Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
* Wspomniani autorzy wnieśli do projektu równy wkład.
The mechanism associated with phagocytosis in Leishmania infection remains poorly understood. Here, we describe methods to evaluate the early events occurring during Leishmania interaction with the host cells.
Phagocytosis is an orchestrated process that involves distinct steps: recognition, binding, and internalization. Professional phagocytes take up Leishmania parasites by phagocytosis, consisting of recognizing ligands on parasite surfaces by multiple host cell receptors. Binding of Leishmania to macrophage membranes occurs through complement receptor type 1 (CR1) and complement receptor type 3 (CR3) and Pattern Recognition Receptors. Lipophosphoglycan (LPG) and 63 kDa glycoprotein (gp63) are the main ligands involved in macrophage-Leishmania interactions. Following the initial recognition of parasite ligands by host cell receptors, parasites become internalized, survive, and multiply within parasitophorous vacuoles. The maturation process of Leishmania-induced vacuoles involves the acquisition of molecules from intracellular vesicles, including monomeric G protein Rab 5 and Rab 7, lysosomal associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP-1), lysosomal associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP-2), and microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3).
Here, we describe methods to evaluate the early events occurring during Leishmania interaction with the host cells using confocal microscopy, including (i) binding (ii) internalization, and (iii) phagosome maturation. By adding to the body of knowledge surrounding these determinants of infection outcome, we hope to improve the understanding of the pathogenesis of Leishmania infection and support the eventual search for novel chemotherapeutic targets.
Leishmaniasis is a neglected tropical disease caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania, resulting in a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations in the vertebrate host, including cutaneous leishmaniasis, mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and visceral leishmaniasis1. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that over one billion people are at risk, with more than one million new cases reported per year2.
Leishmania spp. are obligate intracellular protozoans that survive inside host cells, including monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells3. Leishmania-macrophage interaction is a complex process that involves multiple host cell receptors and parasite ligands either through direct interaction or by opsonization involving complement receptors4,5. Classical surface receptors, such as CR1, CR3, mannose-fucose, fibronectin, toll-like and scavenger receptors, mediate parasite attachment to macrophages6,7,8. These receptors recognize molecules on the surface of Leishmania, including the 63 kDa glycoprotein (gp63) and glycolipid lipophosphoglycan (LPG)9. These are the most abundant molecules on the surface of promastigotes and play an essential role in the subversion of host immune response, favoring the establishment of parasite infection in mammalian cells10. After parasite surface ligands bind to macrophage receptors, F-actin accumulates on mammalian cell surfaces, surrounding parasites as they are phagocytosed. Subsequently, this leads to the formation of a parasite-induced compartment termed parasitophorous vacuole (PV), which presents phagolysosomal features11. Once inside these phagolysosomes, parasites undergo several alterations essential to survival and multiplication3.
The biogenesis of PVs is a highly regulated membrane trafficking process critical to the intracellular survival of this pathogen12. The formation of this compartment results from sequential fusion events between phagosomes and compartments of the host endocytic pathway. Classical cell biology studies have revealed that the maturation of PVs involves the acquisition of monomeric G protein Rab 5 and Rab 7 proteins, which are mainly associated with early and late endosome maturation, respectively13. In addition, these compartments acquire lysosome-associated membrane proteins 1 and 2 (LAMP 1, LAMP 2), the principal protein constituents of the lysosomal membrane and microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), an autophagosome marker14. Despite apparent similarities, the kinetics of PV formation15,16 and the morphology of these compartments vary depending on Leishmania species. For example, infection caused by L. mexicana or L. amazonensis induces the formation of large compartments containing a great number of parasites17. By contrast, other species, such as L. braziliensis and L. infantum, form smaller vacuoles that normally contain only one or two parasites in each vacuole18.
Despite this knowledge surrounding host cell-Leishmania interaction, the initial events triggered by contact between host receptors and parasite ligands have not been fully elucidated. These events are known to be determinants of the outcome of parasite infection and are dependent on parasite species, the type of host cell receptors recruited to recognize parasites and the activation of macrophage signaling pathways19,20. Therefore, it is essential to identify the molecules involved in the biogenesis of Leishmania-induced PVs and determine the role(s) played by these molecules in infection establishment and outcome. Here, we describe a method of monitoring early events occurring during the phagocytosis of Leishmania, including binding, internalization, phagosome formation and maturation. This work could aid in clarifying the participation of PLC, Akt, Rab5, Rab7 and LC3 in the formation of PVs induced by different Leishmania species. Importantly, this protocol can be used to investigate the participation of other proteins involved in PV maturation. Future studies will expand the knowledge surrounding mechanisms involved in Leishmania-host cell interaction and contribute to the design of novel chemotherapeutic strategies.
Cells were obtained from healthy donors following the approval of procedures by the National Research Ethics Committees (ID: 94648218.8.0000.0040).
1. Cell cultures
2. Parasite cultures and CellTracker Red staining
NOTE: To visualize parasites through fluorescence microscopy, perform staining using CellTracker Red fluorescent dye (CMTPX). Alternatively, other markers, including carboxyfluorescein can be used in accordance with manufacturer instructions or promastigotes constitutively expressing GFP, RFP, or other fluorescent reporter genes. Parasites used to infect cells are those at stationary phase of growth obtained from a promastigote axenic culture of no more than 7 passages.
3. Assessment of Leishmania binding to macrophages
4. Assessment of Leishmania phagocytosis by macrophages
5. Evaluation of Leishmania -induced vacuole maturation
NOTE: THP-1 cell transfection should be performed as described by M. B. Maess, B. Wittig and S. Lorkowski 23. Here we summarize this protocol, with minimal modifications. Nucleofection is a specific transfection method that requires a nucleofector. As an alternative method, cells can be transfected using lipofectamine24 and lentivirus transduction25.
6. Evaluation of the recruitment of LC3 to Leishmania spp. PVs
NOTE: The autophagic membrane marker LC3 can be used to investigate whether phagosomes present autophagic features. LC3 recruitment to Leishmania-induced PVs can be assessed during infection by immunolabelling cells with the anti-LC3 antibody, as previously described by C. Matte32 and B. R. S. Dias33.
7. Confocal microscopy acquisition and Fiji quantification
NOTE: Acquiring immunofluorescence images should be performed using a confocal laser scanning microscope. To reach a better resolution, use an oil-immersion 63x objective lens.
8. Statistical analysis
NOTE: For data analysis and graphics, use a statistical analysis program.
This report aims to evaluate the early events occurring during the phagocytosis of L. braziliensis isolated from patients presenting L. braziliensis-LCL or L. braziliensis-DL form of CL. Using confocal microscopy, we investigated the main events associated with parasites' phagocytosis: binding, internalization, and phagosome maturation. We first evaluated the L. braziliensis-LCL or L. braziliensis-DL binding and phagocytosis by human monocyte-derived macrophages. The data ...
Leishmania-macrophage interaction is a complex process and involves several steps that can influence disease development5. To better understand the mechanisms involved in the interaction of unopsonized Leishmania and host cells, we have described a protocol that employs confocal fluorescence microscopy to assess phagocytosis from early to late stages of Leishmania infection. The use of fluorescence techniques involving two or more fluorophores to investigate cell biology...
The funders had no role in study design, data collection or analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Fiocruz Bahia, Brazil and the department of microscopy for assistance. This work was supported by INOVA-FIOCRUZ number 79700287000, P.S.T.V. holds a grant for productivity in research from CNPq (305235/2019-2). Plasmids were kindly provided by Mauricio Terebiznik, University of Toronto, CA. The authors would like to thank Andris K. Walter for English language revision and manuscript copyediting assistance.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
2-mercaptoethanol | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 21985023 | |
AlexaFluor 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Tem varios no site | |
anti-LC3 antibody | Novus Biologicals | NB600-1384 | |
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | X | |
CellStripper | Corning | 25-056-CI | |
CellTracker Red (CMTPX) Dye | Thermo Fisher Scientific | C34552 | |
Centrífuga | Thermo Fisher Scientific | ||
Ciprofloxacin | Isofarma | X | |
CO2 incubator | Thermo Fisher Scientific | X | |
Confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica SP8) | Leica | Leica SP8 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Gibco | 10270106 | |
Fluorescence microscope (Olympus Lx73) | Olympus | Olympus Lx73 | |
Gentamicin | Gibco | 15750045 | |
Glutamine | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 35050-061 | |
HEPES (N- 2-hydroxyethyl piperazine-N’-2-ethane-sulfonic acid) | Gibco | X | |
Histopaque | Sigma | 10771 | |
M-CSF | Peprotech | 300-25 | |
NH4Cl | Sigma | A9434 | |
Normal goat serum | Sigma | NS02L | |
Nucleofector 2b Device | Lonza | AAB-1001 | |
Nucleofector solution | Lonza | VPA-1007 | |
Paraformaldehyde | Sigma | 158127 | |
Phalloidin | Invitrogen | A12379 | |
Phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) | Sigma | P1585 | |
Phosphate buffer solution (PBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 10010023 | |
ProLong Gold Antifade kit | Life Technologies | P36931 | |
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium | Gibco | 11875-093 | |
Saponin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | X | |
Schneider's Insect medium | Sigma | S0146 | |
Sodium bicarbonate | Sigma | S5761 | |
Sodium pyruvate | Sigma | S8636 | |
Triton X-100 | Sigma | X |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone