JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We describe a model of heterotopic abdominal heart transplantation in rats, implying modifications of current strategies, which lead to a simplified surgical approach. Additionally, we describe a novel rejection model by in-ear injection of vital cardiac muscle cells, allowing further transplant immunological analyses in rats.

Abstract

Heterotopic heart transplantation in rats has been a commonly used model for diverse immunological studies for more than 50 years. Several modifications have been reported since the first description in 1964. After 30 years of performing heterotopic heart transplantation in rats, we have developed a simplified surgical approach, which can be easily taught and performed without further surgical training or background.

After dissection of the ascending aorta and the pulmonary artery and ligation of superior and inferior caval and pulmonary veins, the donor heart is harvested and subsequently perfused with ice-cold saline solution supplemented with heparin. After clamping and incising the recipient abdominal vessels, the donor ascending aorta and pulmonary artery are anastomosed to the recipient abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava, respectively, using continuous running sutures.

Depending on different donor-recipient combinations, this model allows analyses of either acute or chronic rejection of allografts. The immunological significance of this model is further enhanced by a novel approach of in-ear injection of vital cardiac muscle cells and subsequent analysis of draining cervical lymphatic tissue.

Introduction

Heterotopic heart transplantation is a frequently used experimental model for different investigations regarding transplantation tolerance, acute and chronic allograft rejection, ischemia-reperfusion injury, machine perfusion or cardiac remodelling. Among other advantages, the graft function can be monitored noninvasively by palpation and graft failure does not lead to a vital impairment of the recipient in contrast to other organs, such as kidneys or livers.

In 1964, Abbott et al. initially described heterotopic abdominal heart transplantation in rats1. Later, in 1966, the end-to-side technique for anastomoses was described by Tomita et al.2. The groundwork for the currently used model was reported by Ono and Lindsey in 19693. During the last decades, several modifications have been published to create different types of unloaded, partially loaded or loaded left ventricular heart grafts including combined heterotopic heart-lung transplantation4,5,6. For immunological analyses a non-volume loaded heart graft transplantation is most commonly performed. In this case, the blood flow retrogradely enters the donor ascending aorta and subsequently the coronary arteries. The venous drainage occurs along the coronary sinus into the right atrium and ventricle (Figure 1A-B). Therefore, the left ventricle is excluded from blood flow, apart from marginal amounts of blood from Thebesian veins. This also makes it a useful model for studying the pathophysiological mechanisms during left ventricular assist device therapy7.

Heterotopic heart transplantation has been performed in various species including mice, rabbits, pigs and has even been used as a uni- or biventricular assist device in humans8,9,10,11. The rat still represents a popular experimental animal for transplant models, especially since the graft survival times for different rat strain combinations have been well-defined in the past and a large number of immunological reagents are accessible12,13. Unlike mice, rats are larger making surgery and access to lymphatic tissue for immunological analyses more feasible12. Furthermore, the introduction of commercial cloning technologies in rats in recent years will most likely lead to a recurring interest in experimental rat models14.

In general, heterotopic heart grafts can be attached to the recipient vessels either by performing cervical or abdominal anastomosis. However, a few studies suggest that a femoral anastomosis facilitates improved monitoring due to better access for manual palpation or transfemoral echocardiography and thus allows a more precise detection of graft failure15,16.

It has been shown that there is no difference regarding operation time, complication rate, outcome and graft survival time between both anastomosis techniques17. Clearly, the availability of a sufficient number of draining lymph nodes must be mentioned as a benefit of cervical anastomosis; however, longer training periods are required. In contrast, the abdominal anastomosis is less complicated and equally valuable for immunological investigations, especially when combined with results from a novel method of in-ear injection of allogenic cardiac muscle cells and subsequent cervical lymphadenectomy. A combination of both models offers a broad spectrum of post-interventional immunological analyses.

The following protocol refers to operating in pairs of surgeons in order to reduce ischemia time. However, all experiments can be performed by a single person. The setup of instruments and materials for heart explantation and implantation is displayed in Figure 2A-B.

Protocol

All animal experiences have been performed according to the guidelines of the local Ethics Animal Review Board of the regional authorities for consumer protection and food safety of Lower Saxony (LAVES, Oldenburg, Germany) with the approval IDs 12/0768 and 17/2472.

1. Heart explantation and perfusion

NOTE: As graft donors, female or male rats at an age of 7-22 weeks were used.

  1. Anesthetize the donor rat by isoflurane inhalation (induction at 5% and maintenance at 3% with an O2 flow of 1 L/min). Inject 5 mg of Carprofen subcutaneously per kg of bodyweight for perioperative analgesia and check for the absence of the toe pinch withdrawal reflex.
  2. Apply eye lubricant and remove the abdominal and thoracic fur using a mechanical clipper.
  3. Place the donor in a supine position, fix the limbs at the base of the operation table with elastic bands and sterilize the skin with 70% ethanol or another sufficient alternative.
  4. Incise the skin in longitudinal direction and after application of local anesthetic (e.g., lidocaine 0.2%) perform a median laparotomy by using scissors.
  5. Insert retractors, mobilize the intestine to the left of the donor, and expose the inferior vena cava with sterilized cotton swabs.
  6. For anticoagulation, inject 500 I.U. of heparin dissolved in 1 mL of ice-cold isotonic saline solution intravenously by puncturing the inferior vena cava. Stop the bleeding at the puncture site by light compression with a cotton swab after retraction of the needle (Figure 3A).
  7. Incise the diaphragm and perform lateral thoracotomy to both sides of the donor.
  8. Pin the mobilized ventral wall of the thorax onto the operation table.
  9. Remove the pericardium and the vagal nerve by blunt preparation using two micro-needle holders.
  10. Perform transection of abdominal vessels in order to exsanguinate the donor and unload the heart.
  11. Insert the blunt branch of a probe pointed scissors into the transvers pericardial sinus and separate the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery as distal as possible under light caudal traction of the heart with a wetted compress (Figure 3B).
  12. Place a single 5-0 ligature around the superior and inferior vena cava and the pulmonary veins and tighten it as dorsal as possible (Figure 3C).
  13. Sever the tissue dorsal to the ligature and extract the heart (Figure 3D).
  14. Perfuse the explanted heart with an 18 G cannula from an intravenous catheter through the ascending aorta and the pulmonary artery with 30 mL of ice-cold, isotone saline solution supplemented with 1000 I.U. of heparin and place the heart in a 15 mL tube filled with saline solution on ice (Figure 3E-F).

2. Heart implantation

NOTE: As recipients, 10-14 weeks old female or male rats were used. Donors and recipients were approximately weight matched.

  1. Perform anesthesia of the recipient rat by also using isoflurane inhalation (induction at 5% and maintenance at 1.5-2% with an O2 flow of 1 L/min). Inject 5 mg of Carprofen subcutaneously per kg of bodyweight for perioperative analgesia and check for the absence of the toe pinch withdrawal reflex.
  2. Apply eye lubricant, remove the abdominal fur, fix the limbs and sterilize the skin analogously to the donor preparation. For optimal postoperative outcome, perform the operation on a heating mat to prevent intraoperative hypothermia.
  3. After longitudinal incision of the skin, apply a local anesthetic, such as lidocaine (0.2%), on the abdominal fascia. Open the abdominal cavity by median laparotomy and insert retractors.
  4. Mobilize the intestine to the upper left side of the recipient and place it in a warm, wetted compress.
  5. After mobilizing the duodenum and proximal jejunum, respectively, using the surgical microscope (or magnifying spectacles) with a 5-7x magnification, expose the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava by blunt preparation with cotton swabs. Do not separate the abdominal vessels.
  6. Elevate the abdominal vessels using two micro needle holders without injuring the lumbar veins and position the Cooley vascular clamp (Figure 4A).
  7. Puncture the abdominal vessels with a 30-45° arched 27 G cannula (Figure 4B).
  8. Enlarge the puncture site using Potts scissors to create a longitudinal incision that matches the size of the lumen of the donor vessels (Figure 4C-D) and perfuse the recipient vessels with saline solution in order to remove clots and prevent postoperative thrombosis.
  9. Place the graft into the situs and fixate the donor ascending aorta to the recipient abdominal aorta by two simple interrupted stitches (8-0 monofilament non-resorbable suture) at the cranial and caudal corner of the longitudinal incision (Figure 4E).
  10. Anastomose the ascending aorta of the donor with the abdominal aorta of the recipient by a running 8-0 monofilament suture in two steps: first, place the graft to the right of the recipient vessels and perform the first half of the anastomosis (Figure 4E). Subsequently, place the graft to the left of the recipient vessels and perform the second half of the anastomosis (Figure 4F).
  11. Fixate the donor pulmonary artery to the inferior vena cava analogously to the aortal anastomosis (8-0 monofilament non-resorbable suture). Suture the first half of the venous anastomosis from the intraluminal side of the vessel (Figure 4G-H).
  12. Flush the anastomoses with saline directly before tightening the knots to prevent peripheral embolism.
  13. Place a hemostatic gauze around both anastomoses and carefully release the Cooley vascular clamp so that the reperfusion of the graft can begin. Handle bleeding along the anastomoses by light compression with sterilized cotton swabs.
    NOTE: The graft should start beating after around 60 s.
  14. Replace the intestine in a meander like fashion. Make sure that there are no malrotations of the mesenteric radix to prevent intestinal necrosis or mechanical obstruction.
  15. Close the abdominal muscles/fascia and skin separately using continuous 3-0 polyfilament running sutures.

3. Postoperative care

  1. For postoperative analgesia, supply the recipients with an additional subcutaneous injection of 5 mg of Carprofen per kg of bodyweight on the first postoperative day (POD). Additionally, add 1 g of Metamizol to 500 mL of drinking water until the third POD.
  2. Start monitoring the heart graft function by daily abdominal palpation on the third POD.
    NOTE: In case of graft failure before the third POD, a surgical rather than an immunological failure should be considered. However, this of course depends on the chosen strain combination and the respective immunological model (e.g., hyperacute rejection after prior immunization).
  3. Following graft rejection, extract tissues like the draining retroperitoneal lymph nodes cranial of the anastomoses, the spleen, the blood, the thymus and the graft for further immunological analyses via flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry.

4. Enzymatic digestion of the heart and subcutaneous injection of heart cells in the ear

  1. Perform heart explantation and perfusion analogously to heterotopic heart transplantation (see step 1).
  2. Shred the heart in 3 mm x 3 mm blocks using a sterile scalpel or sterile scissors and incubate it for 30 min at 37 °C in culture medium containing 0.5 mg/mL collagenase.
    NOTE: It is important to use culture medium containing penicillin, streptomycin and glutamine without fetal calf serum (FCS) particularly as FCS inhibits collagenase digestion.
  3. Add the digested tissue to a large-pored sieve, while removing the culture medium and mince thoroughly to get a suspension of vital cardiac muscle cells, mostly dead single heart cells and remaining blood cells. Wash the cell suspension twice with sterile isotonic saline solution.
    NOTE: Centrifugation settings: 10 min, 200 x g, 20 °C
  4. Filter the suspension using a 40 µm cell strainer and collect the vital cell congeries by flushing the cell strainer with 5-10 mL of isotonic saline solution.
  5. After centrifugation, resuspend the cardiac muscle cells in saline solution dissolved at a concentration of 5x105 cells/mL and draw the cell solution up into a 1 mL syringe.
  6. Perform anesthesia analogously to the protocol described for the recipient narcosis (see step 2) for heterotopic heart transplantation.
  7. Place the recipient in a lateral position and fix the ear with a finger using double sided tape (Figure 5A).
  8. Inject 20 µL of the cardiac muscle cell solution (containing 1 x 104 cells) via a 27 G cannula s.c. close to the visual capillary vessels into the recipient's ear (Figure 5B).
  9. After a defined observation period (depending on the chosen strain combination and strength of rejection), extract the draining cervical lymph nodes and perform further analyses such as flow cytometry or co-cultures (Figure 5C).
    NOTE: Furthermore, histological analysis of the pinna can be performed to determine cell infiltration.

Results

In the past, different immunological issues have been addressed on the basis of the model, which was validated in the work group by more than 500 transplants with a survival rate of more than 95%13,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Tota...

Discussion

The previously described method of heterotopic cardiac transplantation in rats is mainly based on the description of Ono and Lindsey in 19693. Since then, several modifications have been introduced in various species leading to a wide diversity of this model. Combining several of these modifications and introducing our own experience resulting from over 30 years of performing heterotopic heart transplants in the laboratory, we created a feasible surgical approach, which does not require long train...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Britta Trautewig, Corinna Löbbert and Ingrid Meder for their commitment.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Anesthesia device (including isoflurane vaporizer)Summit Anesthesia SolutionsNo Catalog Number available
Cannula (27 G)BD Microlance302200
CarprofenPfizerRimadyl 50 mg/mL
Cellstar Tubes (15 mL)GreinerBioOne188271
Cell strainer (40 µm)BD Falcon2271680
Collagenase Type CLSIIBiochromeC2-22
Compresses 5x5 cmFuhrmann31501
Compresses 7.5x7.5 cmFuhrmann31505
Cotton swabsHeinz Herenz Medizinalbedarf1032128
Dexpathenol (5 %)Bayer"Bepanthen"
DPBS BioWhittakerLonza17-512F
ForcepsB. BraunAesculap BD557R
ForcepsB. BraunAesculap BD313R
ForcepsB. BraunAesculap BD35
Heating matGaymar Industries"T/Pump"
Hemostatic gauzeEthiconTabotamp
Heparin-Natrium 25 000 I.E.RatiopharmNo Catalog Number available
Isofluran CPCP-PharmaNo Catalog Number available
Large-pored sieve (stainless steel)Forschungswerkstätten Hannover Medical SchoolNo Catalog Number available
LidocaineAstra Zeneca2 % Xylocain
Metamizol-NatriumRatiopharmaNovaminsulfon 500 mg/mL
Micro forcepsB. BraunAesculap BD3361
Micro needle holderCodman, Johnson & Johnson MedicalCodmann 80-2003
Micro needle holderB. BraunAesculap BD336R
Micro needle holderB. BraunAesculap FD241R
Micro scissorsB. BraunAesculap FD101R
Micro scissorsB. BraunAesculap FM471R
Needle holderB. BraunAesculap BM221R
Penicillin/Streptomycin/Glutamine (100x)PAAP11-010
Peripheral venous catheter (18 G)B. Braun4268334B
Peripheral venous catheter (22 G)B. Braun4268091B
Probe pointed scissorsB. BraunAesculap BC030R
RetractorsForschungswerkstätten Hannover Medical SchoolNo Catalog Number available
RPMI culture mediumLonzaBE12-702F
Saline solution (NaCl 0.9 %)BaxterNo Catalog Number available
ScissorsB. BraunAesculap BC414
Surgical microscopeCarl-ZeissOPMI-MDM
Sutures (anastomoses)CatgutMariderm 8-0 monofil
Sutures (ligature)ResorbaSilk 5-0 polyfil
Sutures (skin, fascia)EthiconMersilene 3-0
Syringe (1 mL)B. Braun9166017V
Syringe (10 mL)B. Braun4606108V
Syringe (20 mL)B. Braun4606205V
Vascular clampB. BraunAesculap FB708R

References

  1. Abbott, C. P., et al. A Technique for Heart Transplantation In the Rat. Archives of Surgery. 89 (4), 645-652 (1964).
  2. Tomita, F. Heart homotransplantation in the rat. Sapporo igaku zasshi. The Sapporo Medical Journal. 30 (4), 165-183 (1966).
  3. Ono, K., Lindsey, E. S. Improved technique of heart transplantation in rats. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 57 (2), 225-229 (1969).
  4. Wen, P., et al. A simple technique for a new working heterotopic heart transplantation model in rats. Transplantation Proceedings. 45 (6), 2522-2526 (2013).
  5. Benke, K., et al. Heterotopic abdominal rat heart transplantation as a model to investigate volume dependency of myocardial remodeling. Transplantation. 101 (3), 498-505 (2017).
  6. Kearns, M. J., et al. Rat Heterotopic Abdominal Heart/Single-lung Transplantation in a Volume-loaded Configuration. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (99), 52418 (2015).
  7. Ibrahim, M., et al. Heterotopic abdominal heart transplantation in rats for functional studies of ventricular unloading. The Journal of Surgical Research. 179 (1), e31-e39 (2013).
  8. Liu, F., Kang, S. M. Heterotopic heart transplantation in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (6), 238 (2007).
  9. Lu, W., et al. A new simplified volume-loaded heterotopic rabbit heart transplant model with improved techniques and a standard operating procedure. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 7 (4), 653-661 (2015).
  10. Kitahara, H., et al. Heterotopic transplantation of a decellularized and recellularized whole porcine heart. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 22 (5), 571-579 (2016).
  11. Kadner, A., et al. Heterotopic heart transplantation: experimental development and clinical experience. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 17 (4), 474-481 (2000).
  12. Zinöcker, S., et al. Immune reconstitution and graft-versus-host reactions in rat models of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Frontiers in Immunology. 3 (NOV), 1-12 (2012).
  13. Klempnauer, J., et al. Genetic control of rat heart allograft rejection: effect of different MHC and non-MHC incompatibilities. Immunogenetics. 30, 81-88 (1989).
  14. Huang, G., et al. Genetic manipulations in the rat: Progress and prospects. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension. 20 (4), 391-399 (2011).
  15. Gordon, C. R., et al. Pulse doppler and M-mode to assess viability of cardiac allografts using heterotopic femoral heart transplantation in rats. Microsurgery. 27 (4), 240-244 (2007).
  16. Gordon, C. R., et al. A new modified technique for heterotopic femoral heart transplantation in rats. The Journal of Surgical Research. 139 (2), 157-163 (2007).
  17. Ma, Y., Wang, G. Comparison of 2 heterotopic heart transplant techniques in rats: cervical and abdominal heart. Experimental and Clinical Transplantation. 9 (2), 128-133 (2011).
  18. Bektas, H., et al. Differential effect of donor-specific blood transfusions after kidney, heart, pancreas, and skin transplantation in major histocompatibility complex-incompatible rats. Transfusion. 37 (2), 226-230 (1997).
  19. Saiho, K. O., et al. Long-term allograft acceptance induced by single dose anti-leukocyte common antigen (RT7) antibody in the rat. Transplantation. 71 (8), 1124-1131 (2001).
  20. Bektas, H., et al. Blood transfers infectious immunologic tolerance in MHC-incompatible heart transplantation in rats. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 24 (5), 614-617 (2005).
  21. Jäger, M. D., et al. Sirolimus promotes tolerance for donor and recipient antigens after MHC class II disparate bone marrow transplantation in rats. Experimental Hematology. 35 (1), 164-170 (2007).
  22. Timrott, K., et al. Application of allogeneic bone marrow cells in view of residual alloreactivity: Sirolimus but not cyclosporine evolves tolerogenic properties. PLoS ONE. 10 (4), 1-16 (2015).
  23. Hadamitzky, M., et al. Memory-updating abrogates extinction of learned immunosuppression. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 52, 40-48 (2016).
  24. Beetz, O., et al. Recipient natural killer cells alter the course of rejection of allogeneic heart grafts in rats. Plos One. 14 (8), e0220546 (2019).
  25. Hirschburger, M., et al. Nicotine Attenuates Macrophage Infiltration in Rat Lung Allografts. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 28 (5), 493-500 (2009).
  26. Ruzza, A., et al. Heterotopic heart transplantation in rats: improved anesthetic and surgical technique. Transplantation Proceedings. 42 (9), 3828-3832 (2010).
  27. Wang, D., et al. A simplified technique for heart transplantation in rats: abdominal vessel branch-sparing and modified venotomy. Microsurgery. 26 (6), 470-472 (2006).
  28. Wang, C., et al. A modified method for heterotopic mouse heart transplantion. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (88), (2014).
  29. Al-Amran, F. G., Shahkolahi, M. M. Total arterial anastomosis heterotopic heart transplantation model. Transplantation Proceedings. 45 (2), 625-629 (2013).
  30. Hoerstrup, S. P., et al. Modified technique for heterotopic rat heart transplantation under cardioplegic arrest. Journal of Investigative Surgery. 13 (2), 73-77 (2000).
  31. Fry, D. L. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circulation Research. 22 (2), 165-197 (1968).
  32. Ahmadi, A. R., et al. Orthotopic Rat Kidney Transplantation: A Novel and Simplified Surgical Approach. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (147), (2019).
  33. Schmid, C., et al. Successful heterotopic heart transplantation in rat. Microsurgery. 15 (4), 279-281 (1994).
  34. Shan, J., et al. A modified technique for heterotopic heart transplantation in rats. Journal of Surgical Research. 164 (1), 155-161 (2010).
  35. Moris, D., et al. Mechanisms of liver-induced tolerance. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. 22 (1), 71-78 (2017).
  36. Bickerstaff, A. A., et al. Murine renal allografts: spontaneous acceptance is associated with regulated T cell-mediated immunity. Journal of Immunology. 167 (9), 4821-4827 (2001).
  37. Mottram, P. L., et al. Electrocardiographic monitoring of cardiac transplants in mice. Cardiovascular Research. 22 (5), 315-321 (1988).
  38. Torre-Amione, G., et al. Decreased expression of tumor necrosis factor-α in failing human myocardium after mechanical circulatory support: A potential mechanism for cardiac recovery. Circulation. 100 (11), 1189-1193 (1999).
  39. Goldstein, D. J., et al. Circulatory resuscitation with left ventricular assist device support reduces interleukins 6 and 8 levels. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 63 (4), 971-974 (1997).
  40. Tang-Quan, K. R., et al. Non-volume-loaded heart provides a more relevant heterotopic transplantation model. Transplant Immunology. 23 (1-2), 65-70 (2010).
  41. Lakhal-Naouar, I., et al. Transcutaneous immunization using SLA or rLACK skews the immune response towards a Th1 profile but fails to protect BALB/c mice against a Leishmania major challenge. Vaccine. 37 (3), 516-523 (2019).
  42. Sousa-Batista, A. J., et al. Novel and safe single-dose treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with implantable amphotericin B-loaded microparticles. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance. , (2019).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Immunological ModelHeterotopic Heart TransplantationCardiac Muscle Cell TransplantationRat ModelsSurgical ExpertiseTransplant ProcedureTolerance MechanismsRejection MechanismsDonor Heart ExplantationMedian LaparotomyIntravenous InjectionHeparinLateral ThoracotomyExsanguinationVascular LigaturePerfusion Technique

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved