JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol describes the preparation and characterization of a dendrimeric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent that carries cyclen-based macrocyclic chelates coordinating paramagnetic gadolinium ions. In a series of MRI experiments in vitro, this agent produced an amplified MRI signal when compared to the commercially available monomeric analogue.

Abstract

Paramagnetic complexes of gadolinium(III) with acyclic or macrocyclic chelates are the most commonly used contrast agents (CAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Their purpose is to enhance the relaxation rate of water protons in tissue, thus increasing the MR image contrast and the specificity of the MRI measurements. Current clinically approved contrast agents are low molecular weight molecules that are rapidly cleared from the body. The use of dendrimers as carriers of paramagnetic chelators can play an important role in the future development of more efficient MRI contrast agents. Specifically, the increase in local concentration of the paramagnetic species results in a higher signal contrast. Furthermore, this CA provides a longer tissue retention time due to its high molecular weight and size. Here, we demonstrate a convenient procedure for the preparation of macromolecular MRI contrast agents based on poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers with monomacrocyclic DOTA-type chelators (DOTA – 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetate). The chelating unit was appended by exploiting the reactivity of the isothiocyanate (NCS) group towards the amine surface groups of the PAMAM dendrimer to form thiourea bridges. Dendrimeric products were purified and analyzed by means of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. Finally, high resolution MR images were recorded and the signal contrasts obtained from the prepared dendrimeric and the commercially available monomeric agents were compared.

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful and non-ionizing imaging technique widely used in biomedical research and clinical diagnostics due to its noninvasive nature and excellent intrinsic soft-tissue contrast. The most commonly used MRI methods utilize the signal obtained from water protons, providing high-resolution images and detailed information within the tissues based on differences in the density of the water signals. The signal intensity and the specificity of the MRI experiments can be further improved using contrast agents (CAs). These are paramagnetic or superparamagnetic species that affect the longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation times, respectively1,2.

Complexes of the lanthanide ion gadolinium with polyamino polycarboxylic acid ligands are the most commonly used T1 CAs. Gadolinium(III) shortens the T1 relaxation time of water protons, thus increasing the signal contrast in MRI experiments3. However, ionic gadolinium is toxic; its size approximates that of calcium(II), and it seriously affects calcium-assisted signaling in cells. Therefore, acyclic and macrocyclic chelates are employed to neutralize this toxicity. Various multidentate ligands have been developed so far, resulting in gadolinium(III) complexes with high thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness1. Those based on the 12-membered azamacrocycle cyclen, in particular its tetracarboxylic derivative DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetate) are the most investigated and applied complexes of this CA class.

Nevertheless, GdDOTA-type CAs are low molecular weight systems, displaying certain disadvantages such as low contrast efficiency and fast renal excretion. Macromolecular and multivalent CAs may be a good solution to these problems4. Since CA biodistribution is mainly determined by their size, macromolecular CAs display much longer retention times within tissues. Equally important, the multivalency of these agents results in an increased local concentration of the monomeric MR probe (e.g., GdDOTA complex), substantially improving the acquired MR signal and the measurement quality.

Dendrimers are amongst the most preferred scaffolds for the preparation of multivalent CAs for MRI4,5. These highly branched macromolecules with well-defined sizes are prone to various coupling reactions on their surface. In this work, we report the preparation, purification, and characterization of a dendrimeric CA for MRI consisting of a generation 4 (G4) poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer coupled to GdDOTA-like chelates (DCA). We describe the synthesis of the reactive DOTA derivative and its coupling to the PAMAM dendrimer. Upon complexation with Gd(III), the standard physicochemical characterization procedure of DCA was performed. Finally, MRI experiments were performed to demonstrate the ability of DCA to produce MR images with a stronger contrast than those obtained from low molecular weight CAs.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Preparation of DCA

  1. Synthesis of the monomeric unit 46.
    1. Synthesis of 4-(4-nitrophenyl)-2-(4,7,10-tris-tert-butoxycarbonylmethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododec-1-yl)butyric acid tert-butyl ester (2).
      1. Dissolve (4,7-bis-tert-butoxycarbonylmethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraaza-cyclododec-1-yl)-acetic acid tert-butyl ester 1 (1.00 g, 1.94 mmol) in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 5 ml), add potassium carbonate (0.67 g, 4.86 mmol, 2.5 equiv.) and stir the mixture at room temperature for 45 min.
        NOTE: Macrocycle 1 was prepared from cyclen and tert-butyl bromoacetate according to the previously published procedure7.
      2. Add tert-butyl-2-bromo-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butanoate (0.87 g, 2.53 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) portionwise over 1 hr. Continue stirring the mixture under the same reaction conditions for the following 18 hr.
        Note: Tert-butyl-2-bromo-4-(4-nitrophenyl)butanoate was prepared from 4-(4-nitrophenyl)-butyric acid, thionyl chloride, and bromine according to the previously published procedure8.
      3. Remove DMF by means of bulb-to-bulb vacuum distillation at 40-60 °C9.
      4. Purify the residue by column chromatography (silica gel, 7% methanol/dichloromethane) to obtain product 2 as a brown amorphous solid (1.09 g, 72%)10.
    2. Synthesis of 4-(4-aminophenyl)-2-(4,7,10-tris-tert-butoxycarbonylmethyl-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododec-1-yl)butyric acid tert-butyl ester (3).
      1. Dissolve the nitrobenzene derivative 2 (1.00 g, 1.28 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml) and 7 N ammonia solution in methanol (150 µl). Add palladium on activated carbon as a catalyst (Pd/C, 150 mg, 15 wt %) to the solution.
      2. Shake the heterogeneous mixture for 16 hr under a hydrogen atmosphere (2.5 bar) in the Parr hydrogenator apparatus.
      3. Prepare a cake of diatomaceous earth by suspending it in ethanol and filtering the suspension through a sintered glass funnel. Pour the suspension from 1.1.2.2 over the prepared cake to remove the Pd/C catalyst by filtration.
      4. Remove the solvent by gentle distillation on a rotary evaporator (water bath temperature ~40 °C) to obtain compound 3 as a brown amorphous solid (0.91 g, 95%).
    3. Synthesis of 4-(4-isothiocyanatophenyl)-2-(4,7,10-tris-tert-butoxycarbonylmethyl-1,4,7,10- tetraazacyclododec-1-yl)butyric acid tert-butyl ester (4).
      1. Add thiophosgene (0.124 ml, 1.58 mmol, 1.3 equiv.) to a mixture of 3 (0.91 g, 1.22 mmol) and triethylamine (0.685 ml, 4.87 mmol, 4 equiv.) in dichloromethane (15 ml).
      2. Vigorously stir the reaction mixture with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature for 16 hr.
      3. Remove the solvent by gentle distillation on a rotary evaporator (water bath temperature ~40 °C), and then purify the crude product by column chromatography (silica gel, 5% methanol/dichloromethane) to obtain the product 4 as a light brown amorphous solid (0.51 g, 53%).
  2. Synthesis of the dendrimer DCA.
    1. Synthesis of the dendrimer 5.
      1. Take G4-PAMAM dendrimer (667 mg, 10% dendrimer solution in methanol, 4.67 µmol), evaporate the methanol by gentle distillation on a rotary evaporator (water bath temperature ~40 °C), and dissolve the residue in DMF (4 ml).
      2. Add triethylamine (0.105 ml, 0.75 mmol, 160 equiv.), stir for 45 min at 60 °C, and add isothiocyanate 4 (354 mg, 0.45 mmol, 1.5 equiv. relative to the amino surface groups of the dendrimer) portionwise over 1 hr.
      3. Stir the reaction mixture with a magnetic stirrer at 45 °C for 48 hr.
      4. Remove the solvent by means of bulb-to-bulb vacuum distillation at 40-60 °C.
      5. Purify the residue by size-exclusion chromatography using a lipophilic gel filtration medium and methanol as the eluent. To pack the column, swell the filtration media in methanol for at least 3 hr at room temperature (>4 ml of methanol per 1 g of powder) without applying pressure. Perform gravity separation by collecting 1 ml fractions.
      6. Analyze the collected fractions with thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Develop the TLC plate in 15% methanol/dichloromethane (only the most polar spot located on the base line is derived from dendrimeric product). Evaporate the collected fractions by gentle distillation on a rotary evaporator (water bath temperature ~40 °C) to obtain product 5 (270 mg, 91%).
    2. Synthesis of the dendrimer 6.
      1. Dissolve the protected dendrimeric chelator 5 (270 mg, 4.23 µmol) in formic acid (5 ml) and stir the mixture at 60 °C for 24 hr.
      2. Evaporate the formic acid by distillation on a rotary evaporator (~15 mbar pressure, water bath temperature ~40 °C) and freeze-dry the product to give 6 (pressure ~0.2 mbar)9.
    3. Synthesis of the dendrimeric contrast agent (DCA)
      1. Dissolve the dendrimeric chelator 6 (4.35 µmol) in water and adjust the pH to 7.0 with 0.1 M sodium hydroxide.
      2. Dissolve GdCl3·6H2O (113 mg, 304 µmol) in water (1 ml) and add it dropwise to the solution of chelator 6 over a period of 4 hr; maintain the pH at 7.0 with aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (0.05 M) by measuring pH with a pH meter.
      3. Stir the mixture with a magnetic stirrer at room temperature for 24 hr.
      4. Add ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 158 mg, 426 µmol) to the solution portionwise over 4 hr to remove the excess of Gd(III) while maintaining the pH at 7.0 with aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (0.05 M). Stir the mixture at room temperature for 24 hr.
      5. Perform size-exclusion chromatography to remove the majority of GdEDTA and the excess of EDTA. Use a hydrophilic gel filtration medium swollen in water to pack the column. Reduce the mixture to a suitable volume and load the column. Elute the column with deionized water without applying pressure.
      6. Centrifuge the sample using a 3 kDa centrifugal filter unit for 30 min at centrifugal force 1,800 x g to remove the residues of GdEDTA and EDTA. Repeat this step (around five times) until the filtrate shows the absence of EDTA and GdEDTA. Transfer the sample into a flask, evaporate it, and then freeze-dry the solvent to obtain an off-white product as the final DCA (186 mg, 71%).
        NOTE: Check absence of EDTA and GdEDTA by means of ESI-MS.
      7. Confirm the absence of Gd(III) as a free ion using the xylenol orange test. Dissolve the filtrate (0.5 ml) in an acetate buffer solution (pH 5.8). Add a few drops of a xylenol orange solution and track the color change (yellow or violet color indicates the absence or presence of free Gd(III) ions in solution, respectively)11.

2. In Vitro Characterization of Dendrimeric Products

  1. Estimation of the number of macrocyclic DOTA-units coupled to the PAMAM dendrimer (loading of the dendrimer with DOTA-like macrocycles)
    1. Estimation with 1H NMR (NMR — nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy).
      NOTE: This procedure is possible on dendrimers 5 and 6, but not on DCA.
      1. Record the 1H NMR spectrum12.
      2. Integrate the aromatic region and the two separate aliphatic regions (1. signals of the aliphatic dendrimer and macrocyclic protons; 2. signals of the t-Bu groups) or just an aliphatic region for dendrimers 5 and 6, respectively.
        Note: There is no separate signal in the aliphatic region originated from the t-Bu groups in dendrimer 6 since they have been hydrolyzed.
      3. Use Eq. 1 or Eq. 2 to estimate the number of macrocyclic units (n), where R = the ratio of integrals (aliphatic/aromatic in Eq. 1 or aliphatic-dendrimer/aliphatic-t-Bu in Eq. 2), Hdend = the number of protons in dendrimer, HAr = the number of aromatic protons, HtBu= the number of protons in t-Bu groups, and Hmac = the number of protons in one macrocycle.
        Note: Either Eq. 1 or Eq. 2 can be used for dendrimer 5, while only Eq. 1 can be used for dendrimer 6. Since exchangeable protons (on amines, amides, thioureas, or carboxylates) are typically being replaced with deuterium, they were not assumed in the calculations. Here, Hdend = 1,128 (for 5) or 1,000 (for 6), HAr = 4, and Hmac = 27 were used.
        figure-protocol-9442 (1)
        figure-protocol-9523 (2)
    2. Estimation from elemental analysis by using the ratio of nitrogen to sulphur.
      1. Perform the elemental analysis on the solid dendrimeric sample (DCA in this work).
      2. Use Eq. 3 to estimate the number of macrocyclic units (n), where R = the ratio of determined %N and %S, Ndend or Sdend = the number of nitrogen or sulphur atoms in the dendrimer, and Nmac or Smac = the number of nitrogen or sulphur atoms in one macrocyclic unit.
        Note: The factor 2.29 is obtained from the ratio in atomic masses of sulphur and nitrogen. In this work, Ndend = 250, Sdend = 2, Nmac = 5, and Smac = 1 were used.
        figure-protocol-10431 (3)
    3. Estimation with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF).
      1. Perform the MALDI-TOF MS analysis13.
      2. Calculate the number of macrocyclic units (n) according to Eq. 4, where Mz = the observed mass (m/z), z = the charge of the species, Mdend = the mass of the dendrimeric part, and Mmac = the mass of one macrocyclic unit.
        NOTE: Mdend = 14,306 and Mmac = 719 were used in this work.
        figure-protocol-11108 (4)
  2. Determination of DCA concentration ([DCA]): Bulk magnetic susceptibility measurement (BMS)
    1. Dissolve DCA (5-10 mg) in water (360 µl) in a plastic vial tube ([DCA] ~5-10 mM).
      NOTE: [DCA] should be in the range of 5-10 mM to avoid possible overlap of t-BuOH resonances at sample concentrations >15 mM, with the resonance of water at δ = 4.7 ppm.
    2. Add 60 µl of D2O:t-BuOH mixture (2:1 v/v) to the aqueous solution of DCA and mix the resulting solution (420 µl) using a Vortex mixer.
    3. Transfer 400 µl of the sample into an outer NMR tube and place a coaxial NMR insert tube with a t-BuOH:H2O mixture (10:90 v/v) into the sample tube.
    4. Record the 1H NMR spectrum and measure the frequency shift between resonance signals deriving from t-BuOH in the inner and outer NMR tubes (reference)12.
    5. Use Eq. 5 to determine the [DCA], where T = the absolute temperature, Δχ = the recorded shift, µeff = the effective magnetic moment for a lanthanide ion (µeff = 7.94 for Gd(III)14, and s = a constant dependent upon the shape of the sample and its position in the magnetic field (0, 1/3, and 1/6 in the case of a sphere, cylinder parallel to, and cylinder perpendicular to the magnetic field, respectively).
      NOTE: The calculated value obtained for the [DCA] should be corrected to the original concentration due to the addition of the D2O:t-BuOH solution (60 µl).
      figure-protocol-12884 (5)
  3. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.
    1. Prepare a filtered DCA solution (0.2 µm polytetrafluorethylene/PTFE filter, 0.75 mM per Gd(III)) in 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer (25 mM, pH 7.4) and transfer it into a cuvette for the DLS measurement.
    2. Place the cuvette into the DLS apparatus and set the following parameters: 5 repetitions of 15 scans (1 scan = 12 sec, refractive index = 1.345, absorption = 1%) without delays in between the scans and with temperature equilibration 30 sec prior to recording.
    3. Export the acquired data and obtain the size distribution histogram by plotting population (%) as a function of size (hydrodynamic diameter).
  4. Measurement of the longitudinal and transverse relaxivities.
    NOTE: A similar procedure was already described using the relaxation time analyzer15; this procedure was performed using a 300 MHz NMR spectrometer with Topspin software.
    1. Prepare a set of DCA solutions in H2O:D2O (500 µl, 10% D2O in H2O, [DCA] = 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.0 mM, [HEPES] = 25 mM) from the DCA stock sample (see section 2.2).
    2. Transfer 450 µl of solution into an NMR tube and place it into the instrument.
    3. Optimize the acquisition parameters (90° excitation pulse duration (p1), and irradiation frequency offset (O1)) and then perform the T1 and T2 experiments using the inversion recovery (IR) and Car-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) pulse sequences, respectively.
    4. Determination of T1 and T2 relaxation times.
      1. Select the recorded measurement, process the 2D spectrum in the F2 dimension, and perform the interactive phase correction.
      2. Select the appropriate slice (peak with maximum intensity) in the Analysis/ T1/T2 relaxation window, integrate it, and export the region to the relaxation module.
      3. Select the appropriate fitting function (invrec or uxnmrt2 for IR and CPMG experiments, respectively) to obtain the T1 or T2 relaxation times.
    5. Repeat steps 2.4.4.2-2.4.4.4 for all the remaining [DCA] solutions.
    6. Calculate the relaxation rates (R1 and R2) from the obtained T1 values (R1,2=1/T1,2).
    7. Plot R1 and R2 (sec-1) as a function of Gd(III) concentration in mM.
    8. Determine the longitudinal and transverse relaxivities, r1 and r2 (mM-1 sec-1), from the slope of the fitted line, as defined by Eq. 6, where Ri,obs = the longitudinal (i=1) or transverse (i=2) diamagnetic relaxation rate of water in the absence of paramagnetic species and [Gd] = the concentration of Gd(III) used in the experiment.
      figure-protocol-16118 (6)

3. In Vitro MRI; Comparison Between DCA and GdDOTA

  1. Preparation of tube phantoms
    1. Prepare aqueous solutions of DCA (4 x 350 µl) and GdDOTA (4 x 350 µl) as well as water samples (4 x 350 µl) for two sets of experiments where the concentration of the contrast agents is calculated: (3.1.1.1) per Gd(III) or (3.1.1.2) per molecule.
      1. Prepare two DCA samples and two GdDOTA samples with concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 mM per Gd(III), respectively. Additionally, prepare two water samples (as control tubes).
      2. Prepare two DCA samples (2.5 and 5.0 mM per Gd(III) or 0.05 and 0.1 mM per dendrimeric molecule), two GdDOTA samples (0.25, 0.5 mM) and two water samples (control tubes).
        NOTE: The appropriate DCA and GdDOTA concentrations should be prepared by diluting the respective stock samples with concentrations determined via the BMS method (see section 2.2) with HEPES buffer (pH 7.4). In order to simplify the calculations, n = 50 was assumed for the average number of macrocyclic units per dendrimer molecule. Therefore, the ratio of DCA:GdDOTA was 1:5, calculated on a per molecule basis.
    2. Place the samples in 300 µl plastic vial tubes, avoiding the presence of air bubbles in the solution.
      NOTE: The size of the plastic vial tubes depends on the type and size of the radiofrequency coil used (here, an example with the volume coil is given).
    3. Insert the samples inside a syringe (60 ml volume), fill it with 1 mM GdDOTA solution, and place it in the scanner.
      NOTE: Samples were placed in the aqueous solution of GdDOTA to avoid susceptibility effects (variations in the magnetic field strength that occur near interfaces between substances of different magnetic susceptibility).
  2. Parameter optimization and imaging.
    1. Use the anatomical scan (Localizer/Tripilot) to position the syringe with the samples in the isocenter of the magnet.
    2. Press the traffic light (adjustment scan) to perform adjustments for shimming (adjustment of magnetic field homogeneity) of the whole volume, the central frequency (O1), the receiver gain (RG), and the transmit gain (TX0 and TX1).
    3. For T1-weighted (T1w) imaging, select the fast low angle shot (FLASH) method.
    4. Choose coronal slice for the samples placed vertically (syringe horizontally) in the scanner using the Localizer scan.
    5. Use Eq. 7 for optimization of the contrast-to-noise (CNR) acquisition parameters16, where α = the flip angle, TE = the echo time, TR = the repetition time, and T1,A, T1,B = the T1 times of sample A (T1,A) and sample B (T1,B) for which the CNR should be maximized (the same is valid for T2 times: T2,A and T2,B).
      NOTE: T1 and T2 relaxation times should be set to values obtained from the measurements of longitudinal and transverse relaxivities (section 2.4), while TE, TR, and α should be obtained from the CNR optimization calculation.
      figure-protocol-19674 (7)
    6. Acquire the image using the parameters obtained in the previous step (3.2.5).
    7. Calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
      1. Load the acquired T1w image (scan) into the Image display & processing window, and click on Define region of interest (ROI).
      2. Choose a circular ROI and draw it at the sample position and background. Subsequently, click on display to obtain the average signal amplitude (Ssignal) and standard deviation of the background (Snoise).
      3. Repeat step 3.2.7.2 for the DCA, GdDOTA, and water samples.
      4. Calculate the SNR using the formula: SNR = Ssignal / Snoise.
    8. Following a slightly modified procedure, perform T2-weighted (T2w) imaging using the rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) method. For optimization of the CNR acquisition parameters, use Eq. 8.
      figure-protocol-20804 (8)

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The preparation of DCA consisted of two stages: 1) synthesis of the monomeric DOTA-type chelator (Figure 1) and 2) coupling of the chelator with the G4 PAMAM dendrimer and subsequent preparation of the dendrimeric Gd(III) complex (Figure 2). In the first stage, a cyclen-based DOTA-type chelator containing four carboxylic acids and an orthogonal group suitable for further synthetic modifications was prepared. The preparation commenced from...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Preparation of the dendrimeric MRI contrast agent requires appropriate selection of the monomeric unit (i.e., the chelator for Gd(III)). They reduce the toxicity of this paramagnetic ion and, to date, a wide variety of acyclic and macrocyclic chelators serve this purpose1-3. Among these, macrocyclic DOTA-type chelators possess the highest thermodynamic stability and kinetic inertness and, hence, are the most preferred choice for the preparation of inert MRI contrast agents1,18. Furthermore,...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The financial support of the Max-Planck Society, the Turkish Ministry of National Education (PhD fellowship to S. G.), and the German Exchange Academic Service (DAAD, PhD fellowship to T. S.) are gratefully acknowledged.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
CyclenCheMatechC002
tert-Butyl bromoacetate Alfa AesarA14917
N,N-DimethylformamideFluka40248
Potassium carbonateSigma-Aldrich209619
4-(4-Nitrophenyl)butryic acidAldrich335339
Thionyl chloride Acros Organics382662500Note: Corrosive substance; toxic if inhaled
BromineAcros Organics402841000Note: causes severe skin burns, fatal if inhaled 
Diethyl etherany source
Sodium sulphateAcros Organics196640010
Chloroform VWR Chemicals22711.29
tert-Butyl 2,2,2-trichloroacetimidateAldrich364789Note: flammable substance; irritrant to skin and eyes
Boron trifluoride etherateAcros Organics17456025048% BF3. Note: Flammable substance; causes skin burns, fatal if inhaled
Sodium bicarbonateAcros Organics424270010
Ethyl-acetateany sourceFor column chromatography
n-Hexaneany sourceFor column chromatography
Bulb-to-bulb (Kugelrohr) distillation apparatusBüchiModel type: Glass oven B-585
SilicagelCarl Roth GmbHP090.2
Methanolany sourceFor column chromatography
Dichloromethane any sourceFor column chromatography
EthanolVWR Chemicals20821.296
AmmoniaAcros Organics4283810007 N Solution in Methanol
PalladiumAldrich64318115% wet
Hydrogenation apparatus PARRPARR Instrument Company
Celite 503Aldrich22151
Sintered glass funnelany source
ThiophosgenAldrich115150Note: irritrant to skin; toxic if inhaled
TriethylamineAlfa AesarA12646
Dichloromethane Acros Organics348460010Extra dry 
Magnetic stirrerany source
PAMAM G4 DendrimerAndrews ChemServiceAuCS - 29710% wt. solution in MeOH
Lipophylic Sephadex LH-20SigmaLH20100
Thin-layer chromatography platesMerck Millipore1.05554.0001
Formic acidVWR Chemicals20318.297
Lophylizer any source
Gadollinium(III) chloride hexahydrateAldrichG7532
Sodium hydroxideAcros Organics134070010
pH meterany source
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrateAldrichE5134
Mass spectrometer (ESI)AgilentIon trap SL 1100 
Acetate bufferany sourcepH 5.8
Xylenol orangeAldrich5209720 μM in acetate buffer
Hydrophylic Sephadex G-15GE Healthcare17-0020-01
Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter UnitMerck MilliporeUFC900324Ultracel-3 membrane (MWCO 3000)
Centrifugeany source
NMR spectrometer BrukerAvance III 300 MHz
TopspinBrukerVersion 2.1
Combustion analysis instrumentEuroVector SpAEuroEA 3000 Elemental Analyser 
MALDI-ToF MS instrumentApplied BiosystemsVoyager-STR
DeuteriumoxidCarl Roth GmbH6672.3
tert-Butyl alcoholCarl Roth GmbHAE16.1
Vortex mixerany source
Norell NMR tubesDeutero GmbH507-HP-7
NMR coaxial tubeDeutero GmbHcoaxialb-5-7
DLS instrumentMalvernZetasizer Nano ZS
0.20 μm PTFE filter Carl Roth GmbHKC94.1
HEPESFisher BioReagentsBP310
Plastic tube vialsany source
DotaremGuerbetNDC 67684-2000-1
MRI scannerBrukerBioSpec 70/30 USR magnet (7 T). Note: potential hazards related to high magnetic fields
RF coilBrukerDual frequency volume coil (RF RES 300 1H/19F 075/040 LIN/LIN TR)
Paravision (software)BrukerVersion 5.1

References

  1. Merbach, A. E., Helm, L., Tóth, É The chemistry of contrast agents in medical magnetic resonance imaging. 2nd ed. , Wiley. (2013).
  2. Geraldes, C. F. G. C., Laurent, S. Classification and basic properties of contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 4 (1), 1-23 (2009).
  3. Caravan, P., Ellison, J. J., McMurry, T. J., Lauffer, R. B. Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: Structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem. Rev. 99 (9), 2293-2352 (1999).
  4. Villaraza, A. J. L., Bumb, A., Brechbiel, M. W. Macromolecules, Dendrimers, and Nanomaterials in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: The Interplay between Size, Function, and Pharmacokinetics. Chem. Rev. 110 (5), 2921-2959 (2010).
  5. Langereis, S., Dirksen, A., Hackeng, T. M., van Genderen, M. H. P., Meijer, E. W. Dendrimers and magnetic resonance imaging. New J. Chem. 31 (7), 1152-1160 (2007).
  6. Gündüz, S., Power, A., Maier, M. E., Logothetis, N. K., Angelovski, G. Synthesis and Characterization of a Biotinylated Multivalent Targeted Contrast Agent. ChemPlusChem. 80 (3), 612-622 (2015).
  7. Pope, S. J. A., Kenwright, A. M., Heath, S. L., Faulkner, S. Synthesis and luminescence properties of a kinetically stable dinuclear ytterbium complex with differentiated binding sites. Chem. Commun. (13), 1550-1551 (2003).
  8. Vibhute, S. M., et al. Synthesis and characterization of pH-sensitive, biotinylated MRI contrast agents and their conjugates with avidin. Org. Biomol. Chem. 11 (8), 1294-1305 (2013).
  9. Vogel, A. I., Furniss, B. S. Vogel's textbook of practical organic chemistry. 5th ed. , Longman. (1989).
  10. Lundanes, E., Reubsaet, L., Greibrokk, T. Chromatography : basic principles, sample preparations and related methods. , Wiley-VCH. (2013).
  11. Barge, A., Cravotto, G., Gianolio, E., Fedeli, F. How to determine free Gd and free ligand in solution of Gd chelates. A technical note. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 1 (5), 184-188 (2006).
  12. Keeler, J. Understanding NMR spectroscopy. 2nd ed. , Wiley. (2010).
  13. Hillenkamp, F., Peter-Katalinić, J. MALDI MS : a practical guide to instrumentation, methods and applications. , Wiley-VCH. (2007).
  14. Peters, J. A., Huskens, J., Raber, D. J. Lanthanide induced shifts and relaxation rate enhancements. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 28, 283-350 (1996).
  15. Averill, D. J., Garcia, J., Siriwardena-Mahanama, B. N., Vithanarachchi, S. M., Allen, M. J. Preparation, Purification, and Characterization of Lanthanide Complexes for Use as Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Vis. Exp. (53), e2844(2011).
  16. Hagberg, G. E., Scheffler, K. Effect of r1 and r2 relaxivity of gadolinium-based contrast agents on the T1-weighted MR signal at increasing magnetic field strengths. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 8 (6), 456-465 (2013).
  17. Boswell, C. A., et al. Synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation of integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted PAMAM dendrimers. Mol. Pharmaceut. 5 (4), 527-539 (2008).
  18. Sherry, A. D., Caravan, P., Lenkinski, R. E. Primer on Gadolinium Chemistry. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 30 (6), 1240-1248 (2009).
  19. Cakić, N., Gündüz, S., Rengarasu, R., Angelovski, G. Synthetic strategies for preparation of cyclen-based MRI contrast agents. Tetrahedron Lett. 56 (6), 759-765 (2015).
  20. Polasek, M., Hermann, P., Peters, J. A., Geraldes, C. F. G. C., Lukes, I. PAMAM Dendrimers Conjugated with an Uncharged Gadolinium(III) Chelate with a Fast Water Exchange: The Influence of Chelate Charge on Rotational Dynamics. Bioconjugate Chem. 20 (11), 2142-2153 (2009).
  21. Ali, M. M., et al. Synthesis and relaxometric studies of a dendrimer-based pH-responsive MRI contrast agent. Chem. Eur. J. 14 (24), 7250-7258 (2008).
  22. Jackson, C. L., et al. Visualization of dendrimer molecules by transmission electron microscopy (TEM): Staining methods and Cryo-TEM of vitrified solutions. Macromolecules. 31 (18), 6259-6265 (1998).
  23. Jain, K., Kesharwani, P., Gupta, U., Jain, N. K. Dendrimer toxicity: Let's meet the challenge. Int. J. Pharm. 394 (1-2), 122-142 (2010).
  24. Rudovsky, J., et al. PAMAM dendrimeric conjugates with a Gd-DOTA phosphinate derivative and their adducts with polyaminoacids: The interplay of global motion, internal rotation, and fast water exchange. Bioconjugate Chem. 17 (4), 975-987 (2006).
  25. Xu, H., et al. Toward improved syntheses of dendrimer-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents: New bifunctional diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ligands and nonaqueous conjugation chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 50 (14), 3185-3193 (2007).
  26. Nwe, K., Bryant, L. H., Brechbiel, M. W. Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimer Based MRI Contrast Agents Exhibiting Enhanced Relaxivities Derived via Metal Preligation Techniques. Bioconjugate Chem. 21 (6), 1014-1017 (2010).
  27. Livramento, J. B., et al. First in vivo MRI assessment of a self-assembled metallostar compound endowed with a remarkable high field relaxivity. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging. 1 (1), 30-39 (2006).
  28. Norek, M., Kampert, E., Zeitler, U., Peters, J. A. Tuning of the Size of Dy2O3 Nanoparticles for Optimal Performance as an MRI Contrast Agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (15), 5335-5340 (2008).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

DendrimerMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast AgentParamagnetic ChelatingDO3ATert butyl 2 bromo 4 nitrophenyl ButatnoatePalladium On Activated CarbonHydrogenationThiophosgeneDOTA type Monomer

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved