The authors would like to thank Filip Bochner, Marion Richardson, Petra Staeuble, and Matthias Selhausen for providing the animal tissues that were analyzed in this manuscript. We would also like to thank Petra Schwalie, Klas Hatje, Roland Schmucki, and Martin Ebeling for their bioinformatics support.

All animal studies were conducted with the approval of the cantonal veterinary authority of Basel-Stadt in strict adherence to the Swiss federal regulations on animal protection or with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in compliance with the German Animal Welfare Act.
1. Tissue and reagent/instrument preparation
<ol>
	<li>Cleaning and instrument preparation
	<ol>
		<li>Clean benchtops and tweezers with 70% ethanol and RNase decontamination solution. Pre-cool the centrifuges to 4 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Pre-cool the nuclei isolation cartridges in the fridge at 4 &#176;C for at least 30 min.</li>
		<li>Start the robotic dissociator and turn on the cooling by setting the slider at the top right of the screen to cool and by clicking on it to start cooling so that the slider appears orange. Check that the attached nuclei storage reagent (NSR) bottle and the nuclei isolation buffer (NIB) bottle have enough liquid left and are properly cooled.</li>
		<li>Prepare a polystyrene foam box filled with dry ice and pre-cool Petri dishes and scalpel blades on dry ice.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Buffer preparation
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare the 1.5 M sucrose cushion solution (SCS) as shown in Table 1. Distribute the SCS into 500 &#181;L aliquots in 2 mL DNase/RNase tubes to obtain four 500 &#181;L SCS aliquots per sample. Keep the aliquots on ice until further use.</li>
		<li>In case of processing brain tissue, prepare instead an 18% silica colloid solution as described in Table 2, by diluting the silica colloid stock solution in NSR and adding RNase inhibitor. Prepare 3 mL of 18% silica colloid solution per sample and keep it on ice.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Tissue homogenization and nuclei isolation
<ol>
	<li>Remove the sample from the -80 &#176;C freezer and place it immediately on dry ice.</li>
	<li>Cut the sample on a pre-cooled Petri dish or metal plate on dry ice with a pre-cooled scalpel into a 15-50 mg piece (if it is not already the right size). Be sure to cut the sample in the correct direction so that the sample is still representative of the organ structures of interest. 
	NOTE: With this protocol, 15-50 mg is the optimal sample size for nuclear extraction. To achieve a good yield after the clean-up, a sample size of at least 25 mg is recommended. For smaller samples, special cartridges are available that are optimized for processing small inputs with the robotic dissociator. Small input nuclei isolation cartridges were employed to dissociate tissue samples weighing as little as 4 mg with sufficient yield for downstream single nuclei RNA sequencing. An example of nuclei yield using the low input cartridge from rat liver tissue is shown in Table 3.</li>
	<li>Remove the nuclei isolation cartridge from the refrigerator, unpack it, remove the grinder, and pipette 15 &#181;L of RNase inhibitor (40 U/&#181;L) to the bottom of the cartridge. 
	NOTE: During the nuclei extraction, the robotic dissociator will add NIB and NSR to the cartridge to a total volume of 3 mL (with the low volume nuclei extraction protocol). By adding 15 &#181;L of RNase inhibitor (40 U/&#181;L) to the cartridge prior to the extraction, the suspension will have the desired RNAse inhibitor concentration of 0.2 U/&#181;L.</li>
	<li>Place the tissue sample on the bottom of the cartridge using tweezers. Do not place the sample exactly in the center of the cartridge in order to have optimal disruption efficiency.</li>
	<li>Select Run a Protocol on the instrument and click on the Nuclei option in the upper left corner.
	<ol>
		<li>From the menu, select the Low Volume Nuclei Isolation protocol and verify that the disruption speed is set to fast by clicking on Modify. Load the cartridge to the instrument by opening the door and sliding out the stage by lifting the red knob.</li>
		<li>Insert the cartridge into the designated location, rotate the cartridge lock, and slide in the stage until the red knob clicks into place. Close the door and start the nuclei extraction run on the instrument by clicking Next. The run lasts approximately 7 min.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Once the run is finished, remove the cartridge from the instrument by lifting the red knob and pulling out the stage. Immediately place the cartridge on ice.</li>
	<li>For all tissues except the brain, proceed to step 3.1. For brain samples, proceed directly to step 3.2.</li>
</ol>
3. Nuclei clean-up
<ol>
	<li>Sucrose gradient clean-up 
	NOTE: For brain tissue, skip this step and go directly to step 3.2. All the clean-up steps are performed on ice in order to minimize RNA degradation. Buffers and tubes as well as the centrifuges need to be pre-cooled. All resuspension and mixing steps are performed by careful pipetting only, as vortexing could compromise the quality and integrity of the nuclei.
	<ol>
		<li>Carefully pierce the round foil on the dissociator cartridge with a pipette tip. 
		NOTE:&#160;After dissociation, the resulting nuclei suspension has an approximate volume of 2 mL. To facilitate sucrose gradient clean-up, divide the nuclei suspension into two 900 &#181;L aliquots, resulting in a total volume of 1.8 mL of nuclei suspension being used during clean-up.</li>
		<li>Remove the first 900 &#181;L aliquot of the nuclei suspension from the cartridge and add it to a 500 &#181;L SCS aliquot previously prepared in a 2 mL tube. Mix well by pipetting until the mixture is homogeneous.</li>
		<li>Remove the 1400 &#181;L of nuclei suspension - SCS mixture and carefully layer it onto a new 500 &#181;L SCS aliquot by holding the tube at an angle and adding the mixture dropwise, creating a clearly visible phase separation (see Figure 1A).</li>
		<li>Carefully close the tube and place it back on ice without disturbing the phase separation.</li>
		<li>Repeat steps 3.1.2-3.1.4 with the second 900 &#181;L aliquot of suspension and a new SCS aliquot to have two 2 mL tubes per sample with a clearly visible phase separation for gradient centrifugation.</li>
		<li>Carefully add the tubes to a pre-cooled centrifuge and spin at 13,000 x g for 15 min at 4 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>In the meantime, prepare the NSR described in Table 4, by adding the RNase inhibitor to an aliquot of NSR. Prepare 1 mL of NSR per sample. 
		NOTE: At this point, the single cell gene expression reagent gel beads can be removed from the -80 &#176;C freezer, allowing them to equilibrate to room temperature (RT), and the template switch oligo can be resuspended in low TE buffer.</li>
		<li>After centrifugation, remove the supernatant from both tubes without disturbing the pellet and carefully resuspend the pellet in 50 &#181;L of ice-cold NSR as per the manufacturer&#39;s recommendation. Pool the two pellets of the same sample in a new 1.5 mL tube and add 900 &#181;L of ice-cold NSR to a total volume of 1 mL. Mix well by pipetting.</li>
		<li>Centrifuge the sample at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 &#176;C with a swinging-bucket rotor centrifuge. 
		NOTE: It is highly recommended to use a swinging-bucket rotor to minimize nuclei loss, especially when nuclei yield is expected to be low or when starting with small amounts of tissue.</li>
		<li>In the meantime, prepare 500 &#181;L per sample of 1x PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) with 0.04% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.2 U/&#181;L RNase inhibitor as described in Table 5.</li>
		<li>Carefully remove the supernatant without discarding the pellet and resuspend the pellet in 100 &#181;L of PBS solution as prepared above (1x PBS + 0.04% BSA + RNase inhibitor at 0.2 U/&#181;L). 
		NOTE: For small tissue samples, the nuclei concentration may be low, and therefore, it is recommended to resuspend the pellet in only 50 &#181;L of PBS solution to ensure sufficiently high concentrations for single nuclei RNA sequencing.</li>
		<li>Proceed directly to step 4.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Silica colloid gradient clean-up 
	NOTE: For brain tissue, a silica colloid gradient is more suitable than a sucrose gradient to remove myelin and debris from the nuclei suspension. All the clean-up steps are performed on ice to minimize RNA degradation. Buffers and tubes, as well as the centrifuges, need to be pre-cooled. All resuspension and mixing steps are performed by careful pipetting only, as vortexing could compromise the quality and integrity of the nuclei.
	<ol>
		<li>Carefully pierce the round foil on the dissociator cartridge with a pipette tip.</li>
		<li>Remove the nuclei suspension from the cartridge and add it to a 5 mL tube.</li>
		<li>Centrifuge at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 &#176;C in a pre-cooled centrifuge.</li>
		<li>Carefully remove the supernatant without disturbing the pellet and resuspend the pellet in 1 mL of ice-cold 18% silica colloid solution.</li>
		<li>Add an additional 2 mL of 18% silica colloid solution to have a total volume of 3 mL and mix well by pipetting.</li>
		<li>Centrifuge the sample at 700 x g for 5 min at 4 &#176;C in a swinging-bucket rotor with the brake set off.</li>
		<li>In the meantime, prepare the NSR described in Table 4 by adding the RNase inhibitor to an aliquot of NSR. Prepare 1 mL of NSR per sample. 
		NOTE: At this point, the single cell gene expression reagent gel beads can be removed from the -80 &#176;C freezer, allowing it to equilibrate to RT and the template switch oligo can be resuspended in low TE buffer.</li>
		<li>Carefully remove the sample from the centrifuge without disturbing the myelin layer floating on top.</li>
		<li>First, remove the myelin layer from the top and discard; then, carefully remove the entire supernatant without disturbing the pellet. 
		NOTE: The myelin layer can be easily removed by wrapping a sterile lint-free wipe around a 1 mL pipette tip to aspirate the myelin layer along with 1-2 mL of the supernatant.</li>
		<li>Resuspend the pellet in 1 mL of ice-cold NSR as per the manufacturer&#39;s recommendation.</li>
		<li>Centrifuge the sample at 500 x g for 5 min at 4 &#176;C in a centrifuge with a swinging-bucket rotor. 
		NOTE: It is highly recommended to use a swinging-bucket rotor to minimize nuclei loss, especially when nuclei yield is expected to be low or when starting with small amounts of tissue.</li>
		<li>In the meantime, prepare 500 &#181;L per sample of 1x PBS (without Ca2+ and Mg2+) with 0.04% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.2 U/&#181;L RNase inhibitor as described in Table 5.</li>
		<li>Carefully remove the supernatant without disturbing the pellet and resuspend the sample in 100 &#181;L of PBS solution as prepared above (1x PBS + 0.04% BSA + RNase inhibitor at 0.2 U/&#181;L). 
		&#8203;NOTE: For small tissue samples, the nuclei concentration may be low, and therefore, it is recommended to resuspend the pellet in only 50 &#181;L of PBS solution to ensure sufficiently high concentrations for single nuclei RNA sequencing.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
4. Counting
<ol>
	<li>For each sample to be counted, dilute 10 &#181;L of nuclei suspension in 20 &#181;L of PBS solution to obtain a 1:3 dilution.</li>
	<li>For counting, add 25 &#181;L of propidium iodide (PI) staining solution to a mixing well of the fluorescent counter counting plate. Add 25 &#181;L of the diluted nuclei suspension and mix well by pipetting. Transfer the 50 &#181;L stained sample from the mixing well to the loading well.</li>
	<li>Load the counting plate on the cell counter and start the count. 
	NOTE: The nuclei count is taken from the red fluorescent channel with an exposure time of 700 ms. This channel was optimized to get an accurate nuclei count by cross-comparing to manual counting with a Neubauer Chamber and Trypan Blue staining under the microscope. At high concentrations, the nuclei are very close together, making it difficult for the software to separate them. In this case, recounting the sample in a suitable dilution is recommended. The integrity of the nuclei as well as the cleanliness, can be assessed from the bright field image or under a microscope.</li>
	<li>Dilute the samples with PBS (1x PBS + 0.04% BSA + RNase inhibitor at 0.2 U/&#181;L) to the desired concentration for single nuclei RNA sequencing. 
	&#8203;NOTE: Concentrations between 700-1,200 nuclei/&#181;L are considered optimal for single nuclei RNA sequencing. Lower cell concentrations, such as 700 nuclei/&#181;L, may result in reduced background contamination from ambient RNA.</li>
</ol>
5. Library preparation
<ol>
	<li>Perform single nuclei RNA sequencing with the single cell gene expression reagents using the manufacturer&#39;s protocol targeting a nuclei recovery of 8000-10,000 nuclei per sample.</li>
</ol>
6. Sequencing
<ol>
	<li>Sequence the libraries with the desired sequencing depth with paired-end, dual indexing, and the following sequencing reads: Read 1: 28 cycles, i7 Index: 10 cycles, i5 Index: 10 cycles and Read 2: 90 cycles.</li>
</ol>

Isolation and Profiling of Single Nuclei from Frozen Mammalian Tissues

<ol>
	<li>Burja, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+Optimized+Tissue+Dissociation+Protocol+for+Single-Cell+RNA+Sequencing+Analysis+of+Fresh+and+Cultured+Human+Skin+Biopsies.">An Optimized Tissue Dissociation Protocol for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis of Fresh and Cultured Human Skin Biopsies.</a> Front Cell Dev Biol. 10, 872688 (2022).</li><li>Kimbley, L. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Comparison+of+optimized+methodologies+for+isolating+nuclei+from+esophageal+tissue.">Comparison of optimized methodologies for isolating nuclei from esophageal tissue.</a> Biotechniques. 72 (3), 104-109 (2022).</li><li>Maitra, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Extraction+of+nuclei+from+archived+postmortem+tissues+for+single-nucleus+sequencing+applications.">Extraction of nuclei from archived postmortem tissues for single-nucleus sequencing applications.</a> Nature Protocols. 16 (6), 2788-2801 (2021).</li><li>Nadelmann, E. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Isolation+of+nuclei+from+mammalian+cells+and+tissues+for+single-nucleus+molecular+profiling.">Isolation of nuclei from mammalian cells and tissues for single-nucleus molecular profiling.</a> Current Protocols. 1 (5), e132 (2021).</li><li>Rousselle, T. V., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+optimized+protocol+for+single+nuclei+isolation+from+clinical+biopsies+for+RNA-seq.">An optimized protocol for single nuclei isolation from clinical biopsies for RNA-seq.</a> Scientific Reports. 12, 9851 (2022).</li><li>Slyper, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+single-cell+and+single-nucleus+RNA-Seq+toolbox+for+fresh+and+frozen+human+tumors.">A single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-Seq toolbox for fresh and frozen human tumors.</a> Nature Medicine. 26 (5), 792-802 (2020).</li><li>Leiz, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Nuclei+isolation+from+adult+mouse+kidney+for+single-nucleus+RNA-sequencing.">Nuclei isolation from adult mouse kidney for single-nucleus RNA-sequencing.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (175), 62901 (2021).</li><li>Alvarez, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Isolation+of+nuclei+from+human+snap-frozen+liver+tissue+for+single-nucleus+RNA+sequencing.">Isolation of nuclei from human snap-frozen liver tissue for single-nucleus RNA sequencing.</a> Bio-Protocol. 13 (3), e4601 (2023).</li><li>Ayhan, F., Douglas, C., Lega, B. C., Konopka, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Nuclei+isolation+from+surgically+resected+human+hippocampus.">Nuclei isolation from surgically resected human hippocampus.</a> STAR Protocols. 2 (4), 100844 (2021).</li><li>Joshi, N., Misharin, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Single-nucleus+isolation+from+frozen+human+lung+tissue+for+single-nucleus+RNA-seq.">Single-nucleus isolation from frozen human lung tissue for single-nucleus RNA-seq.</a> Protocols.io. , (2019).</li><li>Martelotto, L. G., Luciano Martelotto, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term='Frankenstein'+protocol+for+nuclei+isolation+from+fresh+and+frozen+tissue+for+snRNAseq.">'Frankenstein' protocol for nuclei isolation from fresh and frozen tissue for snRNAseq.</a> Protocols.io. , (2020).</li><li>Masilionis, I., Chaudhary, O., Chaligne, R., Mazutis, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Nuclei+extraction+for+single-cell+RNAseq+from+frozen+tissue+using+Singulator&#8482;+100.">Nuclei extraction for single-cell RNAseq from frozen tissue using Singulator&#8482; 100.</a> Protocols.io. , (2022).</li><li>Matson, K. J. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Isolation+of+adult+spinal+cord+nuclei+for+massively+parallel+single-nucleus+RNA+sequencing.">Isolation of adult spinal cord nuclei for massively parallel single-nucleus RNA sequencing.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (140), 58413 (2018).</li><li>Mendelev, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Multi-omics+profiling+of+single+nuclei+from+frozen+archived+postmortem+human+pituitary+tissue.">Multi-omics profiling of single nuclei from frozen archived postmortem human pituitary tissue.</a> STAR Protocols. 3 (2), 101446 (2022).</li><li>Soule, T. G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+protocol+for+single+nucleus+RNA-seq+from+frozen+skeletal+muscle.">A protocol for single nucleus RNA-seq from frozen skeletal muscle.</a> Life Science Alliance. 6 (5), e202201806 (2023).</li><li>Bakken, T. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Single-nucleus+and+single-cell+transcriptomes+compared+in+matched+cortical+cell+types.">Single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes compared in matched cortical cell types.</a> PLoS One. 13 (12), e0209648 (2018).</li><li>Ding, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Systematic+comparison+of+single-cell+and+single-nucleus+RNA-sequencing+methods.">Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods.</a> Nature Biotechnology. 38, 737-746 (2020).</li><li>Hu, P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Single-nucleus+transcriptomic+survey+of+cell+diversity+and+functional+maturation+in+postnatal+mammalian+hearts.">Single-nucleus transcriptomic survey of cell diversity and functional maturation in postnatal mammalian hearts.</a> Genes &amp; Development. 32 (19-20), 1344-1357 (2018).</li><li>Lake, B. B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+comparative+strategy+for+single-nucleus+and+single-cell+transcriptomes+confirms+accuracy+in+predicted+cell-type+expression+from+nuclear+RNA.">A comparative strategy for single-nucleus and single-cell transcriptomes confirms accuracy in predicted cell-type expression from nuclear RNA.</a> Scientific Reports. 7, 6031 (2017).</li><li>Narayanan, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Nuclei+Isolation+from+Fresh+Frozen+Brain+Tumors+for+Single-Nucleus+RNA-seq+and+ATAC-seq.">Nuclei Isolation from Fresh Frozen Brain Tumors for Single-Nucleus RNA-seq and ATAC-seq.</a> Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (162), 61542 (2020).</li><li>Jovanovich, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> Automated processing of solid tissues into single cells or nuclei for genomics and cell biology applications with the Singulator&#8482; 100 and 200 systems. , (2022).</li><li>Bell, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Characterization+of+a+novel+high-throughput,+high-speed+and+high-precision+plate-based+image+cytometric+cell+counting+method.">Characterization of a novel high-throughput, high-speed and high-precision plate-based image cytometric cell counting method.</a> Cell &amp; Gene Therapy Insights. 7 (4), 427-447 (2021).</li><li>Madler, S. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Besca,+a+single-cell+transcriptomics+analysis+toolkit+to+accelerate+translational+research.">Besca, a single-cell transcriptomics analysis toolkit to accelerate translational research.</a> NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. 3 (4), lqab102 (2021).</li><li>Wu, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Mapping+the+single-cell+transcriptomic+response+of+murine+diabetic+kidney+disease+to+therapies.">Mapping the single-cell transcriptomic response of murine diabetic kidney disease to therapies.</a> Cell Metabolism. 34 (7), 1064-1078 (2022).</li><li>Han, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cell+transcriptomic+atlas+of+the+non-human+primate+Macaca+fascicularis.">Cell transcriptomic atlas of the non-human primate Macaca fascicularis.</a> Nature. 604 (7907), 723-731 (2022).</li><li>Madissoon, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=scRNA-seq+assessment+of+the+human+lung,+spleen,+and+esophagus+tissue+stability+after+cold+preservation.">scRNA-seq assessment of the human lung, spleen, and esophagus tissue stability after cold preservation.</a> Genome Biology. 21 (1), 1 (2019).</li><li>Caglayan, E., Liu, Y., Konopka, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Neuronal+ambient+RNA+contamination+causes+misinterpreted+and+masked+cell+types+in+brain+single-nuclei+datasets.">Neuronal ambient RNA contamination causes misinterpreted and masked cell types in brain single-nuclei datasets.</a> Neuron. 110 (24), 4043-4056 (2022).</li><li>Luecken, M. D., Theis, F. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Current+best+practices+in+single-cell+RNA-seq+analysis:+a+tutorial.">Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: a tutorial.</a> Molecular Systems Biology. 15 (6), e8746 (2019).</li><li>Fleming, S. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Unsupervised+removal+of+systematic+background+noise+from+droplet-based+single-cell+experiments+using+CellBender.">Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender.</a> bioRxiv. , (2022).</li><li>Yang, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Decontamination+of+ambient+RNA+in+single-cell+RNA-seq+with+DecontX.">Decontamination of ambient RNA in single-cell RNA-seq with DecontX.</a> Genome Biology. 21 (1), 57 (2020).</li><li>Young, M. D., Behjati, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=SoupX+removes+ambient+RNA+contamination+from+droplet-based+single-cell+RNA+sequencing+data.">SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data.</a> Gigascience. 9 (12), giaa151 (2020).</li></ol>

All authors are/were employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche during the conduct of the study.

We have developed a versatile and partially automated protocol to obtain high-quality single nuclei from frozen mammalian tissues and demonstrated the protocol on&#160;mouse brain, rat kidney, and cynomolgus liver and spleen tissue.
When comparing the performance of this protocol to that of other published protocols for single nucleus RNA sequencing in brain, kidney, spleen, and liver tissue6,7,20,24,25,26, we observe that we are able to detect a similar number of genes and UMI counts per nucleus and are able to recover the expected cell types. Compared to existing methods, there are several advantages to this protocol. First, the protocol in this study automates tissue&#160;homogenization and isolation of single nuclei. This is achieved with the use of a robotic tissue disruptor21. In most protocols, tissue is homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer in order to liberate single nuclei3,20. However, we have noticed that this manual step can lead to experimental variability in nuclei yield and integrity depending on the amount of force exerted during homogenization, compromising the reproducibility of the experiments. Here, by using an automated tissue grinder with fixed settings, good nuclei quality and yield with greater consistency were obtained across experiments. Furthermore, automating this step also reduces the hands-on time of the protocol (the tissue disruption step takes approximately 7 min), allowing the user to prepare for the subsequent steps. Second, the protocol described in this study is versatile, i.e., it is compatible with different tissues from different species. This enables us to avoid lengthy protocol optimization, e.g., to identify homogenization buffers/detergents for different tissues2,5,6. Third, this protocol does not depend on access to a flow sorter in order to obtain clean nuclei, hence making it more accessible for laboratories that do not have the required equipment/expertise for flow sorting. Instead, we optimized the sucrose gradient-based filtration to remove most of the debris. However, for brain tissue in particular, using a silica colloid gradient instead of a sucrose gradient is recommended for more efficient myelin removal. We have also found that the use of a swinging-bucket rotor at the end of the sucrose/silica colloid gradient centrifugation step minimizes nuclei loss. Hence, the use of such a rotor is highly recommended. Fourth, after testing multiple methods to count nuclei (manual counting under the microscope, use of several automated counters), the use of an automated fluorescent cell counter22 is recommended. The use of a DNA intercalating dye, such as propidium iodide, increases the accuracy of nucleus counting. Fifth, this protocol takes about 75 min from start to loading the microfluidic chip. This helps to ensure that nuclei integrity remains high when processing multiple samples. Finally, we have found the protocol to also be compatible with optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT)-embedded tissue. If using such material, the tissue can be removed from the OCT block using a scalpel before homogenization.
One frequent challenge in single nuclei RNA sequencing datasets is the presence of ambient RNA, which can be non-nuclear (e.g., mitochondrial) as well as nuclear derived27,28. In our protocol, mitochondrial RNA (a proxy for non-nuclear ambient RNA) is low even prior to filtering (0.1-1.6% for the tissues shown). However, similar to other protocols and datasets, ambient RNA contamination from highly expressed genes in the nuclei of abundant cell types (such as hepatocytes in the liver, neurons in brains, etc.) is still present27. Several bioinformatics tools, such as CellBender, SoupX, etc., exist that can remove such ambient RNA contamination prior to nuclei annotation29,30,31. Another limitation of this protocol is that although the tissue disruption and nuclei isolation steps are automated, the throughput of this step is still limiting as only one sample can be processed at a time. However, since this step takes only approximately 7 min per piece of tissue, multiple samples can still be processed in a batch. We typically process four samples per batch but have done up to six samples per batch with good results. Recent improvements in the robotic dissociator to allow the parallel processing of two samples simultaneously will enable the processing of 8-12 samples per batch, which is compatible with the throughput of the microfluidic chip that is used for single nuclei encapsulation.
Although we have not used the nuclei isolated by this protocol for other downstream applications such as ATAC-seq or snRNAseq using other platforms, based on the quality of data obtained with the gene expression reagents used here, we believe our protocol should be compatible with additional downstream applications. However, future work will involve testing this protocol with other downstream applications, such as ATAC-seq.
In conclusion, we have developed a quick, simple, and partially automated nuclei isolation protocol for downstream single nucleus RNA sequencing that has been demonstrated to be compatible with different types of frozen mammalian tissues.

Single-cell (sc) and single-nucleus (sn) RNA sequencing have become commonly used protocols in molecular and cellular biology due to the increased resolution of gene expression compared to bulk RNA sequencing. However, the isolation of good quality single cell and single nuclei preparations from solid tissues remains a challenge and is often the rate-limiting step in sc/sn-RNAseq experiments. Indeed, a plethora of protocols has been developed that use various chemical and mechanical procedures to obtain cell/nuclei suspensions1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Furthermore, strategies to clean up such preparations from debris/clumps, etc., range from flow sorting to filtration to washing. Such protocols are often manual (leading to user-related variability), can be time-consuming (leading to reduced cell/nucleus viability), and/or may require access to a flow cytometer for cell/nucleus sorting. This&#160;study focused on developing a simple, quick, and partially automated single nuclei isolation protocol from frozen mammalian tissues for downstream RNA sequencing applications. We focused specifically on nuclei isolation as opposed to cell isolation as it is compatible with the use of frozen tissues, rendering sample collection/processing more practical and enabling unbiased batching of samples, especially in time-course experiments. Furthermore, although the nuclear transcriptome does not fully reflect the cellular transcriptome, several studies have now shown that single nuclei RNA sequencing data is comparable to single cell RNA sequencing data for cell-type identification, even though the proportions of cell types can vary6,16,17,18,19.
Nuclei isolation consists of several steps: 1) mechanical or chemical disruption of the tissue to release the nuclei, 2) clean-up of debris and clumps, and 3) accurate counting of nuclei for preparation for downstream applications. In a number of protocols, step 1 frequently involves the use of a Dounce homogenizer in order to disrupt the tissue3,20. Alternatively, chemical methods can be used, although these often need to be optimized for different tissues2,5,6. We have experienced that a manual tissue disruption procedure is prone to operator-associated variability, leading to variable quality and yield of nuclei. In order to minimize technical variability and to have a more consistent and reproducible protocol that works across tissues, a protocol that uses a commercially available robotic tissue dissociator was developed21. For step 2, although buffer exchange is usually the simplest means for washing nuclei, we adopted the use of a relatively short sucrose gradient centrifugation step to have a more thorough removal of debris. For brain tissue specifically, we use a silica colloid gradient instead of a sucrose gradient&#160;for more effective myelin removal. Finally, for counting, the use of a hemocytometer is the gold standard for counting and visually inspecting the nuclei. In our protocol, this step can be reliably automated using a commercially available automated fluorescent cell counter22. This protocol has been tested and is compatible with several frozen mammalian tissues, including brain, kidney, spleen, and liver, from different mammalian species (rat, mouse, and non-human primate) and provides good quality nuclei for downstream single nuclei RNA sequencing with a droplet-based commercial platform. The protocol takes approximately 75 min from tissue preparation to the start of the single nuclei RNA sequencing workflow.

<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>1 M DTT</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>P2325</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10% Tween 20</td>
			<td>Bio-Rad</td>
			<td>1662404</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10x Magnetic Separator</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-120250</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>10x Vortex Adapter</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-120251</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1x DPBS (10x), no calcium, no magnesium</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>14190144</td>
			<td>stored at 4&#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>30% Bovine Serum Albumin</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>A9576_50ML</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>400 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>15568025</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>40U/&#956;l RNaseOUT Recombinant Ribonuclease Inhibitor</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>10777019</td>
			<td>Stored at -20 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Agilent High Sensitivity DNA Kit</td>
			<td>Agilent</td>
			<td>5067-4626</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Cellaca MX High-throughput Automated Cell Counter</td>
			<td>Nexcelom Bioscience</td>
			<td>CELMXSYSF2</td>
			<td>Automated fluorescent cell counter</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chromium Next GEM Chip G Single Cell Kit, 16 rxns</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000127</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent, stored at room temperature</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chromium Next GEM Secondary Holder</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000195</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3&#39; Gel Bead Kit v3.1, 4 rxns</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000129</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent, stored at -80 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3&#39; GEM, Library &#38; Gel Bead Kit v3.1, 4 rxns</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000128</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3&#39; Library Kit v3.1 4 rxns</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000158</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent, stored at -20 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3&#39;GEM Kit v3.1 4 rxns</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000130</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent, stored at -20 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Divided Polystyrene Reservoirs</td>
			<td>VWR</td>
			<td>41428-958</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DNA LoBind Tubes 1.5ml Eppendorf</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>EP0030108051</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DNA LoBind Tubes 2ml Eppendorf</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>EP0030108078</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Dry ice</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Dynabeads MyOne SILANE</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-2000048</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent, stored at 4 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ethanol Pure</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>E7023</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Glycerin (Glycerol), 50% (v/v)</td>
			<td>Ricca Chemical Company</td>
			<td>3290-16</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Heatblock</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>High-Throughput Nexcelom Counting Plates</td>
			<td>Nexcelom Bioscience</td>
			<td>CHM24-A100-001</td>
			<td>Cell counter counting plate</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Low TE Buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA)</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>12090015</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Mini Centrifuge</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>NovaSeq 6000 SP Reagent Kit v1.5 (100 cycles)</td>
			<td>Illumina</td>
			<td>2002840</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei Isolation Buffer</td>
			<td>S2 Genomics</td>
			<td>100-063-396</td>
			<td>Stored at 4 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei Isolation Cartridge</td>
			<td>S2 Genomics</td>
			<td>100-063-287</td>
			<td>Precooled at 4 &#176;C before use</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei PURE 2 M Sucrose Cushion Solution</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>NUC201-1KT</td>
			<td>Sucrose cushion solution&#160;</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei PURE Sucrose Cushion Buffer</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>NUC201-1KT</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei Storage Reagent</td>
			<td>S2 Genomics</td>
			<td>100-063-405</td>
			<td>Stored at 4 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PCR Tubes 0.2 ml 8-tube strips</td>
			<td>Eppendorf</td>
			<td>30124359</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Percoll</td>
			<td>GE Healthcare</td>
			<td>17-0891-02</td>
			<td>Silica colloid solution</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PhiX Control v3</td>
			<td>Illumina</td>
			<td>FC-110-3001</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Qiagen Buffer EB</td>
			<td>Qiagen</td>
			<td>19086</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>Q32854</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Refrigerated Centrifuge (Eppendorf 5804R)</td>
			<td>Eppendorf&#160;</td>
			<td>5805000010</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Refrigerated Centrifuge with Swinging-Bucket Rotor (Eppendorf 5810R)</td>
			<td>Eppendorf&#160;</td>
			<td>5811000015</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RNAseZap</td>
			<td>Ambion</td>
			<td>AM9780</td>
			<td>RNAse decontamination solution</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Round cell culture petri dish</td>
			<td>SPL</td>
			<td>330005</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Scalpel disposable</td>
			<td>Aesculap AG</td>
			<td>BA210</td>
			<td>pre-cooled on dry ice before use</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Single Index Kit T Set A, 96 rxns</td>
			<td>10x genomics</td>
			<td>PN-1000213</td>
			<td>Single cell gene expression reagent, stored at -20 &#176;C</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Singulator 100 System</td>
			<td>S2 Genomics</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>Commercially available robotic tissue dissociator</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sodium Hydroxide 1M</td>
			<td>Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td>72068</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>SPRIselect Reagent Kit</td>
			<td>Beckman Coulter</td>
			<td>b23318</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sterile tweezers</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>UltraPure DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water</td>
			<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>10977049</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ViaStain PI Staining Solution</td>
			<td>Nexcelom Bioscience</td>
			<td>CS1-0109-5mL</td>
			<td>Propidium iodide staining solution</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vortex Mixer+A2:D44</td>
			<td>VWR</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

a simple, quick, and partially automated protocol for the isolation of single nuclei from frozen mammalian tissues for single nucleus sequencing

Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing have become common laboratory applications due to the wealth of transcriptomic information that they provide. Single nucleus RNA sequencing, particularly, is useful for investigating gene expression in difficult-to-dissociate tissues. Furthermore, this approach is also compatible with frozen (archival) material. Here, we describe a protocol to isolate high-quality single nuclei from frozen mammalian tissues for downstream single nucleus RNA sequencing in a partially-automated manner using commercially available instruments and reagents. Specifically, a robotic dissociator is used to automate and standardize tissue homogenization, followed by an optimized chemical gradient to filter the nuclei. Lastly, we accurately and automatically count the nuclei using an automated fluorescent cell counter. The performance of this protocol is demonstrated on mouse brain, rat kidney, and cynomolgus liver and spleen tissue. This protocol is straightforward, rapid, and readily adaptable to various mammalian tissues without requiring extensive optimization and provides good quality nuclei for downstream single nuclei RNA sequencing.

The performance and versatility of this protocol are demonstrated by performing single nuclei RNA sequencing on fresh frozen brain occipital cortex tissue from three B6 mice, fresh frozen transversally cut kidney tissue from three Wistar rats, archival (11-year-old) liver and spleen tissue from three Mauritian Cynomolgus macaques. All animals were non-perfused.
As shown in Figures 1B,C, good-quality nuclei that were free of signs of blebbing, debris, and clumping were obtained. The sucrose gradient-based filtration was optimized to remove the majority of debris by testing different densities, spin speeds, and times, and assessing the nuclear purity/integrity under a microscope as well as assessing nuclei size distribution and yield (Figure 1D). This allowed us to choose a sucrose gradient density of 1.5 M and to use a short spin time of 15 min. Next, to further assess the quality of the nuclei, the data was preprocessed using 10X Cell Ranger, and further downstream data analysis was performed using Besca23. Nuclei with &#62;5% percent mitochondrial content (as these tend to be damaged/stressed nuclei) were filtered out, and nuclei with 500-7,000 genes (to minimize empty droplets and multiplets) were retained. We only included genes that were present in at least 30 nuclei. We targeted 8,000 nuclei per brain cortex sample and 10,000 nuclei per kidney, liver, and spleen sample. After filtration, 10,644 high-quality nuclei from the three brain samples, 14,960 high-quality nuclei from the three kidney samples, 18,795 high-quality nuclei from the three liver samples, and 13,882 high-quality nuclei from the three spleen samples were obtained. Figure 2A,D,G,J show violin plots representing the distribution of UMI counts, gene counts, and mitochondrial content in each sample. The median number of counts across all brain samples was 7,563 UMI/nucleus and 3,208 genes/nucleus. The median number of counts across all kidney samples was 3,841 UMI/nucleus and 1,915 genes/nucleus. The median number of counts across all liver samples was 2,649 UMI/nuclei and 1,676 genes/nuclei. The median number of counts across all spleen samples was 1,609 UMI/nuclei and 1,138 genes/nuclei. We then generated clusters using highly variable genes and annotated them using known marker genes17,24,25,26. As seen in Figure 2B,E,H,K, we were able to identify the expected cell types from each tissue. Furthermore, as seen in Figure 2B,E,H,K, all animals contributed to all clusters, indicating overall low technical variability introduced by the protocol. Furthermore, the cellular proportions were comparable in all three samples per tissue type, as were the UMI and gene counts (Figure 2A,C,D,F,G,I,J,L). A notable exception is the liver, where the hepatocyte populations among the three liver samples were different in proportions and profile. This is most likely due to biological differences between the animals (sex, age, metabolic status).
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65611/65611fig01.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: Assessment of nuclei quality and sucrose gradient optimization. (A) The expected phase separation during sucrose gradient centrifugation is shown with an arrow. (B) Representative fluorescent images of propidium iodide-stained rat kidney (top) and cynomolgus spleen (bottom) nuclei obtained with the protocol. (C) Representative bright field microscopy images of nuclei isolated from mouse liver (top) and mouse brain (bottom), scale bar 500 &#181;m. Note the regular smooth surface of nuclei indicating good nuclear quality. (D) Sucrose gradient optimization. Several sucrose densities, spin speeds, and spin times were tested. Bright-field microscopy images of nuclei, nuclei size distribution, and nuclei yield are shown for each condition. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65611/65611fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65611/65611fig02.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Representative data from snRNAseq on mouse brain occipital cortex, rat kidney (cortex and medulla), and cynomolgus macaque liver and spleen. (A) Violin plots showing the distribution of genes/nucleus, UMIs/nucleus, and percent mitochondrial content per brain sample. (B) Left panel: UMAP plot showing the contribution of each sample to the clusters identified in the brain. Right panel: UMAP showing the identities of the clusters annotated based on marker genes in brain tissue. (C) Cellular proportions observed in the 3 brain samples. (D) Violin plots showing the distribution of genes/nucleus, UMIs/nucleus, and percent mitochondrial content per kidney sample. (E) Left panel: UMAP plot showing the contribution of each sample to the clusters identified in the kidney. Right panel: UMAP showing the identities of the clusters annotated based on marker genes in kidney tissue. (F) Cellular proportions observed in the 3 kidney samples. (G) Violin plots showing the distribution of genes/nucleus, UMIs/nucleus, and percent mitochondrial content per liver sample. (H) Left panel: UMAP plot showing the contribution of each sample to the clusters identified in the liver. Right panel: UMAP showing the identities of the clusters annotated based on marker genes in liver tissue. (I) Cellular proportions observed in the 3 liver samples. (J) Violin plots showing the distribution of genes/nucleus, UMIs/nucleus, and percent mitochondrial content per spleen sample. (K) Left panel: UMAP plot showing the contribution of each sample to the clusters identified in the spleen. Right panel: UMAP showing the identities of the clusters annotated based on marker genes in spleen tissue. (L) Cellular proportions observed in the 3 spleen samples. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65611/65611fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Components</td>
			<td>Stock concentration</td>
			<td>Volume per sample</td>
			<td>Final Concentration</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sucrose Cushion Solution</td>
			<td>2 M</td>
			<td>1500 &#181;L</td>
			<td>1.5 M</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Sucrose Cushion Buffer</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>500 &#181;L</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Dithiothreitol (DTT)</td>
			<td>1 M</td>
			<td>2 &#181;L</td>
			<td>1 mM</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RNAse inhibitor&#160;</td>
			<td>40 U/&#181;L</td>
			<td>10 &#181;L</td>
			<td>0.2 U/&#181;L</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 1: Preparation of 1.5 M sucrose cushion solution (SCS). This solution is used for the sucrose gradient centrifugation during the clean-up in step 3.1 and should be freshly prepared each time before starting the protocol. Always keep the SCS on ice during the protocol. The solutions mentioned in this table are referenced in the Table of Materials.
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Components</td>
			<td>Stock concentration</td>
			<td>Volume per sample</td>
			<td>Final Concentration</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Silica colloid stock solution</td>
			<td>90%</td>
			<td>600 &#181;L</td>
			<td>18%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei Storage Reagent (S2 Genomics)</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>2400 &#181;L</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RNAse inhibitor&#160;</td>
			<td>40 U/&#181;L</td>
			<td>15 &#181;L</td>
			<td>0.2 U/&#181;L</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 2: Preparation of 18% silica colloid solution. This solution is used for the silica colloid gradient centrifugation during clean-up in step 3.2 and should be freshly prepared each time before starting the protocol. Always keep the 18% silica colloid solution on ice during the protocol.
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Tissue</td>
			<td>Sample weight</td>
			<td>Cartridge</td>
			<td>Yield</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rat liver</td>
			<td>25 mg</td>
			<td>Nuclei Isolation Cartridge</td>
			<td>65,000 nuclei per mg of tissue</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Rat liver</td>
			<td>4 mg</td>
			<td>Small Input Nuclei Isolation Cartridge</td>
			<td>32,000 nuclei per mg of tissue</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 3: Nuclei yield from the low input nuclei isolation cartridge versus the nuclei isolation cartridge post sucrose gradient clean-up.
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Components</td>
			<td>Stock concentration</td>
			<td>Volume per sample</td>
			<td>Final Concentration</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Nuclei Storage Reagent</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>1000 &#181;L</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RNAse inhibitor&#160;</td>
			<td>40 U/&#181;L</td>
			<td>5 &#181;L</td>
			<td>0.2 U/&#181;L</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 4: Preparation of nuclei storage reagent (NSR). This solution is used during Nuclei Isolation in steps 3-5 as well as during the clean-up in step 3.1.8. It can be stored at 4 &#176;C for up to 4 months. Prepare a fresh aliquot with RNase inhibitor during the centrifugation step in the clean-up step 6. The solutions mentioned in this table are referenced in the Table of Materials.
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">1x PBS + 0.04% BSA stock solution</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Components</td>
			<td>Stock Concentration</td>
			<td>Volume for stock</td>
			<td>Final Concentration</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PBS (no Ca2+, no Mg2+)</td>
			<td>1x</td>
			<td>30 mL</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)</td>
			<td>30%</td>
			<td>40 &#181;L</td>
			<td>0.04%</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td colspan="4">1x PBS + 0.04% BSA + 0.2 U/&#181;L RNAse inhibitor</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Components</td>
			<td>Stock Concentration</td>
			<td>Volume per sample</td>
			<td>Final Concentration</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1x PBS + 0.04% BSA Stock Solution</td>
			<td>-</td>
			<td>500 &#181;L</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>RNAse inhibitor&#160;</td>
			<td>40 U/&#181;L</td>
			<td>2.5 &#181;L</td>
			<td>0.2 U/&#181;L</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 5: Preparation of PBS + 0.04% BSA. This solution is used at the end of the clean-up in step 3.1.10 and after counting to dilute the nuclei suspension to the desired concentration for 10X single nuclei RNA sequencing (counting step 4.4). The stock solution can be stored at 4 &#176;C for up to 1 month. Prepare a fresh aliquot with RNase inhibitor during the centrifugation step in the clean-up step 6.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Enhancing Drug Discovery - Development of Automated, Standardized Protocols for Nuclei Extraction from Frozen Tissues at JoVE.com

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Drug Discovery - Development of Automated, Standardized Protocols for Nuclei Extraction from Frozen Tissues 

The study describes a simple, quick, and partially automated protocol to isolate high-quality nuclei from frozen mammalian tissues for downstream single nuclei RNA sequencing.

A Simple, Quick, and Partially Automated Protocol for the Isolation of Single Nuclei from Frozen Mammalian Tissues for Single Nucleus Sequencing

Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing have become common laboratory applications due to the wealth of transcriptomic information that they ...

a-simple-quick-partially-automated-protocol-for-isolation-single

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

3.8K Views.  Roche Innovation Centre Basel. The study describes a simple, quick, and partially automated protocol to isolate high-quality nuclei from frozen mammalian tissues for downstream single nuclei RNA sequencing. 

Video: Author Spotlight: Enhancing Drug Discovery - Development of Automated, Standardized Protocols for Nuclei Extraction from Frozen Tissues 

A Simple Protocol for Extracting Hemocytes from Wild Caterpillars

Insect hemocytes (equivalent to mammalian white blood cells) play an important role in several physiological processes throughout an insect's life cycle 1. In larval stages of insects belonging to the orders of Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) and Diptera (true flies), hemocytes are formed from the lymph gland (a specialized hematopoietic organ) or embryonic cells and can be carried through to the adult stage. Embryonic hemocytes are involved in cell migration during development and chemotaxis regulation during inflammation. They also take part in cell apoptosis and are essential for embryogenesis 2. Hemocytes mediate the cellular arm of the insect innate immune response that includes several functions, such as cell spreading, cell aggregation, formation of nodules, phagocytosis and encapsulation of foreign invaders 3. They are also responsible for orchestrating specific insect humoral defenses during infection, such as the production of antimicrobial peptides and other effector molecules 4, 5. Hemocyte morphology and function have mainly been studied in genetic or physiological insect models, including the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster 6, 7, the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae 8, 9 and the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta 10, 11. However, little information currently exists about the diversity, classification, morphology and function of hemocytes in non-model insect species, especially those collected from the wild 12.
Here we describe a simple and efficient protocol for extracting hemocytes from wild caterpillars. We use penultimate instar Lithacodes fasciola (yellow-shouldered slug moth) (Figure 1) and Euclea delphinii (spiny oak slug) caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) and show that sufficient volumes of hemolymph (insect blood) can be isolated and hemocyte numbers counted from individual larvae. This method can be used to efficiently study hemocyte types in these species as well as in other related lepidopteran caterpillars harvested from the field, or it can be readily combined with immunological assays designed to investigate hemocyte function following infection with microbial or parasitic organisms 13.

Insect hemocytes carry out many important functions, both immune and non-immune, throughout all stages of insect development. Our present knowledge of hemocyte types and function comes from studies on insect genetic models. Here, we present a method for extracting, quantifying and visualizing hemocytes from wild caterpillars.

Insect hemocytes (equivalent to mammalian white blood cells) play an important role in several physiological processes throughout an insect's life cycle ...

Affinity-based Isolation of Tagged Nuclei from Drosophila Tissues for Gene Expression Analysis

Drosophila melanogaster embryonic and larval tissues often contain a highly heterogeneous mixture of cell types, which can complicate the analysis of gene expression in these tissues. Thus, to analyze cell-specific gene expression profiles from Drosophila tissues, it may be necessary to isolate specific cell types with high purity and at sufficient yields for downstream applications such as transcriptional profiling and chromatin immunoprecipitation. However, the irregular cellular morphology in tissues such as the central nervous system, coupled with the rare population of specific cell types in these tissues, can pose challenges for traditional methods of cell isolation such as laser microdissection and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Here, an alternative approach to characterizing cell-specific gene expression profiles using affinity-based isolation of tagged nuclei, rather than whole cells, is described. Nuclei in the specific cell type of interest are genetically labeled with a nuclear envelope-localized EGFP tag using the Gal4/UAS binary expression system. These EGFP-tagged nuclei can be isolated using antibodies against GFP that are coupled to magnetic beads. The approach described in this protocol enables consistent isolation of nuclei from specific cell types in the Drosophila larval central nervous system at high purity and at sufficient levels for expression analysis, even when these cell types comprise less than 2% of the total cell population in the tissue. This approach can be used to isolate nuclei from a wide variety of Drosophila embryonic and larval cell types using specific Gal4 drivers, and may be useful for isolating nuclei from cell types that are not suitable for FACS or laser microdissection.

Affinity-based Isolation of Tagged Nuclei from Drosophila Tissues for Gene Expression Analysis

Drosophila tissues often contain a heterogeneous mixture of cell types.&#160;To examine gene expression in specific cell types from a particular tissue, nuclei can be genetically tagged and subsequently isolated using an affinity-based approach. Isolated nuclei can be used for downstream applications such as gene expression analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation.

Drosophila melanogaster embryonic and larval tissues often contain a highly heterogeneous mixture of cell types, which can complicate the analysis of gene ...

Efficient Mammalian Cell Expression and Single-step Purification of Extracellular Glycoproteins for Crystallization

Production of secreted mammalian proteins for structural and biophysical studies can be challenging, time intensive, and costly. Here described is a time and cost efficient protocol for secreted protein expression in mammalian cells and one step purification using nickel affinity chromatography. The system is based on large scale transient transfection of mammalian cells in suspension, which greatly decreases the time to produce protein, as it eliminates steps, such as developing expression viruses or generating stable expressing cell lines. This protocol utilizes cheap transfection agents, which can be easily made by simple chemical modification, or moderately priced transfection agents, which increase yield through increased transfection efficiency and decreased cytotoxicity. Careful monitoring and maintaining of media glucose levels increases protein yield. Controlling the maturation of native glycans at the expression step increases the final yield of properly folded and functional mammalian proteins, which are ideal properties to pursue X-ray crystallography. In some cases, single step purification produces protein of sufficient purity for crystallization, which is demonstrated here as an example case.

This is a quick, cost-efficient protocol for the production of secreted, glycosylated mammalian proteins and subsequent single-step purification with sufficient yields of homogenous protein for X-ray crystallography and other biophysical studies.

Production of secreted mammalian proteins for structural and biophysical studies can be challenging, time intensive, and costly. Here described is a time ...

Analysis of LINE-1 Retrotransposition at the Single Nucleus Level

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (Line-1 or L1) accounts for approximately 17% of the DNA present in the human genome. While the majority of L1s are inactive due to 5' truncations, ~80-100 of these elements remain retrotransposition competent and propagate to different locations throughout the genome via RNA intermediates. While older L1s are believed to target AT rich regions of the genome, the chromosomal targets of newer, more active L1s remain poorly defined. Here we describe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methodology that can be used to track patterns of L1 insertion and rates of ectopic L1 incorporation at the single nucleus level. In these experiments, fluorescein isothiocyanate/cyanine-3 (FITC/CY3) labeled neomycin probes were employed to track L1 retrotransposition in vitro in HepG2 cells stably expressing ectopic L1. This methodology prevents errors in the estimation of rates of retrotransposition posed by toxicity and account for the occurrence of multiple insertions into a single nucleus.

Here we employ FISH methodology to track LINE-1 retrotransposition at the single nuclei level in chromosome spreads of HepG2 cell lines stably expressing synthetic LINE-1.

Long interspersed nuclear element-1 (Line-1 or L1) accounts for approximately 17% of the DNA present in the human genome. While the majority of L1s are ...

A Simple High Efficiency Protocol for Pancreatic Islet Isolation from Mice

Pancreatic islets, also called the Islets of Langerhans, are a cluster of endocrine cells which produces hormones for glucose regulation and other important biological functions. The islets primarily consist of five types of hormone-secreting cells: &#945; cells secrete glucagon, &#946; cells secrete insulin, &#948; cells secrete somatostatin, &#949; cells secrete ghrelin, and PP cells secrete pancreatic polypeptide. Sixty to 80% of the cells in the islets are &#946; cells, which are the most important cell population to study insulin secretion. Pancreatic islets are a crucial model system to study ex vivo insulin secretion. Acquiring high quality islets is of great importance for diabetes research. Most islet isolation procedures require technically difficult to access site of collagenase injection, harsh and complex digestion procedures, and multiple density gradient purification steps. This paper features a simple high yield mouse islet isolation method with detailed descriptions and realistic demonstrations, showing the following specific steps: 1) injection of collagenase P at the ampulla of Vater, a small area joining the pancreatic duct and the common bile duct, 2) enzymatic digestion and mechanical separation of the exocrine pancreas, and 3) a single gradient purification step. The advantages of this method are the injection of digestive enzyme using the more accessible ampulla of Vater, more complete digestion using combination of enzymatic and mechanical approaches, and a simpler single gradient purification step. This protocol produces approximately 250&#8212;350 islets per mouse; and islets are suitable for various ex vivo studies. Possible caveats of this procedure are potentially damaged islets due to enzymatic digestion and/or prolonged gradient incubation, all of which can be largely avoided by careful ad justification of incubation time.

This islet isolation protocol described a novel route of collagenase injection to digest the exocrine tissue and a simplified gradient procedure to purify the islets from mice. It involves enzymatic digestion, gradient separation/purification, and islet hand-picking. Successful isolation can yield 250&#8211;350 high quality and fully functional islets per mouse.

Pancreatic islets, also called the Islets of Langerhans, are a cluster of endocrine cells which produces hormones for glucose regulation and other ...

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

The analysis of single cell gene expression across thousands of individual cells within a tissue or microenvironment is a valuable tool for identifying cell composition, discrimination of functional states, and molecular pathways underlying observed tissue functions and animal behaviors. However, the isolation of intact, healthy single cells from adult mammalian tissues for subsequent downstream single cell molecular analysis can be challenging. This protocol describes the general processes and quality control checks necessary to obtain high-quality adult single cell preparations from the nervous system or skin that enabled subsequent unbiased single cell RNA sequencing and analysis. Guidelines for downstream bioinformatic analysis are also provided.

This protocol describes the general processes and quality control checks necessary for preparing healthy adult mammalian single cells for droplet-based, high throughput single cell RNA-Seq preparations. Sequencing parameters, read alignment, and downstream single-cell bioinformatic analysis are also provided.

The analysis of single cell gene expression across thousands of individual cells within a tissue or microenvironment is a valuable tool for identifying ...

Nuclei Isolation from Adult Mouse Kidney for Single-Nucleus RNA-Sequencing

The kidneys regulate diverse biological processes such as water, electrolyte, and acid-base homeostasis. Physiological functions of the kidney are executed by multiple cell types arranged in a complex architecture across the corticomedullary axis of the organ. Recent advances in single-cell transcriptomics have accelerated the understanding of cell type-specific gene expression in renal physiology and disease. However, enzyme-based tissue dissociation protocols, which are frequently utilized for single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), require mostly fresh (non-archived) tissue, introduce transcriptional stress responses, and favor the selection of abundant cell types of the kidney cortex resulting in an underrepresentation of cells of the medulla.
Here, we present a protocol that avoids these problems. The protocol is based on nuclei isolation at 4 &#176;C from frozen kidney tissue. Nuclei are isolated from a central piece of the mouse kidney comprised of the cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla. This reduces the overrepresentation of cortical cells typical for whole-kidney samples for the benefit of medullary cells such that data will represent the entire corticomedullary axis at sufficient abundance. The protocol is simple, rapid, and adaptable and provides a step towards the standardization of single-nuclei transcriptomics in kidney research.

Here, we present a protocol to isolate high-quality nuclei from frozen mouse kidneys that improve the representation of medullary kidney cell types and avoids the gene expression artifacts from enzymatic tissue dissociation.

The kidneys regulate diverse biological processes such as water, electrolyte, and acid-base homeostasis. Physiological functions of the kidney are ...

Real-Time Detection of Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Immune Response in Rice with a Chemiluminescence Assay

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play vital roles in a variety of biological processes, including the sensing of abiotic and biotic stresses. Upon pathogen infection or challenge with pathogen-associated chemicals (pathogen-associated molecular patterns [PAMPs]), an array of immune responses, including a ROS burst, are quickly induced in plants, which is called PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). A ROS burst is a hallmark PTI response, which is catalyzed by a group of plasma membrane-localized NADPH oxidases-the RBOH family proteins. The vast majority of ROS comprise hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which can be easily and steadily detected by a luminol-based chemiluminescence method. Chemiluminescence is a photon-producing reaction in which luminol, or its derivative (such as L-012), undergoes a redox reaction with ROS under the action of a catalyst. This paper describes an optimized L-012-based chemiluminescence method to detect apoplast ROS production in real-time upon PAMP elicitation in rice tissues. The method is easy, steady, standardized, and highly reproducible under firmly controlled conditions.

Here, we describe a method for the real-time detection of apoplastic reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in rice tissues in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immune response. This method is simple, standardized, and generates highly reproducible results under controlled conditions.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play vital roles in a variety of biological processes, including the sensing of abiotic and biotic stresses. Upon pathogen ...

Isolation of Nuclei from Flash-Frozen Liver Tissue for Single-Cell Multiomics

The liver is a complex and heterogenous tissue responsible for carrying out many critical physiological functions, such as the maintenance of energy homeostasis and the metabolism of xenobiotics, among others. These tasks are performed through tight coordination between hepatic parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells. Additionally, various metabolic activities are confined to specific areas of the hepatic lobule-a phenomenon called liver zonation. Recent advances in single-cell sequencing technologies have empowered researchers to investigate tissue heterogeneity at a single-cell resolution. In many complex tissues, including the liver, harsh enzymatic and/or mechanical dissociation protocols can negatively affect the viability or the quality of the single-cell suspensions needed to comprehensively characterize this organ in health and disease.
This paper describes a robust and reproducible protocol for isolating nuclei from frozen, archived liver tissues. This method yields high-quality nuclei that are compatible with downstream, single-cell omics approaches, including single-nucleus RNA-seq, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq), as well as multimodal omics (joint RNA-seq and ATAC-seq). This method has been successfully used for the isolation of nuclei from healthy and diseased human, mouse, and non-human primate frozen liver samples. This approach allows the unbiased isolation of all the major cell types in the liver and, therefore, offers a robust methodology for studying the liver at the single-cell resolution.

Here, we present a protocol for isolating nuclei from flash-frozen, archived liver tissues for single-nucleus RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, and joint multiomics (RNA-seq and ATAC-seq).

The liver is a complex and heterogenous tissue responsible for carrying out many critical physiological functions, such as the maintenance of energy ...

Single-Cell Suspension Preparation from Nile Tilapia Intestine for Single-Cell Sequencing

Nile tilapia is one of the most commonly cultured freshwater fish species worldwide and is a widely used research model for aquaculture fish studies. The preparation of high-quality single-cell suspensions is essential for single-cell level studies such as single-cell RNA or genome sequencing. However, there is no ready-to-use protocol for aquaculture fish species, particularly for the intestine of tilapia. The effective dissociation enzymes vary depending on the tissue type. Therefore, optimizing the tissue dissociation protocol by selecting the appropriate enzyme or enzyme combination to obtain enough viable cells with minimum damage is essential. This study illustrates an optimized protocol to prepare a high-quality single-cell suspension from Nile tilapia intestine with an enzyme combination of collagenase/dispase. This combination is highly effective for dissociation with the utilization of bovine serum albumin and DNase to reduce cell aggregation after digestion. The cell output satisfies the requirements for single-cell sequencing, with 90% cell viability and a high cell concentration. This protocol can also be modified to prepare a single-cell suspension from the intestines of other fish species. This research provides an efficient reference protocol and reduces the need for additional trials in the preparation of single-cell suspensions for aquaculture fish species.

Here, we demonstrate the preparation of a high-quality single-cell suspension of tilapia intestine for single-cell sequencing.

Nile tilapia is one of the most commonly cultured freshwater fish species worldwide and is a widely used research model for aquaculture fish studies. The ...