A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Point-of-care ultrasound evaluation of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is commonly utilized to identify, among other things, the volume status. Imaging should be performed systematically to ensure repeatability. This manuscript reviews the methods and pitfalls of sonographic IVC examination.
Over the past several decades, clinicians have incorporated several applications of diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into medical decision-making. Among the applications of POCUS, imaging the inferior vena cava (IVC) is practiced by a wide variety of specialties, such as nephrology, emergency medicine, internal medicine, critical care, anesthesiology, pulmonology, and cardiology. Although each specialty uses IVC data in slightly different ways, most medical specialties, at minimum, attempt to use IVC data to make predictions about intravascular volume status. While the relationship between IVC sonographic data and intravascular volume status is complex and highly context-dependent, all clinicians should collect the sonographic data in standardized ways to ensure repeatability. This paper describes standardized IVC image acquisition including patient positioning, transducer selection, probe placement, image optimization, and the pitfalls and limitations of IVC sonographic imaging. This paper also describes the commonly performed anterior IVC long-axis view and three other views of the IVC that can each provide helpful diagnostic information when the anterior long-axis view is difficult to obtain or interpret.
Over the last several decades, the accessibility of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has increased dramatically. Providers across medical disciplines can now integrate POCUS into their bedside exams and more readily identify important contributors to patients' conditions1. For example, in acute care settings, one of the most important areas of focus is the assessment and management of volume status2. Inadequate fluid resuscitation can result in tissue hypoperfusion, end-organ dysfunction, and severe acid-base abnormalities. However, overzealous fluid administration is associated with worsened mortality3. The determination of volume status has primarily been accomplished using the combination of physical exam findings and dynamic hemodynamic measures, including pulse pressure variation, central venous pressure, and/or fluid challenges via either passive leg-raise testing or intravenous fluid boluses4. With the growing availability of POCUS devices, some providers are seeking to use ultrasound imaging to supplement these measures5. The sonographic assessment of the anterior-to-posterior dimension of the IVC and the respirophasic change in that dimension can assist in the assessment of right atrial pressure and, possibly, intravascular volume status6,7,8,9.
Notably, however, the relationship between IVC parameters (i.e., size and respirophasic change) and volume responsiveness is distorted in many common situations, including but not limited to, the following: (1) passively ventilated patients receiving either high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) or low tidal volumes; (2) spontaneously breathing patients making either small or large respiratory effort; (3) lung hyperinflation; (4) conditions impairing venous return (e.g., right ventricular dysfunction, tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, etc.); and (5) increased abdominal compart pressure10.
While the utility of IVC sonography as a standalone measure for assessing the intravascular volume status is debated5,10,11,12, there is no debate about the fact that its use as a diagnostic tool requires imaging in standardized ways and the ability to utilize alternative views when a single vantage point proves to be inadequate2. Toward this end, this manuscript defines the four sonographic views of the IVC, illustrates common sonographic pitfalls and how to avoid them, and provides examples of both typical and extreme IVC sonographic states. There are four views in which the IVC can be adequately visualized by transabdominal sonography: anterior short-axis, anterior long-axis, right lateral long-axis, and right lateral short-axis. The protocol below describes a standardized method of image acquisition.
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Duke University Health System Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The protocol was performed using input from several peer-reviewed papers in the academic literature2,13,14,15. Imaging was performed on the authors themselves for the normal images and as part of routine educational ultrasound scans done for teaching purposes for the positive images, with preceding verbal consent obtained as per institutional standards. The patients were selected based on certain criteria. Specifically, the inclusion criterion was any patient with hypotension, and the exclusion criterion was patient refusal to undergo an ultrasound exam.
1. Safety procedures
2. Probe selection
3. Machine preset
4. Scanning technique
Adequate exam
There is no single caliber or respirophasic behavior of the IVC that can be considered universally normal in all circumstances. For instance, the IVC seen in Videos 1-4 and Figure 3 was imaged in a healthy, hydrated male experiencing no acute illness. However, notably, this patient's "normal" IVC has a relatively large AP diameter, >2 cm in the ANT IVC LAX view, and shows minimal respiroph...
Even when properly imaged, information garnered from the IVC should not be the sole data point used for guiding treatment. The exact same IVC size and respirophasic changes can be seen in both normal states and in pathologic conditions. Therefore, the clinical context is critically important for guiding how to interpret the IVC data. Further, when using ultrasound to assess a patient's intravascular volume status, the published literature is mixed as to what thresholds of IVC size and respirophasic change accurately ...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors have no acknowledgments.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Edge 1 ultrasound machine | SonoSite | n/a | Used to obtain all adequate and inadequate images/clips |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved