Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol presents the experimental procedures to perform the adhesion footprint assay to image the adhesion events during fast cell rolling adhesion.

Abstract

Rolling adhesion, facilitated by selectin-mediated interactions, is a highly dynamic, passive motility in recruiting leukocytes to the site of inflammation. This phenomenon occurs in postcapillary venules, where blood flow pushes leukocytes in a rolling motion on the endothelial cells. Stable rolling requires a delicate balance between adhesion bond formation and their mechanically-driven dissociation, allowing the cell to remain attached to the surface while rolling in the direction of flow. Unlike other adhesion processes occurring in relatively static environments, rolling adhesion is highly dynamic as the rolling cells travel over thousands of microns at tens of microns per second. Consequently, conventional mechanobiology methods such as traction force microscopy are unsuitable for measuring the individual adhesion events and the associated molecular forces due to the short timescale and high sensitivity required. Here, we describe our latest implementation of the adhesion footprint assay to image the P-selectin: PSGL-1 interactions in rolling adhesion at the molecular level. This method utilizes irreversible DNA-based tension gauge tethers to produce a permanent history of molecular adhesion events in the form of fluorescence tracks. These tracks can be imaged in two ways: (1) stitching together thousands of diffraction-limited images to produce a large field of view, enabling the extraction of adhesion footprint of each rolling cell over thousands of microns in length, (2) performing DNA-PAINT to reconstruct super-resolution images of the fluorescence tracks within a small field of view. In this study, the adhesion footprint assay was used to study HL-60 cells rolling at different shear stresses. In doing so, we were able to image the spatial distribution of the P-selectin: PSGL-1 interaction and gain insight into their molecular forces through fluorescence intensity. Thus, this method provides the groundwork for the quantitative investigation of the various cell-surface interactions involved in rolling adhesion at the molecular level.

Introduction

The rolling adhesion cascade describes how circulating cells tether to and roll along the blood vessel wall1. Passive rolling is primarily mediated by selectins, a major class of cellular adhesion molecules (CAMs)1. Under the shear flow of blood, leukocytes expressing P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) form highly transient bonds with P-selectin, which may be expressed on the surface of inflamed endothelial cells. This process is critical for leukocytes to migrate to a site of inflammation2. In addition, PSGL-1 is also a mechanosensitive receptor capable of triggering the subsequent firm adhesion stage of the rolling adhesion cascade upon its engagement with P-selectin3.

Genetic mutations affecting CAM function can severely affect the immune system, such as in the rare disease of leukocyte adhesion deficiency (LAD), where malfunction of adhesion molecules mediating rolling leads to severely immunocompromised individuals4,5,6. In addition, circulating tumor cells have been shown to migrate following a similar rolling process, leading to metastasis7,8. However, because cell rolling is fast and dynamic, conventional experimental mechanobiology methods are unsuitable for studying molecular interactions during cell rolling. While single-cell and single-molecule manipulation methods like atomic force microscopy and optical tweezer were able to study molecular interactions such as P-selectin's force-dependent interaction with PSGL-1 at the single-molecule level9, they are unsuitable for investigating live adhesion events during cell rolling. Additionally, the interaction characterized in vitro cannot directly answer the question about molecular adhesion in vivo. For instance, what molecular tension range is biologically relevant when cells are functioning in their native environment? Computational methods such as adhesive dynamics simulation10 or simple steady-state model11 have captured certain molecular details and how they influence the rolling behavior but are highly dependent on the accuracy of the modeling parameters and assumptions. Other techniques such as traction force microscopy can detect forces during cell migration but do not provide sufficient spatial resolution or quantitative information on molecular tension. None of these techniques can provide direct experimental observations of the temporal dynamics, spatial distribution, and magnitude heterogeneity of molecular forces, which directly relate to cell function and behavior in their native environment.

Therefore, implementing a molecular force sensor capable of accurately measuring selectin-mediated interactions is crucial to improving our understanding of rolling adhesion. Here, we describe the protocol for the adhesion footprint assay12 where PSGL-1 coated beads are rolled on a surface presenting p-selectin functionalized tension gauge tethers (TGTs)13. These TGTs are irreversible DNA-based force sensors that result in a permanent history of rupture events in the form of fluorescence readout. This is achieved through the rupturing of the TGT (dsDNA) and then subsequent labeling of the ruptured TGT (ssDNA) with a fluorescently labeled complementary strand. One major advantage of this system is its compatibility with both diffraction-limited and super-resolution imaging. The fluorescently labeled complementary strand can either be permanently bound (>12 bp) for diffraction-limited imaging or transiently bound (7-9 bp) for super-resolution imaging through DNA PAINT. This is an ideal system to study rolling adhesion as the TGTs are ruptured during active rolling, but the fluorescence readout is analyzed post-rolling. The two imaging methods also provide the user with more freedom to investigate rolling adhesion. Typically, diffraction-limited imaging is useful for extracting molecular rupture force through fluorescence intensity13, whereas super-resolution imaging allows for quantitative analysis of receptor density. With the ability to investigate these properties of rolling adhesion, this approach provides a promising platform for understanding the force-regulation mechanism on the molecular adhesion of rolling cells under shear flow.

Protocol

1. Oligonucleotide labeling and hybridization

  1. Reduction of Protein G disulfide bonds
    1. Dissolve 10 mg of Protein G (ProtG) in 1 mL of ultrapure water.
      NOTE: The Protein G here is modified with a single cysteine residue at the C-terminus and an N-terminus poly-histidine tag.
    2. Buffer exchange ≥20 µL of ProtG (10 mg/mL) into 1x PBS (pH 7.2) with a P6 column.
    3. Measure the protein concentration following buffer exchange.
      NOTE: Typical concentration of 7-8 mg/mL.
    4. Prepare 120 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) by dissolving 3 mg of TCEP into 90 µL of 1x PBS (pH 7.2) followed by 10 µL of 0.5 M EDTA.
      NOTE: TCEP should be freshly prepared.
    5. Add 4 µL of 120 mM TCEP (480 nmol) to 20 µL of ProtG (4-5 nmol).
      NOTE: Aim for a molar ratio of ~100:1 TCEP to protein.
    6. Allow the reaction to proceed for 30 min at room temperature (RT).
    7. Remove excess TCEP from the reduced ProtG with a P6 column (buffer exchanged in 1x PBS, pH 7.2).
    8. Measure the concentration of the reduced ProtG with a UV/Vis spectrophotometer and save the spectra.
      NOTE: Typical concentration of 3.5-4.5 mg/mL.
  2. Amine-labeled ssDNA reaction with Sulfo-SMCC
    1. Dissolve amine-labeled ssDNA (amine-ssDNA) in nuclease-free water to a concentration of 1 mM. Verify the strand concentration with a UV/Vis spectrophotometer.
    2. Prepare 11.5 mM sulfo-SMCC (a hetero-bifunctional crosslinker with sulfo-NHS ester and maleimide) solution fresh by dissolving 2 mg of sulfo-SMCC in 400 µL of ultrapure water and vortex to mix.
    3. Add 6 µL of the 1 mM amine-ssDNA (6 nmol) to 5.2 µL of 11.5 mM sulfo-SMCC (60 nmol) and 88.8 µL of 1x PBS (pH 7.2). Vortex for 5 s followed by centrifugation at 8600 x g for 3 min.
    4. Allow the reaction to proceed for 30 min at RT.
    5. Remove excess sulfo-SMCC from the SMCC conjugated amine-ssDNA (mal-ssDNA) with a P6 column (buffer exchanged in 1x PBS, pH 7.2).
    6. Measure the concentration of the mal-ssDNA with a UV/Vis spectrophotometer and save the spectra.
      NOTE: Typical concentration of 35-45 µM.
  3. ProtG-ssDNA conjugation
    1. Add 21 µL of 4.5 mg/mL reduced ProtG (3 nmol) to the mal-ssDNA (~4-5 nmol).
      NOTE: Volumes and concentrations here are typical values. Adjust according to individual experimental measurement. Always ensure an excess amount of mal-ssDNA over ProtG at a ratio of ~1.5:1.
    2. Vortex for 5 s and allow the reaction to proceed for 3 h at RT.
  4. ProtG-ssDNA purification and characterization
    1. Purify the conjugated ProtG-ssDNA through his-tag isolation with magnetic nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) beads.
    2. Remove excess imidazole (Ni-NTA elution buffer) from the product with a P6 column (buffer exchanged in 1x PBS, pH 7.2).
      NOTE: This step is essential for quantifying the conjugation, as imidazole has significant absorption at 280 nm.
    3. Use a UV/Vis spectrophotometer to record the spectra of the product ProtG-ssDNA as well as the Ni-NTA elution buffer (1x).
      NOTE: Typical ProtG-ssDNA absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm is 0.8 and 0.6, respectively.
    4. To determine the conjugation efficiency and ratio of ProtG to ssDNA, use the custom-written MATLAB script (Supplemental Coding File 1) to decompose the final product spectrum based on the three spectra collected previously (ProtG, SMCC-strand, Ni-NTA bead elution buffer).
      NOTE: Briefly, the code works as described in steps 1.4.5-1.4.8. The typical concentration is 4 µM of ProtG-ssDNA with ProtG and ssDNA at a ~1:1 molar ratio (Figure 2A).
    5. Input ProtG, SMCC-strand, Ni-NTA bead elution buffer, and the ProtG-ssDNA UV/Vis spectra into the MATLAB script
    6. Perform a multidimensional unconstrained nonlinear minimization to reconstruct the ProtG-ssDNA spectra from the source spectra (ProtG, SMCC-strand, and Ni-NTA bead elution buffer spectra)
      NOTE: The minimization function outputs three transformation factors, one for each source spectra.
    7. Reconstruct the ProtG-ssDNA spectra by multiplying the spectra by their corresponding factor and combining the transformed source spectra.
    8. Multiply the initial concentration of the ProtG and SMCC-strand by the corresponding transformation factors to determine the concentrations of SMCC-strand and ProtG in the ProtG-ssDNA product.
    9. (OPTIONAL) Run native PAGE according to Figure 2B to help ensure each component and step works as expected.
  5. TGT hybridization
    1. Hybridize ProtG-ssDNA (top strand) with biotinylated bottom strand at a molar ratio of 1.2:1 with concentrations of 240 nM and 200 nM respectively in T50M5 buffer (10 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2) to hybridize the full TGT construct. Let hybridize at RT ≥1 h.

2. Surface PEGylation

  1. Surface cleaning
    1. Clean one Erlenmeyer flask and two staining jars for every 8 coverslips. Fill each container with 1 M KOH solution and sonicate for 1 h at RT. Thoroughly wash each container with ultrapure water and dry with N2 or in an oven.
      NOTE: Fill the KOH to the top to touch the lid, so they are also cleaned.
    2. Thoroughly rinse each coverslip with ultrapure water and place them into one of the cleaned staining jars.
      NOTE: Ensure that they are not stuck to each other or to the wall of the staining jars.
    3. In a fume hood, freshly prepare a piranha solution by adding 30 mL of hydrogen peroxide (30%) to 90 mL of concentrated (95%-98%) sulfuric acid in a 250 mL beaker.
      CAUTION: Concentrated sulfuric acid is highly corrosive. Add the hydrogen peroxide very slowly to the sulfuric acid and carefully swirl to mix.
    4. Fully submerge the coverslips in the staining jar with the piranha solution. Leave coverslips in piranha for 30 min in the fume hood.
      CAUTION: Cool down the piranha solution to no more than 80 °C before pouring to prevent cracking the staining jar.
    5. Discard the piranha solution into a 1000 mL beaker and neutralize with the 1 M KOH from glass cleaning.
    6. (OPTIONAL) Repeat piranha cleaning (steps 2.1.3-2.1.5) with a fresh piranha solution.
    7. Rinse the coverslips with copious amounts of ultrapure water to remove all residual piranha solution. Gently shake the staining jar during each rise to facilitate removal (10 rinses are recommended).
    8. Rinse the coverslips with methanol 3 times to remove water from the coverslip surface and keep the coverslips submerged in methanol.
  2. Surface silanization
    1. Prepare a 1% aminosilane solution by thoroughly mixing 94 mL of methanol, 1 mL of aminosilane, and 5 mL of glacial acetic acid in the cleaned and dried Erlenmeyer flask. Pour into the second cleaned and dried staining jar14.
    2. Transfer the coverslips submerged under the methanol solution to the staining jar containing 1% aminosilane solution and keep the jar covered.
      NOTE: Do not allow the coverslips to dry while transferring to aminosilane to limit glass surface exposure to air.
    3. Incubate the staining jar containing coverslips in aminosilane for 1 h at 70 °C in an oven15.
    4. Carefully discard the aminosilane solution in a separate waste container and rinse the coverslips in the staining jar with methanol 5 times to remove the aminosilane solution.
    5. Rinse coverslips in the staining jar with ultrapure water 5 times and dry them with N2.
    6. Bake the dried coverslips in the staining jar in an oven at 110 °C for 20 min. Allow the coverslips to cool to RT, then place them on the PEGylation rack.
      NOTE: Cover the staining jar with a lid during the bake to minimize particular and chemical deposition on the surface15.
  3. PEG solution preparation
    1. Thaw PEG (Polyethylene glycol) and PEG-biotin to RT for about 30 min.
      NOTE: This step minimizes moisture condensation that can degrade the NHS ester on PEG.
    2. Make PEG buffer by adding 84 mg of sodium bicarbonate to 10 mL of ultrapure water. This formulation should provide a buffer at pH 8.4.
    3. For 8 coverslips, each with one PEGylated side with 20:1 PEG:PEG-biotin: measure 100 mg of PEG and 5 mg of PEG-biotin to add to 400 µL of PEG buffer. Vortex the solution for 30 s and centrifuge for 1 min at the max speed (≥18000 x g).
      NOTE: This step is time-sensitive, as the SVA NHS-ester hydrolysis starts immediately and has a half-life of 34 min at pH 8.0, with a shorter half-life at pH 8.4.
  4. PEG incubation and coverslip storage
    1. Set up the humidity chamber and place the coverslips inside.
    2. Add 90 µL of PEG solution to a coverslip in the humidity chamber and place a second coverslip on top of the PEG solution using coverslip holding tweezers to evenly spread the PEG solution.
    3. Ensure there are no bubbles in the solution dropped onto the coverslip. Lower one end of the second coverslip on the first coverslip and slowly drop the other end so that there are no bubbles sandwiched between the coverslips.
      NOTE: Bubbles will cause certain areas to be poorly PEGylated.
    4. Repeat until all coverslips have PEG (i.e., 8 coverslips = 4 PEG sandwiches). Incubate the PEG solutions overnight (~12 h) at RT in a humidity chamber in the dark16.
    5. Separate the coverslip pairs and place them into a staining jar. Note the PEGylated sides.
    6. Rinse the coverslips thoroughly with ultrapure water and dry with N2.
      NOTE: Hold the coverslips with tweezers and blow N2 across the surface towards the tweezer to prevent contaminants from drying onto the surface.
    7. Mark the non-PEGylated side with a dot at a corner using a permanent marker or a diamond pen.
    8. Place 2 PEGylated coverslips in mailer tubes with the PEGylated sides facing each other to help identify the PEGylated side before use.
    9. Vacuum the tube for 5 min and backfill with N2. Seal the tube with parafilm.
    10. Store the PEGylated coverslips at -20 °C in the sealed mailer tubes for up to 6 months.
      ​NOTE: Warm the storage tubes to RT before chip assembly. Condensation on the coverslips during sealing will cause leaking.

3. Flow chamber preparation

  1. Chip assembly
    1. Thinly spread a small amount of epoxy on both sides of double-sided tape with a razor blade.
      NOTE: Too much epoxy may spread into the channel during assembly.
    2. Laser-cut the epoxy coated tape to create 4 channels. Create the flow chip by sandwiching the epoxy tape between a 4-hole slide and PEG coverslip (Figure 1A).
    3. Using a pipette tip, apply gentle pressure along the length of the channels to create a good seal. Cure the epoxy for ≥1 h.
      NOTE: Do not shear the glass to avoid sliding against epoxy.
  2. Chamber assembly
    1. Align the chip so that the opening of each channel is positioned at the centers of the adapter (Figure 1A). Place two transparent acrylic spacers on top of the chip, apply firm pressure in the middle of the block, and screw in two 4-40 screws at the ends of each spacer.
      NOTE: Do not force the screw or press too hard on the spacers, or the chip may crack.
    2. On the other side of the bracket, screw the inlets into the threaded holes. Monitor the sealing condition through the transparent acrylic block.
    3. As the tubing makes contact with the chip's opening, seal the connection by gently twisting the tubing clockwise.
      NOTE: Overtightened inlets may cause flow blockage, while loose contacts will cause leakage.

4. Surface preparation

NOTE: Refer to Figure 1B for the overall workflow.

  1. Blocking agents to prevent nonspecific binding
    1. Use a pipette to flow 200 µL of wash buffer (10 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM CaCl2, 0.05% Tween 20) into the chamber to check for leakage. If bubbles form in the channel, aggressively push an additional 200 µL to remove the bubbles.
      NOTE: Large air bubbles not removed at this step can dislodge and destroy surface functionalization later.
    2. Add 40 µL of BSA (1% w/v) to the flow chamber to prevent nonspecific binding and incubate for 10 min.
    3. Ensure to add enough volume during each incubation period to fill the flow chambers and form droplets at the inlets and outlets. Adjust incubation volumes accordingly and perform all incubations in a humidity chamber.
    4. Add 40 µL of Tween 20 (5% v/v) to the flow chamber. Incubate for 10 min to further reduce nonspecific binding.
    5. (OPTIONAL) Check the surface for adequate passivation by flowing polystyrene beads through the channel. Add 40 µL of ProtG coated polystyrene beads (0.01% w/v) and image using a darkfield microscope with 10x objective. If beads do not adhere to the surface, proceed to the next step.
    6. Wash the channel with 200 µL of wash buffer to remove all passivation agents.
  2. Chamber surface functionalization
    1. Add 40 µL of streptavidin (100 µg/mL) to the flow chamber and incubate for 20 min. Then, wash with 200 µL of wash buffer.
    2. Add 40 µL of hybridized ProtG-TGT (100 nM) to the flow chamber and incubate for 20 min. Then, wash with 200 µL wash buffer.
    3. Add 40 µL of ProtG-TGT top strand (100 nM) for 20 min to complete any unhybridized TGT bottom strand on the surface. Wash with 200 µL of wash buffer.
    4. Add 40 µL of P-selectin-Fc (10 µg/mL) to the flow chamber and incubate for 60 min. Then, wash with 200 µL of wash buffer.
      ​NOTE: Incubation duration is critical.

5. Experiment and imaging

  1. Flow system setup
    1. Fill a 5 mL glass syringe with the rolling buffer (HBSS with 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA). Ensure there are no air bubbles in the syringe by tapping the sides of the syringe to dislodge the bubbles and pushing them out as they float towards the tip.
    2. Insert a sterile needle (26 G, 5/8 Inch Length) into a ~200 mm of polyethylene tubing (I.D: 0.38 mm; O.D: 1.09 mm) and connect the needle to the glass syringe.
      NOTE: Ensure no air is trapped anywhere in the needle connector.
    3. Fix the syringe onto the syringe pump and tilt the syringe pump such that the plunger side is elevated to prevent air bubbles from entering the channel. Insert the end of the tube into the flow chamber inlet.
      NOTE: Ensure liquid to liquid contact when making the connection by depositing droplets onto the inlets and having droplets at the end of the syringe tubing. Ensure no air bubbles enter the channel by allowing a small drop to form on the end of the syringe tubing before inserting it into the inlet.
    4. Insert one end of another 200 mm of the polyethylene tubing into the outlet, and the other end submerged in a waste beaker.
  2. Setting up for cell rolling
    1. Grow HL-60 cells in 25 cm2 ventilated culture flasks in IMDM media supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotics at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Maintain cell densities between 1 x 105-2 × 106 cells/mL.
    2. (OPTIONAL) Differentiate the HL-60 cells in a complete IMDM medium containing 1.25% DMSO at an initial density of 2 x 105 cells/mL. Incubate cells to be most active for 5-6 days.
    3. Take a sample (1-2 mL) from the cell suspension and centrifuge (200 x g, 3 min) to pellet the cells.
    4. Remove the medium and gently resuspend the cells in 500 µL of the rolling buffer. Repeat the wash step twice to remove cellular debris.
    5. Measure the cell density with a hemocytometer. Resuspend the cell pellets with rolling buffer to a density of 2 x 105 cells/mL.
    6. Carefully disconnect the tubing from the inlets/outlet and pipette 40 µL of the cell suspension into the flow chamber. Reconnect the tubing as described previously, ensure no bubbles are introduced into the flow channel.
    7. Begin cell rolling experiment by starting the syringe pump at desired flow rates.
      NOTE: The intensity of fluorescent tracks depends on the shear stress, and lower cell velocity shear stress/cell velocity will generally produce dimmer tracks (Figure 4A). Avoid high cell density on the surface or excessive rolling duration to ensure separable single-cell tracks (Figure 4B,C).
    8. Use a darkfield microscope with a 10x objective to ensure cell rolling is observed.
    9. Once the experiment is completed, remove the cells from the channel by infusing the rolling buffer at 100 mL/h until the surface is cell-free.
  3. Imaging local tracks by "DNA-based Point Accumulation for Imaging in Nanoscale Topography" (DNA-PAINT)
    1. Add 40 µL of DNA-PAINT imager strand (500 pM) in DNA-PAINT buffer (0.05% Tween-20, 5 mM Tris, 75 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA) to the channel.
    2. Perform Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy using a 100x oil-immersion TIRF objective lens. Acquire 40000+ frames with 25 ms exposure time per frame at an electron-multiplying (EM) gain of 300 using an Electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) camera.
    3. Use Picasso software package17 to localize and render the super-resolution images (Figure 4D) following steps 5.3.4-5.3.5.
    4. Load the DNA-PAINT movie into Localize program to determine the localization of each fluorophore in every frame.
      NOTE: Optimize box side length and Min. Net Gradient parameters until only fluorophores are accurately tracked. Min. Net Gradient parameter can often go above 100000 to achieve optimal tracking. Fit setting: MLE, integrated Gaussian method produces the best result. Lastly, if the movie is too long, split it into stacks of 10000 frames in order for the preview tracking in Localize to work properly before recombining them into a final hdf5 file.
    5. Then, load the resulting hdf5 file into the Render program to perform drift correction and rendering.
      NOTE: Perform multiple drift correction via Undrift by RCC to improve the final result.
  4. Imaging long tracks by permanent labeling
    1. Add the permanent imager strand and incubate for 120 s in T50M5 buffer. Wash the channel by infusing 200 µL of wash buffer.
    2. Record an image with the excitation laser off to obtain background camera noise. Image a large area in a grid pattern by TIRF microscopy.
      NOTE: Frame-over-frame overlap of ≥10% is recommended for subsequent stitching.
    3. Program the microscope to scan over the area of 400 x 50 images (20000 images in total). Using FIJI program, split raw data into individual tiff files, each containing a maximum of 10000 images.
    4. Flatten all images using the illumination profile (Figure 3A-C) following steps 5.4.5-5.4.7.
    5. Subtract the background camera noise from every frame. Obtain the mean stack projection (illumination profile) of every background-subtracted frame.
    6. Normalize the illumination profile by its max value. Divide every background-subtracted frame by the normalized illumination profile.
    7. Rescale the corrected frames to the appropriate range for the corresponding bit depth.
    8. Use MIST18 to stitch the images (Figure 3D,E).

Results

The protocol above describes the experimental procedure of the adhesion footprint assay. The general experiment workflow is illustrated in Figure 1, from the flow chamber assembly (Figure 1A) to the surface functionalization (Figure 1B) and experiment and imaging steps (Figure 1C).

Figure 2 is a representative result for the ProtG-ssDNA bioconjug...

Discussion

The adhesion footprint assay enables visualization of the molecular adhesion events between PSGL-1 and P-selectin during cell rolling adhesion. This process is initiated by P-selectin-mediated capturing followed by rolling under fluidic shear stress. Potential issues during the experiment usually involve poor cell rolling or missing fluorescent tracks even when cells roll well. These problems are often resulting from quality controls at the critical steps in the protocol, as listed in the troubleshooting table (T...

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Canada Foundation of Innovation (CFI 35492), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2017-04407), New Frontiers in Research Fund (NFRFE-2018-00969), Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (SCH-2020-0559), and the University of British Columbia Eminence Fund.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
4-channel drill guideCustom made3D printed with ABS filament
4-holes slideCustom madeDrill clean microscope slide using a Dremel with diamond coated drill bits on a 4-channels drill guide which has a layout that matches with the centers of the 8-32 threaded holes on the aluminum clamp.
AcetoneVWRBDH1101-4LP
Acrylic spacerCustom madeCut two blocks of acrylic sheets with the dimension of 40 mm x 30 mm x 2.5 mm. On each block, drill two 3 mm holes that are precisely aligned with the 4-40 holes on the aluminium holder.
Aluminium chip holderCustom madeMachine anodized aluminium block into a C-shaped holder with the outer dimension of 640 mm x 500 mm x 65 mm and the opening dimension of 400 mm x 380 mm x 65 mm. Inlets and outlets are tapped with 8-32 thread.
AminosilaneAlfaAesarL14043CAS 1760-24-3
Antibiotic/antimycotic solutionCytiva HyCloneSV3007901Pen/Strep/Fungiezone
Beads, ProtG coated polystyreneSpherotechPGP-60-5
Bovine serum albuminVWR332
Buffer, DNA PAINT0.05% Tween-20, 5 mM Tris, 75 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA
Buffer, T50M510mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2
Buffer, RollingHBSS with 2mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes, 0.1% BSA
Buffer, Wash10 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2 and 2 mM CaCl2, 0.05% Tween 20
Calcium chlorideVWRBDH9224
Cell culture flasksVWR10062-868
Concentrated sulfuric acidVWRBDH3072-2.5LG95-98%
Coverslip holding tweezersTechni-Tool758TW150
Diamond-coated drill bitsAbrasive technologyC52505100.75 mm diamond drill
DNA, amine-ssDNA (top strand)IDT DNACustom oligoCCGGGCGACGCAGGAGGG /3AmMO/
DNA, biotin-ssDNA (bottom strand)IDT DNACustom oligo/5BiotinTEG/ TTTTT CCCTCCTGCGTCGCCCGG
DNA, imager strand for DNA-PAINTIDT DNACustom oligoGAGGGAAA TT/3Cy3Sp/
DNA, imager strand for permanent labellingIDT DNACustom oligoCCGGGCGACGCAGG /3Cy3Sp/
Double-sided tapeScotch2373/4 inch width, permanent double-sided tape
EDTAThermofisher155750200.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0
EpoxyGorilla420015 minute curing time
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)Avantor97068-085
GelGreenBiotium41005
Glacial acetic acidVWRBDH3094-2.5LG
Glass, CoverslipsFisher Scientific12-548-5P
Glass, Microscope slideVWR48300-02675 mm x 25 mm x 1 mm
Glass, Staining jarVWR74830-150Wheaton Staining Jar (900620)
Hanks' Balanced Salt solution (HBSS)Lonza04-315Q
HemocytometerSigma-AldrichZ359629-1EA
HL-60 cellsATCCCCL-240
Humidity chamber slide supportCustom made3D printed with ABS filament
Hydrogen peroxideVWRBDH7690-130%
ImidazoleSigma-AldrichI2399
Inlets/outletsCustom madeDrill through eight 8-32 set screws using cobalt drill bits. Insert 1.5 cm  polyethylene tubing (Tygon, I.D. 1/32” O.D. 3/32”) into each hollow setscrew
Iscove Modified Dulbecco Media (IMDM)Lonza12-722F
Magnesium chlorideVWRBDH9244
Magnetic Ni-NTA beadsInvitrogen10103D
Mailer tubesEMSEMS71406-10
MethanolVWRBDH1135-4LP
Micro Bio-Spin P-6 Gel ColumnsBiorad7326200In SSC Buffer
PEGLaysan BioMPEG-SVA-5000
PEG-biotinLaysan BioBiotin-PEG-SVA-5000
Potassium hydroxideVWR470302-132
Protein, Protein GAbcamab155724N-terminal His-Tag and C-terminal cysteine
Protein, P-selectin-FcR&D System137-PSRecombinant Human P-Selectin/CD62P Fc Chimera Protein, CF
Protein, StreptavidinCedarlaneCL1005-01-5MG
Pump SyringeHarvard Apparatus704801
Sodium bicarbonateWard’s Science470302-444
Sodium chlorideVWR97061-274
Sulfo-SMCCThermofisher22322
SyringeHamilton81520Syringes with PTFE luer lock, 5 mL
Syringe needlesBD305115Precision Glide 26 G, 5/8 Inch Length
TCEPSigma-AldrichC4706-2G
TrisVWRBDH4502-500GP
Tubing, AdaptorTygonABW00001Formulation 3350, I.D. 1/32”; O.D. 3/32”
Tubing, PolyethyleneBD Intramedic427406Intramedic (PE20) I.D. 0.38mm; O.D. 1.09mm
Tween-20Sigma-Aldrich93773

References

  1. McEver, R. P., Zhu, C. Rolling cell adhesion. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 26 (1), 363-396 (2010).
  2. Ley, K., Laudanna, C., Cybulsky, M. I., Nourshargh, S. Getting to the site of inflammation: The leukocyte adhesion cascade updated. Nature Reviews Immunology. 7 (9), 678-689 (2007).
  3. Zarbock, A., Ley, K. Neutrophil adhesion and activation under flow. Microcirculation. 16 (1), 31-42 (2009).
  4. Etzioni, A. Adhesion molecules - Their role in health and disease. Pediatric Research. 39 (2), 191-198 (1996).
  5. van de Vijver, E., vanden Berg, T. K., Kuijpers, T. W. Leukocyte adhesion deficiencies. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. 27 (1), 101-116 (2013).
  6. Hanna, S., Etzioni, A. Leukocyte adhesion deficiencies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1250 (1), 50-55 (2012).
  7. Geng, Y., Marshall, J. R., King, M. R. Glycomechanics of the metastatic cascade: Tumor cell-endothelial cell interactions in the circulation. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 40 (4), 790-805 (2012).
  8. Yasmin-Karim, S., King, M. R., Messing, E. M., Lee, Y. F. E-selectin ligand-1 controls circulating prostate cancer cell rolling/adhesion and metastasis. Oncotarget. 5 (23), 12097-12110 (2014).
  9. Marshall, B. T., Long, M., Piper, J. W., Yago, T., McEver, R. P., Zhu, C. Direct observation of catch bonds involving cell-adhesion molecules. Nature. 423 (6936), 190-193 (2003).
  10. Hammer, D. A. Adhesive dynamics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 136 (2), 021006 (2014).
  11. Yasunaga, A. B., Murad, Y., Kapras, V., Menard, F., Li, I. T. S. Quantitative interpretation of cell rolling velocity distribution. Biophysical Journal. 120 (12), 2511-2520 (2021).
  12. Li, I. T. S., Ha, T., Chemla, Y. R. Mapping cell surface adhesion by rotation tracking and adhesion footprinting. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 44502 (2017).
  13. Yasunaga, A. B., Li, I. T. S. Quantification of fast molecular adhesion by fluorescence footprinting. Science Advances. 7 (34), (2021).
  14. Dempsey, G. T., Vaughan, J. C., Chen, K. H., Bates, M., Zhuang, X. Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nature Methods. 8 (12), 1027-1040 (2011).
  15. Zhu, M., Lerum, M. Z., Chen, W. How to prepare reproducible, homogeneous, and hydrolytically stable aminosilane-derived layers on silica. Langmuir. 28 (1), 416-423 (2012).
  16. Chandradoss, S. D., Haagsma, A. C., Lee, Y. K., Hwang, J. H., Nam, J. M., Joo, C. Surface passivation for single-molecule protein studies. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (86), e50549 (2014).
  17. Schnitzbauer, J., Strauss, M. T., Schlichthaerle, T., Schueder, F., Jungmann, R. Super-resolution microscopy with DNA-PAINT. Nature Protocols. 12 (6), 1198-1228 (2017).
  18. Chalfoun, J., et al. MIST: Accurate and scalable microscopy image stitching tool with stage modeling and error minimization. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 4988 (2017).
  19. Wang, X., et al. Constructing modular and universal single molecule tension sensor using protein G to study mechano-sensitive receptors. Scientific Reports. 6, 1-10 (2016).
  20. Crockett-Torabi, E. Selectins and mechanisms of signal transduction. Journal of Leukocyte Biology. 63 (1), 1-14 (1998).
  21. Ye, Z., et al. The P-selectin and PSGL-1 axis accelerates atherosclerosis via activation of dendritic cells by the TLR4 signaling pathway. Cell Death and Disease. 10 (7), 507 (2019).
  22. Saha, K., Bender, F., Gizeli, E. Comparative study of IgG binding to proteins G and A: Nonequilibrium kinetic and binding constant determination with the acoustic waveguide device. Analytical Chemistry. 75 (4), 835-842 (2003).
  23. Murad, Y., Li, I. T. S. Quantifying molecular forces with serially connected force sensors. Biophysical Journal. 116 (7), 1282-1291 (2019).
  24. Yasunaga, A. B., Murad, Y., Li, I. T. S. Quantifying molecular tension-classifications, interpretations and limitations of force sensors. Physical Biology. 17 (1), 011001 (2020).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Molecular AdhesionCell RollingAdhesion Footprint AssayBioconjugationSurface FunctionalizationFlow Chamber AssemblyWash BufferNonspecific BindingProtein G TGTVisual DemonstrationFlow Chip PreparationEpoxy coated TapePhysiological Molecular Force

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved