A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Here we present a protocol to perform preclinical positron emission tomography-based radiotherapy in a rat glioblastoma model using algorithms developed in-house to optimize the accuracy and efficiency.
A rat glioblastoma model to mimic chemo-radiation treatment of human glioblastoma in the clinic was previously established. Similar to the clinical treatment, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were combined during the treatment-planning process. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging was subsequently added to implement sub-volume boosting using a micro-irradiation system. However, combining three imaging modalities (CT, MRI, and PET) using a micro-irradiation system proved to be labor-intensive because multimodal imaging, treatment planning, and dose delivery have to be completed sequentially in the preclinical setting. This also results in a workflow that is more prone to human error. Therefore, a user-friendly algorithm to further optimize preclinical multimodal imaging-based radiation treatment planning was implemented. This software tool was used to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of dose painting radiation therapy with micro-irradiation by using an in silico study design. The new methodology for dose painting radiation therapy is superior to the previously described method in terms of accuracy, time efficiency, and intra- and inter-user variability. It is also an important step towards the implementation of inverse treatment planning on micro-irradiators, where forward planning is still commonly used, in contrast to clinical systems.
Glioblastoma (GB) is a malignant and very aggressive primary brain tumor. GB is a solid heterogeneous tumor typically characterized by infiltrative boundaries, nuclear atypia, and necrosis1. The presence of the blood-brain-barrier and the brain's status as an immune-privileged site makes the discovery of novel targets for chemo- and immunotherapy a daunting task2,3,4. It is noteworthy that the treatment of GB patients has barely changed since the introduction, in 2005, of the Stupp protocol that combines external beam radiation therapy (RT) with concomitant temozolomide, usually followed by adjuvant temozolomide5. Typically, the Stupp protocol is preceded by maximal surgical resection. Therefore, alternative treatment approaches are of pivotal importance.
Current radiation therapy for glioblastoma patients delivers a uniform radiation dose to the defined tumor volume. In radiation oncology, there is an important dose-response correlation for glioblastoma with increasing dose, which seems to cap around 60 Gy, due to increased toxicity to the normal brain6,7. However, tumors can be very (radiobiologically) heterogeneous, with gradients of oxygen level and/or large differences in cellular density. Metabolic imaging techniques, such as PET, can visualize these biological features and can be utilized to customize the dose prescription. This approach is known as dose painting RT. This term was introduced by Ling et al. in 2000. The authors defined dose painting RT as producing "exquisitely conformal dose distributions within the constraints of radiation propagation and scatter"8.
There are two types of dose painting RT, dose painting by contours (DPBC), by which a dose is prescribed to a set of nested sub-volumes, and dose painting by numbers (DPBN), whereby a dose is prescribed at the voxel level. The dose distribution for DPBN RT can be extracted from functional images. The dose in each voxel is determined by the intensity I of the corresponding voxel in the image, with a lower and upper limit, to make sure that, on the one hand, a sufficient dose is delivered to every part of the tumor. On the other hand, doses do not exceed an upper limit to protect organs at risk and avoid toxicity. The most straightforward method is a linear interpolation (see Eq. 1) between minimum dose Dmin and maximum dose Dmax, proportionally varying between minimum intensity Imax and maximum intensity within the target volume9,10
Eq. 1
Because there is some skepticism about the quality assurance of DPBN RT, the deposition of the dose should be verified through preclinical and clinical research10. However, only limited data can be acquired from clinical trials, and it has been hypothesized that more insights can be obtained by downscaling to laboratory animals11,12. Hence, preclinical studies utilizing precision image-guided radiation research platforms that allow coupling with some very specific techniques, such as autoradiography, are suited for examining open issues and paving the way towards personalized medicine and novel treatment strategies, such as dose painting RT13,14. However, the interpretation of preclinical data must be performed with caution, and drawbacks of these preclinical setups have to be considered14.
Micro-irradiation systems, such as the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP), are equipped with similar technologies as their clinical counterpart. They include on-board cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, a preclinical treatment-planning system (PCTPS), and provide sub-millimeter precision. Clinical dose calculations are performed by inverse treatment planning, whereby one initiates from the desired dose distribution to determine the beams via an iterative algorithm. Preclinical irradiators often use forward planning. In forward planning, the required amount and angle of the beams are selected, and the PCTPS then calculates the dose distribution. The optimization of the plans is performed by manual iteration, which is labor-intensive15.
After 2009, novel developments have made the implementation of inverse planning on these research platforms possible16,17,18. To increase the similarity with the clinical method, a motorized variable rectangular collimator (MVC) was developed as a preclinical counterpart of the multi-leaf collimator. A two-dimensional dose painting method utilizing a variable collimator was published by Cho et al.19. This research group implemented a three-dimensional (3D) inverse treatment-planning protocol on a micro-irradiator and determined minimum and maximum doses for the target volume and a maximum dose for the organs at risk. These techniques have mainly been evaluated in silico, and their preclinical applications need to be explored.
This paper presents an in silico study to compare two methodologies for [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) PET-based dose painting in a GB rat model20,21,22 using a small animal radiation research platform. These two methodologies are (1) sub-volume boosting using predefined beam sizes and (2) dose painting using a motorized variable collimator where jaw dimensions are modified based on the PET tracer uptake in the tumor volume. [18F]FET is a PET tracer often used in neuro-oncology because of its ability to detect brain tumors23. [18F]FET is an artificial amino acid that is internalized into tumoral cells but not incorporated into cell proteins. [18F]FET uptake corresponds with cell proliferation rate, tumor cell density, and angiogenesis24. As this is the most commonly used oncologic brain PET tracer in these authors' institute, this radiotracer was chosen to evaluate the new workflow.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee for animal experiments (ECD 18/21). Anesthesia monitoring is performed by acquiring the respiratory rate of the animals using a sensor.
1. F98 GB rat cell model
2. Confirmation of tumor growth
3. Multimodality imaging of target volume selection
NOTE: PET/MRI-guided irradiation requires the sequential acquisition of a multimodal dataset. After intravenous administration of the radiotracer, PET imaging is started, followed by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI and finally a treatment-planning CT.
4. Image co-registration
NOTE: The co-registration is performed with a semi-automatic MATLAB code developed in-house. The code can be found on Github at https://github.com/sdonche/DosePainting. The different steps are described below.
5. Radiation treatment planning
NOTE: A MATLAB app and multiple MATLAB scripts were written for the radiation treatment planning. The code can be found on Github at https://github.com/sdonche/DosePainting. The different steps are explained below.
6. Plan evaluation
NOTE: To compare the two methods, calculate the dose-volume histograms (DVH) and Q-volume histogram (QVH) in the V50 PET volume. Here, a MATLAB script, developed in-house, was used. The code can be found on Github at https://github.com/sdonche/DosePainting.
The feasibility of PET- and MRI-guided irradiation in a glioblastoma rat model using the SARRP to mimic the human treatment strategy has been previously described20,21,22. While the animal was fixed on a multimodality bed made in-house, it was possible to create an acceptable radiation treatment plan combining three imaging modalities: PET, MRI, and CT. In these methods, an external software package (see the Table of Mat...
A rat GB model to mimic the chemo-radiation treatment in the clinic for glioblastoma patients was previously described20. Similar to the clinical method, CT and MRI were combined during the treatment-planning process to obtain more precise irradiation. A multimodality bed to minimize (head) movement was used when the animal was moved from one imaging system to another. Subsequently, PET imaging was added to the treatment-planning process, and PET-based sub-volume boosting could be successfully imp...
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
The authors would like to thank Lux Luka Foundation for supporting this work.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Cell culture | |||
F98 Glioblastoma Cell Line | ATCC | CRL-2397 | https://www.lgcstandards-atcc.org/products/all/CRL-2397 |
Dulbeco's Modified Eagle Medium | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 22320-030 | |
Cell culture flasks | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 178883 | 75 cm² |
FBS | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 10270106 | |
L-Glutamine | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 25030-032 | 200 mM |
Penicilline-Streptomycin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15140-148 | 10,000 U/mL |
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 14040-224 | |
Trypsin-EDTA | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 25300-062 | 0.05% |
GB Rat Model | |||
Ball-shaped burr | Foredom | A-228 | 1.8 mm |
Bone Wax | Aesculap | 1029754 | https://www.aesculapusa.com/en/healthcare-professionals/or-solutions/or-solutions-cranial-closure/hemostatic-bone-wax.html |
Ethilon | Ethicon | 662G/662H | FS-2, 4-0, 3/8, 19 mm |
Fischer F344/Ico crl Rats | Charles River | - | |
Insulin Syringe Microfine | Beckton-Dickinson | 320924 | 1 mL, 29 G |
IR Lamp | Philips | HP3616/01 | |
Meloxicam (Metacam) | Boehringer Ingelheim | - | 2 mg/mL |
Micromotor rotary tool | Foredom | K.1090-22 | |
Micropump system | Stoelting Co. | 53312 | Stoelting Stereotaxic Injector |
Stereotactic frame | Stoelting Co. | 51600 | |
Xylocaine (1%, with adrenaline 1:200,000) | Aspen | - | 1%, with adrenaline 1:200,000 |
Xylocaine gel (2%) | Aspen | - | 2% |
Animal Irradiation | |||
Micro-irradiator | X-Strahl | SARRP | Version 4.2.0 |
Software | X-Strahl | Muriplan | Preclinical treatment planning system (PCTPC), version 2.2.2 |
Small Animal PET | |||
[18F]FET | Inhouse made | - | PET tracer; along with Prohance: MRI/PET agent |
Micro-PET | Molecubes | Beta-Cube | https://www.molecubes.com/b-cube/ |
Small Animal MRI | |||
Micro-MRI | Bruker Biospin | Pharmascan 70/16 | https://www.bruker.com/products/mr/preclinical-mri/pharmascan.html |
30 G Needle for IV injection | Beckton-Dickinson | 305128 | |
PE 10 Tubing | Instech Laboratories Inc | BTPE-10 | BTPE-10, polyethylene tubing 0.011 x 0.024 in (0.28 x 60 mm), non sterile, 30 m (98 ft) spool, Instech laboratories, Inc Plymouth meeting PA USA- (800) 443-4227- http://www.instechlabs.com |
Prohance contrast agent | Bracco Imaging | - | 279.3 mg/mL, gadolinium-contrast agent (along with [18F]FET: MRI/PET agent) |
Tx/Rx Rat Brain - Mouse Whole Body Volumecoil | Bruker Biospin | - | 40 mm diameter |
Water-based Heating Unit | Bruker Biospin | MT0125 | |
Consumables | |||
Isoflurane | Zoetis | B506 | Anesthesia |
Insulin Syringe Microfine | Beckton-Dickinson | 320924 | 1 mL, 29 G |
Image Analysis | |||
MATLAB | Mathworks | - | Version R2019b |
PMOD | PMOD technologies LLC | Preclinical and molecular imaging software |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved