A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Presented here is a modified procedure for minimally invasive injections of bone cement to treat osteoporotic spinal fractures in elderly patients.

Abstract

The minimally invasive injection of bone cement (MIIBC) is an effective way to treat senile osteoporotic spinal fractures (OSF) in clinical practice. However, the intraspinal dura and nerves may be damaged when the puncture needle passes through the pedicle. Therefore, in this protocol, the puncture site was optimized during the surgery, selecting the same 1-2 cm away from the surface projection of the diseased vertebra. The needle was punctured along the lateral cortex of the pedicle from the junction of the pedicle and the vertebral body into the vertebral body. Meanwhile, bone cement was used as a filling material, and the MIIBC was performed by a percutaneous puncture at the external edge of the pedicle under C-arm fluoroscopy. This modified puncture site is far away from the spinal canal as possible, thereby reducing the risk of the puncture needles penetrating the spinal canal and damaging the nerves and dura mater. In conclusion, a modified MIIBC by percutaneous lateral pedicle puncture can effectively relieve pain in elderly patients with OSF.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a common disease among middle-aged and elderly women. Statistics show that about 54% of postmenopausal women have abnormal bone density, and the chance of vertebral fracture over the age of 50 is about 32%1. Osteoporotic spinal fractures (OSF) occur most commonly in women and are mainly compression fractures caused by direct or indirect external forces1,2. After the fracture, the sagittal balance of the spine is broken, resulting in vertebral deformation, diffuse lumbar and back pain, and kyphosis2. In addition, some patients also experience abdominal pressure and breathing difficulties3. Clinical trials have reported that the key to the treatment of OSF is the restoration of bone continuity4. Without effective and timely treatment for OSF patients, it is easy for spinal deformities, secondary nerve injury, spinal canal stenosis, angulation deformity, delayed fracture healing, and bone nonunion to occur, and the lives of the patients may even be threatened5.

Current clinical treatments for OSF include conservative treatment and surgical treatment6. Although the conservative treatment of OSF can provide temporary relief of the symptoms, the course of treatment is long, and the recovery of the injured vertebral height is poor7. Overall, the traditional conservative treatment of OSF requires patients to stay in bed for a long time, and its overall efficacy is not ideal. For now, clinical, surgical treatment for OSF embraces traditional open internal fixation, Sextant minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP)8. Similar to the conservative treatment of long-term bed rest, traditional open internal fixation can lead to aggravated osteoporosis, deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs, lung infection, urinary tract infection, calculi and decubitus, and other complications, which seriously affect the quality of life of the patient and cause a high disability rate9. Nevertheless, Sextant minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation is a complicated operation with a long operation time, and the operation itself can further aggravate secondary injury of the diseased vertebra10. Obviously, the characteristics of lost vertebral bone density in senile OSF patients are more likely to lead to screw loosening and even removal, resulting in the failure of the internal fixation surgery11.

As commonly used clinical treatments for a senile osteoporotic spinal fracture, PVP and PKP can restore vertebral function and improve the mobility of patients with higher surgical safety and better postoperative pain relief. However, the merits and demerits of both in treating osteoporotic spinal compression fractures are still debated. High-pressure perfusion in PVP surgery can cause leakage of the bone cement into the vertebrae, thus damaging the spinal cord and nerve roots and reducing the surgical effect to a certain extent12. Compared with PVP, PKP can observably reduce and avoid the risk of bone cement leakage, but the operation is longer13. Inevitably, the use of a balloon to dilate the diseased vertebra during PKP surgery also carries a potential risk of secondary vertebral injury14. Therefore, in this study, on the basis of PVP, elderly patients with OSF were treated by optimizing the puncture site during surgery, thus avoiding the risk of the spinal cord and nerve injury caused by the puncture itself. In this protocol, the case of a 68-year-old female patient with OSF who underwent a modified minimally invasive injection of bone cement (MIIBC) for the treatment of a seventh thoracic vertebra fracture is presented in detail.

Protocol

The surgical operation using MIIBC for the treatment of an osteoporotic fracture of the seventh thoracic vertebra in a 68-year-old woman was approved by the Ethics Committee of Linfen People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (T20220829006). The patient provided written informed consent.

1. Collection and recording of the patient's medical history

  1. Communicate with the patient to determine the history of trauma, heavy lifting, bumpy rides, jerking, or even coughing.
    ​NOTE: The main clinical manifestations of OSF are as follows: (1) pain, which can be acute or chronic lumbago and back pain or body pain and even obvious limitations in rolling up and down activities and walking activities; (2) spinal deformation, which is mainly manifested as kyphosis, lateral curvature, shortened height, a humpback, and thoracic deformity. In cases of spinal cord compression, severe complications may occur, such as paraplegia and abdominal compression, which may affect cardiopulmonary function.

2. Pre-surgical examinations

  1. Physical examination
    1. Check for percussion pain and pressing pain in the chest, waist, and back. Check the lower extremities for sensory and motor changes.
  2. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    1. Perform MRI (see Table of Materials) to identify acute or old vertebral fractures, as shown in Figure 1.
      NOTE: Newly fractured vertebrae show obvious edema around the tissue. Surgery is prohibited for old vertebra fractures.
  3. X-ray examination
    1. Perform an X-ray (see Table of Materials) to examine the vertebral changes and bone density in the cuneiform lesions, as shown in Figure 2.
  4. Computed tomography (CT) examination
    1. Perform CT (see Table of Materials) to examine the integrity of the posterior wall of the fractured vertebra, and determine if a vertebral fracture mass is present in the vertebral canal, as shown in Figure 3.
  5. Bone mineral density (BMD) examination
    1. Perform dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (see Table of Materials) to measure the BMD of the spine, as shown in Figure 4.

3. Patient positioning

  1. Place a chest pad (see Table of Materials) under the patient's chest to maintain the patient in a prone position. Place a soft pad (see Table of Materials) under the lower leg to bend the knee to 20°. See Figure 5 for the specific details on the patient positioning.
    ​NOTE: Remind the patient to relax the thoracolumbar and back muscles to facilitate the later puncture operation.

4. Surgical procedure

  1. Perform intraoperative digital radiography (DR) and puncture localization.
    1. Fix the Kirschner wire (see Table of Materials) on the body surface, and use the C-arm of the DR machine (see Table of Materials) for intermittent imaging to identify and label the surface projection of the diseased pedicle, as shown in Figure 6.
      NOTE: The location of the diseased pedicle should be evaluated comprehensively based on the results of step 3.1, step 4.1, step 5.1, and step 6.1.
  2. Perform needle puncture and bone cement injection.
    1. Locate the injection point at 1-2 cm outside the surface projection of the outer edge of the pedicle. Perform full invasive anesthesia with 2% lidocaine (see Table of Materials) along the skin of the puncture site toward the pedicle, as shown in Figure 7.
      NOTE: The puncture point is not at the body surface projection of the injured pedicle but is 1-2 cm outside the body surface projection on the outer edge of the pedicle.
    2. Under lateral DR imaging, adjust the orientation of the puncture needle to be consistent with the midline of the seventh thoracic vertebra, and strike the puncture needle to the outer edge of the pedicle with a surgical hammer (see Table of Materials). Next, push the puncture needle to the anterior vertebral 1/3 junction under lateral DR imaging.
      NOTE: When the tip of the puncture needle reaches the posterior edge of the vertebral body, the DR imaging above the prone position should show that the puncture needle passes right over the outer edge of the pedicle. When the puncture needle reaches the anterior 1/3 junction of the vertebral body, the DR imaging above the prone position should indicate that the tip of the puncture needle is located in the center of the vertebral body.
    3. Fill the syringe with the prepared viscous bone cement (see Table of Materials), and slowly inject it into the vertebra under lateral DR imaging. Insert the pillow inner to push the bone cement remaining inside the puncture needle (see Table of Materials) into the vertebral body.
    4. Pull out the puncture needle by turning it backward. After pressing the puncture site for 3-5 min, wrap the puncture site with sterile surgical gauze (see Table of Materials), as shown in Figure 8.
      ​NOTE: Bone cement should be freshly prepared when being used. If obvious leakage is found during the injection of the bone cement, the injection should be terminated immediately.

5. Postoperative care

  1. Administer oxygen, and monitor the vital signs of the patient in a supine position for 6 h after surgery.
    NOTE: On the first day after surgery, the patient can stand and walk under the protection of the lumbar support device. If the thoracolumbar X-ray re-examination is normal, the patient can be discharged from the hospital 2-3 days after surgery.

Results

The OSF patient selected for the modified MIIBC had no history of trauma, heavy lifting, bumpy rides, jerking, or even coughing. Further physical examination showed that the patient had no percussion pain or pressing pain in the chest, waist, or back and had normal sensation and movement in the lower limbs. A new vertebral fracture was first identified in the seventh thoracic vertebra with perivertebral edema using MRI imaging (Figure 1). After that, the X-ray examination demonstrated a vert...

Discussion

Traditional open internal fixation is used with patients who have the neurological symptoms of a vertebral compression fracture and a fractured mass entering the spinal canal and pressing on the spinal cord and nerve roots15. This technique is especially suitable for individuals with severe violent vertebral trauma, such as from a car accident or falling from height. This kind of emergency surgery usually requires spinal canal decompression, which has a long operation time and a large area of trau...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Medical Research Project of Shanxi Province (2020XM51).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Bone cementHeraeus Medical GmbH61805335
Chest padHengshui Hejia Medical Device Co., Ltd.1.00297E+13
Computed tomography instrumentGeneral Electric CompanyDiscovery  CT750 HD
Dualenergy X-ray absorptiometryGeneral Electric CompanyDiscovery  XR656
Kirschner wireTianjin Yutong Medical Device Factory210401
LidocaineShiyao Silver Lake Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.C22B042
Nuclear magnetic resonance apparatusGeneral Electric CompanyAchieva 1.5T
Povidone iodine solutionWen Shui Greatly Industrial Co., Ltd.20220801
Puncture needleDragon Crown Medical Co., Ltd.22040601
Soft padYueyang Zhengyang Medical Device Co., Ltd.HRT445
Sterile coveringSuqian Hongzhilong E-commerce Co., Ltd.56200331882
Sterile surgical gauzeHainuo Group Co. Ltd.7918087
Surgical hammerHengshui Wankai Trading Co., Ltd.5.20808E+11
SyringeShandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Co., Ltd.20220101
Vertebroplasty bone cement filler setShenzhen Hanqiang Medical Device Co., Ltd.TF210301
X-ray instrumentShenzhen Rayvision Technology Co., Ltd.ALC-200H

References

  1. Zhang, B., Li, T., Wang, Z. Efficacy and complications of different surgical modalities of treating osteoporotic spinal compression fracture in the elderly. American Journal of Translational Research. 14 (1), 364-372 (2022).
  2. Kang, C. N., et al. et al.Cumulative incidence and factors associated with subsequent vertebral compression fractures: A nationwide population-based study. World Neurosurgery. 161, e90-e100 (2022).
  3. Yao, X., Liu, M., Jin, F., Zhu, Z. Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed circular RNAs in patients with senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. BioMed Research International. 2020, 4951251 (2020).
  4. Zhai, W., et al. The clinical effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and the prevention of new vertebral fractures. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 8 (8), 13473-13481 (2015).
  5. Yin, H., He, X., Yi, H., Luo, Z., Chen, J. Analysis of the causes on poor clinical efficacy of kyphoplasty performed in unilateral transpedicular puncture for the treatment of senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Scientific Reports. 9 (1), 1498 (2019).
  6. Qin, Z., et al. Transpedical interbody bone grafting in the treatment of senile osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 33 (5), 1166-1170 (2017).
  7. Xu, J. C., Wu, G. H., Zhou, L. L., Yang, X. J., Liu, J. T. Two unilateral puncturation comparative analyses of multiple-level fresh osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by C-arm fluoroscopy or in senile patients. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 21 (7), 1456-1461 (2017).
  8. Anderson, P. A., Froyshteter, A. B., Tontz, W. L. Meta-analysis of vertebral augmentation compared with conservative treatment for osteoporotic spinal fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 28 (2), 372-382 (2013).
  9. Brodano, G. B., et al. Vertebroplasty: Benefits are more than risks in selected and evidence-based informed patients. A retrospective study of 59 cases. European Spine Journal. 20 (8), 1265-1271 (2011).
  10. Yu, D., et al. on the effect of different surgical methods on the treatment of senile osteoporotic spinal compression fractures and the influencing factors of complications. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021, 1599470 (2021).
  11. Demir, S. O., Akin, C., Aras, M., Köseoğlu, F. Spinal cord injury associated with thoracic osteoporotic fracture. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 86 (3), 242-246 (2007).
  12. Li, H., et al. Effects of rosuvastatin and zoledronic acid in combination on the recovery of senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture following percutaneous vertebroplasty. Journal of International Medical Research. 48 (5), (2020).
  13. Kobayashi, K., Shimoyama, K., Nakamura, K., Murata, K. Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. European Radiology. 15 (2), 360-367 (2005).
  14. Sun, Z. G., et al. Assessment of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty for treatment of senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 23 (10), 734-738 (2010).
  15. Spiegl, U. J., et al. The conservative treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. 115 (42), 697-704 (2018).
  16. Muratore, M., Ferrera, A., Masse, A., Bistolfi, A. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. A systematic review. European Spine Journal. 27 (10), 2565-2576 (2018).
  17. Robinson, Y., Heyde, C. E., Försth, P., Olerud, C. Kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures--guidelines and technical considerations. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 6, 43 (2011).
  18. Majumdar, S. R., et al. Interventions to increase osteoporosis treatment in patients with 'incidentally' detected vertebral fractures. The American Journal of Medicine. 125 (9), 929-936 (2012).
  19. Cimatti, M., et al. Pure percutaneous pedicle screw fixation without arthrodesis of 32 thoraco-lumbar fractures: Clinical and radiological outcome with 36-month follow-up. European Spine Journal. 22, S925-S932 (2013).
  20. Dai, F. Q., Du, Y., Luo, L. X., Zhang, Y. Q. Treatment of serious burst thoracolumbar fracture with posterior pedicle screw fixation, transpedicular bone grafting and vertebral canaloplasty. China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 23 (7), 504-506 (2010).
  21. Movrin, I., Vengust, R., Komadina, R. Adjacent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A comparison of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 130 (9), 1157-1166 (2010).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Osteoporotic Spinal FracturesMIIBCBone Cement InjectionClinical TechniqueElderly PatientsPuncture Site OptimizationSpinal Canal Risk ReductionPercutaneous PunctureC arm FluoroscopyPain ReliefModified TechniquePedicle Junction

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved