A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This study describes a method to expand chitin into a foam by chemical techniques that require no specialized equipment.
Chitin is an underexploited, naturally abundant, mechanically robust, and chemically resistant biopolymer. These qualities are desirable in an adsorbent, but chitin lacks the necessary specific surface area, and its modification involves specialized techniques and equipment. Herein is described a novel chemical procedure for expanding chitin flakes, derived from shrimp shell waste, into foams with higher surface area. The process relies on the evolution of H2 gas from the reaction of water with NaH trapped in a chitin gel. The preparation method requires no specialized equipment. Powder X-ray diffraction and N2-physisorption indicate that the crystallite size decreases from 6.6 nm to 4.4 nm and the specific surface area increases from 12.6 ± 2.1 m2/g to 73.9 ± 0.2 m2/g. However, infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis indicate that the process does not change the chemical identity of the chitin. The specific Cu adsorption capacity of the expanded chitin increases in proportion to specific surface area from 13.8 ± 2.9 mg/g to 73.1 ± 2.0 mg/g. However, the Cu adsorption capacity as a surface density remains relatively constant at an average of 10.1 ± 0.8 atom/nm2, which again suggests no change in the chemical identity of the chitin. This method offers the means to transform chitin into a higher surface area material without sacrificing its desirable properties. Although the chitin foam is described here as an adsorbent, it can be envisioned as a catalyst support, thermal insulator, and structural material.
Chitin is a mechanically robust and chemically inert biopolymer, second only to cellulose in natural abundance1. It is the major component in the exoskeleton of arthropods and in the cell walls of fungi and yeast2. Chitin is similar to cellulose, but with one hydroxyl group of each monomer replaced with an acetyl amine group (Figure 1A,B). This difference increases the strength of hydrogen bonding between adjacent polymer chains and gives chitin its characteristic structural resilience and chemical inertness2,3. Due to its properties and abundance, chitin has attracted significant industrial and academic interest. It has been studied as a scaffold for tissue growth4,5,6, as a component in composite materials7,8,9,10,11, and as a support for adsorbents and catalysts11,12,13,14. Its chemical stability, in particular, makes chitin attractive for adsorption applications that involve conditions inhospitable to common adsorbents14. In addition, the abundance of amine groups make chitin an effective adsorbent for metal ions15. However, the protonation of the amine groups under acidic conditions reduces the metal adsorption capacity of chitin16. A successful strategy is to introduce adsorption sites more resistant to protonation17,18. Instead, herein is described a simple method to increase the specific surface area and, therefore, the number of adsorption sites in chitin.
Figure 1. Chemical structure. (A) cellulose, (B) chitin, (C) chitosan. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In spite of its many potential uses, chitin is underutilized. Chitin processing is challenging due to its low solubility in most solvents. A key limitation to its use in catalysis and adsorption is its low specific surface area. While typical carbon and metal oxide supports have specific surface areas in the order 102-103 m2/g, commercial chitin flakes have surface areas in the order of 10 m2/g19,20,21. Methods to expand chitin into foams exist, but they invariably rely on high temperature and pressure, strong acids and bases, or specialized equipment that represent a significant entry barrier5,21,22,23,24,25. In addition, these methods tend to deacetylate chitin to form chitosan (Figure 1C)-a more soluble and reactive biopolymer5,25,26.
Herein, a method is described to expand chitin into solid foams, increase its specific surface area and adsorption capacity, and maintain its chemical integrity. The method relies on the rapid evolution of gas from within a chitin gel and requires no specialized equipment. The increased adsorption capacity of the expanded chitin is demonstrated with aqueous Cu2+-a common contaminant in the local groundwater26.
Unit | Neat Flake | Baked Foam | Lyophilised Foam | |
Crystallinity | % | 88 | 74 | 58 |
Crystal size | nm | 6.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Surface Area | m2/g | 12.6 ± 2.1 | 43.1 ± 0.2 | 73.9 ± 0.2 |
Cu Uptake | mg/g | 13.8 ± 2.9 | 48.6 ± 1.9 | 73.1 ± 2.0 |
Cu Uptake | atom/nm2 | 10.5 ± 2.8 | 10.7 ± 0.4 | 9.4 ± 0.3 |
Table 1. Summary of material properties. Chitin foams have lower crystallinity and crystal size relative to neat chitin flakes. However, the specific surface area and Cu uptake of the chitin foams are proportionally higher than that of the neat chitin flakes.
1. Preparation of expanded chitin
Figure 2. Preparation of expanded chitin foam. (A) The initial chitin in LiCl/DMAc solution. (B) The addition of the NaH/DMAc slurry. (C) The chitin foam after addition of water. (D) The chitin foam as extracted from the reaction flask. (E) The chitin foam during washing with water. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Development of the adsorption isotherms
Expanded chitin shows the same morphology regardless of the drying method. Figure 3 shows images of neat chitin flakes (Figure 3A1), oven-dried expanded chitin (Figure 3B1), and lyophilized expanded chitin (Figure 3C3). While the neat flakes have the appearance of coarse sand, the expanded chitin foam has the appearance of a kernel of popped corn. Scanning electron micrographs show a similar ch...
The proposed method for chitin foam fabrication allows for the production of such foams without the need for specialized equipment or techniques. Production of the chitin foam relies on the suspension of sodium hydride within a chitin sol-gel. Contact with water from the atmosphere induces gelling of the chitin matrix and evolution of hydrogen gas by decomposition of the sodium hydride. Therefore, the critical steps of the preparation are (1) formation of the sol-gel, (2) introduction of the sodium hydride in anhydrous c...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The research was sponsored by the Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory (Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-15-2-0020). Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Army Research Lab.
We thank the Center for Advanced Materials Processing (CAMP) at Montana Technological University for the use of some of the specialized equipment required in this study. We also thank Gary Wyss, Nancy Oyer, Rick LaDouceur, John Kirtley, and Katherine Zodrow for the technical assistance and helpful discussions.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Ammonium bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich | 9830 | NH4HCO3, ≥99.5 % |
Chitin | Sigma-Aldrich | C7170 | Pandalus borealis, practical grade |
Colorimeter | Hanna Instruments | HI83399-01 | Photometer for wastewater analysis |
Copper High Range Checker | Hanna Instruments | HI702 | Bicinchoninate colorimetric titration |
Copper nitrate hydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | 223395 | Cu(NO3)2 · 2.5 H2O, 98 % |
Dimethylacetamide (DMAc) | Sigma-Aldrich | 271012 | Anhydrous, 99.8 % |
IR Spectrophotometer | Thermo Nicolet | Nexus 670 | Fitted with an ATR cell |
Lithium chloride | Sigma-Aldrich | 310468 | LiCl, ≥99 % |
N2 Physisorption Apparatus | Micromeritics | Tristar II | |
Nitric acid | BDH | BDH7208-1 | HNO3, 0.1 N |
Scanning electron microscope | Zeiss LEO | 1430 VP | 15 kV, secondary electron detector, 29-31 mm working distance |
Sodium hydride | Sigma-Aldrich | 223441 | NaH, packed in mineral oil, 90 % |
Thermogravimetric analyzer | TA Instruments | Q500 | 100 ml/min N2, 10 °C/min to 800 °C |
Water Purification System | Millipore | Milli-Q | Type A water (18 MΩ) |
X-Ray Diffractometer | Rigaku | Ultima IV | Cu K-α radiation, 8.04 keV |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved