A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This protocol describes techniques for isolating primary mouse hepatocytes from the liver and electroporating CRISPR-Cas9 as ribonucleoproteins and mRNA to disrupt a therapeutic target gene associated with an inherited metabolic disease of the liver. The methods described result in high viability and high levels of gene modification after electroporation.
This protocol describes a fast and effective method for isolating primary mouse hepatocytes followed by electroporation-mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 as ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) and mRNA. Primary mouse hepatocytes were isolated using a three-step retrograde perfusion method resulting in high yields of up to 50 × 106 cells per liver and cell viability of >85%. This protocol provides detailed instructions for plating, staining, and culturing hepatocytes. The results indicate that electroporation provides a high transfection efficiency of 89%, as measured by the percentage of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive cells and modest cell viability of >35% in mouse hepatocytes.
To demonstrate the utility of this approach, CRISPR-Cas9 targeting the hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase gene was electroporated into primary mouse hepatocytes as proof-of-principle gene editing to disrupt a therapeutic gene related to an inherited metabolic disease (IMD) of the liver. A higher on-target edit of 78% was observed for RNPs compared to 47% editing efficiency with mRNA. The functionality of hepatocytes was evaluated in vitro using an albumin assay that indicated that delivering CRISPR-Cas9 as RNPs and mRNA results in comparable cell viability in primary mouse hepatocytes. A promising application for this protocol is the generation of mouse models for human genetic diseases affecting the liver.
IMDs of the liver are genetic disorders characterized by the deficiency of a crucial hepatic enzyme involved in metabolism that leads to the accumulation of toxic metabolites. Without treatment, IMDs of the liver result in organ failure or premature death1,2. The only curative option for patients with IMDs of the liver is orthotopic liver transplantation, which is limited due to the low availability of donor organs and complications from immunosuppressive therapy following the procedure3,4. According to recent data collected by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, only 40%-46% of adult patients on the liver transplant waiting list receive an organ, while 12.3% of these patients die while on the waiting list5. Moreover, only 5% of all the rare liver diseases have an FDA-approved treatment6. It is clear that there is a critical need for novel treatments for IMDs of the liver. However, appropriate disease models are required to develop new therapeutic options.
Modeling human diseases using in vitro and in vivo systems remains an obstacle for developing effective therapies and studying the pathology of IMDs of the liver. Hepatocytes from patients with rare liver diseases are challenging to obtain7. Animal models are crucial for developing an understanding of disease pathology and for testing therapeutic strategies. However, one obstacle is generating models from embryos carrying lethal mutations. For example, attempts to create mouse models of Alagille Syndrome (ALGS) with embryos containing homozygous deletions of a 5 kb sequence near the 5′-end of the Jag1 gene resulted in the early death of the embryos8. In addition, generating mouse models by gene editing in embryonic stem cells can be time- and resource-intensive9. Lastly, mutations will appear outside the targeted tissue, leading to confounding variables that may impede study of the disease9. Somatic gene editing would allow for easier editing in liver tissue and bypasses the challenges associated with generating models using embryonic stem cells.
Electroporation enables the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 directly into the nucleus by applying high-voltage currents to permeabilize the cell membrane and is compatible with many cell types, including those that are intransigent to transfection techniques, such as human embryonic stem cells, pluripotent stem cells, and neurons10,11,12. However, low viability is a potential drawback of electroporation; optimizing the procedure can yield high levels of delivery while limiting toxicity13. A recent study demonstrates the feasibility of electroporating CRISPR-Cas9 components into primary mouse and human hepatocytes as a highly efficient approach14. Ex vivo electroporation in hepatocytes has the potential to be applied to generate new mouse models for human IMDs of the liver.
This protocol provides a detailed step-by-step procedure for isolating mouse hepatocytes from the liver and subsequently electroporating CRISPR-Cas9 as RNP complexes, consisting of Cas9 protein and synthetic single-guide RNA (sgRNA), or Cas9 mRNA combined with sgRNA to obtain high levels of on-target gene editing. In addition, the protocol provides methods for quantifying gene editing efficiency, viability, and functionality following electroporation of CRISPR-Cas9 into freshly isolated mouse hepatocytes.
The animal experiments were all performed in compliance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines and approved protocols at Clemson University. Surgical procedures were performed in anesthetized wild-type C57BL/6J mice between 8 and 10 weeks old.
1. Animal surgery
2. Hepatocyte isolation
3. Design sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing
NOTE: This section describes the design of an sgRNA targeting the mouse hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (Hpd) gene as proof-of-principle gene editing to disrupt a therapeutic target gene related to an IMD of the liver.
4. Electroporation and cell culture
5. Calculate the volume of the membrane matrix to mix with MM to give a final concentration of 0.25 mg/mL
NOTE: For a 6-well plate, 2 mL of overlay is needed per well.
6. Add the calculated volume of the membrane matrix to ice cold MM and mix by pipetting up and down 10 times
7. Analysis of delivery efficiency, viability, and on-target editing in electroporated mouse hepatocytes
Isolation of plateable primary hepatocytes from the liver
The overall process of liver perfusion and hepatocyte isolation is illustrated in Figure 1. In this experiment, wild-type, 8-10-week-old C57BL6/6J mice were used. The procedure is expected to yield 20-50 × 106 cells per mouse with a viability between 85% and 95%. If the viability is <70%, percoll treatment should be followed to remove dead cells. Freshly isolated hepatocytes should be plated ...
The steps outlined in the protocol for hepatocyte isolation are challenging and require practice for proficiency. There are several key steps for the successful hepatocyte isolation from the liver. First, proper cannulation of the inferior vena cava is essential for complete liver perfusion. The absence of blanching in the liver after perfusion indicates displacement of the catheter (Table 1). The inferior vena cava (retrograde perfusion) was cannulated in the procedure because it is simpler and more acc...
The authors have no competing interests to disclose.
RNC received funding from South Carolina Bioengineering Center of Regeneration and Formation of Tissues Pilot grant supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Foundation, and American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy under grant numbers P30 GM131959, 2021000920, and 2022000099, respectively. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy or the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Foundation. The schematic for Figure 1 was created with BioRender.com.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Equipment | |||
0.2 mL PCR 8-tube FLEX-FREE strip, attached clear flat caps, natural | USA Scientific | 1402-4700 | |
6-well Collagen Plates | Advanced Biomatrix | 5073 | |
accuSpin Micro 17R | Fisher Scientific | 13-100-675 | |
All-in-one Fluorescent Microscope | Keyence | BZ-X810 | |
Analog Vortex Mixer | VWR | 97043-562 | |
ART Wide BORE filtered tips 1,000 µL | ThermoFisher Scientific | 2079GPK | |
Automated Cell Counter | Bio-Rad Laboratories | TC20 | |
Blue Wax Dissection Tray | Braintree Scientific Inc. | DTW1 | 9" x 6.5" x 1/2"+F21 |
Cell scraper/lifter | Argos Technologies | UX-04396-53 | Non-pyrogenic, sterile |
Conical tubes (15 mL) | Fisher Scientific | 339650 | |
Conical tubes (50 mL) | Fisher Scientific | 14-432-22 | |
Cotton applicators | Fisher Scientific | 22-363-170 | |
Curved scissors | Cooper Surgical | 62131 | |
Disposable Petri Dishes | Falcon | 351029 | 100mm,sterile |
Disposable Petri Dishes | VWR | 25373-100 | 35mm, sterile |
Epoch Microplate Spectrophotometer | BioTek Instruments | 250082 | |
Falcon Cell strainer (70 µm) | Fisher Scientific | 08-771-2 | |
Forceps | Cooper Surgical | 61864 | Euro-Med Adson Tissue Forceps |
IV catheters | BD | 382612 | 24 G x 0.75 in |
IV infusion set | Baxter | 2C6401 | |
MyFuge 12 Mini Centrifuge | Benchmark Scientific | 1220P38 | |
Needles | Fisher Scientific | 05-561-20 | 25 G |
Nucleofector 2b Device | Lonza | AAB-1001 | Program T-028 was used for electroporation in mouse hepatocytes |
Peristaltic Pump | Masterflex | HV-77120-42 | 10 to 60 rpm; 90 to 260 VAC |
Precision pump tubing | Masterflex | HV-96410-14 | 25 ft, silicone |
Primaria Culture Plates | Corning Life Sciences | 353846 | Nitrogen-containing tissue culture plates |
Serological Pipets (25 mL) | Fisher Scientific | 12-567-604 | |
Syringes | BD | 329464 | 1 mL, sterile |
T100 Thermal Cycler | Bio-Rad Laboratories | 1861096 | |
Water bath | ALT | 27577 | Thermo Scientific Precision Microprocessor Controlled 280 Series, 2.5 L |
Reagents | |||
Alt-R S.p. Cas9 Nuclease V3 | IDT | 1081058 | |
Beckman Coulter AMPure XP, 5 mL | Fisher Scientific | NC9959336 | |
CleanCap Cas9 mRNA | Trilink Biotechnologies | L-7606-100 | |
CleanCap EGFP mRNA | Trilink Biotechnologies | L-7201-100 | |
Corning Matrigel Matrix | Corning Life Sciences | 356234 | |
DMEM | ThermoFisher Scientific | 11885076 | Low glucose, pyruvate |
Ethanol 70% | VWR | 71001-652 | |
Fetal bovine serum | Thermoscientific | 26140-079 | |
Hepatocyte Maintenance Medium (MM) | Lonza | MM250 | |
Hepatocyte Plating Medium (PM) | Lonza | MP100 | |
Mouse Albumin ELISA Kit | Fisher Scientific | NC0010653 | |
Mouse/Rat Hepatocyte Nucleofector Kit | Lonza | VPL-1004 | |
OneTaq HotStart DNA Polymerase | New England Biolabs | M0481L | |
PBS 10x pH 7.4 | Thermoscientific | 70011-044 | No calcium or magnesium chloride |
Percoll (PVP solution) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology | sc-500790A | |
Periodic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | P7875-25G | |
Permount Mounting Medium | VWR | 100496-550 | |
QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution | Lucigen Corporation | QE05090 | |
Schiff’s fuchsin-sulfite reagent | Sigma-Aldrich | S5133 | |
Trypsin-EDTA (0.25%) | ThermoFisher Scientific | 25200056 | Phenol red |
Vybrant MTT Cell Viability Assay | ThermoFisher Scientific | V13154 | |
Perfusion Solution 1 (pH 7.4, filter sterilized) | Stable at 4 °C for 2 months | ||
EBSS | Fisher Scientific | 14155063 | Complete to 200 mL |
EGTA (0.5 M) | Bioworld | 40520008-1 | 200 µL |
HEPES (pH 7.3, 1 M) | ThermoFisher Scientific | AAJ16924AE | 2 mL |
Perfusion Solution 2 (pH 7.4, filter sterilized) | Stable at 4 °C for 2 months | ||
CaCl2·2H20 (1.8 mM) | Sigma | C7902-500G | 360 µL of 1 M stock |
EBSS (no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red) | Fisher Scientific | 14-155-063 | Complete to 200 mL |
HEPES (1 M) | ThermoFisher Scientific | AAJ16924AE | 2 mL |
MgSO4·7H20 (0.8 mM) | Sigma | 30391-25G | 160 µL of 1 M stock |
Perfusion Solution 3 | Prepared fresh prior to use | ||
Solution 2 | 50 mL | ||
Liberase | Roche | 5401127001 | 0.094 Wunsch units/mL |
Mouse Anesthetic Cocktail | |||
Acepromzine | 0.25 mg/mL final concentration | ||
Ketamine | 7.5 mg/mL final concentration | ||
Xylazine | 1.5 mg/mL final concentration | ||
Software | URL | ||
Benchling | https://www.benchling.com/ | ||
ImageJ | https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ | ||
TIDE: Tracking of Indels by Decomposition | https://tide.nki.nl/ |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved