JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Neuroscience

A Rapid Food-Preference Assay in Drosophila

Published: February 11th, 2021

DOI:

10.3791/62051

1Monell Chemical Senses Center, 2Department of Physiology, The Diabetes Research Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

We present a protocol for a two-choice feeding assay for flies. This feeding assay is fast and easy to run and is suitable not only for small-scale laboratory research, but also for high-throughput behavioral screens in flies.

To select food with nutritional value while avoiding the consumption of harmful agents, animals need a sophisticated and robust taste system to evaluate their food environment. The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, is a genetically tractable model organism that is widely used to decipher the molecular, cellular, and neural underpinnings of food preference. To analyze fly food preference, a robust feeding method is needed. Described here is a two-choice feeding assay, which is rigorous, cost-saving, and fast. The assay is Petri-dish-based and involves the addition of two different foods supplemented with blue or red dye to the two halves of the dish. Then, ~70 prestarved, 2-4-day-old flies are placed in the dish and allowed to choose between blue and red foods in the dark for about 90 min. Examination of the abdomen of each fly is followed by the calculation of the preference index. In contrast to multiwell plates, each Petri dish takes only ~20 s to fill and saves time and effort. This feeding assay can be employed to quickly determine whether flies like or dislike a particular food.

Despite dramatic differences in the anatomical structure of taste organs between flies and mammals, the flies' behavioral responses to many tastant substances are strikingly similar to those of mammals. For example, flies prefer sugar1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, amino acids9,10, and low salt11, which indicate nutrients, but reject....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

1. Assembling the assay chambers

NOTE: While this protocol describes the use of a 35 mm Petri dish (Figure 1A), the desired effect can be achieved using any watertight, smooth-bottomed vessel that can be bisected and covered.

  1. First, bisect a lidded 35 mm Petri dish by fixing a length of plastic (5 mm in width and 3 mm in height) down the midline with waterproof adhesive, forming two watertight compartments. Confirm that the seal is complete to avoid le.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

In this assay, a 35 mm dish was divided into two equal feeding compartments, with each half of the dish containing agarose food coupled with either blue or red dye (Figure 1A). To exclude dye bias, the blue and red dye concentrations were carefully refined to yield an approximate "0" PI when only these two dyes were added (Figure 1B). Once the Petri dish was loaded with tested food, ~70 wet-starved, 2-4-day-old adult flies were transferred to the dish, a.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

This method involves several crucial steps where problems can occur. First, make sure flies ingest a sufficient amount of food to provide stable data. If flies eat poorly, ensure that the flies have been wet-starved for at least 24 h, and that the experimental media contains at least a minimal sucrose concentration (2 mM). To further stimulate food consumption, prolong the wet-starvation period beyond 24 h, depending on the flies' physiological condition. If too many flies fail to survive the prolonged starvation, en.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

The authors would like to thank Dr. Tingwei Mi for helping them optimize the two-choice feeding assay. They would also like to thank Samuel Chan and Wyatt Koolmees for their comments on the manuscript. This project was funded by the National Institutes of Health grants R03 DC014787 (Y.V.Z.) and R01 DC018592 (Y.V.Z.) and by the Ambrose Monell Foundation.

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
35 mm Petri dish Fisher Scientific 08-772E
Agarose Thomas Scientific C756P56
Clear adhesive Fisher Scientific NC9884114
Conical centrifuge tubes Fisher Scientific 05-527-90
Dissection microscope Amscope SM-2T-6WB-V331
FCF Brilliant Blue Wako Chemical 3844-45-9
Fly CO2 anesthesia setup Genesee Scientfic 59-114/54-104M
Fly incubator with programmable day/night cycle Powers Scientific Inc. IS33SD
Fly lines
Glass dish (microwave-safe)
Kimwipes Fisher Scientific 06-666A
Media storage bottle Fisher Scientific 50-192-9998
Plastic divider cut to fit the dish from a sheet no thicker than 5 mm
Plastic fly vials Genesee Scientific 32-116
Sucrose Millipore Sigma S9378
Sulforhodamine B Millipore Sigma S9012
Tastant compound of interest
Vortex mixer Benchmark Scientific BV1000
Water bath Fisher Scientific FSGPD05

  1. Jiao, Y., Moon, S. J., Montell, C. A Drosophila gustatory receptor required for the responses to sucrose, glucose, and maltose identified by mRNA tagging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (35), 14110-14115 (2007).
  2. Dahanukar, A., Foster, K., van der Goes van Naters, W. M., Carlson, J. R. A Gr receptor is required for response to the sugar trehalose in taste neurons of Drosophila. Nature Neuroscience. 4 (12), 1182-1186 (2001).
  3. Ueno, K., et al. Trehalose sensitivity in Drosophila correlates with mutations in and expression of the gustatory receptor gene Gr5a. Current Biology. 11 (18), 1451-1455 (2001).
  4. Fujii, S., et al. Drosophila sugar receptors in sweet taste perception, olfaction, and internal nutrient sensing. Current Biology. 25 (5), 621-627 (2015).
  5. Wang, Z., Singhvi, A., Kong, P., Scott, K. Taste representations in the Drosophila brain. Cell. 117 (7), 981-991 (2004).
  6. Thorne, N., Chromey, C., Bray, S., Amrein, H. Taste perception and coding in Drosophila. Current Biology. 14 (12), 1065-1079 (2004).
  7. Slone, J., Daniels, J., Amrein, H. Sugar receptors in Drosophila. Current Biology. 17 (20), 1809-1816 (2007).
  8. Dus, M., et al. Nutrient sensor in the brain directs the action of the brain-gut axis in Drosophila. Neuron. 87 (1), 139-151 (2015).
  9. Toshima, N., Tanimura, T. Taste preference for amino acids is dependent on internal nutritional state in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology. 215 (16), 2827-2832 (2012).
  10. Melcher, C., Bader, R., Pankratz, M. J. Amino acids, taste circuits, and feeding behavior in Drosophila: towards understanding the psychology of feeding in flies and man. Journal of Endocrinology. 192 (3), 467-472 (2007).
  11. Zhang, Y. V., Ni, J., Montell, C. The molecular basis for attractive salt-taste coding in Drosophila. Science. 340 (6138), 1334-1338 (2013).
  12. Weiss, L. A., Dahanukar, A., Kwon, J. Y., Banerjee, D., Carlson, J. R. The molecular and cellular basis of bitter taste in Drosophila. Neuron. 69 (2), 258-272 (2011).
  13. Moon, S. J., Kottgen, M., Jiao, Y., Xu, H., Montell, C. A taste receptor required for the caffeine response in vivo. Current Biology. 16 (18), 1812-1817 (2006).
  14. Dweck, H. K. M., Carlson, J. R. Molecular logic and evolution of bitter taste in Drosophila. Current Biology. 30 (1), 17-30 (2020).
  15. Lee, Y., et al. Gustatory receptors required for avoiding the insecticide L-canavanine. Journal of Neuroscience. 32 (4), 1429-1435 (2012).
  16. Montell, C. A taste of the Drosophila gustatory receptors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 19 (4), 345-353 (2009).
  17. Clyne, P. J., Warr, C. G., Carlson, J. R. Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila. Science. 287 (5459), 1830-1834 (2000).
  18. Liman, E. R., Zhang, Y. V., Montell, C. Peripheral coding of taste. Neuron. 81 (5), 984-1000 (2014).
  19. Scott, K. Gustatory processing in Drosophila melanogaster. Annual Review of Entomology. 63, 15-30 (2018).
  20. Freeman, E. G., Dahanukar, A. Molecular neurobiology of Drosophila taste. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 34, 140-148 (2015).
  21. Tanimura, T., Isono, K., Yamamoto, M. T. Taste sensitivity to trehalose and its alteration by gene dosage in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 119 (2), 399-406 (1988).
  22. Zhang, Y. V., Raghuwanshi, R. P., Shen, W. L., Montell, C. Food experience-induced taste desensitization modulated by the Drosophila TRPL channel. Nature Neuroscience. 16 (10), 1468-1476 (2013).
  23. Bantel, A. P., Tessier, C. R. Taste preference assay for adult Drosophila. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (115), e54403 (2016).
  24. Shiraiwa, T., Carlson, J. R. Proboscis extension response (PER) assay in Drosophila. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (3), e193 (2007).
  25. Ja, W. W., et al. Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (20), 8253-8256 (2007).
  26. Diegelmann, S., et al. The CApillary FEeder assay measures food intake in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (121), e55024 (2017).
  27. Ro, J., Harvanek, Z. M., Pletcher, S. D. FLIC: high-throughput, continuous analysis of feeding behaviors in Drosophila. PLoS One. 9 (6), 101107 (2014).
  28. Yoshihara, M. Simultaneous recording of calcium signals from identified neurons and feeding behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (62), e3625 (2012).
  29. Deshpande, S. A., et al. Quantifying Drosophila food intake: comparative analysis of current methodology. Nature Methods. 11 (5), 535-540 (2014).
  30. Yapici, N., Cohn, R., Schusterreiter, C., Ruta, V., Vosshall, L. B. A taste circuit that regulates ingestion by integrating food and hunger signals. Cell. 165 (3), 715-729 (2016).
  31. Jiang, L., Zhan, Y., Zhu, Y. Combining quantitative food-intake assays and forcibly activating neurons to study appetite in Drosophila. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (134), e56900 (2018).
  32. Moon, S. J., Lee, Y., Jiao, Y., Montell, C. A Drosophila gustatory receptor essential for aversive taste and inhibiting male-to-male courtship. Current Biology. 19 (19), 1623-1627 (2009).
  33. Zhang, Y. V., Aikin, T. J., Li, Z., Montell, C. The basis of food texture sensation in Drosophila. Neuron. 91 (4), 863-877 (2016).
  34. Itskov, P. M., et al. Automated monitoring and quantitative analysis of feeding behaviour in Drosophila. Nature Communications. 5, 4560 (2014).
  35. Qi, W., et al. A quantitative feeding assay in adult Drosophila reveals rapid modulation of food ingestion by its nutritional value. Molecular Brain. 8, 87 (2015).
  36. Simpson, J. H., Looger, L. L. Functional imaging and optogenetics in Drosophila. Genetics. 208 (4), 1291-1309 (2018).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved