A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Many plant species change the positioning of chloroplasts to optimize light absorption. This protocol describes how to use a straightforward, home-built instrument to investigate chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves using changes in the transmission of light through a leaf as a proxy.
Chloroplast movement in leaves has been shown to help minimize photoinhibition and increase growth under certain conditions. Much can be learned about chloroplast movement by studying the chloroplast positioning in leaves using e.g., confocal fluorescence microscopy, but access to this type of microscopy is limited. This protocol describes a method that uses the changes in leaf transmission as a proxy for chloroplast movement. If chloroplasts are spread out in order to maximize light interception, the transmission will be low. If chloroplasts move towards the anticlinal cell walls to avoid light, the transmission will be higher. This protocol describes how to use a straightforward, home-built instrument to expose leaves to different blue light intensities and quantify the dynamic changes in leaf transmission. This approach allows researchers to quantitatively describe chloroplast movement in different species and mutants, study the effects of chemicals and environmental factors on it, or screen for novel mutants e.g., to identify missing components in the process that leads from light perception to the movement of chloroplasts.
Light is essential for photosynthesis, plant growth, and development. It is one of the most dynamic abiotic factors as light intensities not only change over the course of a season or day, but also rapidly and in unpredictable ways depending on the cloud cover. At the leaf level, light intensities are also influenced by the density and nature of the surrounding vegetation and the plant's own canopy. One important mechanism that allows plants to optimize light interception under variable light conditions is the ability of chloroplasts to move in response to blue light stimuli1,2. Under low light conditions, chloroplasts spread out perpendicular to the light (along the periclinal cell walls) in a so-called accumulation response, maximizing light interception and hence photosynthesis. Under high light conditions, chloroplasts move towards the anticlinal cell wall in a so-called avoidance response, minimizing light interception and the danger of photoinhibition. In many species, chloroplasts also assume a specific dark position, which is distinct from the accumulation and avoidance positions and often intermediary between those two3,4. Various studies have demonstrated that chloroplast movement is not only important for the short-term stress tolerance of leaves5,6,7, but also for the growth and reproductive success of plants, especially under variable light conditions8,9.
Chloroplast movement is readily observed in real time in certain live specimens (e.g., algae or thin-leafed plants like Elodea) using light microscopy1. Studying chloroplast movement in most leaves, however, requires a pretreatment to induce chloroplast movement, chemical fixation, and preparation of cross sections before viewing the samples under a light microscope10. With the introduction of confocal laser microscopy, it also became possible to image the 3D arrangement of chloroplasts in intact or fixed leaves4,11,12. These imaging techniques greatly aid the understanding of chloroplast movement by providing important qualitative information. Quantifying chloroplast positioning (e.g., as a percentage of chloroplasts in the periclinal or anticlinal positions in these images or the percentage of area covered by chloroplasts per total cell surface) is also possible but quite time-consuming, especially if conducted at the intervals necessary to capture rapid changes in positioning10,8. The simplest way to show whether dark-adapted leaves of a certain species or mutants are capable of chloroplast movement into the avoidance response is by covering most of the area of a leaf to keep the chloroplasts in the dark while exposing a strip of the leaf to high light. After a minimum of 20 min of high light exposure, the chloroplasts in the exposed area will have moved into the avoidance position, and the exposed strip will be visibly lighter in color than the rest of the leaf. This is true for wild type A. thaliana but not for some of the chloroplast movement mutants described in more detail later on13. This method and modifications of it (e.g., reversing what parts of the leaf are exposed, changing light intensities) are useful for screening large numbers of mutants and to identify null mutants that lack either the ability to exhibit an avoidance or accumulation response or both. However, it does not provide information about the dynamic changes in chloroplast movement.
In contrast, the method described here allows for the quantification of chloroplast movement in intact leaves using changes in light transmission through a leaf as a proxy for overall chloroplast movement: under conditions when chloroplasts are spread out in the mesophyll cells in the accumulation response, less light is transmitted through the leaf than when many chloroplasts are in an avoidance response, positioning themselves along the anticlinal cell walls. Hence, changes in transmission can be used as a proxy for the overall chloroplast movement in leaves14. The details of the instrument are described elsewhere (see Supplementary File), but basically, the instrument uses blue light to trigger chloroplast movement and measures how much red light is transmitted through that leaf at set intervals. More recently, a modification of this system has been described, which uses a modified 96-well microplate reader, a blue LED, a computer, and a temperature-controlled incubator15.
The option to use a combination of methods, including the optical assessment of leaves for screening, followed by measuring dynamic changes in transmission and the use of microscopy, has greatly aided our understanding of both the underlying mechanisms and the physiological/ecological significance of chloroplast movement. For example, it led to the discovery and characterization of various mutants, which are impaired in specific aspects of their movements. For example, A. thaliana phot 1 mutants lack the ability to accumulate their chloroplasts in low light, while phot 2 mutants lack the ability to perform an avoidance reaction. These phenotypes are due to an impairment in two respective blue light receptors16,17,18. In contrast, chup1 mutants lack the ability to form proper actin filaments around the chloroplasts which are essential to move the chloroplasts into the desired position within a cell11,19. In addition to mutant studies, researchers have assessed the effects of various inhibitors on chloroplast movement to elucidate the mechanistic aspects of the process. For example, chemicals such as H2O2 and various antioxidants were used to investigate the effects of this signaling molecule on chloroplast movement20. Various inhibitors were used to elucidate the role of calcium in chloroplast movement21. In addition to helping to uncover the mechanisms of chloroplast movement, these methods can be used to compare chloroplast movement in various species or mutants grown in different conditions in an attempt to understand the ecological and evolutionary context of this behavior. For example, it has been shown that the extent of the effects of various mutations in the chloroplast movement pathway are dependent on the growth conditions7,9, and that sun-adapted plants do not seem to move their chloroplasts much. In contrast, movement is very important for shade plants10,22,23.
This methods paper, focused on the model plant A. thaliana, describes how to use a transmission device which is an updated version of a previously developed instrument9. While this instrument is not commercially available, people with a basic understanding of electronics or the help of engineering or physics colleagues and students will be able to build the instrument using affordable parts and following the detailed instructions (see Supplementary File). The open-source platform used to build the instrument has extensive web support and a community forum which offers help should problems arise24.
The protocol focuses on how to use the instrument to determine changes in leaf transmission in a standard exploratory run that exposes a leaf to a wide range of light conditions and captures the dark, accumulation, and avoidance reactions of A. thaliana. These runs can be modified depending on the goal of the experiment and can be used with most plant species. The paper provides examples of transmission data of A. thaliana wildtype and several mutants and shows how to further analyze the data.
1. Preparing leaves for a run
2. Testing if the transmission device works
3. Setting up leaves in the leaf clips
NOTE: This step has to be done in the dark with a green light source (e.g., place a green filter in front of a light bulb) to avoid inducing chloroplast movement. Alternatively, use very low white light and an extended dark period in the leaf clips. Remember, one part of the leaf clip holds the LED (larger opening), while the other holds the phototransistor (Figure 1C).
4. Conducting a run
NOTE: For a standard exploratory run, start out with 4 h of darkness (0 µmol photon m-2 s-1), followed by 7 h of low blue light (2 µmol photon m-2 s-1), followed by 60 min each of 5, 10, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 100 µmol photon m-2 s-1 of blue light. This will induce the leaves to exhibit their dark transmission, induce chloroplast movement into the maximum accumulation, and show different degrees of avoidance response.
5. Data analysis
The different parts of the transmission device are shown in Figure 1. The microcontroller is the control unit of the device and controls the light conditions that the leaves, secured in black leaf clips, are experiencing, and stores the light transmission data it receives (Figure 1A,B). A close-up of the control unit of the instrument shows the ON/OFF button, the SD card for data storage capability, the Bluetooth shield (which sends the data to ...
The device is extremely easy to use but it is of crucial importance to calibrate each leaf clip set-up of the transmission device independently since the positioning of the LEDs and phototransistors may slightly vary from leaf clip to leaf clip. Ensure the LEDs and phototransistors are inserted stably and re-check the calibration if the data seem off. Avoid getting water onto the device. The leaves in the leaf clips are placed into 'boats' filled with water to avoid water stress. Place these boats e.g., into a lo...
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Funding was provided by a Fiske Award and a Wellesley College Faculty Award.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Aluminum foil | |||
Dark adapted leaves | |||
Filter paper | |||
iPad with LeafSensor app installed (see Supplemental Info) | |||
Pipette | Any | ||
Petri dish | Any | ||
Transmission device (see Supplemental info) | |||
Water |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved