A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
Immunostaining is an effective technique for visualizing specific cell types and proteins within tissues. By utilizing sonication, the protocol described here alleviates the need to dissect Drosophila melanogaster tissues from late-stage embryos and larvae before immunostaining. We provide an efficient methodology for the immunostaining of formaldehyde-fixed whole mount larvae.
Studies performed in Drosophila melanogaster embryos and larvae provide crucial insight into developmental processes such as cell fate specification and organogenesis. Immunostaining allows for the visualization of developing tissues and organs. However, a protective cuticle that forms at the end of embryogenesis prevents permeation of antibodies into late-stage embryos and larvae. While dissection prior to immunostaining is regularly used to analyze Drosophila larval tissues, it proves inefficient for some analyses because small tissues may be difficult to locate and isolate. Sonication provides an alternative to dissection in larval Drosophila immunostaining protocols. It allows for quick, simultaneous processing of large numbers of late-stage embryos and larvae and maintains in situ morphology. After fixation in formaldehyde, a sample is sonicated. Sample is then subjected to immunostaining with antigen-specific primary antibodies and fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies to visualize target cell types and specific proteins via fluorescence microscopy. During the process of sonication, proper placement of a sonicating probe above the sample, as well as the duration and intensity of sonication, is critical. Additonal minor modifications to standard immunostaining protocols may be required for high quality stains. For antibodies with low signal to noise ratio, longer incubation times are typically necessary. As a proof of concept for this sonication-facilitated protocol, we show immunostains of three tissue types (testes, ovaries, and neural tissues) at a range of developmental stages.
Drosophila embryos and larvae provide an excellent model to study developmental processes in many organs and tissues. Imaging of individual cells is often necessary in these studies in order to ascertain the complex environments in which cells develop. Visualization of cells in tissues can be accomplished through immunostaining. Well-described immunostaining protocols exist for embryonic Drosophila tissues <17 hr after egg laying (AEL)1-3. However, a protective cuticle forms toward the end of embryogenesis, preventing effective antibody permeation. Thus, these immunostaining protocols are inefficient in the analysis of tissues in late-stage embryos and in subsequent stages of larval development (1st instar (L1), 2nd instar (L2), and 3rd instar (L3)). This inefficiency imposes a barrier to our understanding of dynamic processes that occur during this extended developmental period 4. Tissue dissection is a widely employed technique to circumvent this barrier 5-7. However, dissection can prove inefficient. Extraction may be encumbered by difficulty in locating or isolating embryonic and larval tissues. Furthermore, the physical removal of target tissues may cause damage by rupturing them or by failing to extract them in their entirety.
Sonication is a method that employs sound waves to disturb intermolecular interactions. It has been used to disrupt the integrity of the Drosophila larval cuticle in order to immunostain developing neural cell types 6. This protocol has been adapted to immunostain late-stage embryonic and larval gonads, which can be as small as 50μm in diameter 8-10. Through such studies, the process of male germline stem cell (GSC) niche formation has been characterized in late stage Drosophila embryos8-10 and mechanisms regulating stem cell development and differentiation in late stage embryonic gonads and larvae have been elucidated 9-12. Thus, sonication provides an efficient alternative to tissue dissection that may be difficult because of tissue size. Furthermore, it enables immunostaining of Drosophila tissues in situ, leaving cells within the context of the entire organism and maintaining in situ morphology. Here, we describe a step-by-step protocol for fluorescence immunostaining of late-stage embryonic through early/mid-L3 tissues in situ. Analysis of Drosophila gonadal and neural tissue is shown in the Representative Results to demonstrate the efficacy of this protocol. Furthermore, this immunostaining protocol may be adapted to analyze other Drosophila tissues as well as tissues in other organisms with an outer cuticle.
1. Preparation of a Collection Cage
2. Fixation
3. Rehydration and Preparation of Sample for Immunostaining
4. Sonication of Sample
5. Immunostaining
6. Analysis
To demonstrate the efficacy of sonication-based immunostaining in analysis of late-stage embryonic and larval tissues in situ, wild-type embryos and larvae were processed for immunostaining of testes, ovaries, and neural tissue. Samples were imaged via confocal microscopy and representative results are shown (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Results reveal that the described protocol is effective for visualizing morphological features as well as individual cells in situ during l...
This protocol provides a method to successfully immunostain target Drosophila embryonic and larval tissues in situ, thus eliminating the need for dissection. As per prior protocols for staining early embryos1,2,3, the chorionic membrane is removed using 50% bleach (NaOCl). Samples are fixed in formaldehyde and methanol. Because the larval cuticle causes older sample to float, the entire sample is then passed through a cell-strainer to ensure larval retention. Sample is stored, if desired, in ...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We are grateful to Ruth Lehman and Dorthea Godt who kindly supplied Vasa and Traffic Jam antibodies. We would like to acknowledge the Bloomington Stock Center at Indiana University for maintaining the provided stocks and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa. We thank all members of the Wawersik lab for their advice and support. This work was funded by the Monroe Scholars Program Grant (to AF and LB) and NSF grant IOS0823151 (to MW).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Table 1: Reagents and Buffers | |||
Phosphate buffer Triton X-100 (PBTx) | For 5 L: 500 ml PBS 10X, 4.45 L ddH2O, 50 ml Triton 10%. Store at RT. | ||
Phosphate buffer saline 10X (PBS 10X) | For 1 L in dH2O: 80 g NaCl, 2 g KCl,14.4g Na2HPO4, 2.4 g KH2PO4. Add components and fill to appropriate volume. Store at 4 °C. | ||
Triton 10% | For 50 ml: 5 ml of Triton, 5 ml of PBS 10X, 45 ml of ddH2O. Rock to mix. Store at RT. | ||
PEMS | 0.1 M Pipes (pH 6.9), 2.0 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM EGTA. Store at RT. | ||
Pipes | For a 400 ml of a 0.25 M solution (pH 6.9): 30.24 g Pipes dH20 NaOH. Dissolve Pipes in 300 ml dH2O and then adjust to pH 6.9 with NaOH. Bring the total volume to 400 ml with dH2O and autoclave. Store at RT. | ||
Formaldehyde | 37% formaldehyde by weight in methanol. Store at RT. Store formaldehyde, heptane, and methanol waste mixture in a tightly sealed container in fume hood before disposal as per institutional guidelines. | ||
Heptane | CAS 142-82-5 | n-Heptane. Store at RT. Store formaldehyde, heptane, and methanol waste mixture in a tightly sealed container in fume hood before disposal as per institutional guidelines. | |
Methanol | CAS 67-56-1 | Store at RT. Store formaldehyde, heptane, and methanol waste mixture in a tightly sealed container in fume hood before disposal as per institutional guidelines. | |
Phosphate buffer Tween (PBTw) | To make 1 L: 100 ml PBS 10X, 890 ml ddH2O, 10 ml Tween 10%. Filter sterilize after adding all components. Store at 4 °C. | ||
Tween 10% | For 50 ml: 5 ml Tween, 5 ml of PBS 10X, 40 ml of ddH2O. Rock to mix. Store at RT. | ||
Bovine serum albumin/phosphate buffer Tween (BBTw) | To make 1 L: 100 ml PBS 10X, 890 ml ddH2O, 10 ml Tween 10%, 1 g Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). Add BSA then sterilize using a 0.2 μm vacuum filter unit. Store at 4 °C. | ||
Normal goat serum (NGS) | ackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories | 005-000-121 | To make 10 ml: Normal goat serum 10 ml ddH2O. Add ddH2O to vial of NGS and sterilize using a 0.2 μm syrninge filter. Store aliquots at -20 °C. |
1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) | CAS: 281-57-9 | To make 100 ml: 25 ml ddH2O, 1 ml Tris HCl (1M, pH 7.5), 2.5 g of DABCO solid, 3.5 ml 6N HCl, 250 μl 10N NaOH, 70 ml glycerol. In 250 ml beaker with stir bar, add ddH2O, Tris HCl and DABCO. Stir and then add 6N HCl, 10 N NaOH, and glycerol. Then add 10N NaOH dropwise until solution reaches pH 7.5. Aliquot. Store aliquots at -20 °C. | |
DABCO + p-phenylenediamine (PPD) solution | 1.765 ml NaHCO3, 0.353 Na2CO3, 0.02 g PPD (CAS: 106-50-3). Dissolve PPD in NaHCO3 and NaCO3 solution. Add 60 μl of PPD solution to 500 μl of DABCO. Store aliquots at -20 °C. | ||
Apple juice plates | To make ~200 plates: 45 g agar (CAS#9002-18-0), 45 g granulated sugar (store bought), 500 ml apple juice (store bought), 15 ml Tegosept 10%, 1.5 ml ddH2O. Add agar to ddH2O in 4 L flask then autoclave for 30 min. Mix apple juice and sugar on heated stir plate. Gradually add apple juice mixture to autoclaved agar. Mix on heated stir plate then aliquot 10 ml volumes into 35 mm petri dishes and let stand at RT to solidify. Store at 4 °C. | ||
Tegosept 10% | To make 100 ml: 10 g Tegosept, 100 ml ethanol. Store aliquots at -20 °C. | ||
Yeast paste | ~50 g dry active yeast. Gradually add ddH2O to beaker containing yeast while stirring until paste-like consistency reached. Store at 4 °C. | ||
Table 2: Staining Materials | |||
DAPI | Invitrogen | D3571 | 1:1000, stock at 5 mg/ml. |
Rabbit anti-Vasa | 1:250, a gift from Ruth Lehmann. | ||
Mouse anti-Fasciclin III | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) | 7G10 | 1:10 |
Mouse anti-1B1 | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) | 1B1 | 1:4 |
Guniea pig anti-Traffic Jam | 1:2500, a gift from Dorthea Godt (Li et al, 2003). | ||
Mouse anti-Prospero | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) | Prospero MR1A | 1:10 |
Rat anti-Elav | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) | 7EBA10 | 1:30 |
mouse anti-Repo | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) | 8D12 | 1:10 |
Goat anti-rabbit Alexa546 | Invitrogen | A11010 | 1:500 |
Goat anti-mouse Alexa488 | Invitrogen | A11029 | 1:500 |
Goat anti-guniea pig Alexa633 | Invitrogen | A21105 | 1:500 |
Goat anti-rat Alexa488 | Invitrogen | A11006 | 1:500 |
Table 3: Materials and Equipment | |||
Fly Cages | Hand-made; Genesee Scientific Corporation | Not applicable; Bottles: 32-130; Pre-made cage: 59-101 | Made by cutting clear cast acrylic tubing (1 3/4 inch in diameter) into 4 inch tall segments with a compound miter saw at 400 rpm. Ultrafine stainless steel screening (was attached to one end of the tub with acrylic compund glue. An alternate method using an empty fly food bottle can be found in Drosophila Protocols ISBN 0-87969-584-4. Cages may also be purchased from the Genesee Scientific Corporation. |
Sonicator: Branson 250 Digital Sonifier | Branson | Model: Branson Digital Sonifier 250 | |
Sonicator probe | Branson | Model #: 102C (CE) | EDP: 101-135-066; S/N: OBU06064658 |
Syringe filter | Nalgene | 190-25-20 | 0.2 μm cellulose, acetate membrane filter |
Imaging system: Spinning disc confocal microscope with multichromatic light source, digital CCD camera, and imaging software | Microscope: Olympus, Light source: Lumen Dynamics, Camera: Q-Imaging, Imaging Software: Intelligent Imaging Inc. | Microscope: BX51 equipped with DSU spinning disc, Light source: X-Cite 120Q, Camera: RETIGA-SRV, Imaging Software: Slidebook 5.0 | |
Vacuum filter unit | Nalgene | 450-0020 | 0.2 μm cellulose nitrate membrane filter |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved