A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol presents the acetylcholine rechallenge after nitroglycerine as an add-on procedure to spasm provocation testing. The purpose of this technique is to unmask co-existing microvascular spasm in patients with epicardial spasm and to assess the protective efficacy of nitroglycerine on a per-patient level to guide medical therapy.

Abstract

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) can be diagnosed in a large proportion of patients with recurrent angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) using acetylcholine (ACh) spasm provocation testing. CAS can further be divided into different subtypes (e.g., focal, diffuse epicardial, or microvascular spasm), each with different pathophysiological mechanisms that may require tailored drug treatment. The evidence behind the role of nitrates in the setting of each CAS subtype is lacking, and the effectivity can vary on a per-patient basis. In order to assess on a per-patient level whether nitroglycerine (NTG) can prevent inducible spasm, the vasospastic ACh dose can be readministered after NTG administration as part of the spasm provocation test. The preventive effect of NTG is assessed by evaluating improvements in the severity of induced symptoms, ischemic ECG changes, and by reassessing the site and mode of spasm on angiography. This technique can therefore be used to assess the nitrate responsiveness on a per-patient level and unmask co-existing microvascular spasm in patients with epicardial spasm that is prevented with NTG. The NTG rechallenge, therefore, allows to further guide targeted therapy for CAS and provide new insights into the pathophysiological mechanism behind vasospastic disorders.

Introduction

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) can be diagnosed in a large proportion of patients with recurrent angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) by means of spasm provocation testing with acetylcholine(ACh)1,2,3,4.The recent CorMicA trial demonstrated that identification and concurrent tailored treatment of CAS persistently improve the patient's quality of life and reduce the burden of angina5. Usually, once CAS is diagnosed, it is regarded as one distinct disease and treated with anti-vasospastic medication, such as calcium antagonists and nitrates1. Although, CAS can be divided into different subtypes with different pathophysiological mechanisms that may require tailored drug treatment6. CAS can occur on an epicardial level, either focally or diffusely, throughout the epicardial coronary arteries or on a microvascular level. The former is defined as vasospastic angina (VSA) and the latter as microvascular angina (MVA) due to microvascular spasm according to the COronary VAsomotor DISorders study group (COVADIS)3,4. Moreover, combinations of endotypes of CAS may co-exist that can further complicate tailored treatment. This is especially important as the occurrence of microvascular spasm may be masked during spasm provocation when a simultaneous epicardial spasm occurs.

As a consequence, treatment of these patients in clinical practice can be cumbersome and initiates a period of trial and error based treatment with various anti-vasospastic or anti-anginal medications. Nitrates, in particular, are often initiated as first-line treatment in short-acting form as rescue medication for acute anginal attacks or in the long-acting form as maintenance therapy. The evidence behind the role of nitrates in the setting of each CAS subtype is lacking, and the effectivity can vary on a per-patient basis. Especially in the case of microvascular or diffuse distal epicardial spasm, the effect of NTG is controversial7,8. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of chronic NTG treatment has to be weighed against potential side effects, such as severe headaches and a worsened exercise capacity9,10,11.

Recently Seitz et al. demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the ACh rechallenge technique after NTG administration as an add-on procedure to the spasm provocation test12. This is performed after a positive spasm provocation test by readministering the vasospastic dose of ACh in a similar fashion as the vasospastic dose itself 3 min after NTG administration. To this end, the COVADIS criteria are revisited in order to evaluate the preventive effect of NTG, e.g., improvement in symptoms, ischemic ECG changes, and reassessment of the site and mode of spasm by angiography3,4. Moreover, prevention of epicardial spasm during rechallenge can unmask the co-existence of microvascular spasm.

The purpose of the rechallenge after NTG, therefore, is two-fold: (1) to assess the preventive effect of NTG on the re-occurrence of spasm on a per patients level in order to improve clinical outcomes and tailor treatment immediately after diagnosis that is made during spasm provocation and (2) to assess the co-existence of microvascular spasm in patients with epicardial coronary artery spasm10,13.

A previous publication by Ong et al. extensively covered the spasm provocation test14. In our institute, we use a variation of this protocol where the ACh dosages are administered in 60 s instead of 20 s. The purpose of this paper is to describe the NTG rechallenge as an add-on procedure to the ACh spasm provocation test. This technique can be performed with each type of protocol, as demonstrated by Seitz et al. since the results of the NTG rechallenge did not differ among the participating centers that used different protocols.

Protocol

Intracoronary ACh testing has been approved by the local ethics committee of the Academic Medical Centre, and the protocol follows the guidelines of Amsterdam UMC for human research.

1. Preparation of the ACh stock solution

  1. Mix the 20 mg of ACh with the 2 mL of solvent provided with the package (Table of Materials).
  2. Add 1 mL of the ACh solution to 499 mL of 0.9% NaCl to create the stock solution, corresponding to a 20 µg/mL dose.
  3. Fill a sterile dish with 50 mL of the stock solution, which will be used to prepare the syringes under sterile conditions.

2. Preparation of the syringes containing ACh for intracoronary injection

  1. Prepare five 10 mL syringes under sterile conditions for the intracoronary injection according to the Supplementary Material.
    ​NOTE: It is advised to prepare each syringe sequentially after administration and not all at once to avoid confusion when administering the syringes

3. Diagnostic coronary angiography

  1. Anesthetize the puncture site of the right radial artery (usually 2 mL of lidocaine) or the area of the puncture site of the right femoral artery (usually 15 mL of lidocaine) when the femoral artery is the preferred route of catheterization.
    NOTE: By puncturing the skin with the needle, the successfulness of the local anesthesia can be assessed.
  2. Puncture the artery with a cannula using the Seldinger wire technique, then insert a wire through the cannula. After removing the cannula, insert a sheath (6F) over the wire. Perform coronary angiography under sterile conditions.
  3. Advance the wire into the ascending aorta through the sheath and subsequently position the diagnostic catheter (6Fr) above the aortic valve. Withdraw the wire and attach the contrast syringe to the catheter.
    NOTE: The contrast agent used is iodixanol Injectable Contrast Medium.
  4. Position the tip of the diagnostic catheter for the left coronary artery in the left main coronary artery. Confirm the position of the catheter by injecting 2 mL of the contrast agent.
  5. Exclude the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease by perming coronary angiography. Inject ~5-10 mL of the contrast agent to visualize the coronary arteries in different views.
    ​NOTE: Most often, the following projections provide the best overview: LAO 40° and RAO 35° for the right coronary artery and LAO 45°/CRAN 25°, RAO 30°/CRAN 30° and RAO 20°/ CAUD 30° for the left coronary artery.

4. Preparations for Doppler flow assessment

NOTE: Here, ComboWire was used as the Doppler guidewire with the ComboMap system (Table of Materials)

  1. Connect the Doppler guidewire to the system and zero the pressure on the console and the aortic pressure on the hemodynamic system.
  2. Advance the Doppler guidewire through the guiding catheter into the ostium of the coronary artery with the pressure sensor of the Doppler guidewire placed just distally of the tip of the guiding catheter. Press normalization (Norm) on the system to equalize the two pressures.
  3. After normalization, reintroduce the wire via the microcatheter into the proximal or mid LAD and acquire a stable flow signal.
    NOTE: The Doppler guidewire can alternatively be introduced more distally into the LAD or in the CX when acquiring an adequate signal in the proximal LAD is not feasible, such as in the case of tortuous anatomy or when another position is otherwise required, for instance, proximal from a myocardial bridge.
  4. Document the position of the wire using fluoroscopy.
  5. Start ACh testing as described in section 5 after exclusion of any relevant epicardial stenosis (≥50%) by visual assessment.

5. Intracoronary administration of ACh

  1. Administer the first syringe containing 2 µg of acetylcholine as described in the Supplementary Material into the LCA through the guiding. Inject this in 60 s with continuous monitoring of the ECG, average peak velocity (APV), and the patient's symptoms (e.g., angina and/or dyspnea).
    1. Flush the ACh that remains in the guiding into the left coronary artery at a similar injection speed to the injection itself with contrast using the contrast syringe.
    2. Perform coronary angiography of the left coronary artery by injecting 10 mL of the contrast agent into the catheter in the same projection as done for the baseline coronary angiography. Bookmark and print a 12-lead ECG after every dose of ACh or when symptoms and/or ECG changes occur.
    3. If diagnostic criteria are not met, continue with the administration of the second syringe containing 20 µg of acetylcholine as described in the Supplementary Material using the same technique as described in steps 5.1.1-5.1.3. Pause for 3 min between every dose.
    4. If diagnostic criteria are not met after the second dose, continue with the administration of the third syringe containing 100 µg of acetylcholine as described in the Supplementary Material using the same technique as described in steps 5.1.1-5.1.3. Pause for 3 min between every dose.
      NOTE: At dose 3 most patients will report some symptoms, ischemic ECG changes can occur, and some epicardial diameter reduction may occur. In some cases, the speed of the manual injection will have to be slowed down. For instance, at doses 3 and 4, bradycardia may occur, and the speed of the injection will have to be slowed down. An extended injection over 1-3 min may also be feasible.
    5. If diagnostic criteria are not met after the third dose, continue with the administration of the fourth syringe containing 100 µg of acetylcholine as described in the Supplementary Material using the same technique as described in steps 5.1.1-5.1.3. Pause for 3 min between every dose.
      NOTE: At dose 4 most patients will report some symptoms, ischemic ECG changes can occur, and some epicardial diameter reduction may occur. In some cases, the speed of the manual injection will have to be slowed down. For instance, at doses 3 and 4, bradycardia may occur, and the speed of the injection will have to be slowed down. An extended injection over 1-3 min may also be feasible.
  2. When diagnostic criteria according to COVADIS are not met after step 5.1.6 in the LCA, continue with RCA as the target vessel. Inject 80 µg of ACH (10 mL, syringe #RCA) in 60 s into the right coronary artery while continuously monitoring the ECG and the patient's symptoms.
    NOTE: Clinical practice on testing of the RCA can vary among centers as routine testing of the RCA is advocated according to the JCS guidelines as multi-vessel epicardial coronary vasospasm is associated with worse prognosis2,15. In contrast, vasospasm provocation protocols from European and United states centers do not routinely test the RCA16. Acetylcholine can induce bradycardia and can be resolved by decreasing the speed of the injection to prevent prolonged bradycardia and/or asystole.
    1. Flush the remaining ACh in the guiding into the left coronary artery at a similar injection speed to the injection itself with contrast using the contrast syringe. Perform coronary angiography of the RCA (perform angiography in the same projection as the baseline angiography).
    2. Inject 200 µg of intracoronary NTG into each target vessel after the test, or when severe symptoms (e.g., angina and/or dyspnoea)), ischemic ECG changes or epicardial spasm occurs. Continuously monitor the APV and patient's symptoms to monitor the effect of NTG.
    3. Perform coronary angiography of the target vessel after 1 min or when the APV has returned to baseline, and no symptoms are present to document reversion of spasm

6. Rechallenge

  1. In the case of a positive diagnosis, wait for 3 min after NTG administration until the patient is free of symptoms, ECG changes have resolved, and APV values have returned to baseline before starting the rechallenge.
  2. Inject 10 mL of the syringe containing the acetylcholine dose that previously induced vasospasm as described in the Supplementary Material into guiding. Inject this in 60 s with continuous monitoring of the ECG, APV and the patient's symptoms (e.g., angina and/or dyspnea).
  3. Flush the remaining ACh in the guiding into the left coronary artery at a similar injection speed to the injection itself with contrast using the contrast syringe. Image the target vessel in the same projection as done in the baseline angiography after injection of the 10 mL.
  4. Perform coronary angiography of the left coronary artery by injecting 10 mL of contrast into the catheter in the same projection as done for the baseline coronary angiography. Bookmark and print a 12-lead ECG after every dose of ACh or when symptoms and/or ECG changes occur.
  5. Inject 200 µg of intracoronary NTG into each target vessel after the test or when severe symptoms (i.e., angina and/or dyspnea), ischemic ECG shifts, or epicardial spasm occurs.
  6. Perform coronary angiography of the target vessel after 1 min or when the APV has returned to baseline, and no symptoms are present to document reversion of spasm

Results

Interpretation of the ACh-test and rechallenge are based on criteria defined by the COVADIS study group4. A positive diagnosis for CAS is defined as (i) reproduction of the previously reported symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, or other symptoms and (ii) the induction of ischemic ECG changes (ST-segment elevation or depression, or U-waves) in reaction to ACh. (Figure 2). It is therefore important to register a 12-lead-ECG continuously throughout the tes...

Discussion

The usefulness of the ACh after NTG rechallenge has shown to be two-fold: (1) to unmask the co-existence of microvascular spasm in patients with epicardial spasm and (2) to assess the preventive efficacy of NTG on a per-patient level in order to guide medical therapy12. Regardless of the result of the spasm provocation test, intracoronary NTG is always routinely administered into the target vessel after the test or when severe symptoms, ischemic ECG changes, or epicardial spasm occur. Adding ...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

None

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Cannula (various manufacturers)BBraun4206096
ComboMap systemVolcano-PhilipsModel No. 6800 (Powers Up)
ComboWire XT Guide WireVolcano-Philips9515Doppler guidewire
Diagnostic catheterBoston scientific34356-661H749343566610/ MODEL-6F MACH 1 JL3.5
Diagnostic catheterBoston scientific34356-686H749343566860/MODEL - 6F MACH 1 JR4
FINECROSS MG Coronary Micro-Guide CatheterTerumoNC-F863A
Intracoronary NTGhameln pharma gmbhRVG 119982
Lidocaine HCLFresenius KabiRVG 51673
Miochol-E Acetylcholine chlorideBausch & LombNDC 240208-539-20
Sheath RadialisTeleflexAA15611S
Syringe- 10 mLBBraun4606108V
VisipaqueGE HealthcareRVG 17665Iodixanol injectable contrast medium

References

  1. Knuuti, J., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal. 41 (3), 407-477 (2020).
  2. JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with vasospastic angina (Coronary Spastic Angina) (JCS 2013). Circulation Journal: Official Journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 78 (11), 2779-2801 (2014).
  3. Ong, P., et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. International Journal of Cardiology. 250, 16-20 (2018).
  4. Beltrame, J. F., et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. European Heart Journal. 38 (33), 2565-2568 (2017).
  5. Ford, T. J., et al. 1-Year Outcomes of angina management guided by invasive coronary function testing (CorMicA). JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 13 (1), 33-45 (2020).
  6. Bairey Merz, C. N., Pepine, C. J., Walsh, M. N., Fleg, J. L. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): Developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation. 135 (11), 1075-1092 (2017).
  7. Sun, H., Fukumoto, Y., Ito, A., Shimokawa, H., Sunagawa, K. Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with microvascular angina: analysis by TIMI frame count. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. 46 (5), 622-626 (2005).
  8. Kiyooka, T., Kobayashi, Y., Ikari, Y. A case of vasospastic angina in which the ergonovine provocation test with intracoronary isosorbide dinitrate and nicorandil was effective in the diagnosis of microvascular spasm. Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. 29 (4), 344-349 (2014).
  9. Takahashi, J., et al. Prognostic impact of chronic nitrate therapy in patients with vasospastic angina: multicentre registry study of the Japanese coronary spasm association. European Heart Journal. 36 (4), 228-237 (2015).
  10. Ferrari, R., et al. Expert consensus document: A 'diamond' approach to personalized treatment of angina. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 15 (2), 120-132 (2018).
  11. Redfield, M. M., et al. Isosorbide mononitrate in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The New England Journal of Medicine. 373 (24), 2314-2324 (2015).
  12. Seitz, A., et al. Acetylcholine rechallenge: A first step towards tailored treatment in patients with coronary artery spasm. Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions. 15 (1), 65-75 (2022).
  13. Crea, F., Lanza, G. A. Treatment of microvascular angina: The need for precision medicine. European Heart Journal. 37 (19), 1514-1516 (2016).
  14. Ong, P., Athanasiadis, A., Sechtem, U. Intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing for assessment of coronary vasomotor disorders. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (114), e54295 (2016).
  15. Han, S. H., et al. Impact of multi-vessel vasospastic angina on cardiovascular outcome. Atherosclerosis. 281, 107-113 (2019).
  16. Feenstra, R. G. T., et al. Principles and pitfalls in coronary vasomotor function testing. EuroIntervention: Journal of EuroPCR in Collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. , (2021).
  17. Seitz, A., Beck, S., Pereyra, V. M., Bekeredjian, R., Sechtem, U., Ong, P. Testing acetylcholine followed by adenosine for invasive diagnosis of coronary vasomotor disorders. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (168), e62134 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

AcetylcholineIntracoronary AdministrationCoronary Function TestVasomotor DisordersEndothelial DysfunctionEpicardial VasospasmMicrovascular AnginaRe challenge MethodDiagnostic CatheterContrast AgentDoppler Guide WireHemodynamic SystemCoronary ArteriesFlow SignalECG Monitoring

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved