Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
This protocol describes an approach to facilitate precise knock-in edits in zebrafish embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 technology. A phenotyping pipeline is presented to demonstrate the applicability of these techniques to model a Long QT Syndrome-associated gene variant.
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) in animal models enable precise genetic manipulation for the study of physiological phenomena. Zebrafish have been used as an effective genetic model to study numerous questions related to heritable disease, development, and toxicology at the whole-organ and -organism level. Due to the well-annotated and mapped zebrafish genome, numerous tools for gene editing have been developed. However, the efficacy of generating and ease of detecting precise knock-in edits using CRISPR is a limiting factor. Described here is a CRISPR-Cas9-based knock-in approach with the simple detection of precise edits in a gene responsible for cardiac repolarization and associated with the electrical disorder, Long QT Syndrome (LQTS). This two-single-guide RNA (sgRNA) approach excises and replaces the target sequence and links a genetically encoded reporter gene. The utility of this approach is demonstrated by describing non-invasive phenotypic measurements of cardiac electrical function in wild-type and gene-edited zebrafish larvae. This approach enables the efficient study of disease-associated variants in a whole organism. Furthermore, this strategy offers possibilities for the insertion of exogenous sequences of choice, such as reporter genes, orthologs, or gene editors.
CRISPR-based gene editing strategies in animal models enable the study of genetically heritable disease, development, and toxicology at the whole-organism level1,2,3. Zebrafish provide a powerful model that is closer in numerous physiological aspects to humans than murine or human-derived cell models4. An extensive array of genetic tools and strategies have been used in zebrafish for both forward5 and reverse genetic screening6. Comprehensive genetic mapping and annotation in zebrafish have facilitated gene-editing approaches as a primary technique to engineer targeted gene knockouts (KOs) and precise knock-ins (KIs)7.
Despite this, generating precise KI edits in zebrafish is limited by low efficiencies and the difficulty of accurate detection. Although transcription factor-like effector nucleases (TALENs) have been successfully used and optimized for KIs8, CRISPR provides an improved gene-editing strategy with simpler sgRNA targeting. Numerous studies have used CRISPR to generate precise KIs in zebrafish9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20, although these edits generated through CRISPR-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) tend to be inefficient with low intrinsic success rates that require genotyping as a primary screen9,10,14,21. This demonstrates the need for an efficient KI CRISPR system in zebrafish, as well as a reliable high-throughput system for detecting precise edits.
The goal of this study was to describe a platform for generating a precise cardiac gene KI in zebrafish hearts with simple and high-throughput detection of successful edits. A CRISPR-Cas9-based two-sgRNA exon replacement approach is described, which is based on a TALEN approach8. This approach involves excision of the target sequence using two-sgRNA guides and replacement with an exogenous template sequence that contains the KI of interest as well as a genetically encoded intronic reporter gene (Figure 1). The integration of a genetically encoded fluorescent reporter within the target gene intronic sequence enables the efficient detection of positive edits. A phenotyping platform is then described for assessing cardiac electrical function in zebrafish larvae for non-invasive characterization of the gene variants associated with inherited LQTS, a cardiac electrical disorder that predisposes individuals to sudden cardiac death.
These approaches will enhance the access to and use of zebrafish KI gene edits to model inherited diseases and address biological and physiological questions, such as mapping gene expression patterns, and developmental regulation. Since zebrafish hearts better parallel human cardiac electrophysiological characteristics than murine models, they may be particularly attractive as a genetically tractable system for cardiac disease modeling7,22,23.
Studies using zebrafish were conducted in agreement with the policies and procedures of the Simon Fraser University Animal Care Committee and the Canadian Council of Animal Care and were completed under protocol # 1264K-18.
1. Design of CRISPR components for precise edits
2. Preparation of CRISPR components for embryo microinjection
3. Breeding of zebrafish and embryo microinjection
NOTE: Protocols for zebrafish breeding and the microinjection of single-cell embryos have been described previously29,30,31.
4. Reporter gene screening of CRISPR-Cas9-edited larval zebrafish
5. Phenotyping of CRISPR-Cas9-edited larval zebrafish
6. Genotyping of CRISPR-Cas9-edited larval zebrafish
The successful use of this two-sgRNA exon replacement CRISPR approach is highlighted by the introduction and simple detection of a precise edit to engineer the LQTS-associated variant, R56Q, in the zkcnh6a gene in zebrafish. Figure 6 shows a representative 3 dpf larvae injected at the one-cell embryo stage with CRISPR components as described above. Figure 6A shows the presence of the YFP mVenus reporter gene expression in the eye lens as a positive repo...
The engineering of precise gene edits using CRISPR-Cas9 is challenged by the low efficiencies of HDR mechanisms and their efficient detection. Here, a CRISPR-Cas9-based two-sgRNA exon replacement approach is described that produces precise edits in zebrafish with straightforward visual detection of positive edits. The efficacy of this approach is demonstrated by generating precise edits in the zkcnh6a gene. This paper shows how cardiac function in gene-edited zebrafish larvae may be assessed using non-invasive p...
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This research was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project grant (T.W.C.) and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery grants (T.W.C.).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Program | |||
CRISPOR | TEFOR Infrastructure | ||
ENSEMBL | European Bioinformatics Institute | ||
ImageJ | National Institutes of Health (NIH) | ||
Micro-Manager | Open Source (Github) | ||
NEBiocalculator | New England Biolabs (NEB) | ||
EQUIPMENT | |||
24-well Plate | VWR | ||
25 mm Petri Dish | VWR | ||
Blackfly USB3 Camera | Teledyne FLIR | ||
C1000 Thermal Cycler | Bio-Rad | ||
Centrifuge 5415C | Eppendorf | ||
EZNA Gel Extraction Kit | Omega Biotek | ||
MAXIscript T7 Transcription Kit | Invitrogen | ||
MaxQ 5000 Incubator | Barnstead Lab Line | ||
Miniprep Kit | Qiagen | ||
mMessage mMachine T7 Ultra Transcription Kit | Invitrogen | ||
ND1000 Spectrophotometer | Nanodrop | ||
PCR Purification Kit | Qiagen | ||
PLI 100A Picoinjector | Harvard Apparatus | ||
PowerPac Basic Power Supply | Bio-Rad | ||
Stemi 305 Steroscope | Zeiss | ||
Wide Mini Sub Cell GT Electrophoresis System | Bio-Rad | ||
ZebTec Zebrafish Housing System | Tecniplast | ||
SERVICES | |||
Gene Synthesis | Genewiz | ||
Sanger Sequencing | Genewiz | ||
REAGENTS | |||
10β Competent Cells | NEB | ||
10X PCR Buffer | Qiagen | ||
100 mM Nucleotide Mixture | ABM | ||
Ampicillin | Sigma | ||
BamHI Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
BsaI Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
DR274 Plasmid (XL1 Blue bacterial agar stab) | Addgene | ||
EcoRI Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
Glycerol | |||
HEPES | Sigma | ||
HindIII Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
Kanamycin | Sigma | ||
Methylene Blue | Sigma | ||
MLM3613 Plasmid (XL1 Blue bacterial agar stab) | Addgene | ||
MS-222 (Tricaine) | Sigma | ||
pKHR5 Plasmid (DH5α bacterial agar stab) | Addgene | ||
PmeI Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
SalI Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
Sodium Hydroxide | Sigma | ||
T4 Ligase w/ buffer | Sigma | ||
Taq Polymerase | Qiagen | ||
TE Buffer | Sigma | ||
Tris Hydrochloride | Sigma | ||
XhoI Endonuclease w/ buffer | NEB | ||
RECIPES | |||
Solution | Component | Supplier | |
Annealing Buffer (pH 7.5-8.0) | 10 mM Tris | Sigma | |
50 mM NaCl | Sigma | ||
1 mM EDTA | Sigma | ||
E3 Media (pH 7.2) | 5 mM NaCl | Sigma | |
0.17 mM KCl | Sigma | ||
0.33 mM CaCl2 | Sigma | ||
0.33 mM MgSO4 | Sigma | ||
Injection Buffer (pH 7.5) | 20 mM HEPES | Sigma | |
150 mM KCl | Sigma |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone