JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We present a detailed protocol to construct and screen mutant libraries for directed evolution campaigns in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Abstract

Directed evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers many attractive advantages when designing enzymes for biotechnological applications, a process that involves the construction, cloning and expression of mutant libraries, coupled to high frequency homologous DNA recombination in vivo. Here, we present a protocol to create and screen mutant libraries in yeast based on the example of a fungal aryl-alcohol oxidase (AAO) to enhance its total activity. Two protein segments were subjected to focused-directed evolution by random mutagenesis and in vivo DNA recombination. Overhangs of ~50 bp flanking each segment allowed the correct reassembly of the AAO-fusion gene in a linearized vector giving rise to a full autonomously replicating plasmid. Mutant libraries enriched with functional AAO variants were screened in S. cerevisiae supernatants with a sensitive high-throughput assay based on the Fenton reaction. The general process of library construction in S. cerevisiae described here can be readily applied to evolve many other eukaryotic genes, avoiding extra PCR reactions, in vitro DNA recombination and ligation steps.

Introduction

Directed molecular evolution is a robust, fast and reliable method to design enzymes1, 2. Through iterative rounds of random mutation, recombination and screening, improved versions of enzymes can be generated that act on new substrates, in novel reactions, in non-natural environments, or even to assist the cell to achieve new metabolic goals3-5. Among the hosts used in directed evolution, the brewer's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae offers a repertoire of solutions for the functional expression of complex eukaryotic proteins that are not otherwise available in prokaryotic counterparts6,7.

Used exhaustively in cell biology studies, this small eukaryotic model has many advantages in terms of post-translational modifications, ease of manipulation and transformation efficiency, all of which are important traits to engineer enzymes by directed evolution8. Moreover, the high frequency of homologous DNA recombination in S. cerevisiae coupled to its efficient proof-reading apparatus opens a wide array of possibilities for library creation and gene assembly in vivo, fostering the evolution of different systems from single enzymes to complex artificial pathways9-12. Our laboratory has spent the past decade designing tools and strategies for the molecular evolution of different ligninases in yeast (oxidoreductases involved in the degradation of lignin during natural wood decay)13-14. In this communication, we present a detailed protocol to prepare and screen mutant libraries in S. cerevisiae for a model flavooxidase, -aryl-alcohol oxidase (AAO15)-, that can be easily translated to many other enzymes. The protocol involves a focused-directed evolution method (MORPHING: Mutagenic Organized Recombination Process by Homologous in vivo Grouping) assisted by the yeast cell apparatus16, and a very sensitive screening assay based on the Fenton reaction in order to detect AAO activity secreted into the culture broth17.

Protocol

1. Mutant Library Construction

  1. Choose the regions to be subjected to MORPHING with the help of computational algorithms based on the available crystal structure or homology models18.
    1. Here, target two regions of AAO from Pleurotus eryngii for random mutagenesis and recombination (Met[α1]-Val109, Phe392-Gln566), while amplifying the remainder of the gene (844 bp) by high-fidelity PCR (Figure 1).
      Note: Several segments can be studied by MORPHING in an independent or combined manner16.
  2. Amplify the targeted areas by mutagenic PCR. Create overlapping areas between segments (~50 bp each) by superimposing PCR reactions of the defined regions.
    1. Prepare mutagenic PCR of targeted segments in a final volume of 50 µl containing DNA template (0.92 ng/µl), 90 nM oligo sense (RMLN for segment M-I and AAO-BP for segment M-II), 90 nM antisense primer (AAO-92C for segment M-I and RMLC for segment M-II) , 0.3 mM dNTPs (0.075 mM each), 3% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.05 mM MnCl2 and 0.05 U/µl Taq DNA polymerase. Primers sequences are detailed in Figure 1.
    2. Use the following PCR program: 95 °C for 2 min (1 cycle); 95 °C for 45 sec, 50 °C for 45 sec, 74 °C for 45 sec (28 cycles); and 74 °C for 10 min (1 cycle).
  3. Amplify the non-mutagenic regions with ultra-high fidelity polymerase and include the corresponding areas overlapping the mutagenic segments and/or linearized vector overhangs.
    1. Prepare reaction mixtures in a final volume of 50 µl containing: DNA template (0.2 ng/µl), 250 nM oligo sense HFF, 250 nM oligo antisense HFR, 0.8 mM dNTPs (0.2 mM each), 3% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and 0.02 U/µl iproof DNA polymerase. Primers sequences are detailed in Figure 1.
    2. Use the following PCR program: 98 °C for 30 sec (1 cycle); 98 °C for 10 sec, 55 °C for 25 sec, 72 °C for 45 sec (28 cycles); and 72 °C for 10 min (1 cycle).
      Note: With conditions described in 1.2 and 1.3 overlaps of 43 bp (plasmid-M1 region); 46 bp (M1 region-HF region); 47 bp (HF region-M2 region) and 61 bp (M2 region- plasmid) are designed (Figure 1) to favor in vivo splicing in yeast.
    3. Purify all the PCR fragments (mutagenic and non-mutagenic) with a commercial gel extraction kit according to manufacturer's protocol.
  4. Linearize the vector such that flanking regions of approximately 50 bp are created that are homologous to the 5´- and 3´-ends of the target gene.
    1. Prepare a linearization reaction mixture containing 2 µg DNA, 7.5 U BamHI, 7.5 U XhoI, 20 µg BSA and 2 µl of Buffer BamHI 10x in a final volume of 20 µl.
    2. Incubate the reaction mixture at 37 °C for 2 hr and 40 min. Afterwards, proceed with inactivation at 80 °C for 20 min.
  5. Purify the linearized vector by agarose gel extraction to avoid contamination with the residual circular plasmid (Figure 2).
    1. Load the digestion reaction mix into the mega-well of a semi-preparative low melting point agarose gel (0.75%, w:v) as well as an aliquot (5 µl) of the reaction mix in the adjacent well as a reporter.
    2. Run DNA electrophoresis (5 V/cm between electrodes, 4 ᵒC) and separate the agarose gel corresponding to the mega-well and store it at 4 ᵒC in 1x TAE.
    3. Stain the lane with the molecular weight ladder and the reporter. Visualize the bands under UV light. Nick the position where the linearized vector places.
      Note: As the quality of the purified linearized vector is a critical factor for successful recombination and assembly in yeast, avoid gel staining for semi-preparative DNA electrophoresis. The use of dyes and UV exposure for gel extraction may affect the stability of the DNA vector, compromising the in vivo recombination efficiency. As alternative to toxic EtBr dyes, Gel Red and SYBR dyes are commonly used for gel staining.
    4. In the absence of UV light, identify the linearized vector in the mega-well fragment using the guidance of the nicks in the stained reporter lane so that it can be isolated.
    5. Extract the linearized vector from agarose and purify it with a commercial gel extraction kit according to manufacturer's protocol.
      Note: Use high-copy episomal shuttle vectors with antibiotic and auxotrophy markers: In this example we employed the uracil independent and ampicillin resistance pJRoC30 vector, under the control of the yeast GAL1 promoter.
  6. Prepare an equimolar mixture of the PCR fragments and mix it with the linearized vector at a 2:1 ratio, with no less than 100 ng of linearized plasmid (test different ratios of equimolar library/open vector to achieve good transformation yields).
    1. Measure the absorbance of the PCR fragments and linearized vector at 260 nm and 280 nm to determine their concentration and purity.
  7. Transform yeast competent cells with the DNA mixture using a commercial yeast transformation kit (see Table for supplies) according to manufacturer's instructions.
    1. Here, use a protease deficient and URA3- dependent S. cerevisiae strain, BJ5465. Transform the cells with the parental circularized vector as an internal standard during screening (see below). Additionally, check the background by transforming the linearized vector in the absence of PCR fragments.
      Note: In case of detecting initial low secretion levels, use S. cerevisiae protease deficient strains like BJ5465 to foster the accumulation of active protein in culture supernatants. If the target enzyme undergoes hyperglycosylation, the use of glycosylation-deficient strains (e.g., Δkre2 that is only capable of attaching smaller mannose oligomers) could be a suitable option.
  8. Plate the transformed cells on SC drop-out plates and incubate them at 30 °C for three days. Plate (on SC drop-out plates supplemented with uracil) URA3-S. cerevisiae cells lacking the plasmid as a negative control for screening (see below).

2. High-Throughput Screening Assay (Figure 3)

  1. Fill an appropriate number of sterile 96-well plates (23 plates to analyze a library of 2,000 clones) with 50 µl minimal medium per well with the help of a pipetting robot.
  2. Pick individual colonies from the SC-drop out plates and transfer them to the 96-well plates.
    1. In each plate, inoculate column number 6 with the parental type as an internal standard and well H1 with URA3-S. cerevisiae cells (in SC medium supplemented with uracil) with no plasmid as a negative control.
      Note: Well H1 is filled specifically with drop-out media supplemented with uracil. A blank well containing media without cells can be also prepared as an additional sterility control.
  3. Cover the plates with their lids and wrap them in Parafilm. Incubate plates for 48 hr at 30 °C, 225 rpm and 80% relative humidity in a humid shaker.
  4. Remove the Parafilm, add 160 µl of expression medium to each well with the help of the pipetting robot, reseal the plates and incubate them for a further 24 hr.
    Note: Minimal medium and expression medium are prepared as reported elsewhere19. Secretion levels may vary depending on the gene under study and accordingly, the incubation times must be optimized in each case to synchronize the cell growth in all the wells.
  5. Centrifuge the plates (master plates) at 2,800 x g for 10 min at 4 °C.
  6. Transfer 20 µl of the supernatant from the wells in the master plate to the replica plate using a liquid handling robotic multistation.
    Note: To favor enzyme secretion it is advisable to replace the native signal peptide of the target protein by signal peptides commonly used for heterologous expression in yeast (e.g., the α factor prepro-leader, the leader of the K1 Killer toxin from S. cerevisiae, or even chimeric versions of both peptides13). Alternatively, the native signal peptide can be exclusively evolved for secretion in yeast.
  7. Add 20 µl of 2 mM p-methoxybenzylalcohol in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.0 with the help of the pipetting robot. Stir the plates briefly with a 96-well plate mixer and incubate them for 30 min at RT.
  8. With the pipetting robot, add 160 µl of the FOX reagent to each replica plate and stir briefly with the mixer (final concentration of FOX mixture in the well: 100 µM xylenol orange, 250 µM Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2 and 25 mM H2SO4).
    1. Add several additives to the reagent to enhance sensitivity, such as organic co-solvents (DMSO, ethanol, methanol) or sorbitol17. Here, amplify the response by adding sorbitol to a final concentration of 100 mM (Figure 4).
  9. Read the plates (end-point mode, t0) at 560 nm on a plate reader.
  10. Incubate the plates at RT until the color develops and measure the absorption again (t1).
    1. Calculate the relative activity from the difference between the Abs value after incubation and that of the initial measurement normalized to the parental type for each plate (Δt- t0).
  11. Subject the best mutant hits to two consecutive re-screenings to rule out false positives.
    Note: Typically, re-screenings include plasmid isolation from yeast, amplification and purification in Escherichia coli, followed by transformation of fresh yeast cells with the plasmid19. Each selected clone is re-screened in pentaplicate.

Results

AAO from P. eryngii is an extracellular flavooxidase that supplies fungal peroxidases with H2O2 to start attacking lignin. Two segments of AAO were subjected to focused-directed evolution by MORPHING in order to enhance its activity and its expression in S. cerevisiae 19. Irrespective of the foreign enzymes harbored by S. cerevisiae, the most critical issue when constructing mutant libraries in yeast concerns the engineering of s...

Discussion

In this article, we have summarized most of the tips and tricks employed in our laboratory to engineer enzymes by directed evolution in S. cerevisiae (using AAO as an example) so that they can be adapted for use with many other eukaryotic enzyme systems by simply following the common approach described here.

In terms of library creation, MORPHING is a fast one-pot method to introduce and recombine random mutations in small protein stretches while leaving the remaining regions of the p...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Commission project Indox-FP7-KBBE-2013-7-613549; a Cost-Action CM1303-Systems Biocatalysis; and the National Projects Dewry [BIO201343407-R] and Cambios [RTC-2014-1777-3].

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1. Culture media
Ampicillin sodium saltSigma-AldrichA0166CAS Nº 69-52-3 M.W. 371.39
Bacto AgarDifco214010
CloramphenicolSigma-AldrichC0378CAS Nº 56-75-7 M.W. 323.13
D-(+)-GalactoseSigma-AldrichG0750CAS Nº 59-23-4 M.W. 180.16
D-(+)-GlucoseSigma-AldrichG5767CAS Nº 50-99-7 M.W. 180.16
D-(+)-Raffinose pentahydrateSigma-Aldrich83400CAS Nº 17629-30-0 M.W. 594.51
PeptoneDifco211677
Potassium phosphate monobasicSigma-AldrichP0662CAS Nº 7778-77-0 M.W. 136.09
UracilSigma AldrichU1128
Yeast ExtractDifco212750
Yeast Nitrogen Base without Amino AcidsDifco291940
Yeast Synthetic Drop-out Medium Supplements without uracilSigma-AldrichY1501
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
2. PCR Reactions
dNTP MixAgilent genomics200415-5125 mM each
iProof High-Fidelity DNA polymeraseBio-rad172-5301
Manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrateSigma-AldrichM8054CAS Nº 13446-34-9 M.W. 197.91
Taq DNA PolymeraseSigma-AldrichD4545For error prone PCR
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3. Plasmid linearization
BamHI restriction enzymeNew England BiolabsR0136S
Bovine Serum AlbuminNew England BiolabsB9001S
XhoI restriction enzymeNew England BiolabsR0146S
Not I restriction enzymeNew England BiolabsR0189S
Gel RedBiotium41003For staining DNA
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
4. FOX assays
Ammonium iron(II) sulfate hexahydrateSigma-AldrichF3754CAS Nº 7783-85-9 M.W. 392.14
Anysil AlcoholSigma AldrichW209902CAS Nº 105-13-5 M.W. 138.16
D-SorbitolSigma-AldrichS1876CAS Nº 50-70-4 M.W. 182.17
Hydrogen peroxide 30%Merck Millipore1072090250FOX standard curve
Xylenol Orange disodium saltSigma-Aldrich52097CAS Nº 1611-35-4 M.W. 716.62
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
5. Agarose gel stuff
AgaroseNorgen28035CAS Nº 9012-36-6
Gel RedBiotium41003DNA analysis dye
GeneRuler 1kb LadderThermo ScientificSM0311DNA M.W. standard
Loading Dye 6xThermo ScientificR0611
Low-melting temperature agaroseBio-rad161-3112CAS Nº 39346-81-1
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
6. Kits and cells
S. cerevisiae strain BJ5465LGC PromochemATTC 208289Protease deficient strain with genotype: MATα ura3-52 trp1 leu2-delta1 his3-delta200 pep4::HIS3 prb1-delta1.6R can1 GAL
E. coli XL2-Blue competent cellsAgilent genomics200150For plasmid purification and amplification
NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up KitMacherey-Nagel740,609,250DNA gel extraction
NucleoSpin Plasmid KitMacherey-Nagel740,588,250Column miniprep Kit
Yeast Transformation KitSigma-AldrichYEAST1-1KTIncluded DNA carrier (Salmon testes)
Zymoprep yeast plasmid miniprep IZymo researchD2001Plasmid extraction from yeast
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
7. Plates
96-well platesGreiner Bio-One655101Clear, non-sterile, polystyrene (for activity measurements)
96-well platesGreiner Bio-One655161Clear, sterile, polystyrene (for microfermentations)
96-well plate lidGreiner Bio-One656171Clear, sterile, polystyrene (for microfermentations)

References

  1. Jäckel, C., Hilvert, D. Biocatalysts by evolution. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21 (6), 753-759 (2010).
  2. Bornscheuer, U. T. Engineering the third wave of biocatalysis. Nature. 485 (7397), 185-194 (2012).
  3. Renata, H., Wang, Z. W., Arnold, F. H. Expanding the enzyme universe: accessing non-natural reactions by mechanism-guided directed evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (11), 3351-3367 (2015).
  4. Cobb, R. E., Chao, R., Zhao, H. Directed evolution: past, present and future. AIChE J. 59 (5), 1432-1440 (2013).
  5. Abatemarco, J., Hill, A., Alper, H. S. Expanding the metabolic engineering toolbox with directed evolution. Biotechnol. J. 8 (12), 1397-1410 (2013).
  6. Pourmir, A., Johannes, T. W. Directed evolution: selection of the host organism. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2 (3), e201209012 (2012).
  7. Krivoruchko, A., Siewers, V., Nielsen, J. Opportunities for yeast metabolic engineering: lessons from synthetic biology. Biotechnol J. 6 (3), 262-276 (2011).
  8. Gonzalez-Perez, D., Garcia-Ruiz, E., Alcalde, M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae in directed evolution: an efficient tool to improve enzymes. Bioeng Bugs. 3, 172-177 (2012).
  9. Alcalde, M. Mutagenesis protocols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by In Vivo Overlap Extension. Methods Mol. Biol. 634, 3-14 (2010).
  10. Bulter, T., Alcalde, M. Preparing libraries in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods. Mol. Biol. 231, 17-22 (2003).
  11. Ostrov, N., Wingler, L. M., Cornish, W. Gene assembly and combinatorial libraries in S. cerevisiae via reiterative recombination. Methods. Mol. Biol. 978, 187-203 (2013).
  12. Shao, Z., Zhao, H., Zhao, H. DNA assembler, an in vivo genetic method for rapid construction of biochemical pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (2), e16 (2009).
  13. Alcalde, M. Engineering the ligninolytic enzyme consortium. Trends Biotechnol. 33 (3), 155-162 (2015).
  14. Garcia-Ruiz, E. Directed evolution of ligninolytic oxidoreductases: from functional expression to stabilization and beyond. Cascade Biocatalysis: integrating stereoselective and environmentally friendly reactions. , 1-22 (2014).
  15. Hernandez-Ortega, A., Ferreira, P., Martinez, A. T. Fungal aryl-alcohol oxidase: a peroxide-producing flavoenzyme involved in lignin degradation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93 (4), 1395-1410 (2012).
  16. Gonzalez-Perez, D., Molina-Espeja, P., Garcia-Ruiz, E., Alcalde, M. Mutagenic organized recombination process by homologous in vivo grouping (MORPHING) for directed enzyme evolution. PLoS One. 9, e90919 (2014).
  17. Rhee, S. G., Chang, T., Jeong, W., Kang, D. Methods for Detection and Measurement of Hydrogen Peroxide Inside and Outside of Cells. Mol. Cells. 29 (6), 539-549 (2010).
  18. Sebestova, E., Bendl, J., Brezovsky, J., Damborsky, J. Computational tools for designing smart libraries. Methods. Mol. Biol. 1179, 291-314 (2014).
  19. Viña-Gonzalez, J., Gonzalez-Perez, D., Ferreira, P., Martinez, A. T., Alcalde, M. Focused directed evolution of aryl-alcohol oxidase in yeast using chimeric signal peptides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. , (2015).
  20. Gay, C., Collins, J., Gebicki, J. M. Hydroperoxide Assay with the Ferric-Xylenol orange Complex. Anal. Biochem. 273 (2), 149-155 (1999).
  21. Reetz, M. T. Biocatalysis in organic chemistry and biotechnology: Past, present, and future. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (34), 12480-12496 (2013).
  22. Mate, D. M., Gonzalez-Perez, D., Mateljak, I., Gomez de Santos, P., Vicente, A. I., Alcalde, M. The pocket manual of directed evolution: Tips and tricks. Biotechnology of Microbial Enzymes: Production, Biocatalysis and Industrial Applications. , .
  23. Chao, R., Yuan, Y., Zhao, H. Recent advances in DNA assembly technologies. FEMS Yeast Res. 15, 1-9 (2015).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Directed EvolutionSaccharomyces CerevisiaeMutant LibraryAryl alcohol Oxidase AAORandom MutagenesisPCRIn Vivo SplicingOverlapping RegionsHigh fidelity PCRScreening

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved