A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay

Summary

We present a cost-effective method to the scratch migration assay that provides a new approach for determining cell migration without the use of equipment-intensive methods. While fibroblasts were used in this protocol, it can be adapted and utilized to study additional cell types and influences on cell migration.

Abstract

Cell migration is a key component in both physiological and pathological events. Normal cell migration is required for essential functions such as development and mounting an immune response. When a defect or alteration occurs with the cell migration process, it can have detrimental outcomes (i.e., cancer metastasis, wound healing, and scar formation). Due to the importance of cell migration, it is necessary to have access to a cell migration assay that is affordable, adaptable, and repeatable. Utilizing the common scratch migration assay, we have developed a new approach to analyzing cell migration that uses general laboratory equipment. The method described uses visual markers that allow for recapturing specific areas of interest without the use of time-lapse microscopy. In addition, it provides flexibility in the experimental design, ranging from altering the migration matrix substrate to the addition of pharmacological modifiers. Furthermore, this protocol outlines a way to account for the area of cell migration, which is not considered by several methods when examining cell migration. This new approach offers a scratch migration assay to a larger audience and will provide greater opportunity for researchers to examine the physiological and pathophysiological impact of cell migration.

Introduction

Cell migration is crucial for many physiological as well as pathological events. It is required during development, for mounting an immune response, and for proper wound healing^1,2,3. Many of these cell migration events can be triggered by physical or chemical signals. For example, during an immune response, leukocytes will migrate towards a site of injury in response to a chemoattractant². Additionally, leukocytes will also release cytokines to induce migration of additional immune cells, as well as other cell types, such as fibroblasts, which are involved in the wound healing process, and thus, initiating a multicellular response⁴. The ability of cells to migrate is essential for proper physiological function; however, when cell migration goes unchecked, it can have an adverse response and contribute to pathological events, such as chronic inflammation, vascular disease, cancer metastasis, and impaired wound healing^2,3,4,5,6,7. Impaired wound healing is a common affliction of diabetics due to defects in cell migration, and if these defects are not addressed, it could lead to further complications (e.g., amputation^8,9). This study, as well as others, have indicated the need to further understand the process by which cell migration occurs, either under normal physiological or pathological conditions, and it is vital for furthering this field of research. In order to accomplish this, there needs to be migration assays available that are both accessible and affordable to those researchers, who may not possess the equipment needed to conduct these assays.

Currently, there are a variety of migration assays available to examine a wide range of topics regarding cell migration. Both 2D and 3D migration models have been developed, each targeting specific areas impacting cell migration. 3D migration models are typically associated with cell invasion studies and assess the impact of extracellular matrix on cell migration^10,11,12, whereas 2D migration assays have a greater range of application and are primarily used to study chemotactic migration, wound healing, and functional changes during cell migration^13,14,15,16. Several of these assays require additional equipment, such as Boyden chambers or exclusion rings, which can reduce the availability of these assays to certain researchers. One of the more cost-efficient assays is the scratch assay, which is typically used to assess wound healing and general changes in cell migration^14,17. While most laboratories are equipped to conduct a scratch assay, the equipment used to track cell migration tend to either be unavailable or too expensive to purchase. This includes time-lapse microscopy, which requires an inverted microscope and a live imaging system. These expensive pieces of equipment are not commonly accessible to every laboratory. Therefore, this observation highlights the need for a new protocol that allows assessment of cell migration with more readily available equipment.

The protocol presented here provides a new and affordable way to assess cell migration. This method follows the same procedure associated with scratch assays but differs in the analysis of examining cell migration by utilizing equipment more commonly available in a basic sciences laboratory setting. This protocol using common equipment allows for a more accurate determination of cell migration without the use of time-lapse microscopy. In addition to determining migration, this method also accounts for variable factors in the scratch area that has been noted to greatly impact cell migration. Overall, this new protocol for cell migration analysis provides an opportunity for more laboratories to explore and contribute to the field of cell migration.

Protocol

1. General cell culture

1. Culture cardiac fibroblasts in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) containing 1 g/L glucose, sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, and supplemented with 14.2 mM NaHCO₃, 14.9 mM HEPES, 15% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2% L-glutamine, and 0.02% antimicrobial reagent (see Table of Materials) and maintained in CO₂ incubator at 37 °C.
2. Culture cardiac fibroblasts until 90-95% confluency is reached at passage 0 (P0). At this point the fibroblasts are ready to be split into a 48-well plate, which is used for the migration assay.

2. Preparation of the migration plate

1. Prepare a 48-well cell culture plate by drawing a line, using a yellow or light-colored permanent marker, down the center of the well. Then, draw three hash marks dividing the well into three separate areas of interest. These sections will be used for imaging.
   NOTE: Using a light color permanent marker will allow for easy imaging of migrating cells. Dark markers such as black or blue will prevent visualization of migrating cells.
2. If assessing migration on a substrate (e.g., collagen), coat the well at this time following instructions and concentrations used for the specific substrate.
3. Plate ~15,000-20,000 cardiac fibroblasts, P1, into each well and culture cells, under normal culturing conditions (conditions listed in previous section), until they reach 90-95% confluency. Confluency should be reached between 24-48 hours.
   NOTE: When setting up the migration plate make sure to include a positive control (a known migratory cell, such as 3T3 cells¹⁸), a negative control (unscratched cells) and a blank well.

3. Scratch migration assay & fixation

1. Once cells reach 90-95% confluency, remove the media and scratch along the drawn line using a sterile P200 pipette tip.
   NOTE: A P200 pipette tip is the common pipette tip sized used with the scratch assay^10,14,19. Also, only make one pass with the P200 tip as more than one attempt may result in multiple scratch lines.
2. Rinse the well with low serum media (1.5% FBS) to remove any unattached cardiac fibroblasts.
3. Add 500 µL of low serum media to each well. If using any pharmacological agents, add them at this time.
   NOTE: Low serum media is used because it allows/promotes cell migration to occur and prevents fibroblasts from proliferating which could skew the results of the migration assay²⁰. For this protocol, 1.5% FBS was used.
4. Capture 0 h images before incubating the fibroblasts in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37 °C for 24 h.
   1. Capture 0 h images using an inverted microscope with a 20x objective. Take two 0 h images per well. This will allow for a more complete coverage of the line of migration.
   2. Using the markings (line and dashes), position the well to capture the top half of the line of scratch. Avoid imaging the middle dash to ensure that the same area of migration is not imaged twice, which could skew results.
   3. Use imaging software (Table of Materials) to capture 0 h image #1. Then move the plate to position the bottom half of the well/line of scratch in view of the camera. Again, avoid capturing the middle dash. Once in place, capture 0 h image #2 (Figure 1).
      NOTE: Avoiding the middle dash in both 0 h images will prevent capturing areas of migration twice which if done could produce repeating results and skew the data.
5. After incubating for 24 h, remove the media from the well, and wash the well with 1x nonsterile PBS (henceforth all 1x PBS used is nonsterile).
6. In the fume hood, add 500 µL of 4% paraformaldehyde to the well and incubate for 10 minutes at room temperature (RT).
7. Remove paraformaldehyde and wash 3x with 1x PBS for 5 min each at RT.
8. Once cells are washed, proceed to capturing 24 h images or add 1x PBS to each well and place at 4 °C until a later time. Cells can stay at 4 °C for 1-2 weeks until ready to image.
   1. Permeabilize the cells by adding 300 µL of permeabilizing solution (1x PBS and 0.01% triton X-100) to each well. Incubate cells/plate with gentle, continual rocking for 30 min at RT.
   2. Remove permeabilizing solution and add 1% Coomassie Brilliant Blue stain (3% Coomassie Brilliant Blue, 10% acetic acid, 45% methanol, and 45% dH₂O) for 10 min with gentle, continual rocking at RT.
      NOTE: If plates are coated with an extracellular matrix substrate make sure to test a coated plate with Coomassie staining before conducting migration assay. Figure 2 demonstrates that a matrix substrate can be used with this assay and not impact visualization of cells.
   3. Wash wells 3x with 1x PBS at RT with continual rocking for 5 min each.
   4. After washes, added 300 µL of 1x PBS and capture 24 h images.
   5. Capture 24 h images by aligning the well into the same position that was used to capture the 0 h images. In order to accomplish this, open the previously captured 0 h images and using the marking made with the permanent marker, align the well into the same position. The line down the middle and additional dash marks should allow close alignment between the 24 h image and the 0 h image (Figure 1).

4. Preparation of 0 h and 24 h images

1. Open 0 h and 24 h images taken of the same well and position in imaging software (Table of Materials).
2. Create a new layer on the 0 h image. Then, click the new layer and change the name of the layer to “line layer” by double clicking on the text.
   NOTE: This layer will be referred to as line layer from this point forth.
3. Click the Brush Tool (brush icon) and set the size at 10 px and the color to red.
4. With the line layer selected, draw two, separate lines that outline the area of the scratch. The lines should not touch any cells due to these lines marking the area of migration.
5. Click the Move Tool (arrow icon) and then press down Ctrl button and click on both the line and background layers.
6. Click in the center of the 0 h image and drag both these layers to the middle of the 24 h image.
7. Now using the 24 h image, click on the 0 h background layer and change the opacity to 50%.
8. Holding the Ctrl button, click on both the 0 h background and line layer and then free transform the layers (Edit>Free Transform). Using free transformation, align the 0 h background and line image to the 24 h background image. This step results in the overlaying of the 0 h and 24 h image, which is necessary to position the lines that mark the area of migration in the correct position on the 24 h image.
9. After successful overlaying of the 0 h background and line layers onto the 24 h background image, delete the 0 h background layer. Delete by clicking the 0 h background layer, then right click, and click delete layer.
10. Deleting the 0 h background image will leave just the line and the 24 h background layer (now referred to as migration image). The line layer will indicate the area of migration/scratch on the 24 h image and can be used for determining the number of migrating cells.
11. Save as the new migration image as both a photoshop file and a TIFF/JPEG. NOTE: a representative figure that depicts this process is presented in Figure 3.

5. Counting the number of migrating cells

1. Open the migration image. This can be done in a program that accepts TIFF/JPEG files (Table of Materials).
2. Count the number of cells that are located in between as well as touching the two red lines.
3. Record the number of migrating cells per image. There will be two migrating images per well, and these values should not be combined until after the values have been corrected for area of migration (detailed in next section).

6. Determine area of migration

1. Open the 24 h image that contains the lines of migration in the imaging software program in section 5 (Table of Materials).
2. Save As this image as “Migration Area Image”.
3. After saving, click the background layer, right click, and click delete layer. This should leave only the scratch lines on the image (Figure 3).
4. Using the Brush Tool (brush icon) fill in the area between the lines of scratch. Match the color of the brush with the color used to draw the lines for migration.
5. Change the image to a grayscale to generate a black and white image (Image>Mode>Grayscale) and then save the image (Figure 4).
6. Start the analysis software (Table of Materials) and then open the “Area of Migration” file within analysis software.
7. To determine the area of the line of migration, click Image>Adjust>Threshold. The black migration area will turn red and the percent area will be indicated in the Threshold box. The area will be reported as the percent of area the line of migration covers compared to the entire area captured in the image.
8. Record the percent area for the line of migration and make sure that this value is paired with the number of migrating cells for the same image.

7. Data analysis

1. Normalize the number of migrating cells to the percent area of the scratch. Divide the number of migrating cells by the percent area of the line of migration (# migrated cells % Area of migration). Do this per image and not an average based on migration per well.
2. After normalizing values per image, add the values of the two images, which represents an individual well. This value will be used for graphical and statistical analysis. If the experimental design contained multiple replicates. Average replicate values before statistical analysis.

Results

This procedure documents a new approach to studying cell migration that is both cost-effective and easily adaptable for most labs. Many studies have used time-lapse microscopy to assess cell migration, but the equipment required for this method is not readily available to many laboratories. Whereas utilizing lines and dashes for demarcation allows for the ability to recapture specific areas of interest at different time points without the use of expensive equipment (Figure 1 &

Discussion

This new approach to the scratch migration assay provides a more accessible method for researchers to examine changes in cell migration. While this assay follows the same procedure for administering a scratch similar to other scratch assays, it does provide a new method for imaging and accurate analysis of cell migration¹⁰. Instead of using equipment-intensive methods of time-lapse microscopy and live cell imaging chambers, this method details the use of commonly available lab equipment. Utilizing...

Materials

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Adobe All Apps	Adobe		This includes Adobe photoshop which is the imaging software used with this protocol
Avant Pipette Tips 200ul Binding non-sterile	MIDSCI	AVR1	Tips are autoclaved to sterilize
AxioCam Erc 5s Camera	Zeiss	426540-9901-000
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250	Fisher Scientific	BP101-25
Costar Flat Bottom Cell Culture Plates 48 Wells	Fisher Scientific	07-200-86
DMEM with L-Glutamine, 1g/L glucose and sodium pyruvate	Fisher Scientific	MT10014CM
Image J	NIH		This is a free software offered by the US government and is the analysis software used with this protocol
Paraformaldehyde	Fisher Scientific	AC416785000
Premium US origin fetal bovine serum	Innovative Research	IFBS-HU
Primocin	InvivoGEN	ant-pm-2	This is the anitmicrobial used for with this procotol to culture cardiac fibroblasts
Zeiss Primovert Microscope	Zeiss	491206-0002-000
Zen Blue Edition 2.3 software	Zeiss		software comes with camera purchase