A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
The present protocol demonstrates the different steps involved in wounding the cornea of an embryonic chick in ovo. The regenerating or fully restored corneas can be analyzed for regenerative potential using various cellular and molecular techniques following the wounding procedure.
Chick embryonic corneal wounds display a remarkable capacity to fully and rapidly regenerate, whereas adult wounded corneas experience a loss of transparency due to fibrotic scarring. The tissue integrity of injured embryonic corneas is intrinsically restored with no detectable scar formation. Given its accessibility and ease of manipulation, the chick embryo is an ideal model for studying scarless corneal wound repair. This protocol demonstrates the different steps involved in wounding the cornea of an embryonic chick in ovo. First, eggs are windowed at early embryonic ages to access the eye. Second, a series of in ovo physical manipulations to the extraembryonic membranes are conducted to ensure access to the eye is maintained through later stages of development, corresponding to when the three cellular layers of the cornea are formed. Third, linear cornea wounds that penetrate the outer epithelial layer and the anterior stroma are made using a microsurgical knife. The regeneration process or fully restored corneas can be analyzed for regenerative potential using various cellular and molecular techniques following the wounding procedure. Studies to date using this model have revealed that wounded embryonic corneas display activation of keratocyte differentiation, undergo coordinated remodeling of ECM proteins to their native three-dimensional macrostructure, and become adequately re-innervated by corneal sensory nerves. In the future, the potential impact of endogenous or exogenous factors on the regenerative process could be analyzed in healing corneas by using developmental biology techniques, such as tissue grafting, electroporation, retroviral infection, or bead implantation. The current strategy identifies the embryonic chick as a crucial experimental paradigm for elucidating the molecular and cellular factors coordinating scarless corneal wound healing.
The cornea is the transparent, outer-most tissue of the eye that transmits and refracts light conducive to visual acuity. In the adult cornea, damage or infection to the corneal stroma leads to a rapid and robust wound healing response characterized by keratocyte proliferation, fibrosis, increased inflammation leading to cytokine-induced apoptosis, generation of repair myofibroblasts, and overall remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM)1,2. Following injury, such corneal tissue repair results in opaque scar tissue that reduces corneal transparency and occludes the passage of light, thus distorting vision and, in the most severe cases, leading to corneal blindness3. Thus, there is a clear need to develop reliable animal models to address the complexities of wound healing and to identify the cellular and molecular factors responsible for wound closure and tissue regeneration.
To date, most studies examining corneal wound healing have utilized post-natal4 or adult animal models1,2,5,6,7. While these studies have led to a significant advancement in the understanding of the corneal wound healing response and the mechanisms underlying scar formation, the damaged corneal tissues in these healing models fail to fully regenerate, thus limiting their utility for identifying the molecular factors and cellular mechanisms responsible for fully recapitulating corneal morphology and structure post-injury. By contrast, fetal wounds generated with a knife in the embryonic chick cornea possess an intrinsic capacity to heal fully in a scarless fashion8. Specifically, the embryonic chick cornea exhibits nonfibrotic regeneration with the complete recapitulation of the extracellular matrix structure and innervation patterns8,9.
The present protocol describes a sequence of steps involved in wounding the cornea of an embryonic chick in ovo. First, eggs are windowed at early embryonic ages to facilitate access to the embryo. Second, a series of in ovo physical manipulations to the extraembryonic membranes are conducted to ensure access to the eye is maintained through later stages of development, corresponding to when the three cellular layers of the cornea are formed and wounding is desired. Third, linear central cornea incisions penetrating through the corneal epithelium and into the anterior stroma are made using a microsurgical knife. The regeneration process or fully restored corneas can be analyzed for regenerative potential using various cellular and molecular techniques following the wounding procedure.
The strain of eggs used in this protocol was White Leghorn, and all animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Illinois Wesleyan University.
1. Incubation of chick eggs
2. Windowing the eggs to prepare for membrane dissection
3. Microdissections of the extraembryonic membranes
4. Corneal wounding
Following the earlier dissection of the ACM and CAM at E5.5 to expose the cranial region of the developing embryo, a series of lacerations that spanned the E7 central cornea was made in ovo (Figure 1). An ideal wound to study cornea regeneration occurs following three lacerations, each made in the same location of the cornea. The first laceration traverses the corneal epithelium, while the second and third lacerations penetrate the underlying basement membrane and anterior stroma, r...
The chick is an ideal model system for studying fetal, scarless cornea wound repair. Unlike mammals, the chick is easily accessible throughout development using in ovo8 or ex ovo strategies24. The embryonic chick cornea is much larger than rodent corneas, with nearly 50% of the cranial volume dedicated to the eye25, making it highly amenable to physical manipulations such as wounding. Moreover, chicken eggs are readily availabl...
The authors have no competing financial interests concerning the information presented in this manuscript.
This work was supported by an Artistic and Scholarly Development grant through Illinois Wesleyan University to TS and funded in part by NIH-R01EY022158 (PL).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
18 G hypodermic needle | Fisher Scientific | 14-826-5D | |
30 degree angled microdissecting knife | Fine Science Tools | 10056-12 | |
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) | Molecular Probes | D1306 | |
5 mL syringe | Fisher Scientific | 14-829-45 | |
Alexa Fluor labelled secondary antibodies | Molecular Probes | ||
Calcium chloride dihydrate (CaCl2-H20) | Sigma | C8106 | |
Chicken egg trays | GQF | O246 | |
Dissecting Forceps, Fine Tip, Serrated | VWR | 82027-408 | |
Dissecting scissors, sharp tip | VWR | 82027-578 | |
Iris 1 x 2 Teeth Tissue Forceps, Full Curved | VWR | 100494-908 | |
Kimwipes | Sigma | Z188956 | |
Microdissecting Scissors | VWR | 470315-228 | |
Mouse anti-fibronectin (IgG1) | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | B3/D6 | |
Mouse anti-laminin (IgG1) | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | 3H11 | |
Mouse antineuron-specific β-tubulin (Tuj1, IgG2a) | Biolegend | 801213 | |
Mouse anti-tenascin (IgG1) | Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank | M1-B4 | |
Paraformaldehyde | Sigma | 158127 | |
Penicillin/Streptomycin | Sigma | P4333 | |
Potassium chloride (KCl) | Sigma | P5405 | |
Sodium chloride (NaCl) | Fisher Scientific | BP358 | |
Sportsman 1502 egg incubator | GQF | 1502 | |
Tear by hand packaging (1.88 inch width) | Scotch | n/a |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved