JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

A high-throughput assay to in vitro phenotype Salmonella or other bacterial association, invasion, and replication in phagocytic cells with high-throughput capacity was developed. The method was employed to evaluate Salmonella gene knockout mutant strains for their involvements in host-pathogen interactions.

Abstract

Salmonella species are zoonotic pathogens and leading causes of food borne illnesses in humans and livestock1. Understanding the mechanisms underlying Salmonella-host interactions are important to elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of Salmonella infection. The Gentamicin protection assay to phenotype Salmonella association, invasion and replication in phagocytic cells was adapted to allow high-throughput screening to define the roles of deletion mutants of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in host interactions using RAW 264.7 murine macrophages. Under this protocol, the variance in measurements is significantly reduced compared to the standard protocol, because wild-type and multiple mutant strains can be tested in the same culture dish and at the same time. The use of multichannel pipettes increases the throughput and enhances precision. Furthermore, concerns related to using less host cells per well in 96-well culture dish were addressed. Here, the protocol of the modified in vitro Salmonella invasion assay using phagocytic cells was successfully employed to phenotype 38 individual Salmonella deletion mutants for association, invasion and intracellular replication. The in vitro phenotypes are presented, some of which were subsequently confirmed to have in vivo phenotypes in an animal model. Thus, the modified, standardized assay to phenotype Salmonella association, invasion and replication in macrophages with high-throughput capacity could be utilized more broadly to study bacterial-host interactions.

Introduction

Nontyphoidal Salmonella are important causes of enteric diseases in all vertebrates. Salmonellosis in humans is among the top bacterial food-borne diseases1. Characterization of the molecular mechanisms that underpin the interactions of Salmonella with their animal hosts is mainly achieved through the study of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium (STM) in tissue culture and animal models of infection. Gaining insights in STM-host interactions will help us understand how Salmonella survive and grow inside host cells. The first challenge in studying these interactions is to identify as many participating factors as possible from both host and pathogen, but these endeavors are largely obstructed by the significant difficulties of dealing with two independent complex biological systems simultaneously, i.e., host and Salmonella, under physiological conditions. Additionally, the large repertoire of Salmonella and host genes potentially encoding factors involved in host interactions require high-throughput biological platform to tackle this challenge.

A modified, standardized assay to phenotype Salmonella association, invasion and replication in macrophages with high-throughput capacity was developed to examine a large set of genes likely engaging in Salmonella-host interactions. The Gentamicin protection assay was developed in 19732, but was first thoroughly described by Elsinghorst in 19943,4. It has now become a standard tool for studying many intracellular bacterial pathogens ex vivo, including Salmonella5,6. Internalized bacteria avoid being killed by some antibiotics, like Gentamicin, that cannot penetrate eukaryotic cells3. By taking advantage of this phenomenon, the Gentamicin protection assay measures the survival and growth of intracellular bacterial pathogens. Three events during the infection, i.e., association with eukaryotic cells, invasion and replication, can be evaluated for intracellular bacterial pathogens based on the time interval between infection, Gentamicin treatment, and further incubation (Figure 1). Eukaryotic cell lines provide a physiological environment that is less complex than relevant animal models for host-pathogen interaction studies.

The Gentamicin protection assay is an appropriate platform to study STM-host interactions, but the standard assay in a 24-well culture dish has low-throughput capacity. Computational analysis of in vivo datasets identified 149 Salmonella gene products that are predicted to interact with approximately 300 host gene products (unpublished data). The standard Gentamicin protection assay does not have the capacity to phenotype this number of mutants efficiently.

In addition, the Gentamicin protection assay can theoretically detect the invasion of even a single bacterium. Because of this inherent sensitivity, the raw data are susceptible to technical variances when repeated at different times. The internal controls and relative data presentation after normalization are essential for meaningful interpretation of the results. Given these considerations, a modified, standardized Gentamicin protection assay was developed to enhance testing capacity and increase precision.

The following protocol is detailed and illustrated to perform the modified Gentamicin protection assay using 96-well culture dishes and the murine macrophage RAW264.7 cell line. Compared to the standard protocol in 24-well culture dishes, the modified protocol has the following advantages: 1) Using 96-well culture dishes allows up to 10 different mutant strains to be phenotyped including internal positive and negative controls with sufficient statistical power; 2) The variance of results is significantly reduced, because the mutant strains are tested in the same culture dish and at the same time; 3) The use of multichannel pipettes increases throughput while reducing operator fatigue. Lastly, comparing to 24-well culture dishes, concerns of less host cells per well in 96-well culture dish were addressed through protocol optimization and standardization.

In summary, the modified, standardized assay to in vitro phenotype Salmonella or other bacterial association, invasion and replication in phagocytic cells increases precision and achieves high-throughput capacity while reducing operator fatigue.

Protocol

1. Murine Macrophage RAW264.7 Cell Culture

  1. Grow low passage number murine macrophage cells, RAW264.7 (The ATCC® Number, TIB-71) in a T-75 cell culture flask vented filter cap in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.5% NaHCO3, and 1% 100x Nonessential amino acids (NEAA) at 37°C, in a 5% CO2 incubator.
  2. Once cells reach a 60-80% confluence in the flask, use a cell scraper to harvest cells, and count the cells in a hemacytometer and calculate the cell concentration.
  3. Resuspend the cells and dilute the cell concentration into 2.5 x 105/ml in fresh DMEM cell culture medium. Use multichannel pipettes to plate 200 μl of DMEM cell culture medium containing 5 x 104 cells in each well of 96-well cell culture plates.
  4. Plate four wells of each Salmonella strain. Set up three separate plates for one set of phagocytic cells invasion assay, and mark them with “association”, “invasion” and “replication”, respectively.
  5. Place the plates in the 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C ON to allow the macrophage cells to attach to the bottom of the wells.

2. Preparation of Salmonella Wild-type and Mutants

  1. On the same day of preparing the macrophage RAW264.7 cells, pick single colonies of wild-type (WT) Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium 14028s, DinvA mutant, DphoP mutant, and the desired test mutant strains, and culture them in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth supplemented with antibiotics as appropriate. Use each set of the phagocytic cells invasion assays to test up to 10 mutant strains (DinvA mutant and DphoP mutant are defective in invasion and intracellular replication, respectively).
  2. Grow the bacteria for 14 hr at 37 °C with shaking at 220 rpm in 5 ml each of LB broth in loosely capped 14 ml polypropylene in a round bottom tube. LB broth contains appropriate antibiotics, in our case, most of mutant strains are resistant to Kanamycin, 50 µg/ml
  3. The next day, subculture each of the ON cultures of Salmonella strains in plain 5 ml of LB broths at a ratio of 1:50 for an additional 4 hr with shaking at 220 rpm.
  4. Read OD600 values of each bacterial culture on a spectrophotometer, and each read should range from 0.6-1.2 to optimize Salmonella pathogenicity island-1 type III secretion system (SPI-1 TTSS) gene expression for invasion.
  5. Use the formula of 1 OD600 = 7.5 x 108 CFU/ml to estimate the bacterial concentration, then dilute bacteria to a concentration of 5 x 106 CFU/ml in fresh DMEM cell culture medium.

3. Invasion Assay in 96-well Culture Plate

  1. Remove three 96-well cell culture plates from the CO2 incubator and wash each well once with 200 μl of 1x PBS buffer.
  2. After washing and complete removal of PBS, add 200 μl bacteria in DMEM medium (see above) into each well. This results in 1 x 106 Salmonella cells in each well and multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20:1.
  3. Centrifuge the plates at 1,000 x g in a sealed carrier for 10 min, then replace plates (time zero) in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for 30 min. For each strain, set up at least four duplicate wells.
  4. After 30 min, remove plates from the incubator and wash three times with 200 μl of 1x PBS to remove unassociated bacteria.
  5. Following washing, save the plate labeled with “association” for further treatment. Add 200 μl of DMEM medium containing 100 μg/ml Gentamicin to each well of the plates marked with “invasion” and “replication” in order to kill the extracellular Salmonella. Return the plates to 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for an additional hr.
  6. Save one well from each infected strain for recording macrophage cell count, treat the rest of wells on the “association” plate with 200 μl of 1x PBS containing 1% Triton X-100 for 10 min. The Triton solution will lyse macrophage cells and release associated Salmonella.
  7. Harvest Salmonella from each well and place them into 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. Perform three 10 fold serial dilutions with 900µl 1x PBS on the harvested samples from each well, vortex is performed between each dilution.
  8. Plate the third dilution, 10-3, on either LB (WT) or LB Kan (mutants) plates. Label the plates with appropriate Salmonella strain name, dilution number, time point and date.
  9. After vortexing the third dilution tube, dispense 10 µl sample on the surface of the agar and repeat four times for a total of 5 drops. Be sure to space the five 10 μl drops evenly on the Petri dish plates7.
  10. After the drops soak into the agar, turn the plates over and incubate overnight at 37 °C, 5% COincubator.
  11. Treat wells saved for counting of macrophages with 150 µl 1xPBS containing 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA for 10 min.
  12. After trypsinization, place macrophages into 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes and treat them with 50 µl of FBS to neutralize Trypsin/EDTA solution, stain the cells with 0.4% Trypan blue and score them through using hemacytometer.
  13. When the one hr incubation has elapsed, remove the “invasion” and “replication” plates from the CO2 incubator, and wash each well as “Step 3.4”.
  14. Save the “invasion” plate for further treatment as “Step 3.6-3.12”.
  15. Add 200 µl of DMEM medium containing 10 μg/ml Gentamicin to the “replication” plate to maintain clearance of extracellular Salmonella in the medium. Return the plate to 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for an additional 22.5 hr.
  16. The next day, remove the “replication” plate from 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator, and wash each well as “Step 3.4” and treat them as “Step 3.6-3.12”.
  17. Lastly, remove the agar plates after incubation overnight in 37 °C incubator and score the number of bacterial colonies.
  18. A good colony distribution should be between 10 and 100 colonies, each spot approximately contains 2 to 20 colonies, it would be hard to score if there were more than 20 colonies on one spot. If the count is too low or too high, replate the sample with 10-fold higher or lower dilutions as needed.

4. Data Analysis

  1. Calculate the CFU (colony formation units per ml) of each plate based on the plating volume and dilution factor.
  2. Ascertain the number of Salmonella per macrophage through the recorded macrophage cell count from each strain.
  3. Calculate the geometric means of CFU per macrophage from at least three independent experiments for cell association, invasion or replication, respectively, and normalize further to the WT for the relative value.
  4. Analyze the data for association, invasion, and replication by Student’s t-test respectively, by comparing each strain to WT, and determine the statistical significance by the p-value.

Results

See representative results (Figure 2) after the data are plotted based on the modified phagocytic cell invasion assay. The data include five different strains, WT, ΔinvA, ΔphoP, mutant A, and mutant B. ΔinvA, known to be defective for invasion, and ΔphoP known to be defective for replication8, are used as positive controls to assess the experimental validity. Indeed, in the modified invasion assay, a ΔinvA mutant is int...

Discussion

The Gentamicin protection assay is widely used to study the invasion and replication of intracellular bacterial pathogens inside host cell, and it is especially an important biological tool for studying pathogens, like Salmonella, whose invasion is the prerequisite step for establishing infection1. The standard Gentamicin protection assay in Salmonella research community is implemented in 24-well culture dish5. Though the use of 48 or even 96-well plates were discussed before for h...

Disclosures

We have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported partly by a grant for National Institutes of Health NIAID (for A.J.B. and L.G.A., R01 AI076246). The Salmonella mutant collection was partly supported by National Institutes of Health grants (for M.M., U01 A152237-05, R01 AI07397-01, R01 AI039557-11 and R01 AI075093-01), partly by National Institutes of Health grants (for H.A.P, R21 AI083964-01, 1R0 1AI083646-01, 1R56AI077645, R01 AI075093). We thank Steffen Prowollik for replica plating and confirming the mutants in the collection.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)Life Technologies11965
Fetal bovine serumHyCloneSH30910.03
T-75 Cell culture flask vented filter capNest Biotechnology708003
100x Non-Essential Amino AcidsLife Technologies11140
Cell scraperBD Falcon353086
96-well Cell culture plateCorning Incorporated3595
Luria-Bertani (LB) brothMP Biomedicals3002-075
14 ml Polypropylene Round-Bottom TubeBD Falcon352059
PBS pH 7.4 (1x)Life Technologies10010
Triton X-100SigmaT-8787
Kanamycin solutionSigmaK0254
Gentamicin solutionSigmaG1272
0.25% Trypsin-EDTALife Technologies25200
Trypan blueSigmaT8154

References

  1. Haraga, A., Ohlson, M. B., Miller, S. I. Salmonellae interplay with host cells. Nat Rev Microbiol. 6, 53-66 (2008).
  2. Mandell, G. L. Interaction of intraleukocytic bacteria and antibiotics. The Journal of clinical investigation. 52, 1673-1679 (1973).
  3. Elsinghorst, E. A. Measurement of invasion by gentamicin resistance. Methods Enzymol. 236, 405-420 (1994).
  4. Elsinghorst, E. A., Weitz, J. A. Epithelial cell invasion and adherence directed by the enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli tib locus is associated with a 104-kilodalton outer membrane protein. Infect Immun. 62, 3463-3471 (1994).
  5. Behlau, I., Miller, S. I. A PhoP-repressed gene promotes Salmonella typhimurium invasion of epithelial cells. J Bacteriol. 175, 4475-4484 (1993).
  6. Hueck, C. J., et al. Salmonella typhimurium secreted invasion determinants are homologous to Shigella Ipa proteins. Mol Microbiol. 18, 479-490 (1995).
  7. Steele-Mortimer, O. Infection of epithelial cells with Salmonella enterica. Methods Mol Biol. 431, 201-211 (2008).
  8. Foster, J. W., Spector, M. P. How Salmonella survive against the odds. Annu Rev Microbiol. 49, 145-174 (1995).
  9. Edwards, A. M., Massey, R. C. Invasion of human cells by a bacterial pathogen. Journal of visualized experiments JoVE. 10, (2011).
  10. Molinari, G., et al. The role played by the group A streptococcal negative regulator Nra on bacterial interactions with epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol. 40, 99-114 (2001).
  11. Van der Velden, A. W., Lindgren, S. W., Worley, M. J., Heffron, F. Salmonella pathogenicity island 1-independent induction of apoptosis in infected macrophages by Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium. Infect Immun. 68, 5702-5709 (2000).
  12. Santos, R. L., Zhang, S., Tsolis, R. M., Baumler, A. J., Adams, L. G. Morphologic and molecular characterization of Salmonella typhimurium infection in neonatal calves. Vet Pathol. 39, 200-215 (2002).
  13. Lawhon, S. D., et al. Role of SPI-1 secreted effectors in acute bovine response to Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium a systems biology analysis approach. PLoS One. 6, e26869 (2011).
  14. Drecktrah, D., Knodler, L. A., Galbraith, K., Steele-Mortimer, O. The Salmonella SPI1 effector SopB stimulates nitric oxide production long after invasion. Cell Microbiol. 7, 105-113 (2005).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

SalmonellaMacrophageAssociationInvasionReplicationHigh throughputGentamicin Protection AssayPhenotypingDeletion MutantsIn VitroIn Vivo

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved