Iowa State University is part of a team supporting DARPA&#39;s Insect Allies program HR0011-17-2-0053. This work was also supported by the Iowa State University Plant Sciences Institute, Iowa State University Crop Bioengineering Center, USDA NIFA Hatch project number 3808, and State of Iowa Funds. K.L.H. was also partially supported by the Iowa State University Predictive Plant Phenomics graduate training program funded by the National Science Foundation (DGE #1545453) and by Agricultural and Food Research Initiative grant no. 2019-07318 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.
We thank Nick Lauter (USDA-ARS, Ames, IA) for seed of maize inbred lines, Christian F. Montes-Serey (Iowa State University) for making the FoMV-GFP clone, and Tyler Austin (Iowa State University) for technical assistance.

1. Plasmid construction
NOTE: This protocol can be applied to other viral vectors or Agrobacterium strains, but this may affect the overall success of inoculation by agroinjection. Always perform bacterial inoculation and plating steps in a laminar flow hood.
<ol>
	<li>FoMV silencing construct 
	NOTE: Luria-Bertani (LB) media (Miller) is used for all media unless otherwise specified. Liquid LB is made by suspending 25 g of granules into 1,000 mL of distilled water and autoclaving for 15 min at 121 &#176;C. Solid LB media is similarly made with the addition of 1.5% agar before autoclaving. Antibiotics&#160;are added after LB is cooled to ~60 &#176;C, and the solution is poured into 95 x 15 mm Petri plates. The antibiotic concentrations to use are as follows: rifampicin (rif) at 25 &#181;g/mL, gentamycin (gent) at 50 &#181;g/mL, and kanamycin (kan) at 50 &#181;g/mL.
	<ol>
		<li>PCR amplify fragments from the maize gene to be silenced (e.g., les22 or pds) using a forward primer with a PacI restriction site and a reverse primer with an XbaI restriction site. This will enable ligation of the gene fragments into the MCS1* of the FoMV-pCAMBIA1380 binary vector in the antisense orientation. 
		NOTE: Set up the PCR using a high-fidelity DNA polymerase, forward and reverse primers at 10 &#181;M each, plasmid DNA template, and water, following the DNA polymerase specifications. Amplify for 35 cycles, using an annealing temperature according to the DNA polymerase and primer melting temperature (Tm), and a 30 s extension per kilobase to be amplified.</li>
		<li>Perform PCR purification using a PCR purification kit according to the kit specifications.</li>
		<li>Digest the purified PCR product and the FoMV-EV with the restriction enzymes XbaI and PacI. Use 1 &#181;g of plasmid or all of the purified PCR product, 2 &#181;L of 10x buffer, 1 &#181;L of restriction enzyme, and add water to make a 20 &#181;L final reaction volume. Incubate according to enzyme specification.</li>
		<li>Ligate the digested PCR product and FoMV-EV together with T4 DNA ligase according to the manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
		<li>Transform the ligated plasmid into DH5&#945; chemically competent E. coli cells using the heat shock method.
		<ol>
			<li>Thaw cells on ice and add 3 &#181;L of plasmid to the tube. Incubate on ice for 30 min, then heat shock for 30 s at 42 &#176;C.</li>
			<li>Place on ice for 5 min, add 200 &#181;L super optimal broth with catabolic repression (SOC) and allow E. coli cells to recover in SOC media for 1 h at 37 &#176;C with shaking at 225 rpm.</li>
			<li>Plate on kanamycin&#160;selective LB media and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Check colonies for accurate clones by Sanger sequencing using the primers FM-5840F and FM-6138R (Supplemental Table 1). Submit 250 ng of plasmid DNA to a facility that will perform Sanger sequencing. For this experiment samples were sent to Iowa State University DNA Core Facility.</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2 mL of liquid LB with the chosen colony and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight with shaking at 225 rpm. Extract plasmid DNA from the overnight culture through an alkaline lysis plasmid DNA preparation52.</li>
		<li>Transform plasmid DNA into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 cells using the freeze-thaw method. Allow 100 &#181;L of chemically competent cells to thaw on ice, add 1-5 &#181;L of plasmid and incubate on ice for 30 min. Place in liquid nitrogen for 1 min, then incubate at 37 &#176;C for 3 min. Add 1 mL of SOC, allow to recover for 2-3 h at 28 &#176;C with shaking, plate on rif, gent, and kan selective LB media and incubate at 28 &#176;C for 2 days.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for the presence of insert with colony PCR. Pick a single bacterial colony and mix it in 30 &#181;L of water. Set up a PCR reaction by adding 12.5 &#181;L of polymerase&#160;master mix, 1.25 &#181;L of each 10 &#181;M primer, FM-5840F and FM-6138R, 3 &#181;L of the bacterial colony suspension, and water to a final volume of 25 &#181;L. Cycle 35 times with an annealing temperature of 64 &#176;C and an extension time of 1 min (1 min for every kb amplified).</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2-5 mL of liquid LB (rif, gent, kan) with the correct Agrobacterium colony. Let it grow overnight at 28 &#176;C with shaking at 225 rpm.</li>
		<li>Mix the overnight culture with a 50% glycerol solution 1:1. Store at -80 &#176;C for long-term storage.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>FoMV expression construct
	<ol>
		<li>PCR amplify the coding sequence of interest including start and stop codons (e.g., GFP) as described in 1.1.1, adding a Bsu36I restriction site on the forward primer and a PspOMI restriction site on the reverse primer to enable directional cloning in the sense orientation into MCS2.</li>
		<li>Perform PCR purification using a PCR purification kit according to the kit&#39;s specifications.</li>
		<li>Digest the PCR product and the FoMV-EV with the restriction enzymes Bsu36I and PspOMI, as described in 1.1.3.</li>
		<li>Ligate the digested PCR product and FoMV-EV together with T4 DNA ligase according to the manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
		<li>Transform into DH5&#945; chemically competent E. coli cells using the heat shock method as described in 1.1.5. Plate on kanamycin&#160;selective LB media and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight.</li>
		<li>Check colonies for accurate clones by Sanger sequencing as described in 1.1.6 using the primers 5AmuS2 and 5AmuA2 (Supplemental Table 1).</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2 mL of liquid LB with the chosen colony and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight with shaking at 225 RPM. Extract plasmid DNA from the overnight culture through an alkaline lysis plasmid DNA preparation52.</li>
		<li>Transform plasmid DNA into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 chemically competent cells using the freeze-thaw method as described in 1.1.8. Plate on rif, gent, and kan selective LB media and incubate at 28 &#176;C for 2 days.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for the presence of insert with colony PCR using the primers 5AmuS2 and 5AmuA2.</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2-5 mL liquid LB (rif, gent, kan) with the correct Agrobacterium colony. Shake overnight at 225 rpm at 28 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Mix the overnight culture with a 50% glycerol solution 1:1. Store at -80 &#176;C for long-term storage.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>SCMV expression construct
	<ol>
		<li>PCR amplify the gene of interest (e.g., GFP) excluding the stop codon as described in 1.1.1, including a PspOMI digestion site on the forward primer and a SbfI digestion site on the reverse primer to enable directional cloning into the SCMV-pCAMBIA1380 binary vector. 
		NOTE: Insert must be cloned in frame with the viral polyprotein.</li>
		<li>Perform PCR purification using a PCR purification kit according to the kit&#39;s specifications.</li>
		<li>Digest the PCR product and the SCMV-EV with the restriction enzymes PspOMI and SbfI, as described in 1.1.3.</li>
		<li>Ligate the digested PCR product and SCMV-EV together with T4 DNA ligase according to the manufacturer&#39;s protocol.</li>
		<li>Transform the product into DH5&#945; chemically competent E. coli cells using the heat shock method as described in 1.1.5. Plate on kan&#160;selective LB media and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for accurate clones by Sanger sequencing as described in 1.1.6 using the primers SC-745F and HCProR1 (Supplemental Table 1).</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2 mL of liquid LB with the chosen colony and incubate at 37 &#176;C overnight with shaking at 225 rpm. Extract the plasmid DNA from the overnight culture through an alkaline lysis plasmid DNA preparation52.</li>
		<li>Transform the plasmid DNA into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 chemically competent cells using the freeze-thaw method as described in 1.1.8. Plate on rif, gent, and kan selective LB media and incubate at 28 &#176;C for 2 days.</li>
		<li>Screen colonies for presence of insert with colony PCR with the primers SC-745F and HCProR1 as described in 1.1.9.</li>
		<li>Inoculate 2-5 mL of liquid LB (rif, gent, kan) with the correct Agrobacterium colony. Shake overnight at 225 rpm at 28 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Mix the overnight culture with a 50% glycerol solution 1:1. Store at -80 &#176;C for long-term storage.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Seedling preparation
<ol>
	<li>Plant 1-2 maize seeds (&#39;Golden Bantam&#39; sweet corn, FR1064, B73, etc.) in peat-based growing medium in small inserts placed inside trays 4-7 days before injection. Place in a growth chamber under 16 h days at 25 &#176;C and 8 h nights at 22 &#176;C (~185 photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)) or in a greenhouse under 16 h days at 22-25 &#176;C and 8 h nights at 22-25 &#176;C (350-400 PAR). 
	NOTE: Susceptibility to Agrobacterium varies among maize genotypes, affecting the rates of success. Additionally, some viral vectors may be incompatible with certain maize genotypes.</li>
	<li>Water regularly and fertilize once a week with 15-5-15 liquid fertilizer at 330 parts per million (PPM).</li>
</ol>
3. Preparation of Agrobacterium
<ol>
	<li>One day before the injection, prepare LB liquid media with the appropriate antibiotic (rif, gent, kan) and inoculate with the Agrobacterium strain carrying the desired viral construct. It is recommended to add 20 &#181;L of glycerol stock into 50 mL of LB, which should yield enough bacterial culture to inoculate &#62;100 plants and can be scaled up or down as needed. 
	NOTE: Prepare enough inoculum to have a final amount of bacterial suspension of at least 1 mL at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0 for every 4-5 plants.</li>
	<li>Shake at 225 rpm at 28 &#176;C for 24 h.</li>
	<li>Pellet bacteria for 10 min at 4,000 x g at room temperature. Discard the supernatant.</li>
	<li>Wash the pellet thoroughly with 1 mL of deionized (DI) water by pipetting or gentle vortexing.</li>
	<li>Repeat step 3.3 to pellet bacteria.</li>
	<li>Resuspend the pellet in 1 mL of 10 mM MgSO4 solution by pipetting or gentle vortexing.
	<ol>
		<li>Optionally, add 200 &#181;M acetosyringone to the solution. Although commonly used, acetosyringone only enhances the transformation ability of some Agrobacterium strains. The authors have not found that the addition of acetosyringone affects efficiency in this protocol (Supplemental Table 2). 
		NOTE: 10 mM MgSO4 solution can be made from a 1 M stock solution with a pH of 6.3 stored at room temperature. Solution will likely not require pH adjustment.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Measure OD600 of the sample with a spectrophotometer and dilute to 1.0 OD600 with 10 mM MgSO4 solution. 
	&#8203;NOTE: This is a safe stopping point. Bacterial suspension can be kept at room temperature for up to 5 h before injection.</li>
</ol>
4. Injection
NOTE: Maize seedlings from 4-7 days old can be used for injection. Seedling growth rate is greatly affected by growth conditions, amount of PAR (i.e., higher PAR in greenhouse than in growth chamber), and genotype, among other things that can be difficult to control in greenhouse conditions. Plants can be injected as young as 4 days old when they are 2-3 cm tall with no leaves expanded and as old as 7 days when the lowermost rounded-tip leaf is expanded. The success rate of this inoculation methods drops rapidly as plants age beyond 7 days after sowing. The injection site is the same no matter the age of the seedlings.
<ol>
	<li>Wearing safety goggles, inject the bacterial suspension into the seedlings 2-3 mm above the coleoptilar node using a 25G x 5/8&#34; needle attached to a 1 mL disposable syringe. 
	NOTE: The coleoptilar node is where crown roots will eventually form. This is the lowest node on the plant. Typically, there will be a color change from green to white at and below the node. The injection location is just above the meristem. Dissecting a few seedlings at this stage may help with visualizing the location of the meristem and consequently the proper injection site.</li>
	<li>Apply gentle pressure to the syringe until the suspension fills up the coleoptile or is visible in the whorl, depending on the growth stage of the plants. This is approximately 100-200 &#181;L of suspension. 
	NOTE: If it is difficult to inject the suspension into the seedling, the injection site may be too low. Moderate pressure is all that should be needed to inject the suspension.</li>
	<li>Inject all seedlings, changing syringes and needles for each construct.</li>
</ol>
5. Continued plant care
<ol>
	<li>Transplant the injected seedlings to 13 x 13 x 15 cm or larger pots when they are 7-8 days old.</li>
	<li>Maintain growth conditions (16 h photoperiod and fertilizing once per week).</li>
</ol>
6. Confirmation of infection (Phenotypically and RT-PCR)
<ol>
	<li>Phenotypically score plants between 14-21 DPI. Lesions from silencing the control genes lesion mimic 22 or phytoene desaturase can easily be seen on the leaves and are distinct from FoMV symptoms. GFP expression can be detected via fluorescent microscope imaging or other UV light imaging. 
	NOTE: Some constructs/viral vectors may take longer to show symptoms or may not show any symptoms at all. High light conditions greatly increase the phenotypes caused by silencing lesion mimic 22 and phytoene desaturase. Lesions may be less visible or absent if plants are maintained in lower light conditions such as a growth chamber, however the actual infection rate as determined by RT-PCR should not be affected (Table 1).</li>
	<li>To confirm infection molecularly, sample leaf 6 between 14-21 DPI and extract total RNA using a phenol-chloroform extraction according to manufacturer&#39;s instruction.</li>
	<li>Using the extracted RNA as a template to generate first-strand cDNA.
	<ol>
		<li>Set up the cDNA reaction with up to 5 &#181;g of total RNA, 1 &#181;L of random hexamer primers, 1 &#181;L of oligo (dT)18 primers, 1 &#181;L of dNTPs, 1 &#181;L of of reverse transcriptase and water for a final volume of 14.5 &#181;L.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Using primers designed for the viral construct and the cDNA as a template, perform PCR on each sample to confirm viral infection and determine the integrity of the gene or gene fragment of interest as described in 1.1.1, except reduce cycles to 25 for FoMV and 30 for SCMV to avoid false positives.
	<ol>
		<li>For FoMV silencing constructs, use primers FM-5840F and FM-6138R to amplify across the MCS1*, which contains the maize gene fragment. For FoMV expression constructs, use primers 5AmuS2 and 5AmuA2 to amplify across the MCS2, which contains the inserted gene.</li>
		<li>For SCMV expression constructs, use primers SC745-F and HCProR1 to amplify across the MCS, which contains the inserted gene (Supplementary Figure 3).</li>
		<li>For an endogenous control gene, use primers ZmActS and ZmActA, which amplify an mRNA fragment of maize actin (GRMZM2G126010) or primers ZmUbiF and ZmUbiR, which amplify an mRNA fragment of maize polyubiquitin (GRMZM2G409726_T01).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Visualize the PCR product on a 1% agarose gel containing a nucleic acid stain to determine the presence or absence of virus and gene or gene fragment.</li>
</ol>

The researchers have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Agrobacterium is an essential tool that facilitates numerous molecular biology techniques in plant-related research. This study provides an agroinjection protocol for inoculating FoMV and SCMV viral vectors directly into maize tissues for VIGS and VOX applications. The main goal is to increase the ease and utility of virus-based technologies for research in monocot crop plants. Although direct agroinoculation of maize has been reported for a few viruses, the authors are not aware of a detailed protocol, and there are no examples of VIGS and VOX applications in those studies19,22.
It has been reported, and was confirmed while developing this protocol, that the injection location is a key factor for successfully launching a systemic viral infection via agroinjection19. Consistently injecting the recommended location on the plant is assumed to be the largest variable, because the exact position of the meristem in maize seedlings is virtually undetectable by eye. To minimize interpersonal variation, dissecting a few maize seedlings down to the meristem is recommended to better visualize its location (Figure 3C). The meristem&#39;s position in relation to the coleoptilar node should be roughly the same for plants aged 4-7 days old. Additionally, practicing injection with a dyed liquid provides an easily visible demonstration of how the &#34;inoculum&#34; fills the leaf whorl, and because the injection site is marked with dye, the accuracy of the injection site can be corroborated (Figure 3G,H). Meristematic tissues are the most susceptible to agroinjection, but injecting Agrobacterium suspensions directly into this tissue results in undesirable morphological effects (Figure 6)19. Plants with damaged meristems survive, but the resulting defects are undesirable, and thus, direct injection of this tissue should be avoided.
There are several variables that may impact the successful launch of a systemic viral infection via agroinjection because three complex biological systems (plant, virus, and Agrobacterium strain) must interact in coordination. This complex interplay may be aided by the rapidly-dividing cells of the meristematic region, making it an ideal location for agroinoculation19. The Agrobacterium strain&#160;must be able to infect cells of the plant tissues to deliver the T-DNA carrying the viral genome, and the plant must be susceptible to the virus in order to initiate viral replication and systemic infection. Maize genotypes differ in their susceptibility to viruses (e.g., Mo17 is resistant to FoMV) or Agrobacterium strains, but the majority that were tested appear to be susceptible to both FoMV and SCMV (Table 1 and Table 2)53. For example, the inbred line FR1064 and the sweet corn variety Golden Bantam may be particularly susceptible to both GV3101 Agrobacterium and FoMV-based vectors.
The leaf number sampled and the timing of sampling for RT-PCR is critical for accurate assessment of viral infection. In the examples shown here, leaf number was determined by starting at the first rounded leaf (commonly known as the &#34;thumb leaf&#34;) and counting upward. Leaves were sampled once they were expanded and the next leaf had begun emerging. However, which leaves are optimal for sampling might vary based on virus species used, growth conditions, and maize genotype. Therefore, an initial time course experiment is recommended when applying this protocol to a new virus system to optimize the sampling strategy with respect to leaves and timing.
The specific construct used significantly affects the efficiency of this protocol. For example, the empty vectors, FoMV-EV and SCMV-EV, and FoMV-PDS&#160;and FoMV-LES22,which both contain small inserts (313 bp and 329 bp, respectively), typically produce the highest percentages of plants with viral symptoms in these experiments (Tables 1 and Table 2). However, recombinant viruses carrying larger inserts of the GFP ORF (720 bp) in FoMV-GFP and SCMV-GFP, had much lower infection rates when compared to plants injected with the empty vector or gene silencing constructs. This trend may be due to the negative impacts on viral fitness caused by increasing amounts of exogenous genetic material in the viral genome. Several studies have shown that the insert stability of plant viral vectors is largely dependent on insert size and sequence36,54,55,56,57. Additionally, there was a notable difference in percentage of plants that become infected following inoculation with either the FoMV or SCMV empty vector, suggesting additional work is needed to optimize this protocol for SCMV (Table 1). These results indicate that some troubleshooting may be needed when developing a construct, because the sequence and length of the fragment can both affect efficiency.
Overall, this study has shown that agroinjection of maize seedlings is an effective inoculation method for two different RNA plant viruses, multiple vector configurations, and 11 genotypes of maize. This work with FoMV and SCMV, paired with previous works utilizing injection with maize chlorotic mottle virus (MCMV) or MSV, indicates that agroinjection is suitable for inoculating maize seedlings with infectious clones of both RNA and DNA viruses19,20,21,22. Additionally, this work further shows agroinjection is a viable method for VIGS and VOX vectors and can be applied to plants as young as four days old (Table 3). The protocol presented here is expected to be readily adapted by maize biologists to facilitate research in functional genomics studies involving transient gene silencing (VIGS) and overexpression (VOX). Agroinjection also has the capacity to facilitate virus-based gene editing approaches (VEdGE) that would otherwise be limited by reliance on plant transformation, potentially improving editing efficiency as well as accessibility58,59,60. Given the appropriate Agrobacterium strain, maize genotypes, and viral vectors are thoughtfully combined, inoculation by agroinjection is expected to become a valuable tool for transient gene function analyses in maize.

Infectious clones of many plant viruses have been engineered for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), gene overexpression (VOX), and most recently, virus-enabled gene editing (VEdGE)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. As new viral constructs are developed, methods to successfully infect plant tissues with these modified viruses must also be considered. Current methods to launch virus infections in plants include particle bombardment, rub-inoculation of in vitro RNA transcripts or DNA clones, vascular puncture inoculation, or Agrobacterium tumefaciens inoculation (agroinoculation)5,12,13,14,15,16,17. Each of these inoculation methods has inherent advantages and disadvantages, which include cost, need for specialized equipment, and feasibility within a given plant-virus system. Methods that utilize infiltration or injection of Agrobacterium strains containing binary T-DNA constructs designed to deliver recombinant viruses are preferred, because they are simple and inexpensive. However, detailed agroinoculation methods for monocotyledonous species such as Zea mays (maize) are lacking.
One of the first reports of agroinoculation for virus delivery was published in 1986, when the genome of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) was inserted into a T-DNA construct, and the resulting Agrobacterium carrying this construct was rub-inoculated onto turnip plants18. Additional methods for agroinoculation have since been developed. For example, in the case of foxtail mosaic virus (FoMV), Nicotiana benthamiana can be used as an intermediate host to generate virus particles in leaves that provide an inoculum source6. Rub inoculation of maize using infected N. benthamiana leaves is efficient, rapid, and simple, but the use of an intermediate host does not work for all maize-infecting viruses. Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), for example, cannot infect N. benthamiana,&#160;requiring the use of alternative inoculum sources for vectors derived from this virus. In 1988, Agrobacterium containing maize streak virus (MSV), a DNA virus, was introduced into maize seedlings by injection (agroinjection), demonstrating Agrobacterium-based inoculation methods are also useful for monocots19. Despite this early success with agroinjection, few studies utilizing this technique in maize have been published, leaving open questions about the applicability of this method for RNA viruses and VIGS, VOX, and VEdGE vectors20,21,22. However, broad use of agroinjection in monocot species is promising, because this general approach has been utilized in orchid, rice, and wheat23,24,25,26,27,28.
This protocol was optimized for FoMV and Agrobacterium strain GV3101 and has also been applied to an SCMV vector. FoMV is a potexvirus with a wide host range that includes 56 monocot and dicot species29. FoMV has a 6.2 kilobase (kb) positive sense, single-stranded RNA genome that encodes five different proteins from five open reading frames (ORFs)30,31,32,33,34,35. FoMV was previously developed into both a VIGS and VOX vector for maize by incorporating an infectious clone onto a T-DNA plasmid backbone6,36,37. The viral genome was modified for VIGS applications by adding a cloning site (MCS1*) immediately downstream of the coat protein (CP) (Figure 1A)36. For VOX and VEdGE applications, the CP promoter was duplicated and a second cloning site (MCS2) was added to enable insertion of sequences of interest between ORF 4 and the CP (Figure 1B)6. The FoMV vector containing both MCS1 and MCS2 with no inserts is FoMV empty vector (FoMV-EV) (Figure 1).
SCMV is an unrelated virus that has been developed for VOX in maize38. It is a member of the Potyviridae family, of which several members have been engineered to express foreign proteins in planta39,40,41,42,43,44. The host range of SCMV includes maize, sorghum, and sugarcane45,46, making it valuable for gene functional studies in these major crop plants36,38. SCMV has a positive sense, single-stranded RNA genome of approximately 10 kb in length47,48. To create the SCMV VOX vector, the well-established P1/HCPro junction was utilized as an insertion site for heterologous sequences38. This cloning site is followed by sequence encoding a NIa-Pro protease cleavage site, leading to the production of proteins independent from the SCMV polyprotein (Figure 1C).
T-DNA plasmids carrying infectious cDNA of these recombinant viruses have been transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. GV3101 is a nopaline type strain, which are well-known to be able to transfer T-DNA to monocotyledonous species, including maize26,28,49. Additionally, previous agroinjection studies have used the strains C58 or its derivative GV3101, as well19,20,22,27.
Three marker genes were used in the development of this protocol: two for gene silencing and one for gene expression. A 329 base-pair (bp) fragment from the maize gene lesion mimic 22 (les22, GRMZM2G044074) was used to construct the silencing vector FoMV-LES22. When les22 is silenced in maize, small, round patches of necrotic cells appear along the vasculature of leaves that expand and coalesce into large areas of necrotic leaf tissue50. FoMV-PDS, containing a 313 bp fragment from the sorghum gene phytoene desaturase (pds, LOC110436156, 96% sequence identity to maize pds, GRMZM2G410515), induces silencing of pds in maize, resulting in small streaks of photobleached cells along the vasculature of the leaves that lengthen over time51. The intact coding sequence for green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used to demonstrate protein expression for both FoMV (FoMV-GFP) and SCMV (SCMV-GFP). GFP expression in the leaves is typically most detectable at 14 days post inoculation (DPI)6. Although there have been previous studies utilizing agroinjection of viral vectors in maize, these experiments have only shown that agroinjection can facilitate viral infection from an infectious clone in maize seedlings and do not expand to recombinant viruses designed for VIGS or VOX applications19,20,21,22. The protocol presented here builds upon previous agroinjection methods, particularly Grismley et al.19. Overall, this agroinjection method is compatible with VIGS and VOX vectors, does not require specialized equipment or alternative hosts as inoculum sources, and decreases the overall time and cost required to set up and perform inoculations relative to other common methods that require biolistics or in vitro transcription. This protocol will facilitate functional genomics studies in maize with applications involving VIGS, VOX, and VEdGE.

<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>1 mL syringes</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>14955450</td>
			<td>alternatively, BD 309659</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>15 mL Falcon Tubes</td>
			<td>Corning Science</td>
			<td>352059</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1kb+ Ladder</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td>
			<td>10787018</td>
			<td>For assessing sizes of PCR products</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>25G x 5/8&#34; PrecisionGlide Needles</td>
			<td>Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD)</td>
			<td>305122</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>28&#176;C Incubator</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For Agrobacterium</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>37&#176;C Incubator</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For E. coli</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Acetosyringone</td>
			<td>MilliporeSigma</td>
			<td>D134406</td>
			<td>Optional</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Agar</td>
			<td>MilliporeSigma</td>
			<td>A4800</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Agarose</td>
			<td>GeneMate</td>
			<td>E-3120</td>
			<td>For making gels to check for virus/insert stability</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Agrobacterium tumefaciens Strain GV3101</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Carries vir plasmid encoding T-DNA transfer machinery, RifR, GmR, from lab stock</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bsu36I</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>R0524</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>cDNA Kit</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td>
			<td>K1672</td>
			<td>Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with Dnase</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chloroform</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>C298</td>
			<td>For RNA extraction</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cuvettes</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>14955127</td>
			<td>1.5 mL</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>D-(+)-Glucose</td>
			<td>MilliporeSigma</td>
			<td>G7528</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DH5alpha Competent E. coli Cells</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>C2987</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DNA Ligase</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td>
			<td>K1422</td>
			<td>Rapid DNA Ligation Kit</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>EDTA (Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid, Disodium Salt Dihydrate)</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>S311</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ethanol</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For RNA extraction</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fertilizer</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Peters Fertilizer 15-15-15 Concentrate</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Flat Inserts</td>
			<td>T.O. Plastics</td>
			<td>715357C</td>
			<td>For germinating seeds in trays</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Flats</td>
			<td>T.O. Plastics</td>
			<td>710245C</td>
			<td>For germinating seeds in trays</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>FluorCam</td>
			<td>Photon Systems Instruments</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>To assess maize plants for GFP expression before microscope</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Fluorescence Microscope</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gel Electrophoresis Box</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Gentamycin Sulfate</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>BP918</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glacial Acetate</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>A38</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glycerol</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>G33-500</td>
			<td>For saving frozen stocks of bacteria</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Go-Taq, 2X</td>
			<td>Promega</td>
			<td>M7123</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Hydrochloric Acid</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>A144</td>
			<td>for pHing solutions</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Isopropanol</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>109827</td>
			<td>For RNA extraction</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Kanamycin, Monosulfate</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>BP906</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Large Pots</td>
			<td>Kordlok</td>
			<td>SQL0550</td>
			<td>5x5x4&#34; or bigger.&#160; For transplanting seedlings.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Luria Bertani (LB) Broth, Miller</td>
			<td>Himedia</td>
			<td>M1245</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Magnesium Sulfate Heptahydrate</td>
			<td>Amresco</td>
			<td>662</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Maize Golden Bantam Sweet Corn Seed</td>
			<td>American Meadows, West Coast Seeds</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Maize Inbred Seed</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Our seed comes from our institution, but we are not able to provide this for other researchers.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Maxima H Minus Reverse Transcriptase</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td>
			<td>EP0753</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>MilliQ</td>
			<td>Elga</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Purelab Ultra</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Monarch PCR &#38; DNA Cleanup Kit</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>T1030</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PacI</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>R0547</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Peters Excel 15-5-15 Fertilizer</td>
			<td>ICL Specialty Fertilizers</td>
			<td>G99140</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Petri Dish, 95 mm x 15 mm</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>FB0875714G</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>pH Meter</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Potassium Acetate</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>P171</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Primers</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>Our primers were synthesized through our institutional DNA facility or through IDT</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PspOMI</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>R0653</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>M0491</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rifampicin</td>
			<td>EMD Millipore Corp</td>
			<td>557303</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rnase A</td>
			<td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td>
			<td>12091021</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SbfI</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>R0642</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Scale</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For weighing chemicals for media or buffers</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SDS (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate)</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>BP166</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium Hydroxide</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>S318</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Soil Substrate</td>
			<td>SunGro Horticulture</td>
			<td>SS#1-F1P</td>
			<td>Sunshine Mix #1/Fafard-1P, any soil mix that maize grows well in is sufficient</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Spectrophotometer</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For measuring OD600</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sybr Safe, 10,000X</td>
			<td>Invitrogen</td>
			<td>S33102</td>
			<td>For making gels to check for virus/insert stability</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Thermocycler</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For PCR</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tris Base</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>BP154</td>
			<td>Alkaline Lysis</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Trizol</td>
			<td>Ambion</td>
			<td>15596018</td>
			<td>For RNA extraction</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Weigh Paper</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>For weighing chemicals for media or buffers</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>XbaI</td>
			<td>New England Biolabs</td>
			<td>R0145</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

direct agroinoculation of maize seedlings by injection with recombinant foxtail mosaic virus and sugarcane mosaic virus infectious clones

Agrobacterium-based inoculation approaches are widely used for introducing viral vectors into plant tissues. This study details a protocol for the injection of maize seedlings near meristematic tissue with Agrobacterium carrying a viral vector. Recombinant foxtail mosaic virus (FoMV) clones engineered for gene silencing and gene expression were used to optimize this method, and its use was expanded to include a recombinant sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) engineered for gene expression. Gene fragments or coding sequences of interest are inserted into a modified, infectious viral genome that has been cloned into the binary T-DNA plasmid vector pCAMBIA1380. The resulting plasmid constructs are transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. Maize seedlings as young as 4 days old can be injected near the coleoptilar node with bacteria resuspended in MgSO4 solution. During infection with Agrobacterium, the T-DNA carrying the viral genome is transferred to maize cells, allowing for the transcription of the viral RNA genome. As the recombinant virus replicates and systemically spreads throughout the plant, viral symptoms and phenotypic changes resulting from the silencing of the target genes lesion mimic 22 (les22)&#160;or&#160;phytoene desaturase (pds) can be observed on the leaves, or expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) can be detected upon illumination with UV light or fluorescence microscopy. To detect the virus and assess the integrity of the insert simultaneously, RNA is extracted from the leaves of the injected plant and RT-PCR is conducted using primers flanking the multiple cloning site (MCS) carrying the inserted sequence. This protocol has been used effectively in several maize genotypes and can readily be expanded to other viral vectors, thereby offering an accessible tool for viral vector introduction in maize.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones at JoVE.com

Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones

An Agrobacterium-based injection (agroinjection) protocol is presented for the inoculation of foxtail mosaic virus&#160;and sugarcane mosaic virusclones into maize seedlings. Inoculation in this manner leads to viral infection, virus-induced gene silencing of marker genes, and viral overexpression of GFP.

Agrobacterium-based inoculation approaches are widely used for introducing viral vectors into plant tissues. This study details a protocol for the ...

direct-agroinoculation-maize-seedlings-injection-with-recombinant

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

4.7K Views.  Iowa State University. An Agrobacterium-based injection (agroinjection) protocol is presented for the inoculation of foxtail mosaic virus and sugarcane mosaic virusclones into maize seedlings. Inoculation in this manner leads to viral infection, virus-induced gene silencing of marker genes, and viral overexpression of GFP.

Video: Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones

Vaccinia Virus Infection &amp; Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 1

The family Poxviridae consists of large double-stranded DNA containing viruses that replicate exclusively in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Members of the orthopox genus include variola, the causative agent of human small pox, monkeypox, and vaccinia (VAC), the prototypic member of the virus family. Within the relatively large (~ 200 kb) vaccinia genome, three classes of genes are encoded: early, intermediate, and late. While all three classes are transcribed by virally-encoded RNA polymerases, each class serves a different function in the life cycle of the virus. Poxviruses utilize multiple strategies for modulation of the host cellular environment during infection. In order to understand regulation of both host and virus gene expression, we have utilized genome-wide approaches to analyze transcript abundance from both virus and host cells. Here, we demonstrate time course infections of HeLa cells with Vaccinia virus and sampling RNA at several time points post-infection. Both host and viral total RNA is isolated and amplified for hybridization to microarrays for analysis of gene expression.

Vaccinia Virus Infection & Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 1

Protocol for Vaccinia infection of HeLa cells and analysis of host and viral gene expression. Part 1 of 3.

The family Poxviridae consists of large double-stranded DNA containing viruses that replicate exclusively in the cytoplasm of infected cells.  Members of ...

Vaccinia Virus Infection &amp; Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 2

The family Poxviridae consists of large double-stranded DNA containing viruses that replicate exclusively in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Members of the orthopox genus include variola, the causative agent of human small pox, monkeypox, and vaccinia (VAC), the prototypic member of the virus family. Within the relatively large (~ 200 kb) vaccinia genome, three classes of genes are encoded: early, intermediate, and late. While all three classes are transcribed by virally-encoded RNA polymerases, each class serves a different function in the life cycle of the virus. Poxviruses utilize multiple strategies for modulation of the host cellular environment during infection. In order to understand regulation of both host and virus gene expression, we have utilized genome-wide approaches to analyze transcript abundance from both virus and host cells. Here, we demonstrate time course infections of HeLa cells with Vaccinia virus and sampling RNA at several time points post-infection. Both host and viral total RNA is isolated and amplified for hybridization to microarrays for analysis of gene expression.

Vaccinia Virus Infection & Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 2

Protocol for Vaccinia infection of HeLa cells and analysis of host and viral gene expression. Part 2 of 3.

Vaccinia Virus Infection &amp; Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 3

Vaccinia Virus Infection & Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 3

Protocol for Vaccinia infection of HeLa cells and analysis of host and viral gene expression. Part 3 describes the process of fluorescently labeling the amplified RNA from both host and viral samples by amino allyl coupling of dyes. Part 3 of 3.

A Technique to Simultaneously Visualize Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells and Virus-Infected Cells In situ

The numbers and locations of virus-specific CD8+ T cells relative to the numbers and locations of their infected cell targets is thought to be critical in determining outcomes that range from clearance to chronic persistent infections. We describe here a method for assessing the spatial and quantitative relationships between immune effector (E) virus-specific CD8+ T cells and infected targets (T) that combines in situ tetramer (IST) staining to detect virus-specific CD8+ T cells and in situ hybridization (ISH) to detect viral-RNA+ cells in the tissues where the battle between immune defenses and infection takes place. The combination of IST staining and ISH, abbreviated ISTH, enables visualization and mapping of the locations of immune effector cells and targets, and facile determination of E:T ratios.  These parameters in turn can then be used to determine the relationships between spatial proximity, and the timing and magnitude of the immune response that predict outcomes in early infection.

A Technique to Simultaneously Visualize Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells and Virus-Infected Cells In situ

A technique combining in situ tetramer staining and in situ hybridization (ISTH) enables visualization, mapping and analysis of the spatial proximity of virus-specific CD8+ T cells to their virus-infected targets, and determination of the quantitative relationships between these immune effectors and targets to infection outcomes.

The numbers and locations of virus-specific CD8+ T cells relative to the numbers and locations of their infected cell targets is thought to be critical in ...

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Evaluating Enhancer Sequences

The completion of the human genome sequence, along with that of many other species, has highlighted the challenge of ascribing specific function to non coding sequences. One prominent function carried out by the non coding fraction of the genome is to regulate gene transcription; however, there are no effective methods to broadly predict cis-regulatory elements from primary DNA sequence. We have developed an efficient protocol to functionally evaluate potential cis-regulatory elements through zebrafish transgenesis. Our approach offers significant advantages over cell-culture based techniques for developmentally important genes, since it provides information on spatial and temporal gene regulation. Conversely, it is faster and less expensive than similar experiments in transgenic mice, and we routinely apply it to sequences isolated from the human genome. Here we demonstrate our approach to selecting elements for testing based on sequence conservation and our protocol for cloning sequences and microinjecting them into zebrafish embryos.

We demonstrate our approach to finding potential enhancer elements from developmentally regulated genes and evaluating their function through mosaic zebrafish transgenesis.

The completion of the human genome sequence, along with that of many other species, has highlighted the challenge of ascribing specific function to non ...

Chemically-blocked Antibody Microarray for Multiplexed High-throughput Profiling of Specific Protein Glycosylation in Complex Samples

In this study, we describe an effective protocol for use in a multiplexed high-throughput antibody microarray with glycan binding protein detection that allows for the glycosylation profiling of specific proteins. Glycosylation of proteins is the most prevalent post-translational modification found on proteins, and leads diversified modifications of the physical, chemical, and biological properties of proteins. Because the glycosylation machinery is particularly susceptible to disease progression and malignant transformation, aberrant glycosylation has been recognized as early detection biomarkers for cancer and other diseases. However, current methods to study protein glycosylation typically are too complicated or expensive for use in most normal laboratory or clinical settings and a more practical method to study protein glycosylation is needed. The new protocol described in this study makes use of a chemically blocked antibody microarray with glycan-binding protein (GBP) detection and significantly reduces the time, cost, and lab equipment requirements needed to study protein glycosylation. In this method, multiple immobilized glycoprotein-specific antibodies are printed directly onto the microarray slides and the N-glycans on the antibodies are blocked. The blocked, immobilized glycoprotein-specific antibodies are able to capture and isolate glycoproteins from a complex sample that is applied directly onto the microarray slides. Glycan detection then can be performed by the application of biotinylated lectins and other GBPs to the microarray slide, while binding levels can be determined using Dylight 549-Streptavidin. Through the use of an antibody panel and probing with multiple biotinylated lectins, this method allows for an effective glycosylation profile of the different proteins found in a given human or animal sample to be developed.
Introduction
Glycosylation of protein, which is the most ubiquitous post-translational modification on proteins, modifies the physical, chemical, and biological properties of a protein, and plays a fundamental role in various biological processes1-6. Because the glycosylation machinery is particularly susceptible to disease progression and malignant transformation, aberrant glycosylation has been recognized as early detection biomarkers for cancer and other diseases 7-12. In fact, most current cancer biomarkers, such as the L3 fraction of &alpha;-1 fetoprotein (AFP) for hepatocellular carcinoma 13-15, and CA199 for pancreatic cancer 16, 17 are all aberrant glycan moieties on glycoproteins. However, methods to study protein glycosylation have been complicated, and not suitable for routine laboratory and clinical settings. Chen et al. has recently invented a chemically blocked antibody microarray with a glycan-binding protein (GBP) detection method for high-throughput and multiplexed profile glycosylation of native glycoproteins in a complex sample 18. In this affinity based microarray method, multiple immobilized glycoprotein-specific antibodies capture and isolate glycoproteins from the complex mixture directly on the microarray slide, and the glycans on each individual captured protein are measured by GBPs. Because all normal antibodies contain N-glycans which could be recognized by most GBPs, the critical step of this method is to chemically block the glycans on the antibodies from binding to GBP. In the procedure, the cis-diol groups of the glycans on the antibodies were first oxidized to aldehyde groups by using NaIO4 in sodium acetate buffer avoiding light. The aldehyde groups were then conjugated to the hydrazide group of a cross-linker, 4-(4-N-MaleimidoPhenyl)butyric acid Hydrazide HCl (MPBH), followed by the conjugation of a dipeptide, Cys-Gly, to the maleimide group of the MPBH. Thus, the cis-diol groups on glycans of antibodies were converted into bulky none hydroxyl groups, which hindered the lectins and other GBPs bindings to the capture antibodies. This blocking procedure makes the GBPs and lectins bind only to the glycans of captured proteins. After this chemically blocking, serum samples were incubated with the antibody microarray, followed by the glycans detection by using different biotinylated lectins and GBPs, and visualized with Cy3-streptavidin. The parallel use of an antibody panel and multiple lectin probing provides discrete glycosylation profiles of multiple proteins in a given sample 18-20. This method has been used successfully in multiple different labs 1, 7, 13, 19-31. However, stability of MPBH and Cys-Gly, complicated and extended procedure in this method affect the reproducibility, effectiveness and efficiency of the method. In this new protocol, we replaced both MPBH and Cys-Gly with one much more stable reagent glutamic acid hydrazide (Glu-hydrazide), which significantly improved the reproducibility of the method, simplified and shorten the whole procedure so that the it can be completed within one working day. In this new protocol, we describe the detailed procedure of the protocol which can be readily adopted by normal labs for routine protein glycosylation study and techniques which are necessary to obtain reproducible and repeatable results.

In this study, we describe an improved protocol for a multiplexed high-throughput antibody microarray with lectin detection method that can be used in glycosylation profiling of specific proteins. This protocol features new reliable reagents and significantly reduces the time, cost, and lab equipment requirements as compared to the previous procedure.

 In this study, we describe an effective protocol for use in a multiplexed high-throughput antibody microarray with glycan binding protein detection that ...

The MultiBac Protein Complex Production Platform at the EMBL

Proteomics research revealed the impressive complexity of eukaryotic proteomes in unprecedented detail. It is now a commonly accepted notion that proteins in cells mostly exist not as isolated entities but exert their biological activity in association with many other proteins, in humans ten or more, forming assembly lines in the cell for most if not all vital functions.1,2 Knowledge of the function and architecture of these multiprotein assemblies requires their provision in superior quality and sufficient quantity for detailed analysis. The paucity of many protein complexes in cells, in particular in eukaryotes, prohibits their extraction from native sources, and necessitates recombinant production. The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) has proven to be particularly useful for producing eukaryotic proteins, the activity of which often relies on post-translational processing that other commonly used expression systems often cannot support.3 BEVS use a recombinant baculovirus into which the gene of interest was inserted to infect insect cell cultures which in turn produce the protein of choice. MultiBac is a BEVS that has been particularly tailored for the production of eukaryotic protein complexes that contain many subunits.4 A vital prerequisite for efficient production of proteins and their complexes are robust protocols for all steps involved in an expression experiment that ideally can be implemented as standard operating procedures (SOPs) and followed also by non-specialist users with comparative ease. The MultiBac platform at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) uses SOPs for all steps involved in a multiprotein complex expression experiment, starting from insertion of the genes into an engineered baculoviral genome optimized for heterologous protein production properties to small-scale analysis of the protein specimens produced.5-8 The platform is installed in an open-access mode at EMBL Grenoble and has supported many scientists from academia and industry to accelerate protein complex research projects.

Protein complexes catalyze key cellular functions. Detailed functional and structural characterization of many essential complexes requires recombinant production. MultiBac is a baculovirus/insect cell system particularly tailored for expressing eukaryotic proteins and their complexes. MultiBac was implemented as an open-access platform, and standard operating procedures developed to maximize its utility.

Proteomics  research revealed the impressive complexity of eukaryotic proteomes in  unprecedented detail. It is now a commonly accepted notion that ...

The Tomato/GFP-FLP/FRT Method for Live Imaging of Mosaic Adult Drosophila Photoreceptor Cells

The Drosophila eye is widely used as a model for studies of development and neuronal degeneration. With the powerful mitotic recombination technique, elegant genetic screens based on clonal analysis have led to the identification of signaling pathways involved in eye development and photoreceptor (PR) differentiation at larval stages. We describe here the Tomato/GFP-FLP/FRT method, which can be used for rapid clonal analysis in the eye of living adult Drosophila. Fluorescent photoreceptor cells are imaged with the cornea neutralization technique, on retinas with mosaic clones generated by flipase-mediated recombination. This method has several major advantages over classical histological sectioning of the retina: it can be used for high-throughput screening and has proved an effective method for identifying the factors regulating PR survival and function. It can be used for kinetic analyses of PR degeneration in the same living animal over several weeks, to demonstrate the requirement for specific genes for PR survival or function in the adult fly. This method is also useful for addressing cell autonomy issues in developmental mutants, such as those in which the establishment of planar cell polarity is affected.

The Tomato/GFP-FLP/FRT Method for Live Imaging of Mosaic Adult Drosophila Photoreceptor Cells

The Tomato/GFP-FLP/FRT method involves visualizing mosaic photoreceptor cells in living Drosophila. It can be used to follow individual photoreceptor cell fates in the retina for days or weeks. This method is ideal for studies of retinal degeneration and neurodegenerative diseases or photoreceptor cell development.

The Drosophila eye is widely used as a model  for studies of development and neuronal degeneration. With the powerful mitotic  recombination technique, ...

Efficient Generation Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Somatic Cells with Sendai-virus

A few years ago, the establishment of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) ushered in a new era in biomedicine. Potential uses of human iPSCs include modeling pathogenesis of human genetic diseases, autologous cell therapy after gene correction, and personalized drug screening by providing a source of patient-specific and symptom relevant cells. However, there are several hurdles to overcome, such as eliminating the remaining reprogramming factor transgene expression after human iPSCs production. More importantly, residual transgene expression in undifferentiated human iPSCs could hamper proper differentiations and misguide the interpretation of disease-relevant in vitro phenotypes. With this reason, integration-free and/or transgene-free human iPSCs have been developed using several methods, such as adenovirus, the piggyBac system, minicircle vector, episomal vectors, direct protein delivery and synthesized mRNA. However, efficiency of reprogramming using integration-free methods is quite low in most cases.
Here, we present a method to isolate human iPSCs by using Sendai-virus (RNA virus) based reprogramming system. This reprogramming method shows consistent results and high efficiency in cost-effective manner.

Here, we present our established method to reprogram human somatic cells into transgene-free human iPSCs with Sendai virus, which shows consistent outcome and enhanced efficiency.

A few years ago, the establishment of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) ushered in a new era in biomedicine. Potential uses of human iPSCs ...

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination

Virus-like particles (VLPs) and subviral particles (SVPs) are an alternative approach to viral vaccine design that offers the advantages of increased biosafety and stability over use of live pathogens. Non-infectious and self-assembling, VLPs are used to present structural proteins as immunogens, bypassing the need for live pathogens or recombinant viral vectors for antigen delivery. In this article, we demonstrate the different stages of VLP design and development for future applications in preclinical animal testing. The procedure includes the following stages: selection of antigen, expression of antigen in cell line of choice, purification of VLPs/SVPs, and quantification for antigen dosing. We demonstrate use of both mammalian and insect cell lines for expression of our antigens and demonstrate how methodologies differ in yield. The methodology presented may apply to a variety of pathogens and can be achieved by substituting the antigens with immunogenic structural proteins of the user&#39;s microorganism of interest. VLPs and SVPs assist with antigen characterization and selection of the best vaccine candidates.

Here, we present a protocol for synthesizing virus-like particles using either baculovirus or mammalian expression systems, and ultracentrifugation purification. This highly customizable approach is used to identify viral antigens as vaccine targets in a safe and flexible manner.

Virus-like particles (VLPs) and subviral particles (SVPs) are an alternative approach to viral vaccine design that offers the advantages of increased ...

Direct Agroinoculation of Maize Seedlings by Injection with Recombinant Foxtail Mosaic Virus and Sugarcane Mosaic Virus Infectious Clones

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Vaccinia Virus Infection & Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 1

Vaccinia Virus Infection & Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 2

Vaccinia Virus Infection & Temporal Analysis of Virus Gene Expression: Part 3

A Technique to Simultaneously Visualize Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells and Virus-Infected Cells In situ

Mosaic Zebrafish Transgenesis for Evaluating Enhancer Sequences

Chemically-blocked Antibody Microarray for Multiplexed High-throughput Profiling of Specific Protein Glycosylation in Complex Samples

The MultiBac Protein Complex Production Platform at the EMBL

The Tomato/GFP-FLP/FRT Method for Live Imaging of Mosaic Adult Drosophila Photoreceptor Cells

Efficient Generation Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Somatic Cells with Sendai-virus

Expression and Purification of Virus-like Particles for Vaccination