CYP1A17,8.
The Chemical Terrorism Risk Assessment (CTRA) list and the toxic industrial chemicals (TIC) listings have itemized select chemicals based on their toxicity and potential to be released during a terrorist, warfare, or industrial accident event9. We are applying an siRNA high throughput screening (HTS) toxicogenomic approach to the study of CTRA list toxicants, which have been identified to be at high risk of use in a terrorist incident. Traditional toxicology seeks to understand the adverse effects that chemicals have on living organisms; however, we have a further desire to understand the mechanisms of injury for the purpose of informing the development of therapeutics and therapeutic approaches, and possibly, to discover molecules which can be targeted for therapeutic development. This effort in some ways may be considered analogous to the use of high throughput siRNA screening and cell based assays in the drug discovery process10. A major difference would be that drug discovery typically seeks a singular target for therapeutic discovery whereas in our approach it is somewhat unlikely that there would be a singular target with high therapeutic value for the treatment of toxicant exposure. We anticipate that any effective treatment paradigm for toxicant exposure would require a multi-faceted approach to achieve high therapeutic value, and toxicogenomic data may vitally inform an effective treatment paradigm.
Benchtop automation brings high throughput methodology to laboratories outside the pharmaceutical or biotech industries. The in vitro studies at our institute have historically been traditional assays which are low throughput11,12,13. In the past few years, our laboratory has transitioned to the use of benchtop robotics to perform high throughput siRNA screening. Herein, we present the refinement of ocular cell models and the development of in vitro exposure methods for hydrogen fluoride (HF) and chloropicrin (CP) suitable for high throughput siRNA screening. Our goal is to identify molecules that regulate cellular injury in response to these toxicants. The targets of the siRNA library we selected include G protein-coupled receptors, protein kinases, proteases, phosphatases, ion channels, and other potentially druggable targets. HF and CP were selected for study by cross-referencing CTRA list agents with the ToxNet reports of industrial accidents to find those that present the greatest risk of ocular injury via vapor exposure9,14. CP (chemical formula Cl3CNO2, CAS number 76-06-2) was originally used as a tear gas in WWI15. It is currently used as an agricultural fumigant and functions as a nematicide, fungicide, and insecticide16. Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) is used in processes including alkylation in oil refineries and electrochemical fluorination of organic compounds17. HF (chemical formula HF, CAS number 62778-11-4) is a gas but in its aqueous form is hydrofluoric acid (HFA, CAS number 7664-39-3). Therefore, we elected to use HFA in our in cell exposure models. The SV40 large T antigen immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line SV40-HCEC was selected for study. Cell viability and the inflammatory marker IL-8 were selected as endpoints because targets that are involved in cellular injury should be reflected in the cell death and the inflammatory response. Specifically, if a target were to play a protective role in toxicant exposure, cell death and/or inflammatory cytokine production should increase when the target expression is inhibited by siRNA. The opposite would be true for targets that play a negative role. Also, chronic inflammation appears to play a role in cornea pathology after exposure, and intervention in cell death pathways may improve clinical outcome2,18.
1. Cell Culture Maintenance
2. Plate Cells for Experimentation
3. Transfect Cells with siRNA
4. Refeed the Cells the Following Day
5. Positive Control Addition
6. HF Exposure of Cultured Cells
CAUTION: HFA is corrosive and acutely toxic.
7. CP Exposure of Cultured Cells
CAUTION: CP is acutely toxic and an irritant.
8. Sample Collection and Cell Viability Assay
9. Measure IL-8 Concentration in Cell Culture Supernatants
Exposure Method Development
We refined and evaluated the suitability of the human corneal epithelial cell line SV40-HCEC for use in HTS studies. SV40-HCEC were immortalized using the SV-40 large T antigen and were a gift from Dhanajay Pal23. There were too many variables explored in exposure methodology development to present concisely herein, and so, only some samples of findings we beli...
Herein we describe our methods and results on the development of a high throughput cornea epithelial cell screening model for the study of HF and CP injuries. We also present the results from the primary siRNA screen for HF injury. There were many challenges to the development of HTS models for the study of TIC injuries. Methods that we could find in the literature related to the study of HF, HFA or CP in cell culture models were of little help. Most in vitro studies on the fluoride ion involve oral cells and ut...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This research was supported by an interagency agreement between NIH/NIAID and the USAMRICD, and in part by an appointment to the Postgraduate Research Participation Program at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and USAMRMC.
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health CounterACT Program Interagency Agreement# AOD13015-001. We would like to thank Stephanie Froberg and Peter Hurst for their efforts and expertise on video production.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Bravo liquid handing platform | Agilent or equivalent | G5409A | |
Bravo plate shaker | Agilent or equivalent | Option 159 | |
Bravo 96LT disposable tip head | Agilent or equivalent | Option 178 | 96-channel large tip pipetting head unit |
Bravo 96ST disposable tip head | Agilent or equivalent | Option 177 | 96-channel small tip pipetting head unit |
Bravo 384ST disposable tip head | Agilent or equivalent | Option 179 | 384-channel small tip pipetting head unit |
Bravo 96 250 μL sterile barrier tips | Agilent or equivalent | 19477-022 | |
Bravo 384 30 μL sterile barrier tips | Agilent or equivalent | 19133-212 | |
Bravo 384 70 μL sterile barrier tips | Agilent or equivalent | 19133-212 | |
EnSpire multimode plate reader | Perkin Elmer or equivalent | 2300-0000 | AlphaLISA assay detector with high power laser excitation |
IL-8 (human) AlphaLISA Detection Kit | Perkin Elmer or equivalent | AL224F | no-wash bead-based assay |
ProxiPlate-384 Plus white 384-shallow well microplates | Perkin Elmer or equivalent | 6008359 | |
Lipofectamine RNAiMAX | Invitrogen or equivalent | 13778500 | Transfection reagent |
Opti-MEM 1 Reduced Serum Medium | Invitrogen or equivalent | 31985070 | |
TrypLE Express | Gibco or equivalent | 12605010 | Cell detachment solution |
IncuCyte Zoom | Essen Instruments or equivalent | ESSEN BIOSCI 4473 | Incubator-housed automated microscope |
Chloropicrin | Trinity Manufacturing or equivalent | N/A | Acute toxicity and irritant |
DMEM-F12 cell culture medium | Invitrogen or equivalent | 11330-057 | Contains HEPES |
Fetal bovine serum | Invitrogen or equivalent | 1891471 | |
Human epidermal growth factor (cell culture grade) | Invitrogen or equivalent | E9644-.2MG | |
Recombinant human insulin (cell culture grade) | Invitrogen or equivalent | 12585-014 | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin solution (cell culture grade) | Invitrogen or equivalent | 15140122 | |
Hydrocortisone (cell culture grade) | Sigma or equivalent | H0888-10G | |
Glucose (cell culture grade) | Sigma or equivalent | G7021 | |
PBS (cell culture grade) | Sigma or equivalent | P5493 | |
siRNA | Dharmacon or equivalent | various | |
Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide | Sigma or equivalent | M5655 | MTT assay substrate |
siRNA buffer | Thermo or equivalent | B002000 | |
96-well cell culture plates | Corning or equivalent | CLS3595 | |
T150 cell culture flasks | Corning or equivalent | CLS430825 | |
BSL-2 cell culture hood | Nuaire or equivalent | NU-540 | |
300 mL robotic reservoirs | Thermo or equivalent | 12-565-572 | |
96 baffled automation reservoirs | Thermo or equivalent | 1064-15-8 | |
500 mL sterile disposable storage bottles | Corning or equivalent | CLS430282 | |
Microplate heat sealer | Thermo or equivalent | AB-1443A | |
Microplate heat sealing foil | Thermo or equivalent | AB-0475 | |
Cardamonin | Tocris or equivalent | 2509 | Anti-inflammatory, used as positive control |
SKF 86002 | Tocris or equivalent | 2008 | Anti-inflammatory, used as positive control |
DMSO | Sigma or equivalent | D8418 | |
48% hydrofluoric acid | Sigma or equivalent | 339261 | Corrosive and acute toxicity |
1000 μL Single channel pipettors | Rainin or equivalent | 17014382 | |
200 μL Single channel pipettors | Rainin or equivalent | 17014391 | |
20 μL Single channel pipettors | Rainin or equivalent | 17014392 | |
1000 μL 12-channel pipettors | Rainin or equivalent | 17014497 | |
200 μL 12-channel pipettors | Rainin or equivalent | 17013810 | |
20 μL 12-channel pipettors | Rainin or equivalent | 17013808 | |
Pipettor tips 1000 μL | Rainin or equivalent | 17002920 | |
Pipettor tips 200 μL | Rainin or equivalent | 17014294 | |
Pipettor tips 20 μL | Rainin or equivalent | 17002928 | |
Chemical fume hood | Jamestown Metal Products | MHCO_229 | |
384-well sample storage plates | Thermo or equivalent | 262261 | |
Sodium chloride | Sigma or equivalent | S6191 | |
50 mL conical tubes | Thermo or equivalent | 14-959-49A | |
Serological pipettes 50 mL | Corning or equivalent | 07-200-576 | |
Serological pipettes 25 mL | Corning or equivalent | 07-200-575 | |
Serological pipettes 10 mL | Corning or equivalent | 07-200-574 | |
Serological pipettes 5 mL | Corning or equivalent | 07-200-573 | |
SV40-HCEC immortalized human corneal epithelial cells | N/A | N/A | These cells are not commercially available, but can be obtained from the investigators cited in the article |
Sceptor Handheld Automated Cell Counter | Millipore or equivalent | PHCC20060 | |
GeneTitan Multi-Channel (MC) Instrument | Affymetrix or equivalent | 00-0372 | |
Affymetrix 24- and 96-array plates | Affymetrix or equivalent | 901257; 901434 | |
Draegger tube HF | Draeger or equivalent | 8103251 | |
Draegger tube CP | Draeger or equivalent | 8103421 | |
Draegger pump | Draeger or equivalent | 6400000 | |
Clear Plate seals | Resesarch Products International or Equivalent | 202502 | |
Reagent reservoirs | VistaLab Technologies or equivalent | 3054-1000 | |
Xlfit | IDBS or equivalent | N/A | Excel add-in used for automated curve fitting |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone