JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Erratum Notice
  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Erratum
  • Reprints and Permissions

Erratum Notice

Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. Read More ...

Summary

Here we describe a procedure to image viral complexes in liquid at nanometer resolution using a transmission electron microscope.

Abstract

Researchers regularly use Transmission Electron Microscopes (TEMs) to examine biological entities and to assess new materials. Here, we describe an additional application for these instruments- viewing viral assemblies in a liquid environment. This exciting and novel method of visualizing biological structures utilizes a recently developed microfluidic-based specimen holder. Our video article demonstrates how to assemble and use a microfluidic holder to image liquid specimens within a TEM. In particular, we use simian rotavirus double-layered particles (DLPs) as our model system. We also describe steps to coat the surface of the liquid chamber with affinity biofilms that tether DLPs to the viewing window. This permits us to image assemblies in a manner that is suitable for 3D structure determination. Thus, we present a first glimpse of subviral particles in a native liquid environment.

Introduction

A common goal of biologists and engineers is to understand the inner-workings of molecular machines. Transmission Electron Microscopes (TEMs) are ideal instruments to visualize these intricate details at near-atomic resolution1-2. In order to sustain the high vacuum system of a TEM, biological samples are typically embedded in thin films of vitreous ice3, sugars4, heavy metal salts5, or some combination thereof6. As a result, images of embedded specimens may reveal only limited snapshots of dynamic processes.

Early attempts to maintain biological specimens hydrated in environmental liquid chambers were undertaken by Parsons and colleagues using differential pumping stages. Electron diffraction patterns of unstained catalase crystals were successfully recorded to a resolution of 3 Å in a hydrated state7-8. In addition, phase-separated lipid domains could be examined in hydrated membranes of human erythrocytes9-10. However, motion caused by diffusing liquid and its interference with the electron beam, resulted in severe resolution loss and further experiments using biological specimens were not attempted until recently.

Newly developed microfluidic specimen holders have been introduced that utilize semiconductor microchips to form a micro-scaled environmental chamber. These devices can maintain samples in liquid while they are positioned in a TEM column11-12. This technical breakthrough in TEM imaging has allowed researchers to view, for the first time, progressive events at the molecular level13. We refer to this new modality as “in situ molecular microscopy” as experiments can now be performed “inside” the EM column14-15. The overall goal of this method is to image biological assemblies in liquid in order to observe their dynamic behaviors at nanometer resolution. The rationale behind the developed technique is to record real-time observations and examine new properties of biological machinery in solution. This methodology expands the use of TEMs for broader purposes in cellular and molecular biology12-16.

In the current video article, we present a comprehensive protocol to assemble and use a commercially available microfluidic specimen holder. These specialized holders utilize silicon nitride microchips produced with integrated spacers to form a liquid chamber that encloses minute volumes of solution. Thin, transparent windows are etched into the microchips for imaging purposes12. We demonstrate the proper use of a microfluidic holder to examine simian rotavirus double-layered particles (DLPs) in liquid using a TEM. To ensure that biological assemblies, such as DLPs, do not rapidly diffuse over great distances while imaging, we employ the Affinity Capture approach to tether them to the surface of the microfluidic chamber16. This molecular capture step has a major advantage over alternative techniques for imaging biological specimens in liquid because it allows for the acquisition of images that will be used for downstream processing routines. This capture step used in conjunction with microfluidic imaging is unique to our procedures17. Readers employing structural biology applications using TEM or microfluidic imaging chambers may consider the use of affinity capture techniques when dynamic observations at the molecular level are the end goal.

Protocol

1. Prepare Affinity Capture Devices16

  1. Clean the silicon nitride E-chips by incubating them in 15 ml of acetone for 2 min followed by 15 ml of methanol for 2 min (Figure 1A). Allow chips to dry under laminar air-flow.
  2. Incubate the dried chips on a heated stir plate (without stirring) for 1.5 hr at 150 °C, then allow them to cool to room temperature before use.
  3. Use Hamilton syringes to compose lipid mixtures in small glass tubes to contain 25% chloroform, 55% DLPC (1,2-dilauroyl-phosphocholine) in chloroform (1 mg/ml) and 20% Ni-NTA lipid (1,2-dioleoyl-iminodiacetic acid-succinyl-nickel salt) in chloroform (1 mg/ml) for a total volume of 40 μl.
  4. Apply a 1 μl aliquot of the mixture over each 15 μl drop of Milli-Q water on a piece of Parafilm in a humid Petri dish (Figure 1B). Incubate samples on ice for at least 60 min.

2. Capture Macromolecules17

  1. Place an E-chip with a 150 nm integrated spacer on top of a monolayer sample and incubate for 1 min (Figure 1C).
  2. Gently lift the chip off of the sample and add a 3 μl aliquot of His-tagged Protein A. Incubate for 1 min at room temperature (Figure 1D).
  3. Blot away the excess drop using Whatman #1 filter paper and immediately add a 3 μl aliquot of antibody solution. Incubate for 1 min at room temperature.
  4. Remove the excess solution using a Hamilton syringe and immediately add a 1 μl aliquot of rotavirus DLPs (0.1 mg/ml) in buffer solution containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2 and 10 mM CaCl2. Incubate for at least 2 min at room temperature. The preparation of DLPs has been described previously18.

3. Assemble the Microfluidic Chamber and Load the In situ Specimen Holder

  1. Load the wet E-chip containing the viral sample into the tip of the microfluidic specimen holder. Glow-discharge a second flat E-chip for 1 min then loaded on top of the spacer chip (Figure 2, panels 1-5).
  2. Alternatively, to increase the contrast of biological macromolecules, heavy metal stain (e.g. 0.2% uranyl formate) can be added to wet specimens prior to placing the second E-chip on the wet specimen. However, the E-chip containing the specimen will need to be washed with Milli-Q water prior to adding the contrast reagent.
  3. Sandwich the entire assembly together to form a sealed enclosure, held in place mechanically within the holder by 3 brass screws (Figure 2, panels 6-8).
  4. Following assembly, the tip of the holder is pumped to 10-6 Torr using a turbo-pumped dry pumping station before placing the holder inside the TEM.

4. Imaging in Liquid Using a Transmission Electron Microscope

  1. Load the in situ specimen holder into a Transmission Electron Microscope (FEI Company) equipped with a LaB6 filament and operating at 120 kV.
  2. Turn on the TEM filament and adjust the eucentric height of the microscope stage with respect to the specimen by using the wobbler function to tilt the sample from -15° to +15° back and forth in the column. This procedure adjusts the stage in the z-direction to help account for the proper thickness of the liquid chamber. This step also ensures an accurate magnification is used when recording images.
  3. Record images along the edges and in the corner regions of the microfluidic chamber first. These areas typically contain the thinnest solution. Record images of specimens under low-dose conditions (1-3 electrons/Å2) using a CCD camera. Use nominal magnifications of 6,000X - 30,000X.
  4. Determine the proper defocus value by focusing at the edge of fluidic chamber. Use a value of -1.5 μm to record images at 30,000X magnification. If thick solution is encountered or if contrast agent is not used in the specimen preparation, use higher defocus values in the range of -2 to -4 μm.
  5. To ensure solution is contained in the microfluidic chamber throughout the experiments, focus the electron beam until the bubbles are formed in the liquid within the device.

Results

Representative images of DLPs in liquid using E-chips that were glow-discharged (Figure 3A) show fewer DLPs in a given viewing area, presumably due to diffusion, in comparison to DLPs that are enriched on Affinity Capture devices (Figure 3B). The addition of uranyl formate in the imaging chamber enhances the contrast of the specimen and hence the visibility of individual DLPs in solution (Figure 3C, top panel). Better contrast allows for downstream image p...

Discussion

In our presented work, we employed the affinity capture approach to tether rotavirus DLPs to a microfluidic platform. This allowed for in situ imaging of macromolecular complexes in a liquid microenvironment. The capture approach is significant with respect to other microfluidic imaging techniques because it localizes biological specimens to the imaging window to negate large diffusive issues that arise while recording images in liquid. However, one of the most critical steps in our protoc...

Disclosures

The author, Madeline J. Dukes, is an employee of Protochips, Inc.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Michael J. Friedlander, Director of the Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute for encouraging our research endeavors. This project was supported by development funds to S.M.M and D.F.K. and in part by the Nano-Bio initiative of the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science at Virginia Tech.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
E-chips, spacer chipProtochips, Inc.EPB-52TBD400 μm x 50 μm window
E-chip, top chipProtochips, Inc.EPT-45W400 μm x 50 μm window
Ni-NTA lipidAvanti Polar Lipids790404PPowder form
DLPC (12:0) lipidAvanti Polar Lipids850335PPowder form
Volumetric flasks Fisher Scientific20-812A; 20-812C1 ml; 5 ml 
Hamilton SyringesHamilton Co.80300, 804001-10 μl; 1-25 μl
Whatman #1 filter paperWhatman1001 090100 pieces, 90 mm
Glass Petri dishesCorning70165-101100 mm x 15 mm
Glass Pasteur pipettesVWR14673-01014673-010
Glass culture tubesVWR47729-5666 mm x 50 mm
AcetoneFisher ScientificA11-11 L
MethanolFisher ScientificA412-11 L
Chloroform Electron Microcopy Sciences12550100 ml 
His-tagged Protein AAbcam, Inc.ab5295310 mg
Milli-Q water systemEMD Millipore Corp.Z00QSV001Ultrapure Water
HEPESFisher ScientificBP310-500500 g
Equipment 
Poseidon In situ specimen holderProtochips, Inc. FEI compatible
FEI Spirit BioTwin TEMFEI Co.120 kV
Eagle 2k HS CCD cameraFEI Co.10 Å/pixel sampling at 30,000X
Gatan 655 Dry pump stationGatan, Inc.Pump holder tip to 10-6 range
PELCO easiGlow, glow discharge unitTed Pella, Inc. Negative polarity mode
Isotemp heated stir plateFisher ScientificHeat to 150 ºC for 1.5 hr

References

  1. Zhou, Z. H. Towards atomic resolution structural determination by single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 218-228 (2008).
  2. Wolf, M., Garcea, R. L., Grigorieff, N., Harrison, S. C. Subunit interactions in bovine papillomavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 6298-6303 (2010).
  3. Dubochet, J., et al. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q. Rev. Biophys. 21, 129-228 (1988).
  4. Unwin, P. N., Henderson, R. Molecular structure determination by electron microscopy of unstained crystalline specimens. J. Mol. Biol. 94, 425-440 (1975).
  5. Ohi, M., Li, Y., Cheng, Y., Walz, T. . Negative Staining and Image Classification - Powerful Tools in Modern Electron Microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online. 6, 23-34 (2004).
  6. Adrian, M., Dubochet, J., Fuller, S. D., Harris, J. R. Cryo-negative staining. Micron. 29, 145-160 (1998).
  7. Parsons, D. F. Structure of wet specimens in electron microscopy. Improved environmental chambers make it possible to examine wet specimens easily. Science. 186, 407-414 (1974).
  8. Parsons, D. F., Matricardi, V. R., Moretz, R. C., Turner, J. N. Electron microscopy and diffraction of wet unstained and unfixed biological objects. Adv. Biol. Med. Phys. 15, 161-270 (1974).
  9. Hui, S. W., Parsons, D. F. Electron diffraction of wet biological membranes. Science. 184, 77-78 (1974).
  10. Hui, S. W., Parsons, D. F., Cowden, M. Electron diffraction of wet phospholipid bilayers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 71, 5068-5072 (1974).
  11. Ring, E. A., de Jonge, N. Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 16, 622-629 (2010).
  12. Dukes, M. J., Ramachandra, R., Baudoin, J. P., Gray Jerome, W., de Jonge, N. Three-dimensional locations of gold-labeled proteins in a whole mount eukaryotic cell obtained with 3nm precision using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 552-562 (2011).
  13. Yuk, J. M., et al. High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science. 336, 61-64 (2012).
  14. Peckys, D. B., de Jonge, N. Visualizing gold nanoparticle uptake in live cells with liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett. 11, 1733-1738 (2011).
  15. Klein, K. L., Anderson, I. M., de Jonge, N. Transmission electron microscopy with a liquid flow cell. J. Microsc. 242, 117-123 (2011).
  16. Degen, K., Dukes, M., Tanner, J. R., Kelly, D. F. The development of affinity capture devices-a nanoscale purification platform for biological in situ transmission electron microscopy. Rsc. Adv. 2, 2408-2412 (2012).
  17. Gilmore, B. L., et al. Visualizing viral assemblies in a nanoscale biosphere. Lab Chip. 13, 216-219 (2013).
  18. Bican, P., Cohen, J., Charpilienne, A., Scherrer, R. Purification and characterization of bovine rotavirus cores. J. Virol. 43, 1113-1117 (1982).
  19. Frank, J., et al. SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 190-199 (1996).
  20. Zhang, X., et al. Near-atomic resolution using electron cryomicroscopy and single-particle reconstruction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1867-1872 (2008).
  21. Scheres, S. H. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 415, 406-418 (2012).
  22. Kelly, D. F., Abeyrathne, P. D., Dukovski, D., Walz, T. The Affinity Grid: a pre-fabricated EM grid for monolayer purification. J. Mol. Biol. 382, 423-433 (2008).

Erratum


Formal Correction: Erratum: In situ TEM of Biological Assemblies in Liquid
Posted by JoVE Editors on 10/10/2024. Citeable Link.

This corrects the article 10.3791/50936

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Keywords In Situ TEMBiological AssembliesLiquid EnvironmentTransmission Electron MicroscopyMicrofluidic HolderSimian RotavirusDouble layered ParticlesAffinity Biofilms3D Structure Determination

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved