Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
We describe a method to sort single mammalian cells and to quantify the expression of up to 96 target genes of interest in each cell. This method includes the use of internal qPCR standards to enable the estimation of absolute transcript counts.
Gene expression measurements from bulk populations of cells can obscure the considerable transcriptomic variation of individual cells within those populations. Single-cell gene expression measurements can help assess the role of noise in gene expression, identify correlations in the expression of pairs of genes, and reveal subpopulations of cells that respond differently to a stimulus. Here, we describe a procedure to measure the expression of up to 96 genes in single mammalian cells isolated from a population growing in tissue culture. Cells are sorted into lysis buffer by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), and the mRNA species of interest are reverse-transcribed and amplified. Gene expression is then measured using a microfluidic real-time PCR machine, which performs up to 96 qPCR assays on up to 96 samples at a time. We also describe the generation and use of PCR amplicon standards to enable the estimation of the absolute number of each transcript. Compared with other methods of measuring gene expression in single cells, this approach allows for the quantification of more distinct transcripts than RNA FISH at a lower cost than RNA-Seq.
Individual cells in a population can show widely differing responses to a uniform physiological stimulus1,2,3,4. The genetic variation of cells in a population is one mechanism for this variety of responses, but there are also several non-genetic factors that can increase the variability of responses, even in a clonal population of cells. For example, the levels of individual proteins and other important signaling molecules can vary on a cell-by-cell basis, giving rise to variation in downstream gene expression profiles. Additionally, gene activation can occur in short-duration bursts of transcripts5,6 that may be limited to a relatively small number of transcripts per burst7,8,9. Such stochasticity in gene activation can greatly contribute to variability in biological responses and can provide a selective advantage in microorganisms10 and in mammalian cells1,2 responding to a physiological stimulus. Due to both genetic and non-genetic sources of variation, the gene expression profile of any given cell in response to a stimulus may differ greatly from the average gene expression profile obtained from the measurement of the bulk response. Determining the extent to which individual cells show variability in response to a stimulus requires techniques for the isolation of individual cells, the measurement of the expression levels for transcripts of interest, and the computational analysis of the resulting expression data.
There are several approaches for assaying gene expression in single cells, covering a wide range of costs, number of transcripts probed, and accuracy of quantification. For example, single-cell RNA-Seq offers a wide depth of transcript coverage and the ability to quantify thousands of distinct transcripts for the most highly expressed genes in individual cells; however, the cost associated with such sequencing depth can be prohibitive, although costs continue to decrease. Conversely, single-molecule RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (smRNA FISH) offers precise quantification of transcripts for even low-expressing genes at a reasonable cost per gene of interest; however, only a small number of target genes can be assayed in a given cell by this approach. Quantitative PCR-based assays, described in this protocol, provide a middle ground between these techniques. These assays employ a microfluidic real-time PCR machine to quantify up to 96 transcripts of interest at a time in up to 96 cells. While each of the aforementioned methods has requisite hardware costs, the cost of any individual qPCR assay is relatively low. This protocol is adapted from one suggested by a manufacturer of a microfluidic real-time PCR machine (Protocol ADP 41, Fluidigm). To enable the estimation of the absolute number of each transcript in a PCR-based approach, we have expanded the protocol to make use of internal controls of prepared target gene amplicons that can be used across multiple experiments.
As an example of this technique, the quantification of the expression of genes regulated by the tumor suppressor p53 in MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells is described11. The cells are challenged with a chemical agent that induces DNA double-strand breaks. Previous studies have shown that the p53 response to DNA double-strand breaks exhibits a great deal of heterogeneity in individual cells, both in terms of p53 levels12 and in the activation of distinct target genes11. Furthermore, p53 regulates the expression of over 100 well-characterized target genes involved in numerous downstream pathways, including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence13,14. Since the p53-mediated response in each cell is both complex and variable, the analysis of the system benefits from an approach in which nearly 100 target genes can be probed simultaneously in individual cells, such as that described below. With slight modifications (such as alternative methods for single-cell isolation and lysis), the protocol can be readily adapted to study a wide range of mammalian cell types, transcripts, and cellular responses.
With proper advance preparation, a round of cell sorting and gene expression measurement can be conducted according to this protocol over a period of three days. The following timing is suggested: in advance, select the transcripts of interest, identify and validate the primer pairs that amplify the cDNA from those transcripts, and prepare the standards and primer mixes using those primers. On Day 1, following cell treatment, harvest and sort the cells, perform reverse transcription and specific target amplification, and treat the samples with an exonuclease to remove unincorporated primers. On Day 2, perform quality control on sorted cells using qPCR. Finally, on Day 3, measure the gene expression in the sorted cells using microfluidic qPCR. Figure 1 summarizes the steps involved.
1. Advance Preparation
2. Treatment
3. Lysis Buffer Preparation for Cell Sorting
NOTE: Making a single plate of lysis buffer takes about 1 hr. It is advisable to make and sort multiple plates, as cell sorting can be inefficient and yield many wells with no detectable cell.
4. Cell Sorter Setup
5. Cell Harvest and Sorting
6. Exonuclease Treatment
7. Sample Dilution
8. Sort Quality Control Using qPCR
NOTE: Because cell sorting is not perfectly efficient, this step is necessary to identify which wells of the sorted plate actually received a cell. These samples can then be used for further analysis.
9. Gene Expression Measurement Using Microfluidic qPCR
NOTE: For every step in this section, pipette only to the first stop to minimize the formation of bubbles in the reagents.
10. Data Analysis
A general overview of the protocol is shown in Figure 1, including steps for cell treatment, the isolation of single cells by FACS, the generation and pre-amplification of cDNA libraries from single-cell lysates, the confirmation of single-cell cDNA libraries in sorted wells, and the measurement of gene expression by qPCR.
In preparation for single-cell isolation and gene expression analysis, it is necessary to ...
We have presented a method for isolating individual mammalian cells from a population of adherent cells grown in culture and for assaying the expression of approximately 96 genes in each cell. Good advance preparation is critical for this method to work well. In particular, designing and testing primer pairs specific to the transcripts of interest (steps 1.2-1.3) are time-consuming but important steps, as the primers determine the quality of the single-cell measurements. Once reliable primer pairs have been obtained, the...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We would like to thank V. Kapoor in the CCR ETIB Flow Cytometry Core for her aid in performing the cell sorting during the development of this protocol. We also thank M. Raffeld and the CCR LP Molecular Diagnostics Unit and J. Zhu and the NHLBI DNA Sequencing and Genomics Core for their aid in performing the qPCR during the development of this protocol. This research was supported by the Intramural Program of the NIH.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
RNeasy Plus Mini Kit | Qiagen | 74134 | |
High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit with RNase Inhibitor | ThermoFisher | 4374966 | |
Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase | New England BioLabs | M0530S | |
QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit | Qiagen | 28704 | |
Quant-iT High-Sensitivity dsDNA Assay Kit | ThermoFisher | Q33120 | |
2.0 ml low adhesion microcentrifuge tubes | USA Scientific | 1420-2600 | |
DNA Suspension Buffer | Teknova | T0221 | |
Axygen 0.2 ml Maxymum Recovery Thin Wall PCR Tubes | Corning | PCR-02-L-C | |
GE 96.96 Dynamic Array DNA Binding Dye Sample & Assay Loading Reagent Kit | Fluidigm | 100-3415 | |
HyClone RPMI 1640 media | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | SH30027.01 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum, Certified (US) | ThermoFisher | 16000-044 | |
Antibiotic-Antimycotic Solution | Corning | 30-004-CI | |
Neocarzinostatin | Sigma | N9162 | |
ELIMINase | Decon Labs | 1101 | |
SUPERase-In | ThermoFisher | AM2696 | |
CellsDirect One-Step qRT-PCR Kit | ThermoFisher | 11753500 | |
E. coli DNA | Affymetrix | 14380 10 MG | |
ThermalSeal Sealing Film, Sterile | Excel Scientific | STR-THER-PLT | |
BD FACSAria IIu | BD Biosciences | ||
HyClone Trypsin 0.05% | GE Healthcare Life Sciences | SH30236.01 | |
PBS, 1x | Corning | 21-040-CV | |
Falcon 40 µm Cell Strainer | Corning | 352340 | |
Exonuclease I | New England BioLabs | M0293S | |
SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix with Low ROX | Bio-Rad | 172-5210 | |
96.96 Dynamic Array IFC for Gene Expression (microfluidic qPCR chip) | Fluidigm | BMK-M-96.96 | |
IFC Controller HX (loading machine) | Fluidigm | ||
BioMark or BioMark HD (microfluidic qPCR machine) | Fluidigm | ||
Real-Time PCR Analysis software | Fluidigm | ||
MATLAB software | MathWorks |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone