JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage (EUS-BD) is an alternative method of biliary decompression in malignant biliary obstruction. Here we describe the technique of EUS guided-Hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) in a case of unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Abstract

Patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction often require biliary drainage to decompress the biliary system. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary biliary drainage method whenever possible. Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) is used as a salvage method if ERCP fails. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage (EUS-BD) provides a feasible alternative biliary drainage method where one of the methods is EUS guided Hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS). Here we describe the EUS-HGS technique in a case of unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction to achieve biliary drainage.

Presented here is the case of a 71-year-old female with painless jaundice and weight loss for 2 weeks. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging showed a 4 x 5 cm hilar tumor with lymphadenopathy and liver metastasis. EUS fine needle biopsy (FNB) of the lesion was consistent with cholangiocarcinoma. Her bilirubin levels were 212 µmol/L (<15) during presentation.

A linear echoendoscope was used to locate the left dilated intrahepatic ducts (IHD) of the liver. The segment 3 dilated IHD was identified and punctured using a 19 G needle. Contrast was used to opacify the IHDs under fluoroscopic guidance. The IHD was cannulated using a 0.025-inch guidewire. This was followed by the dilation of the fistula tract using a 6 Fr electrocautery dilator along with a 4 mm biliary balloon dilator. A partially covered metallic stent of 10 cm in length was deployed under fluoroscopic guidance. The distal part opens in the IHD and the proximal part was deployed within the working channel of the echoendoscope that subsequently released into the stomach. The patient was discharged three days after the procedure. Follow up performed in the second and fourth weeks showed that the bilirubin levels were 30 µmol/L and 14 µmol/L, respectively. This indicates that EUS-HGS is a safe method for biliary drainage in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction.

Introduction

Patients with malignant biliary obstruction are often unresectable and advanced at presentation1,2. As a result, palliative endoscopic biliary decompression is often needed in managing these cases3,4,5. According to current recommendations, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary method of biliary drainage, whenever possible, and if this fails or is contraindicated, Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) is used as a salvage method6,7,8. However, there are certain complications associated with PTBD, which include septicemia, cholangitis, bleeding, electrolyte lost, leakage, wound infection, local discomfort; these complications are reported to be as high as 53.2%9. The emergence of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage (EUS-BD) provides a feasible alternative biliary drainage method to address this gap. The principal technique of EUS-BD involves the use of endosonographic imaging to guide access to the biliary system via the gastrointestinal tract to provide therapeutic decompression of an obstructed biliary system.

EUS-BD was first performed in 2001, and since then, this method of biliary drainage has evolved over the years10. Methods of EUS-BD commonly are EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS), EUS-guided Anterograde stenting (EUS-AS), and EUS-guided Rendezvous (EUS-RV)11,12. To date, the indications for EUS-BD include patients who have failed ERCP, patients having an inaccessible papilla by duodenal obstruction, and patients with altered surgical anatomy13,14,15.

EUS-HGS involves transmural drainage of the left intrahepatic duct into the stomach. The main advantage is that it provides internal drainage, which is more physiological and, most of all, offers better patients' comfort compared to PTBD12,16. This method is feasible for both hilar and distal malignant biliary obstruction. Here, we describe the technique of EUS-HGS as one of the methods of EUS-BD in a case of unresectable malignant hilar tumor.

A 71-year-old female was presented with painless jaundice and had a weight loss of 4 kg in 2 weeks duration. On examination, she was found to have scleral jaundice. Abdominal examination was unremarkable. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging showed a 4 x 5 cm hilar tumor involving the bifurcation of the right hepatic duct, the confluence of hepatic ducts and extrahepatic ducts, causing marked intrahepatic duct dilatation with lymphadenopathy and liver metastasis (Figure 1A). EUS fine needle biopsy (FNB) of the lesion was performed and it showed adenocarcinoma with positive CK7 and CA19-9 which was consistent with the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Figure 1B). Her bilirubin levels were 212 µmol/L (<15) at presentation and CA19-9 levels were 305 U/mL. EUS-HGS was performed to provide relief in the biliary obstruction.

Protocol

The protocol was performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the University of Malaya Medical Center. Written consent was obtained, and a detailed explanation of the procedure was provided to the patient. Permission was also granted to produce the video of the procedure for educational purposes.

1. Positioning and sedation

  1. Place the patient in a prone position. Provide moderate sedation using intravenous infusion of Propofol. Ensure the infusion is titrated by the anesthetist.

2. Identifying the suitable target dilated left intrahepatic ducts

  1. Advance the linear echoendoscope making sure it passes the gastro-esophageal junction.
  2. Place the tip of the echoendoscope at the lesser curvature of the gastric cavity and proceed to identify the dilated left intrahepatic duct (IHD).
  3. Perform fluoroscopic imaging to ascertain the position of the echoendoscope. The tip of the echoendoscope must be placed at the lesser curvature of the gastric cavity, as stated previously. Always maintain the echoendoscope position and stabilize with periodic checks using fluoroscopic imaging throughout the procedure.
  4. Identify the dilated segment 3 IHD. Slightly tilt the angle of the tip of the echoendoscope upward to facilitate the next step in needle puncture.
    ​NOTE: Subsequent steps of the procedure involve inserting and exchanging of accessories via the working channel of the echoendoscope throughout the procedure.

3. Needle access into the targeted dilated left intrahepatic duct

  1. Perform Doppler ultrasound to ensure that there are no intervening blood vessels around the targeted IHD.
  2. Using a 19 G needle, puncture the segment 3 IHD (Figure 2A). Using a 10 mL syringe preloaded with 7 mL of the contrast solution, gently aspirate the bile solution, this was to confirm the success of biliary access.
  3. Following that, perform contrast injection to opacify the left IHD and the rest of the biliary system.

4. Guidewire manipulation

  1. Use a 0.025-inch guidewire to navigate into the left IHD under the fluoroscopic guidance.
  2. Cannulate the guidewire across into the right intrahepatic duct (Figure 2B).
    ​NOTE: Ideally, the guidewire should be manipulated deep into the common bile duct; however, it was not possible in this case due to the obstructing hilar tumor.

5. Fistula tract dilation

  1. Dilate the fistula tract using a 6 Fr electrocautery dilator in addition to using a 4 mm biliary balloon dilator (Figure 2C).
    NOTE: Fistula tract dilation is required to facilitate insertion of the biliary stent later.
  2. Perform balloon inflation for approximately 5 s.
    NOTE: While doing these, monitor the position of the accessories monitored using both the sonographic and fluoroscopic image, ensuring that the wire is visible and the echoendoscope position is maintained. This is done to ensure a smooth transition during the exchange of accessories which is very important.

6. Stent insertion and deployment

  1. Deploy a 10 mm sized partially covered biliary stent (length of 10 cm) under fluoroscopic guidance (Figure 3A).
    NOTE: The stent has a 3 cm uncovered distal portion and a 7 cm covered proximal portion. The uncovered part must be within the intrahepatic duct (Figure 3C). Approximately 3 cm of the covered part of the stent is left in the gastric cavity to prevent inward migration of the stent (Figure 3B).
  2. Ensure that the distal end of the stent opens in the IHD. Deploy the proximal end within the working channel of the echoendoscope and subsequently release into the stomach with bile seen flowing within the stent.

Results

The procedure was completed in approximately 30 min. There were no complications after the procedure and the patient was able to resume oral intake the next day. The bilirubin levels fell to 92 µmol/L and she was discharged three days after the procedure. A repeated CT imaging was done which showed the stent in position with a resolution of biliary obstruction. The bilirubin level on the follow-up was 30 µmol/L after 2 weeks post procedure and 14 µmol/L at 4 weeks post procedure (Table 1)....

Discussion

The above case description illustrates the possibility of using EUS-HGS as an alternative biliary drainage method in the management of biliary tract malignancies compared to existing methods such as ERCP and PTBD. Among the steps described above, identifying, and accessing the correct intrahepatic duct, guidewire manipulation, and stent deployment are the three main crucial steps in ensuring that the procedure can be performed successfully and safely.

In choosing the ideal liver segment for bi...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgments.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
10mm in size, 10cm in length Partially Covered Metallic StentM.I TechBPD10100-E180
Curved Linear EchoendoscopyFujifilmEG-580UT
Electrocautary Dilator, 6FrG-FlexCYSTO06U
Endoscopic Ultrasound System ProcessorFujifilmSU-1
Expect 19-guage FNA NeedleBoston ScientificM00555500
Hurricane Biliary Balloon Dilator, 4mmBoston ScientificM00545900
Visiglide 0.025-inch Guidewire, 4500mm in lengthOlympusG-240-2545S

References

  1. Rawla, P., Sunkara, T., Gaduputi, V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: Global trends, etiology and risk factors. World Journal of Oncology. 10 (1), 10-27 (2019).
  2. Nagino, M., et al. Evolution of surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single-center 34-year review of 574 consecutive resections. Annals of Surgery. 258 (1), 129-140 (2013).
  3. Aadam, A. A., Liu, K. Endoscopic palliation of biliary obstruction. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 120 (1), 57-64 (2019).
  4. Boulay, B. R., Birg, A. Malignant biliary obstruction: From palliation to treatment. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 8 (6), 498-508 (2016).
  5. Irisawa, A., Katanuma, A., Itoi, T. Otaru consensus on biliary stenting for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. Digestive Endoscopy. 25, 52-57 (2013).
  6. Mukai, S., et al. Indications and techniques of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis in updated Tokyo Guidelines 2018. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 24 (10), 537-549 (2017).
  7. Dumonceau, J. M., et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated 2017. Endoscopy. 50 (9), 910-930 (2018).
  8. Anderson, M. A., et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with biliary neoplasia. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 77 (2), 167-174 (2013).
  9. Heedman, P. A., et al. Palliation of malignant biliary obstruction: Adverse events are common after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 107 (1), 48-53 (2018).
  10. Giovannini, M., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage. Endoscopy. 33 (10), 898-900 (2001).
  11. Hara, K., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: Who, when, which, and how. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 22 (3), 1297-1303 (2016).
  12. Khoo, S., Do, N., Kongkam, P. Efficacy and safety of EUS biliary drainage in malignant distal and hilar biliary obstruction: A comprehensive review of literature and algorithm. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 9 (6), 369-379 (2020).
  13. Teoh, A. Y. B., et al. Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel. Gut. 67 (7), 1209-1228 (2018).
  14. Isayama, H., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for safe performance of endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: 2018. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 26 (7), 249-269 (2019).
  15. Nakai, Y., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for unresectable hilar malignant biliary obstruction. Clinical Endoscopy. 52 (3), 220-225 (2019).
  16. Paik, W. H., Park, D. H. Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 8, 44-49 (2019).
  17. Ogura, T., Higuchi, K. Technical tips for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 22 (15), 3945-3951 (2016).
  18. Piraka, C., et al. EUS-guided transesophageal, transgastric, and transcolonic drainage of intra-abdominal fluid collections and abscesses. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 70 (4), 786-792 (2009).
  19. Kaneko, J., et al. Mediastinitis due to perforation by a metal stent after endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a rare complication. Endoscopy. 52 (06), 519-521 (2020).
  20. Kedia, P., Gaidhane, M., Kahaleh, M. Endoscopic guided biliary drainage: How can we achieve efficient biliary drainage. Clinical Endoscopy. 46 (5), 543-551 (2013).
  21. Ogura, T., et al. Liver impaction technique to prevent shearing of the guidewire during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy. 47, 583-584 (2015).
  22. Honjo, M., et al. Safety and efficacy of ultra-tapered mechanical dilator for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and pancreatic duct drainage compared with electrocautery dilator (with video). Endoscopic Ultrasound. 7 (6), 376-382 (2018).
  23. Ogura, T., et al. Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: experimental and clinical evaluation study (with video). Endoscopy International Open. 7 (12), 1652-1657 (2019).
  24. Paik, W. H., et al. Simplified fistula dilation technique and modified stent deployment maneuver for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 20 (17), 5051-5059 (2014).
  25. Dhir, V., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary and pancreatic duct interventions. Digestive Endoscopy. 29 (4), 472-485 (2017).
  26. Umeda, J., et al. A newly designed plastic stent for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a prospective preliminary feasibility study (with videos). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 82 (2), 390-396 (2015).
  27. De Cassan, C., et al. Use of partially covered and uncovered metallic prosthesis for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: Results of a retrospective monocentric study. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 6 (5), 329-335 (2017).
  28. Leung Ki, E. -. L., Napoleon, B. EUS-specific stents: Available designs and probable lacunae. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 8, 17-27 (2019).
  29. Cho, D. H., et al. Long-term outcomes of a newly developed hybrid metal stent for EUS-guided biliary drainage (with videos). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 85 (5), 1067-1075 (2017).
  30. Miyano, A., et al. Clinical impact of the intra-scope channel stent release technique in preventing stent migration during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 22 (7), 1312-1318 (2018).
  31. Dhir, V., et al. Multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided expandable biliary metal stent placement: Choice of access route, direction of stent insertion, and drainage route. Digestive Endoscopy. 26 (3), 430-435 (2014).
  32. Kawakubo, K., et al. Multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Japan. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 21 (5), 328-334 (2014).
  33. Artifon, E. L. A., et al. Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: Is there any difference. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 81 (4), 950-959 (2015).
  34. Poincloux, L., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP: cumulative experience of 101 procedures at a single center. Endoscopy. 47 (9), 794-801 (2015).
  35. Khashab, M. A., et al. International multicenter comparative trial of transluminal EUS-guided biliary drainage via hepatogastrostomy vs. choledochoduodenostomy approaches. Endoscopy International Open. 4 (2), 175-181 (2016).
  36. Gupta, K., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-assisted bile duct access and drainage: multicenter, long-term analysis of approach, outcomes, and complications of a technique in evolution. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. 48 (1), 80-87 (2014).
  37. Guo, J., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using a fully covered metallic stent after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology Research Practice. 2016, 9469472 (2016).
  38. Nakai, Y., et al. Long-term outcomes of a long, partially covered metal stent for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (with video). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 92 (3), 623-631 (2020).
  39. Khan, M. A., et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 61 (3), 684-703 (2016).
  40. Wang, K., et al. Assessment of efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 83 (6), 1218-1227 (2016).
  41. Sportes, A., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a retrospective expertise-based study from two centers. Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology. 10 (6), 483-493 (2017).
  42. Sharaiha, R. Z., et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 85 (5), 904-914 (2017).
  43. Nam, K., et al. Patient perception and preference of EUS-guided drainage over percutaneous drainage when endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage fails: An international multicenter survey. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 7 (1), 48-55 (2018).
  44. Kongkam, P., et al. ERCP plus endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a multicenter observational open-label study. Endoscopy. 53 (01), 55-62 (2021).
  45. Oh, D., et al. Optimal biliary access point and learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting. Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology. 10 (1), 42-53 (2017).
  46. Ben-Menachem, T., et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 76 (4), 707-718 (2012).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Endoscopic UltrasoundBiliary DrainageHepaticogastrostomyMalignant Biliary ObstructionERCPPTBDPalliative CareCholangitisIntrahepatic DuctsAdenocarcinomaLiver MetastasisEUS guided ProceduresHistologyCholangiocarcinoma

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved