Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
* Wspomniani autorzy wnieśli do projektu równy wkład.
This manuscript describes the experimental procedure and software analysis for a bidirectional integration site assay that can simultaneously analyze upstream and downstream vector-host junction DNA. Bidirectional PCR products can be used for any downstream sequencing platform. The resulting data are useful for a high-throughput, quantitative comparison of integrated DNA targets.
Integration Site (IS) assays are a critical component of the study of retroviral integration sites and their biological significance. In recent retroviral gene therapy studies, IS assays, in combination with next-generation sequencing, have been used as a cell-tracking tool to characterize clonal stem cell populations sharing the same IS. For the accurate comparison of repopulating stem cell clones within and across different samples, the detection sensitivity, data reproducibility, and high-throughput capacity of the assay are among the most important assay qualities. This work provides a detailed protocol and data analysis workflow for bidirectional IS analysis. The bidirectional assay can simultaneously sequence both upstream and downstream vector-host junctions. Compared to conventional unidirectional IS sequencing approaches, the bidirectional approach significantly improves IS detection rates and the characterization of integration events at both ends of the target DNA. The data analysis pipeline described here accurately identifies and enumerates identical IS sequences through multiple steps of comparison that map IS sequences onto the reference genome and determine sequencing errors. Using an optimized assay procedure, we have recently published the detailed repopulation patterns of thousands of Hematopoietic Stem Cell (HSC) clones following transplant in rhesus macaques, demonstrating for the first time the precise time point of HSC repopulation and the functional heterogeneity of HSCs in the primate system. The following protocol describes the step-by-step experimental procedure and data analysis workflow that accurately identifies and quantifies identical IS sequences.
Retroviruses insert their genomic DNA into the host genome at various sites. This unique property, which may contribute to the development of cancers and other forms of viral pathogenesis, has the ironic benefit of making these viruses highly amenable to cellular engineering for gene therapy and basic biology research. The viral Integration Site (IS) – the location on the host genome where a foreign DNA (virus) is integrated – has important implications for the fate of both the integrated viruses and the host cells. IS assays have been used in various biological and clinical research settings to study retroviral integration site selection and pathogenesis, cancer development, stem cell biology, and developmental biology1,2,3,4. Low detection sensitivity, poor data reproducibility, and frequent cross-contamination are among the key factors limiting the applications of IS assays to current and planned studies.
Many IS analysis technologies have been developed. Restriction enzyme-based integration site assays, including Linker-Mediated (LM) Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)5, inverse PCR6, and Linear-Amplification-Mediated (LAM) PCR7, are the most widely used. The use of site-specific restriction enzymes, however, generates a bias during the retrieval of the IS, allowing only a subset of integromes (a foreign DNA integrated into the host genome) in the vicinity of the restriction site to be recovered4. Assay technologies that more comprehensively assess vector IS have also been introduced in recent years. These assays employ various strategies, including Mu transposon-mediated PCR8, nonrestrictive (nr)-LAM PCR9, type-II restriction enzyme-mediated digestion10, mechanical shearing11, and random hexamer-based PCR (Re-free PCR)12, to fragment genomic DNAs and amplify IS. Current technologies have varying levels of detection sensitivity, genome coverage, target specificity, high-throughput capacity, complexity of assay procedures, and biases in detecting the relative frequencies of target sites. Given the varying qualities of the existing assays and the variety of purposes for which they can be used, the optimal assay approach should be carefully selected.
This work provides detailed experimental procedures and a computational data analysis workflow for a bidirectional assay that significantly improves detection rates and sequence quantification accuracy by simultaneously analyzing the IS upstream and downstream of the integrated target DNA (see Figure 1 for a schematic view of the assay procedures). This approach also provides the means to characterize the retroviral integration process (for example, the fidelity of target site duplication and variations in the genomic sequences of upstream and downstream insertions). Other bidirectional methods have been used primarily for cloning and sequencing both ends of the target DNA11,13,14. This assay is extensively optimized for the high-throughput and reproducible quantification of vector-marked clones, using the well-established LM-PCR method and computational analysis mapping, and for quantifying both upstream and downstream junctions. Bidirectional analysis with the TaqαI enzyme has proven useful for high-throughput clonal quantification in stem cell gene therapy preclinical studies2,15. This paper describes a modified method using a more frequent cutter (RsaI/CviQI - motif: GTAC) that doubles the chances of detecting integromes compared to a TaqαI-based assay. Detailed experimental and data analysis procedures that use GTAC motif enzymes for lentiviral (NL4.3 and its derivatives) and gamma-retroviral (pMX vectors) vector IS analysis are described. The oligonucleotides used in the assay are listed in Table 1. An in-house programming script for IS sequence analysis is provided in the supplemental document.
1. Generating Upstream (left)- and Downstream (right)-junction Sequence Libraries
2. Computational IS Sequence Analysis
The bidirectional IS assay generated different sizes of PCR amplicons for both the upstream (left) and downstream (right) vector host junctions (Figure 2). The size of a PCR amplicon is dependent on the location of the nearest GTAC motif upstream and downstream from an integrome. The assay also produced internal DNA PCR amplicons: retroviral sequences near the polypurine tract and the primer binding site were concomitantly amplified during left- and right-jun...
The bidirectional assay enables the simultaneous analysis of both the upstream (left) and downstream (right) vector-host DNA junction sequences and is useful in a number of gene therapy, stem cell, and cancer research applications. The use of GTAC-motif enzymes (RsaI and CviQI) and the bidirectional PCR approach significantly improves the chances of detecting an integrome (or a clonal population) when compared to previous TCGA-motif enzyme (TaqαI)-based assays2,
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding was provided by the National Institutes of Health Grants R00-HL116234, U19 AI117941, and R56 HL126544; the National Science Foundation Grant DMS-1516675; the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2011-0030049, NRF-2014M3C9A3064552); and the KRIBB initiative program.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Thermostable DNA polymerase | Agilent | 600424 | PicoMaxx Polymerase |
Thermostable DNA polymerase buffer | Agilent | 600424 | PicoMaxx Polymerase buffer |
Deoxynucleotide (dNTP) solution mix | New England Biolabs | N0447L | dNTP solution mix (10 mM each) |
PCR tubes | VWR International | 53509-304 | PCR Strip Tubes With Individual Attached Caps |
2 mL microcentrifuge tube | Molecular Bioproducts | 3453 | microcentrifuge tubes |
PCR purification kit | Qiagen | 28106 | |
RsaI | New England Biolabs | R0167L | restriction enzyme |
CviQI | New England Biolabs | R0639L | restriction enzyme |
Buffer A | New England Biolabs | B7204S | NEB CutSmart buffer |
DNA Polymerase I large (klenow) fragment | New England Biolabs | M0210L | Blunting |
streptavidin beads solution | Invitrogen | 60101 | Dynabeads kilobaseBINDER kit |
Binding Solution | Invitrogen | 60101 | Dynabeads kilobaseBINDER kit |
Washing Solution | Invitrogen | 60101 | Dynabeads kilobaseBINDER kit |
magnetic stand | ThermoFisher | 12321D | DynaMag™-2 Magnet |
T4 DNA ligase | New England Biolabs | M0202L | T4 DNA ligase |
10X T4 DNA ligase buffer | New England Biolabs | B0202S | T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer |
5X T4 DNA ligase buffer | Invitrogen | 46300-018 | T4 DNA ligase buffer with polyethylene glycol-8000 |
UV-Vis spectrophotometer | Fisher Scientific | S06497 | Nanodrop 2000 |
pvuII | new England Biolabs | R0151L | restriction enzyme |
sfoI | new England Biolabs | R0606L | restriction enzyme |
Buffer B | new England Biolabs | B7203S | NEB buffer 3.1 |
Nuclease free water | Integrated DNA Technologies | 11-05-01-14 | |
Capillary electrophoresis | Qiagen | 9001941 | QIAxcel capillary electrophoresis |
Veriti 96-well Fast Thermal Cycler | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 4375305 | PCR Instrument |
Rotating wheel (or Roller) | Eppendorf | M10534004 | Cell Culture Roller Drums |
DNA size marker | Qiagen | 929559 | QX size marker (100 - 2,500 bp) |
DNA size marker | Qiagen | 929554 | QX size marker (50 - 1,500 bp) |
DNA alignment markers | Qiagen | 929524 | QX DNA Alignment Marker |
genomc DNA | Not Available | Not Available | Sample genomc DNA from in vivo or in vitro experiments |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone