Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Spatial distance is a key parameter in assessing hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in a co-culture model of separate endothelial and cardiomyocyte cell layers, suggesting, for the first time, that optimizing the co-culture spatial environment is necessary to provide a favorable in vitro model for testing the role of endothelial cells in cardiomyocyte protection.

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Reperfusion causes additional injury beyond ischemia. Endothelial cells (ECs) can protect cardiomyocytes (CMs) from reperfusion injury through cell-cell interactions. Co-cultures can help investigate the role of cell-cell interactions. A mixed co-culture is the simplest approach but is limited as isolated treatments and downstream analyses of single cell types are not feasible. To investigate whether ECs can dose-dependently attenuate CM cell damage and whether this protection can be further optimized by varying the contact distance between the two cell lines, we used Mouse Primary Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells and Adult Mouse Cardiomyocytes to test three types of cell culture inserts which varied in their inter-cell layer distance at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm, respectively. In CMs-only, cellular injury as assessed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release increased significantly during hypoxia and further upon reoxygenation when the distance was 2.0 mm compared to 0.5 and 1.0 mm. When ECs and CMs were in nearly direct contact (0.5 mm), there was only a mild attenuation of the reoxygenation injury of CMs following hypoxia. This attenuation was significantly increased when the spatial distance was 1.0 mm. With 2.0 mm distance, ECs attenuated CM injury during both hypoxia and hypoxia/reoxygenation, indicating that sufficient culture distancing is necessary for ECs to crosstalk with CMs, so that secreted signal molecules can circulate and fully stimulate protective pathways. Our findings suggest, for the first time, that optimizing the EC/CM co-culture spatial environment is necessary to provide a favorable in vitro model for testing the role of ECs in CM-protection against simulated ischemia/reperfusion injury. The goal of this report is to provide a step-by-step approach for investigators to use this important model to their advantage.

Introduction

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide1,2. However, the treatment process of reperfusion can itself cause cardiomyocyte death, known as myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury, for which there is still no effective remedy3. Endothelial cells (ECs) have been suggested to protect cardiomyocytes (CMs) through the secretion of paracrine signals, as well as cell-to-cell interactions4.

Cell co-culture models have been used extensively to investigate the role of autocrine and/or paracrine cell-cell interactions on cell function and differentiation. Among co-culture models, mixed co-culture is the simplest, where two different types of cells are in direct contact within a single culture compartment at a desired cell ratio5. However, separate treatments between cell types and downstream analysis of a single cell type are not readily feasible given the mixed population.

Previous studies indicated that hypoxic and ischemic insults cause significant damage to the integrity of cell membrane as measured by the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). This injury is worsened upon reoxygenation, mimicking reperfusion injury6,7,8. The goal of the current protocol was to test the hypotheses that the presence of ECs can dose-dependently attenuate cell membrane leakage of CMs caused by hypoxia and reoxygenation (HR) and that the protective effect of ECs can be optimized by varying the contact distance between the two cell lines. Thus, we employed three types of cell culture inserts and Mouse Primary Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells and Adult Mouse Cardiomyocytes. The inserts, branded by Corning, Merck Millipore, and Greiner Bio-One allowed us to create three different cell culture crosstalk conditions with inter-cell line distances of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm, respectively. 100,000 ECs were plated per insert in each case.

In addition, in order to determine whether the density of ECs in co-culture contributes to HR injury attenuation in this model, we studied the dose-response relationship between EC concentration and LDH release by CMs. ECs were plated at 25,000, 50,000 and 100,000 per insert, respectively, in the 2.0 mm insert.

This report provides a step-by-step approach for investigators to use this important model to their advantage.

Protocol

1. Experimental preparation/plating

  1. Maintain CMs and ECs according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    1. Thaw both cell lines when they arrive from vendors. Plate in T25 flasks after being washed with fresh media. It is recommended to purchase each cell culture media from the same vendors the cells were purchased from. The next day, refresh the cells with media and use when confluent.
    2. Maintain the cell culture incubator at 37 °C with 21% O2, 5% CO2, 74% N2 and keep it humidified.
      NOTE: The Mouse Primary Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells used in this protocol are isolated from coronary arteries of C57BL/6 mice, and Adult Mouse Cardiomyocytes are isolated from adult C57BL/6J mouse hearts and commercially obtained (see Table of Materials).
  2. Plate CMs under sterile conditions onto the bottom of 24-well plates (inferior layer). 24 h later, plate ECs into the insert (or superior portion) of the co-culture well. 24 h after EC plating, place EC inserts onto CM plate bases, starting the co-culture period. Allow the cells to co-culture for at least 12-24 h before use. These steps are described in detail below.
    1. Estimate CM cell line confluency under a light microscope. When cells appear to be 90%-100% confluent in culture flasks, proceed with experimental plating.
    2. Remove the media from the flasks containing confluent cell cultures and trypsinize with 3-5 mL of Trypsin/Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for T25 flasks. Agitate the flask gently, incubate at 37 °C for 2-5 min, and then assess the enzymatic progress under a light microscope. Once the cells start to round up, use a cell scraper to detach the cells from the surface.
    3. After detachment, inactivate the trypsin solution by adding the trypsin/cell solution to a 50 mL tube containing 10 mL of media for T25 flasks. Centrifuge the cell suspension at 120 x g for 2 min to obtain a soft cell pellet. Remove the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 5 mL of media.
    4. To perform cell counting and confirm cell viability, mix an aliquot of 10 µL of resuspended cells and 10 µL of trypan blue dye. Count the living cells using a cell counter. Dilute the cells with fresh regular media to achieve the desired seeding densities. Volumes are calculated depending on the desired seed density and cell concentration of stock solutions. All plating should be performed under sterile conditions.
    5. Plate CMs at seeding densities of 300,000 per well onto the bottom of a 24-well plate pre-coated with extracellular matrix. Maintain the cells at 37 °C with 21% O2 and 5% CO2 overnight.
    6. After 24 h, plate ECs into inserts at an optimal plating density of 100,000 per insert (culture area is 33.6 mm2), (Figure 1). After 24 h of EC plating, place EC inserts inside the CM wells, initiating co-culture. Allow cells to co-culture for 12-24 h before performing the experiments.
    7. Ensure that, by the time experiments are performed, both CMs and ECs have reached 80%-90% confluency.

2. Hypoxia/reoxygenation to simulate ischemia/reperfusion injury  In Vitro

NOTE: The following steps need to be performed as described, do not pause in-between.

  1. Prepare the hypoxic media by pouring ~25 mL of media in a 50 mL conical tube. Air-seal the top with a silicone membrane and use a sterilized pipette to punch a hole. Create another hole, this time leaving the pipette submerged approximately 2/3 into the media.
  2. Flush the media with hypoxic gas (0.0125% O2, 5% CO2, 94.99% N2) for 5 min at a flow rate of 30 L/min. This minimizes O2 dissolved in the media when hypoxia starts (step 2.5).
  3. Discard the media of the 24-well plates or culture inserts containing attached cells and wash with 100 µL/well of 10% Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) very gently. Afterwards, add 500 µL of the freshly prepared hypoxic media to each well of the plates or inserts.
    NOTE: Hypoxia in the media is interrupted as briefly as possible during this step before true hypoxia for cells and media starts in step 2.5.
    1. In the normoxic control group, replace the original media with fresh normal media containing glucose and serum.
  4. Humidify the hypoxia chamber by placing a Petri-dish filled with sterile water within the chamber. Next, place the plates comprising the hypoxic groups into the chamber.
  5. Flush the hypoxia chamber with hypoxic gas (0.0125% O2, 5% CO2, 94.99% N2) for 5 min at a flow of 30 L/min. Place the chamber in the 37 °C incubator for 24 h.
  6. After hypoxia, cultivate CMs and ECs under normal conditions. To do so, discard the old media of the plates/inserts, replace it with normal media (containing glucose and serum; 500 µL of each well/insert) and store it in the incubator under normal culture conditions (21% O2, 5% CO2, 74% N2, 37 °C) for 2 h to mimic reperfusion.
  7. To control for any effects of media replacement, change the media of normoxic cells at the same time as the hypoxic media is changed.
    NOTE: Figure 2 provides a schematic overview of this protocol.

3. Endpoint assessment

  1. Transfer the cell culture media from the 24-well plate into a 96-well plate. Use 200 µL of media from each well of the 24-well plate and equally distribute into four wells of the 96-well plate, accordingly. Use one plate each for normoxia versus hypoxia versus HR.
  2. Determine the degree of cellular injury, e.g., by measuring absorbance for LDH using a cytotoxicity assay kit following the manufacturer's instructions. Perform the assay in a 96-well plate as instructed in the assay protocol.

4. Statistics

  1. Display the parametric data as mean/standard deviation and non-parametric data as box plots with median/interquartile range. Adequate parametric versus non-parametric multiple comparisons tests with acceptable post-hoc tests to decrease the chance for a type-1 error should be performed. Significance is typically set at an alpha of 0.05 (two-tailed).
  2. For all the experiments carried out in the current study, perform at least three well replicates within one experiment. There were three to six repetitions of each experiment used for statistical analysis.

Results

All three types of inserts (A, B, C) used in this experiment have the same pore size of 0.4 µm. The only difference among them is the insert-to-base height, which allows distances between the two co-cultured cell layers to be 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mm, respectively, (Figure 3) and that they are from different vendors (for details see Table of Materials).

To establish an in vitro co-culture model with separate layers of two cell lines under...

Discussion

Critical steps in the protocol
Cell co-culture models have been used to study cellular mechanisms of cardioprotection. How to create two separate layers with a meaningful distance between them is, thus, crucial for the development of a suitable co-culture model. A challenge in studying simulated IR, i.e., HR, injury is that not only ischemia (hypoxia) itself but also reperfusion (reoxygenation) aggravates cellular dysfunction. Therefore, a realistic model needs to reflect these characteristics by, ...

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by the US Department of Veterans Affairs Biomedical Laboratory R&D Service (I01 BX003482) and by institutional funds to M.L.R.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Adult Mouse Cardiomyocytes (CMs)Celprogen Inc11041-14Isolated from adult C57BL/6J mouse cardiac tissue
Automated Cell Counter Countess IIInvitrogenA27977Cell counting for calculating cell numbers
Bio-Safety CabinetNuaireNU425400Cell culture sterile hood
Cell Culture Freezing MediumCell Biologics Inc6916Used for cell freezing for long term cell line storage
Cell Culture IncubatorNuaireNu-5500To provide normal cell living condition (21%O2, 5%CO2, 74%N2, 37°C, humidified)
Cell Culture Incubator Gas TankA-L Compressed GasesUN1013Gas needed for cell culture incubator 
Cell Culture Inserts A (0.5 mm)Corning Inc353095Used for EC-CM co-culture
Cell Culture Inserts B (1.0 mm)Millicell MilliporePIHP01250Used for EC-CM co-culture
Cell Culture Inserts C (2.0 mm)Greiner Bio-One662640Used for EC-CM co-culture
CentrifugeAnstel Enterprises Inc4235For cell culture plating and passaging
CMs Cell Culture Flasks T25Celprogen IncE11041-14Used for CMs regular culture, coated by manufacturer
CMs Cell Culture Medium CompleteCelprogen IncM11041-14SCMs culture complete medium
CMs Cell Culture Medium Complete Phenol freeCelprogen IncM11041-14PNCMs culture medium without phenol red used during LDH measurement
CMs Cell Culture Plates 96 wellCelprogen IncE11041-14-96wellUsed for experiments of LDH measurement, coated by manufacturer
CMs Hypoxia Cell Culture MediumCelprogen IncM11041-14GFPNCMs cell culture under hypoxic condition (glucose- and serum-free)
Countess cell counting chamber slidesInvitrogenC10283Counting slides used for cell counter
Cyquant LDH Cytotoxicity KitThermo Scientific C20301LDH measurement kit
ECs Cell Culture Flasks T25Fisher Scientific FB012935Used for ECs regular culture
ECs Cell Culture Medium CompleteCell Biologics IncM1168ECs culture complete medium
ECs Cell Culture Medium Complete Phenol freeCell Biologics IncM1168PFECs culture medium without phenol red used during LDH measurement
ECs Cell Culture Plates 96 wellFisher Scientific (Costar)3370Used for experiments of LDH measurement
ECs Culture Gelatin-Based Coating SolutionCell Biologics Inc6950Used for coating flasks and plates for ECs
ECs Hypoxia Cell Culture MediumCell Biologics IncGPF1168ECs cell culture under hypoxic condition (glucose- and serum-free)
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)Fisher ScientificMT35011CVFBS-HI USDA-approved for cell culture and maintenance
Hypoxia ChamberStemCell Technologies27310To create a hypoxic condition with 0.01%O2 environment
Hypoxia Chamber Flow MeterStemCell Technologies27311To connect with hypoxic gas tank for a consistent gas flow speed
Hypoxic Gas Tank (0.01%O2 Cylinder)A-L Compressed GasesUN1956Used to flush hypoxic medium and chamber (0.01%O2/5%CO2/94.99N2)
Microscope NikonTMSTo observe cell condition
Mouse Primary Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells (ECs)Cell Biologics IncC57-6093Isolated from coronary artery of C57BL/6 mice
NUNC 15ML CONICL TubesFisher Scientific12565269For cell culture process, experiments, solution preparation etc.
NUNC 50ML CONICL TubesFisher Scientific12565271For cell culture process, experiments, solution preparation etc.
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)Sigma-AldrichD8662Used for cell washing during culture or experiments
Plate ReaderBioTek Instrument11120533Colorimetric or fluorometric plate reading
Reaction 96 Well Palte (clear no lid)Fisher Scientific12565226Used for LDH measurement plate reading
Trypsin/EDTA for CMsCelprogen IncT1509-0141 x sterile filtered and tissue culture tested
Trypsin/EDTA for ECsCell Biologics Inc6914/06190.25%, cell cuture-tested

References

  1. Hausenloy, D. J., et al. Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery. Basic Research in Cardiology. 111 (6), 70 (2016).
  2. Hausenloy, D. J., Yellon, D. M. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: a neglected therapeutic target. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 123 (1), 92-100 (2013).
  3. Gottlieb, R. A. Cell death pathways in acute ischemia/reperfusion injury. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 16 (3-4), 233-238 (2011).
  4. Colliva, A., Braga, L., Giacca, M., Zacchigna, S. Endothelial cell-cardiomyocyte crosstalk in heart development and disease. The Journal of Physiology. 598 (14), 2923-2939 (2020).
  5. Bogdanowicz, D. R., Lu, H. H. Studying cell-cell communication in co-culture. Biotechnology Journal. 8 (4), 395-396 (2013).
  6. Salzman, M. M., Bartos, J. A., Yannopoulos, D., Riess, M. L. Poloxamer 188 protects isolated adult mouse cardiomyocytes from reoxygenation injury. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives. 8 (6), 00639 (2020).
  7. Kalogeris, T., Baines, C. P., Krenz, M., Korthuis, R. J. Cell biology of ischemia/reperfusion injury. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. 298, 229-317 (2012).
  8. Martindale, J. J., Metzger, J. M. Uncoupling of increased cellular oxidative stress and myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury by directed sarcolemma stabilization. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 67, 26-37 (2014).
  9. vander Meer, A. D., Orlova, V. V., ten Dijke, P., vanden Berg, A., Mummery, C. L. Three-dimensional co-cultures of human endothelial cells and embryonic stem cell-derived pericytes inside a microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip. 13, 3562-3568 (2013).
  10. Bidarra, S. J., et al. Phenotypic and proliferative modulation of human mesenchymal stem cells via crosstalk with endothelial cells. Stem Cell Research. 7, 186-197 (2011).
  11. Campbell, J. J., Davidenko, N., Caffarel, M. M., Cameron, R. E., Watson, C. J. A multifunctional 3D co-culture system for studies of mammary tissue morphogenesis and stem cell biology. PloS One. 6, 25661 (2011).
  12. Mehes, E., Mones, E., Nemeth, V., Vicsek, T. Collective motion of cells mediates segregation and pattern formation in co-cultures. PloS One. 7, 31711 (2012).
  13. Miki, Y., et al. The advantages of co-culture over mono cell culture in simulating in vivo environment. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 131 (3-5), 68-75 (2012).
  14. Moraes, C., Mehta, G., Lesher-Perez, S. C., Takayama, S. Organs-on-a-chip: a focus on compartmentalized microdevices. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 40 (6), 1211-1227 (2012).
  15. Campbell, J., Davidenko, N., Caffarel, M., Cameron, R., Watson, C. A multifunctional 3D co-culture system for studies of mammary tissue morphogenesis and stem cell biology. PLoS One. 6, 25661 (2011).
  16. Wu, M. H., Huang, S. B., Lee, G. B. Microfluidic cell culture systems for drug research. Lab on a Chip. 10, 939-956 (2010).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Cell Co culture ModelCardiac IschemiaReperfusion InjuryEndothelial CellsCardiomyocytesHypoxiaCell cell InteractionsMedia PreparationCell Culture IncubatorConfluencyTrypsin EDTACentrifugeCell CountingViability AssessmentExtracellular Matrix

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved