Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

In this study, a rat model of induction of periodontitis is presented via a combination of retentive ligature and repetitive injections of lipopolysaccharide derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis, over 14 days around the first maxillary molars. The ligation and LPS injection techniques were effective in inducing peridontitis, resulting in alveolar bone loss and inflammation.

Streszczenie

Periodontitis (PD) is a highly prevalent, chronic immune-inflammatory disease of the periodontium, that results in a loss of gingival soft tissue, periodontal ligament, cementum, and alveolar bone. In this study, a simple method of PD induction in rats is described. We provide detailed instructions for placement of the ligature model around the first maxillary molars (M1) and a combination of injections of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), derived from Porphyromonas gingivalis at the mesio-palatal side of the M1. The induction of periodontitis was maintained for 14 days, promoting the accumulation of bacteria biofilm and inflammation. To validate the animal model, IL-1β, a key inflammatory mediator, was determined by an immunoassay in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), and alveolar bone loss was calculated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This technique was effective in promoting gingiva recession, alveolar bone loss, and an increase in IL-1β levels in the GCF at the end of the experimental procedure after 14 days. This method was effective in inducing PD, thus being able to be used in studies on disease progression mechanisms and future possible treatments.

Wprowadzenie

Periodontitis (PD) is the sixth most prevalent public health condition worldwide, affecting approximately 11% of the total population, being an advanced, irreversible, and destructive form of periodontal disease1,2. PD is an inflammatory process that affects the gingival and periodontal tissues, which results in gingiva recession, apical migration of the junctional epithelium with pocket development, and the loss of alveolar bone3. Furthermore, PD is associated with several systemic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis, for which environmental and host-specific factors play a significant role4,5.

Hence, PD is a multifactorial disease primarily initiated by the accumulation of microbial plaque - resulting from dysbiosis of microbial communities - and by an exaggerated host immune response to periodontal pathogens, which leads to the breakdown of periodontal tissue4,6. Among several periodontal bacteria, the gram-negative anaerobic bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis is one of the key pathogens in PD4. P. gingivalis contains a complex lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in its walls, a molecule known to induce polymorphonuclear leukocyte infiltration and vascular dilatation in inflamed periodontal tissues7. This results in the production of inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin 1 (IL-1), IL-6, and IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), or prostaglandins, with a subsequent osteoclast activation and bone resorption, leading to tissue destruction and ultimate tooth loss3.

Among the different advantages of animal models include the capacity to mimic cellular complexities as in humans, or to be more accurate than in vitro studies, which are carried out on plastic surfaces with limited cell types8. For modeling PD experimentally in vivo, different animal species have been used, like non-human primates, dogs, pigs, ferrets, rabbits, mice, and rats9. However, rats are the most extensively studied animal model for the pathogenesis of PD because they are inexpensive and easy to handle10. Their dental gingival tissue has similar structural features to human gingival tissue, with a shallow gingival sulcus and junctional epithelium attached to the tooth surface. Furthermore, as in humans, the junctional epithelium facilitates the passage of bacterial, foreign materials, and exudates from inflammatory cells 9.

One of the most reported experimental models of PD induction in rats is the placement of ligatures around the teeth, which is technically challenging but reliable10. The ligature placement facilitates dental plaque and bacterial accumulation, generating a dysbiosis in the gingival sulci, that causes periodontal tissue inflammation and destruction11. Loss of periodontal attachment and resorption of alveolar bone could occur in 7 days in this rat model8.

Another animal model for PD consists of the injection of LPS into the gingival tissue. As a result, osteoclastogenesis and bone loss are stimulated. The histopathological features of this model are similar to human-established PD, characterized by higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines, collagen degradation, and alveolar bone resorption6,8.

Thus, the aim of this study was to describe a simple rat model of experimental PD based on the techniques of P. gingivalis-LPS (Pg-LPS) injections, combined with ligature placement around the first maxillary molars (M1). This is a model with similar characteristics to those observed in human PD disease, which could be used in the study of disease progression mechanisms and future possible treatments.

Protokół

NOTE: The experimental protocol of the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of the Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (CEEA-UIB; reference number 163/03/21).

1. Animal anesthesia and procedure preparation

  1. Sterilize all surgical instruments (aluminium mouth gags, dental explorer, diamond lance, surgical scissors, microsurgical pliers, a micro needle holder, a hollenback carver, a periosteal microsurgical elevator, and microsurgical scissors) (5 min at 135 °C) before surgery.
  2. Prepare all the solutions needed for the procedure in sterile conditions, as described:
    1. Prepare a mix of Ketamine (60 mg/mL) and Xylazine (8 mg/mL) by mixing 1.6 mL of Ketamine with 1 mL of Xylazine diluted in Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS)/saline. Store the stock at 4 °C.
    2. Dilute Atipamezole to a final concentration of 0.25 mg/mL in PBS/saline. Store the stock at 4 °C.
    3. Dilute Buprenorphine to a final concentration of 0.03 mg/mL in PBS/saline. Store the stock at 4 °C.
    4. Prepare 1 mL of Pg-LPS (1 mg/mL) in sterile saline. Store the stock at -20 °C.
  3. For the experiment, use female and male Wistar rats, aged 12 weeks and weighing 210-350 g at the time of surgery. Keep the animals housed in groups under the appropriate environment and constant conditions (20-24 °C, 12 h per day light-dark cycles), with food and standard water, offered ad libitum.
  4. To induce anesthesia, weigh the rat and administer the mix of Ketamine/Xylazine at a concentration of 80/10 mg/kg intraperitoneally (IP), by using a 25 G sterile hypodermic needle and 1 mL syringe.
  5. After the rat is anesthetized, place the animal on its back on a heated surgical platform; during the procedure, cover the animal's body to prevent heat loss.
    NOTE: Anesthesia depth is assessed by the loss of pedal reflex during the procedure and by monitoring vital signs. If needed, use a small nose cone to maintain anesthesia with 2% Isoflurane in 100% oxygen. Apply sterile ophthalmic ointment to both eyes after anesthesia induction to protect the corneas and prevent drying. 
  6. During the procedures, administer 100% oxygen using a small nose cone, and monitor the pulse rate and oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry.
    NOTE: If the oxygen saturation and pulse rate fall below 95% and 190 bpm, respectively, stop the procedure and place the animal in the lateral decubitus position until reaching normal values.
  7. Open the rat mouth using an aluminum mouth gag around the incisors (upper and lower), retracting the tongue with it and stabilizing the maxilla and mandible in an open, comfortable working position, enabling access to mandibular molars.
    NOTE: If the animal needs to be placed in lateral decubitus, remove the mouth gag before changing its position to favor recovery. Once the animal is anesthetized, collect gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) before surgery (sample in basal conditions) (day 0).
  8. Collect GCF as described by the following steps:
    1. Place the animal on its back on a surgical platform and stabilize the maxilla and mandible in an open position with aluminum mouth gags.
    2. Collect GCF using a total of four (two for each M1) absorbent paper point nº 30 (0.03 cm diameter x 3 cm length), by inserting it into the gingival crevice (space between gingival epithelium and adjacent enamel) around the mesio-palatal of the M1 until slight resistance. Retain the paper point in the same position for a total of 30 s before immediate removal.
    3. After collection, transfer the paper point immediately into a plastic vial, and store at -80 °C until assay performance.

2. Retentive ligature technique and intragingival Pg -LPS injection

NOTE: The ligature model was created (day 0) by placing a sterile braided silk ligature (5/0) around the M1 bilaterally within the gingival sulcus using microsurgical instruments and securing it with the surgeon's knots on the palatal surface. The microsurgical instruments used were microsurgical pliers, a micro needle holder, a hollenback carver, a periosteal microsurgical elevator, and microsurgical scissors. Surgical loupes with an LED light source were also used (3.6x magnification).

  1. Position the distal tail of the suture on the palatal side of the dentition and insert the proximal segment between the contact of M1 and second maxillary molars (M2).
  2. Use the periosteal microsurgical elevator to insert the suture within the sulcus. Wrap the ligature around the buccal surface of the M1 very carefully, as the tissues at this level present a narrow zone of attached gingiva. On the palatal aspect, make sure the suture is tightened on both ends to ensure it is driven into the gingival sulcus.
    NOTE: If resistance is observed when inserting the suture between the M1 and the M2, the contact may be opened slightly using a dental explorer and diamond lance-shaped bur.
  3. Tie the ends of the suture with a surgeon's knot and trim the tails as short as possible. Insert the knot in the sulcus.
    NOTE: Tips of surgical instruments can cause oral trauma and bleeding. Prepare small segments of gauze or a cotton swab to remove blood from the oral cavity and apply pressure to stop any hemorrhage. Careful soft tissue management with a microsurgical approach minimizes surgical complications and leads to less tissue trauma.
  4. After ligature positioning, inject 40 µL of Pg-LPS in sterile saline with a 25 G sterile hypodermic needle and a 1 mL syringe to the subgingival tissue (between the root or neck of a tooth and the gum margin) at the mesio-palatal side of the M1 bilaterally (day 0).

3. End of the procedure

  1. After ligation positioning and Pg-LPS application, release the rat from the surgical state and place it in a clean individual cage under a heat lamp.
  2. Inject the antagonist Atipamezole (0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC)) with a 25 G sterile hypodermic needle and a 1 mL syringe.
  3. For pain relief, inject 0.03 mg/kg Buprenorphine, SC.
  4. Monitor the animal's recovery until the effects of the operation are completely reversed. Individually house each rat in the appropriate environment under constant conditions (20-24 °C, 12 h per day light-dark cycles). Offer food and deionized water ad libitum.
  5. During the first 2 days after the procedure, weigh the animals and inject Buprenorphine SC twice daily for pain relief.
    NOTE: Buprenorphine can be administered before beginning the procedure to eliminate the windup effect.
  6. During the time of the experiment, monitor the animals by weight and general behavior assessment one or two times a week.

4. Post-procedure follow-up

NOTE: The induction of PD was maintained for 14 days to promote the accumulation of bacteria biofilm and consequent inflammation. The ligatures have to be examined and adjusted, and Pg-LPS is injected three times per week (day 2, day 4, day 6, day 8, day 10, and day 12).

  1. Examine and adjust the ligature (day 2, day 4, day 6, day 8, day 10, and day 12) as follows:
    1. Anesthetize with 2% isoflurane in 100% oxygen using an anesthesia induction chamber.
    2. After the rat is anesthetized, place the animal on its back and use a small nose cone during the procedure with 1% isoflurane in 100% oxygen for maintenance of the animal anesthesia.
    3. Open the rat mouth using the aluminum mouth gag around the incisors (upper and lower), retracting the tongue with it and stabilizing the maxilla and mandible in an open, comfortable working position, enabling access to ligatures.
    4. Tighten the ligatures against the gingiva with the help of a periosteal microsurgical elevator, and make sure the suture of the ligatures is inserted, creating inflammation around the gingiva.
      NOTE: It is possible that 7-10 days after surgery, ligatures are lost. If this happens, follow the protocol as explained for the injection of Pg-LPS (step 2.4).
  2. After the ligature adjustment, bilaterally inject 40 µL of Pg-LPS with a 25 G sterile hypodermic needle and a 1 mL syringe to the subgingival tissue at the mesio-palatal side of the M1 (day 2, day 4, day 6, day 8, day 10, and day 12).
  3. Remove the nose cone for anesthesia and place the rat in its cage. Monitor the animal's recovery until the effects of the anesthesia are completely reversed.

5. Animal sacrifice and analysis

NOTE: There are different options for evaluating the progression of PD. Here, the analysis described consists of an evaluation of pro-inflammatory cytokines at the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), and an evaluation of the loss of alveolar bone.

  1. On day 14 of the study (day 14), sacrifice the animals with CO2 in a carbon dioxide chamber. A displacement rate of 30% to 70% of the chamber volume/min is recommended for rodents.
    NOTE: Lack of animal response to pedal reflex and absence of vital signs must be verified to confirm euthanasia. 
  2. Collect GCF as described by the following steps:
    NOTE: GCF is collected before PD induction (before surgery) (day 0) and after PD induction (after sacrifice) (day 14).
    1. Place the animal on its back on a surgical platform, and stabilize the maxilla and mandible in an open position with aluminum mouth gags.
    2. Collect the GCF using adsorbent paper point nº 30 (0.03 cm diameter x 3 cm length) by inserting it into the gingival crevice around the mesio-palatal of the M1 until slight resistance. Retain the paper point in the same position for a total of 30 s before immediate removal.
    3. After collection, transfer the paper point immediately into a plastic vial and store at -80 °C until assay performance.
  3. To evaluate proteins within the GCF, prepare the following solutions and follow the steps of the elution method as described:
    NOTE: IL-1β is evaluated on the GCF (day 14) using an immunoassay, according to the manufacturer's protocol.
    1. Prepare the elution buffer fresh and keep it on ice throughout the entire extraction process to inhibit protease activity.
    2. Prepare all solutions needed for the elution buffer as described:
      1. Prepare 1 mL of Aprotinin (1 mg/mL) in ultrapure water.
      2. Prepare 10 mL of phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) (200 mM) in methanol.
      3. Add 125 µL of PMSF and 250 µL of Aprotinin to 24.5 mL of PBS solution (pH = 7.4) to prepare the elution buffer.
    3. Dissolve one commercial phosphatase inhibitor tablet with 10 mL of freshly prepared elution buffer for 10 min under agitation at 4 °C.
      NOTE: The duration of GCF elution is limited; use immediately for centrifugations after the addition of phosphatase inhibitor tablet within the first 30 min.
    4. After adding the phosphatase inhibitor, add 11 µL of complete elution buffer directly onto the tube with the paper points.
    5. Centrifuge the tube at 452 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
    6. Transfer the eluted content to a new plastic vial. Repeat this process four additional times to yield a 50 µL total volume.
    7. After the last centrifugation, add a total volume of 60 µL directly onto the paper point, and centrifuge one last time at 452 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
    8. Use the required volume eluted for protein evaluation.
  4. After euthanasia and GCF collection, with the help of surgical scissors, cut out the superior jaw of the rats. Try to peel off the mask of the rat and leave as little soft tissue as possible.
  5. Position the jaw in the microscope stage for visualization and take a picture at the desired magnification.
  6. Place the jaw directly in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) diluted in PBS. Refresh twice a week with new PFA for 12 days for a complete fixation.
    CAUTION: Steps involving PFA should be performed in a fume hood following the Safety Data Sheet recommendations.
  7. After complete jaw fixation, evaluate bone loss using a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner, as follows:
    1. Open the PC.
    2. Open the CBCT analysis program.
    3. Select Scan Protocol > Denture Scan Mode.
    4. Select Field of View (FOV) > (11x8) HIRes (90 kV of voltage and 3 mA of current).
    5. Place the fixed upper maxilla of the rats in the gantry.
    6. Click Next.
    7. Click the X-ray firing button (press the X-ray remote control to make the emission and keep it pressed for the entire duration of the scan).
    8. If necessary, relocate the upper maxilla in the center of the frontal plane by pressing the control button, then click the X-ray firing button (press the X-ray remote control to make the emission and keep it pressed for the entire duration of the scan).
    9. Click Next.
    10. Click the X-ray firing button (press the X-ray remote control to make the emission and keep it pressed for the entire duration of the scan).
    11. If necessary, relocate the denture in the center of the sagittal plane by pressing the control button, then click the X-ray firing button (press the X-ray remote control to make the emission and keep it pressed for the entire duration of the scan).
    12. Click Next.
    13. Click the Start button (press the X-ray remote control to make the emission and keep it pressed for the entire duration of the exam). Wait until receiving a processing message, and then follow the instructions shown.
    14. A window view appears. Regulate the gray at 65% and click Apply.
    15. For saving the scan, click on File and save it in DICOM format. Then, click All Images and at the DICOM export selection window, select all the parameters shown (initial image, original axial, reformatted axial, multiplanar) and select predefined type.
  8. Process the maxillary molars' two-dimensional and sagittal representative images using an analysis program, as follows:
    1. Open the software.
    2. Click File and Open, and then select the folder with images in DICOM format and click Open.
    3. Wait until the window "Convert to 8 bit" appears, select the range from 0 to 6,000, and click OK.
    4. Click Raw images.
    5. Define the top and bottom of the selection to limit the region of interest. Search for the first and last images where alveolar bone appears and select it with the top of selection and bottom of selection commands.
      NOTE: Representative two-dimensional images of the alveolar bone of the molars could be exported, as in Figure 3A,B.
    6. For sagittal representative images, click on Toggle profile bar.
    7. Draw a sagittal line in the middle of the palate and click Reslice model. Determine parameters for delimiting the region of interest (slice spacing: 1; number of slices: 100) and click OK. Wait until the reslicing model ends. Finally, click save Resliced images.
      NOTE: Representative sagittal imagines of the alveolar bone of the molars could be exported, as in Figure 3C,D.

Wyniki

A timeline of the experimental steps is presented in Figure 1. Figure 2A shows an image of the mandibula after surgical intervention, with ligature placement around the sulcus of the M1 at time 0 of the experiment. Figure 2B shows how, after 14 days of the procedure, the ligature around the M1 enters the gingival sulcus, causing inflammation of the gingiva and infiltrating accumulation.

Dyskusje

This method describes the induction of PD in rats following a combined technique of Pg-LPS injections and ligature placement around the M1, revealing that significant changes in the periodontal tissues and alveolar bone could be induced in 14 days following this method.

During this procedure, attention to different critical steps must be provided. During animal anesthesia and procedure preparation, assessing the proper anesthesia during the surgical process is critical for its success...

Ujawnienia

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Podziękowania

This work was supported by Fundació Universitat-Empresa de les Illes Balears (Proof of concept call 2020), by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economía y Competividad, co-funded by the ESF European Social Fund and the ERDF European Regional Development Fund (contract to M.M.B; FI18/00104) and by the Direcció General d'Investigació, Conselleria d'Investigació, Govern Balear (contract to M.M.F.C; FPI/040/2020). The authors thank Dr. Anna Tomás and Maria Tortosa for their help at the experimental surgery and platform of IdISBa. Finally, thanks to ADEMA School of Dentistry for the access to the CBCT scanner.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Adsorbent paper point nº30 Proclinc8187
AprotininSigma-AldrichA1153
AtipamezoleDechra573751.5Revanzol 5 mg/mL
Braided silk ligature (5/0) Laboratorio Arago Sl613112
Buprenorphine Richter pharma578816.6Bupaq 0.3 mg/mL
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) Scanner MyRayhyperion X9Model Hyperion X9
CTAn softwareSkyScanVersion 1.13.4.0
Dental explorer Proclinc99743
Diamond lance-shaped bur DentaltixIT21517
Food maintenance dietSodispain researchROD14 
Heated surgical platformPetSavers
Hollenback carverHu-FRIEDY HF45234
Hypodermic needle  BD 30060025G X 5/8” - 0,5 X 16 MM
Isoflurane KarizooIsoflutek 1000mg/g
Ketamine  Dechra581140.6Anesketin 100 mg/mL
Lipopolysaccharide  derived from P.Gingivalis InvivoGenTLRL-PGLPS
MethanolFisher ScientificM/4000/PB08
Micro needle holterFehling Surgical InstrumentsKOT-6
Microsurgical pliersKLS Martin12-384-06-07
microsurgical scissors S&T microsurgical instrumentsSDC-15 RV
Monitor iMEC 8 VetMindray 
Multiplex bead immunoassayProcartaplex, Thermo fisher ScientificPPX-05
Paraformaldehyde (PFA) Sigma-Aldrich8187151000
Periosteal microsurgical elevator DentaltixCU19112468
Phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) Roche10837091001
Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS)Capricorn ScientificPBS-1A
PhosSTOP Roche4906845001Commercial phosphatase inhibitor tablet 
Plastic vialSPL Lifesciencies600151.5mL
SalineCinfa204024.3
Stereo Microscope ZeissModel SteREO Discovery.V12
Surgical loupes led lightZeiss
Surgical scissors Zepf Surgical08-1701-17
Syringe BD plastipak3031721mL
Veterinary dental micromotorEickemeyer174028
XylazineCalier20102-003Xilagesic 20 mg/mL

Odniesienia

  1. Carvalho, J. D. S., et al. Impact of citrus flavonoid supplementation on inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-induced periodontal disease in mice. Food and Function. 12 (11), 5007-5017 (2021).
  2. Nazir, M. A. Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention. International Journal of Health Sciences. 1 (2), 72-80 (2017).
  3. Dumitrescu, A. L., El-Aleem, S. A., Morales-Aza, B., Donaldson, L. F. A model of periodontitis in the rat: Effect of lipopolysaccharide on bone resorption, osteoclast activity, and local peptidergic innervation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 31 (8), 596-603 (2004).
  4. Wang, H. Y., et al. Preventive effects of the novel antimicrobial peptide Nal-P-113 in a rat Periodontitis model by limiting the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis and modulating IL-1β and TNF-α production. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 17 (1), 1-10 (2017).
  5. Guan, J., Zhang, D., Wang, C. Identifying periodontitis risk factors through a retrospective analysis of 80 cases. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 38 (1), 293-296 (2021).
  6. Khajuria, D. K., Patil, O. N., Karasik, D., Razdan, R. Development and evaluation of novel biodegradable chitosan based metformin intrapocket dental film for the management of periodontitis and alveolar bone loss in a rat model. Archives of Oral Biology. 85, 120-129 (2018).
  7. Nishida, E., et al. Bone resorption and local interleukin-1alpha and interleukin-1beta synthesis induced by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Periodontal Research. 36 (1), 1-8 (2001).
  8. Graves, D. T., Kang, J., Andriankaja, O., Wada, K., Rossa, C. Animal models to study host-bacteria interactions involved in periodontitis. Bone. 23 (1), 1-7 (2008).
  9. Struillou, X., Boutigny, H., Soueidan, A., Layrolle, P. Experimental animal models in periodontology: a review. The Open Dentistry Journal. 4 (1), 37-47 (2010).
  10. Mustafa, H., et al. Induction of periodontal disease via retentive ligature, lipopolysaccharide injection, and their combination in a rat model. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 24 (3), 365-373 (2021).
  11. Chadwick, J. W., Glogauer, M. Robust ligature-induced model of murine periodontitis for the evaluation of oral neutrophils. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2020 (155), 6-13 (2019).
  12. Cheng, R., Wu, Z., Li, M., Shao, M., Hu, T. Interleukin-1β is a potential therapeutic target for periodontitis: a narrative review. International Journal of Oral Science. 12 (1), 1-9 (2020).
  13. Abe, T., Hajishengallis, G. Optimization of the ligature-induced periodontitis model in mice. Journal of Immunological Methods. 394 (1-2), 49-54 (2013).
  14. Jeong-Hyon, K., Bon-Hyuk, G., Sang-Soo, N., Yeon-Cheol, P. A review of rat models of periodontitis treated with natural extracts. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences. 7 (2), 95-103 (2020).
  15. Marchesan, J., et al. An experimental murine model to study periodontitis. Nature Protocols. 13 (10), 2247-2267 (2018).
  16. Lin, P., et al. Application of ligature-induced periodontitis in mice to explore the molecular mechanism of periodontal disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (16), 8900 (2021).
  17. Irie, M. S., et al. Use of micro-computed tomography for bone evaluation in dentistry. Brazilian Dental Journal. 29 (3), 227-238 (2018).
  18. Haas, L. F., Zimmermann, G. S., De Luca Canto, G., Flores-Mir, C., Corrêa, M. Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 47 (2), 20170084 (2018).
  19. Kamburoğlu, K., Ereş, G., Akgün, C. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of alveolar bone destruction in adult rats using CBCT. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry. 36 (4), 245-250 (2019).
  20. Sousa Melo, S. L., Rovaris, K., Javaheri, A. M., de Rezen de Barbosa, G. L. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging for the assessment of periodontal disease. Current Oral Health Reports. 7 (4), 376-380 (2020).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

PeriodontitisRat ModelLigature PlacementLipopolysaccharide InjectionInflammatory ResponseConnective Tissue LossAlveolar Bone ResorptionAnesthetic ProtocolSurgical ProcedureGingival Crevice Fluid GCFWistar RatsAssay PerformanceKetamineXylazineAtipamezoleBuprenorphine

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone