A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Using three-dimensional organotypic cultures to visualize morphology and functional markers of salivary glands may provide novel insights into the mechanisms of tissue damage following radiation. Described here is a protocol to section, culture, irradiate, stain, and image 50–90 μm thick salivary gland sections prior to and following exposure to ionizing radiation.
Hyposalivation and xerostomia create chronic oral complications that decrease the quality of life in head and neck cancer patients who are treated with radiotherapy. Experimental approaches to understanding mechanisms of salivary gland dysfunction and restoration have focused on in vivo models, which are handicapped by an inability to systematically screen therapeutic candidates and efficiencies in transfection capability to manipulate specific genes. The purpose of this salivary gland organotypic culture protocol is to evaluate maximal time of culture viability and characterize cellular changes following ex vivo radiation treatment. We utilized immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy to determine when specific cell populations and markers are present during a 30-day culture period. In addition, cellular markers previously reported in in vivo radiation models are evaluated in cultures that are irradiated ex vivo. Moving forward, this method is an attractive platform for rapid ex vivo assessment of murine and human salivary gland tissue responses to therapeutic agents that improve salivary function.
Proper salivary gland function is essential to oral health and is altered following head and neck cancer treatment with radiotherapy1. In 2017, nearly 50,000 new cases of head and neck cancer were reported in the United States2. Due to the tissue-damaging and frequently irreversible effects of radiation therapy on surrounding normal tissues such as salivary glands, patients are often left with severe side effects and diminished quality of life2,3,4. Common complications caused by radiation damage manifests in symptoms such as xerostomia (the subjective feeling of dry mouth), dental caries, impaired ability to chew and swallow, speech impairments, and compromised oral microbiomes2,3,4. These symptoms collectively can lead to malnutrition and impaired survival in affected individuals5. While salivary gland dysfunction in this population has been well-documented, the underlying mechanisms of damage to acinar cells have been disputed, and there is little integration among different animal models6,7.
The current methods of studying salivary gland function and radiation-induced damage include the use of in vivo models, immortalized cell lines, two-dimensional (2-D) primary cell cultures, and three-dimensional (3-D) salisphere cultures8,9,10,11,12. Traditionally, cell culture models from immortalized cell lines and 2-D cultures involve single layered cells cultured on flat surfaces and are valuable for fast, easy, and cost-effective experimentation. However, artificial cell culture conditions can alter the differentiation status and physiological responses of cells exposed to various conditions, and the results often fail to translate to whole organism models14,15. In addition, immortalized cell cultures require modulation of p53 activity, which is critical for the salivary gland response to DNA damage16,17.
3-D salisphere cultures are enriched for stem and progenitor cells at early time points in culture and have been useful for understanding the radiosensitivity of this subset of salivary gland cells9,18. A critical limitation of all these culture models is they are ineffective in visualizing the 3-D structure of the salivary gland, including the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell-cell interactions over various layers, which are crucial in modulating salivary secretion15. The need for a method that encompasses the behavior of the tissue as a whole but can also be manipulated under laboratory conditions to study the effects of treatment is necessary to further discover the underlying mechanisms of radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction.
Live tissue sectioning and culture has been documented previously19,20 and is often used to study brain-tissue interactions21. In previous studies, parotid (PAR) salivary gland tissue from mice was sectioned at approximately 50 µm and cultured for up to 48 h, and analysis of viability, cell death, and function was performed thereafter19. Su et al. (2016) expanded on this methodology by culturing human submandibular glands (SMGs) sectioned at 35 µm or 50 µm for 14 days20. The proposed method is an advancement in that it includes both parotid and submandibular salivary glands sectioned at 50 µm and 90 µm and evaluation of the cultures for 30 days. The ability to cut a range of tissue thickness is important in evaluating cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions that are relevant for cellular processes including apical-basolateral polarity and innervation for secretion. Furthermore, the salivary gland slices were irradiated while in culture to determine the feasibility of this culture model to study radiation-induced salivary gland damage.
The purpose of this salivary gland organotypic culture protocol is to evaluate maximal time of culture viability and characterize cellular changes following ex vivo radiation treatment. To determine the maximum time sections that are viable post-dissection, trypan blue staining, live cell staining, and immunohistochemical staining for cell death were performed. Confocal microscopy and immunofluorescent staining were utilized to evaluate specific cell populations, morphological structures, and levels of proliferation. Tissue section cultures were also exposed to ionizing radiation to determine the effects of radiation on various markers in this 3-D model. Induction of cell death, cytoskeletal disruption, loss of differentiation markers, and compensatory proliferation in irradiated ex vivo cultures were compared to previous studies of in vivo models. This methodology provides a means to investigate the role of cell-cell interactions following radiation damage and provides an experimental model to efficiently evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions (gene manipulations or pharmacological agents) that may be less suitable for in vivo models.
1. Preparation of vibratome
2. Preparation of tissue sample in agarose block and sectioning using the vibratome
3. Culturing sections
4. Irradiation of salivary gland sections
5. Viability staining
6. Antibody staining vibratome sections
NOTE: The following provides a general antibody staining protocol specific for Ki-67; however, this protocol can be used with any antibody. All washes are conducted at RT unless otherwise noted.
7. Imaging vibratome sections
Primary 2-D cultures are grown in fetal bovine serum (FBS) supplemented media while primary 3-D salisphere culture are typically cultured in serum-free conditions10,11. In addition, the two previous studies utilizing vibratome cultures from salivary glands cultured their sections in 0% or 10% FBS supplemented media19,20. Mouse submandibular slices were sectioned at a thick...
Salivary gland research has utilized a number of culture models, including immortalized 2-D cultures, primary 2-D cultures, 3-D salisphere cultures, and 3-D organ cultures from embryonic explants to ascertain questions on underlying biology and physiology. These culture models have yielded insightful information across a diverse array of research questions and will continue to be important tools in salivary research. The limitations of these culture models include modulation of p53 activity during immortalization, transi...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported in part by pilot funding provided by University of Arizona Office of Research and Discovery and National Institutes of Health (R01 DE023534) to Kirsten Limesand. The Cancer Biology Training Grant, T32CA009213, provided stipend support for Wen Yu Wong. The authors would like to thank M. Rice for his valuable technical contribution.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Vibratome VT1000S | Leica Biosystems | N/A | Vibratome for sectioning |
Double Edge Stainless Steel Razor Blades | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 72000 | |
Agarose | Fisher Scientific | BP165-25 | Low-melt |
Parafilm | Sigma-Aldrich | P6543 | |
Penicillin-Streptomycin-Amphotericin B | Lonza | 17-745H | PSA |
24-well plate | CellTreat | 229124 | |
Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) | Gibco | 14190-144 | |
Loctite UltraGel Control Superglue | Loctite | N/A | Purchased at hardware store |
Natural Red Sable Round Paintbrush | Princeton Art & Brush Co | 7400R-2 | |
Gentamicin Sulfate | Fisher Scientific | ICN1676045 | |
Transferrin | Sigma-Aldrich | T-8158-100mg | |
L-glutatmine | Gibco | 25030-081 | |
Trace Elements | MP Biomedicals | ICN1676549 | |
Insulin | Fisher Scientific | 12585014 | |
Epidermal Growth Factor | Corning | 354001 | |
Hydrocortisone | Sigma-Aldrich | H0888 | |
Retinoic acid | Fisher Scientific | R2625-50MG | |
Fetal Bovine Serum | Gibco | A3160602 | |
DMEM/F12 Media | Corning | 150-90-CV | |
Millicell Cell Culture Insert | Millipore Sigma | PICM01250 | 12 mm, 0.4 um pore size for 24 well plate |
0.4% Trypan Blue | Sigma-Aldrich | T8154 | |
LIVE/DEAD Cell Imaging Kit (488/570) | Thermo-Fisher | R37601 | Only used LIVE dye component |
Anti-Ki-67 Antibody | Cell Signaling Technology | 9129S | |
Anti-E-cadherin Antibody | Cell Signaling Technology | 3195S | |
Anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 Antibody | Cell Signaling Technology | 9661L | |
Anti-SMA Antibody | Sigma-Aldrich | C6198 | |
Anti-amylase Antibody | Sigma-Aldrich | A8273 | |
Anti-CD31 Antibody | Abcam | ab28364 | |
Anti-TUBB3 Antibody | Cell Signaling Technology | 5568S | |
Alexa Fluor 594 Antibody Labeling Kit | Thermo-Fisher | A20185 | |
Alexa Fluor 594 Phalloidin | Thermo-Fisher | A12381 | |
Bovine Serum Albumin | Fisher Scientific | BP1600 | |
Triton X-100 | Sigma-Aldrich | 21568-2500 | |
Paraformaldehyde Prills | Fisher Scientific | 5027632 | |
New England Nuclear Blocking Agent | Perkin Elmer | 2346249 | No longer sold |
DAPI | Cell Signaling Technology | 4083S | |
Prolong Gold Antifade Mounting Media | Invitrogen | P36934 | |
Leica SPSII Spectral Confocal | Leica Biosystems | N/A | For confocal imaging |
Leica DMIL Inverted Phase Contrast Microscope | Leica Biosystems | N/A | |
Cobalt-60 Teletherapy Instrument | Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd Theratron-80 | N/A | |
Amac Box, Clear | The Container Store | 60140 | Agarose block mold |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved