A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The protocol describes infection of Solanum tuberosum roots with plant parasitic nematodes under in vivo greenhouse conditions and potato in vitro transgenic roots for histochemical analysis of root structure through optical microscopy.
Soil-dwelling plant parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are important potato pests that cause lesions and/or change plant roots structure, leading to reduced crop fitness and productivity. Research on the cellular and subcellular mechanisms of PPNs infection and development can resort to field plants or seedlings under greenhouse conditions. Field studies are more representative of natural environments but are subjected to the unpredictability of environmental conditions that can heavily influence research outcomes. Greenhouse studies allow higher control over environmental variables and higher safety against contaminants or pathogens. However, in some hosts, genetic diversity becomes an important factor of variability and influences the host-parasite complex response. We have developed in vitro co-cultures of transgenic roots with PPNs as a reliable alternative that occupies less space, requires less time to obtain, and is free from contamination or from host genetic variability. Co-cultures are obtained by introducing aseptic PPNs to host in vitro transgenic roots. They can be maintained indefinitely, which makes them excellent support for keeping collections of reference PPNs. In the present work, a protocol is detailed for the controlled infection of in vivo potato roots with the root lesion nematode and for establishing in vitro co-cultures of potato transgenic roots with the root-knot nematode. The in vitro co-cultures provided a laboratory proxy for the natural potato infection condition and produced nematode life stages irrespective of season or climate conditions. Additionally, the methodology used for structural analysis is detailed using histochemistry and optical microscopy. The acid fuchsin dye is used to follow nematode attack sites on roots, while differential staining with Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and toluidine blue O highlights nematode structures in potato internal root tissue.
Root and tuber crops rank 4th among the world's most important staple foods. Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the most important cultivated tubers. It had its origin in the Andes mountains of South America, but after being introduced to Europe in the 16th century quickly became the most common food source for the population with a lower income. Today, potatoes make up 1.7% of the world's caloric intake1. Crop production is heavily affected by plant pests and pathogens, of which plant parasitic nematodes (PPNs) can cause average yield losses that rise up to 12%2. Plant parasitic nematodes are responsible for some of the most damaging diseases to crops in modern agriculture. Soil-dwelling PPNs impose heavy losses to farmers because they affect plant roots and interfere with crop productivity by reducing production and/or injuring products, turning them unmarketable3. These dangerous phytoparasites use their stylet (a needle-like mouthpart) to puncture root cells and feed on cell content. Some PPNs feed from outside the roots, others enter the root and cause tissue damage (migratory), while others enter the roots and become sedentary, heavily changing root structure to facilitate feeding4. The main PPNs affecting potato are the potato cyst nematodes, Globodera spp., root-knot nematodes (RKN), Meloidogyne spp., root lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp., the false root-knot nematode Nacobbus aberrans, and the potato rot nematode Ditylenchus destructor. For these PPNs, different feeding habits induce different structural changes in host root tissues5,6. Research on the mechanisms of PPN infection and host response is often performed through field or greenhouse trials to maintain reference PPN culture collections or to perform large scale experiments7,8. Testing under natural conditions is strongly influenced by environmental variation and biotic or abiotic stress factors. Greenhouse bioassays are a closer alternative to a natural condition while allowing a relative control of environmental variation and limiting the influence of abiotic and biotic stress. However, host genetic diversity can still be a challenge for trials that require a finer control of biological variability. These limitations can be overcome by resorting to in vitro plant tissue cultures. These are versatile laboratory systems with many advantages for PPNs disease research. For soil-dwelling PPNs, in vitro cultures of transgenic roots are a useful tool for research in laboratory conditions9,10.
Transgenic roots, or hairy roots (HR), are obtained after infection of plant material with Rhizobium rhizogenes (Riker et al. 1930) Young et al. 200111. This gram-negative bacterium induces the transfection of its Ri plasmid into the host genome and changes the regulation of plant hormone biosynthesis, promoting the formation of root tissue12. Transgenic roots can be maintained indefinitely under asepsis in a culture medium. The advantages of using HR for studying PPNs are a high growth rate in the absence of plant growth regulators that influence nematode infection and development, a high ratio of biomass production per unit time, and cellular integrity and longevity, which determine a higher genetic and biochemical stability6. By resorting to in vitro transgenic roots, PPNs genotypes can be maintained indefinitely under laboratory conditions, infection and PPNs development can be easily followed, host genetic variability can be reduced, manipulation of host molecular makeup can be directly linked to nematode response, and host and parasite structural changes can be more accurately followed6,13. For studies on PPN diseases of potato, in vitro transgenic root co-cultures allow carrying out experiments independently of season or potato tuber dormancy.
In this protocol, the traditional methodology of PPNs maintenance and in vivo infection of potato plants are detailed. For the structural analysis of infected roots, an improved methodology based on the establishment of in vitro co-cultures of transgenic potato roots with PPNs is also detailed as an alternative that allows a higher control of environmental and host genetic variability. To follow PPNs infection and development in the root tissue, histochemistry is employed to aid in PPNs observation under optical microscopy. The overall aim of this protocol is to optimize the study of PPN-host interactions, ensuring more controlled and reproducible conditions for experimentation while facilitating detailed structural and developmental analyses of nematodes in the root tissue.
1. Infection of greenhouse-grown potato plants
NOTE: Greenhouse trials are performed with suspensions of PPNs in mixed life stages or second-stage juveniles (J2), depending on the specific life cycle of the PPN pest. For this protocol, suspensions of mixed life stages of the root lesion nematode (RLN) Pratylenchus penetrans were used. PPNs can either be reared in the lab or requested from certified reference laboratories.
2. Establishment of in vitro co-cultures of potato transgenic roots with PPNs
3. Structural analysis of PPNs infection
NOTE: To follow PPNs induced changes in root tissue structure, histochemical staining techniques are used to contrast tissues with different chemical compositions. Differential staining is performed in roots masses or in thin sections of fixed root material, where specific dyes react with the target tissue according to their chemical affinity21. For the present protocol, we used acid fuchsin, or periodic acid-Schiff's reagent (PAS) combined with toluidine blue O dyes for differential staining.
Carrot disks can be used to multiply and maintain several types of migratory PPNs23. For the RLN, this technique is generally used to maintain reference collections of nematode species or isolates. Using carrot disks, an average 100x increase in nematode populations can be obtained in a period of 3 months (Figure 1). However, nematode numbers vary widely (between 30x and 200x), mainly owing to nematode genetic diversity and/or variation in nutritional contents of carr...
The study of the mechanisms of infection and disease development in plants attacked by soil-dwelling PPNs is difficult because these phytoparasites generally infect the inner tissues of the root system and induce unspecific symptoms in the shoots. Despite the controlled environmental conditions of the greenhouse, sprouting potato tubers and the growth of potato plants are still favored in the spring and summer months, reducing the experimental period available to one season per year. Also, a substantial number of pots ha...
We have nothing to disclose.
This research was partly funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), through grants NemACT, DOI: 10.54499/2022.00359.CEECIND/CP1737/CT0002 (JMSF), CEECIND/00040/2018, DOI: 10.54499/CEECIND/00040/2018/CP1560/CT0001 (CSLV) and SFRH/BD/134201/2017 (PB); project PratyOmics, DOI: 10.54499/PTDC/ASP-PLA/0197/2020; and structural funding UIDB/00329/2020 | cE3c (DOI: 10.54499/UIDB/00329/2020) + LA/P/0121/2020 |CHANGE (DOI: 10.54499/LA/P/0121/2020), and GreenIT (DOI: 10.54499/UIDB/04551/2020 and DOI: 10.54499/UIDP/04551/2020)..
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine | Sigma-Aldrich | D199303 | |
2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate | Sigma-Aldrich | 17348 | |
Acetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 695092 | |
Acid Fuchsin | Sigma-Aldrich | F8129 | |
Benzoyl peroxide | Sigma-Aldrich | B5907 | |
borosilicate glass beaker | Sigma-Aldrich | Z231827 | |
Carbenicillin disodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | C3416 | |
Cefotaxime sodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | C7039 | |
Dimethyl sulfoxide | Sigma-Aldrich | 472301 | |
Ethanol | Supelco | 1.00983 | |
Fertilizer | Compo Expert | ||
Flower pot 5 L | VWR | 470049-676 | |
Glutaraldehyde | Sigma-Aldrich | 354400 | |
Glycerol | Sigma-Aldrich | G7893 | |
Hydrochloric acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 258148 | |
Kanamycin monosulfate | Sigma-Aldrich | BP861 | |
LB Broth with agar | Sigma-Aldrich | L3147 | |
MCE syringe filter | Millipore | SLGSR33SS | |
PARAFILM M sealing film | BRAND | HS234526B-1EA | |
Pararosaniline hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | P3750 | |
Periodic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | P0430 | |
Phyto agar | Duchefa Biochemie | P1003 | |
Scalpel blade no. 24 | Romed Holland | BLADE24 | |
Schenk & Hildebrandt Basal salt medium | Duchefa Biochemie | S0225 | |
Schenk & Hildebrandt vitamin mixture | Duchefa Biochemie | S0411 | |
Schiff′s reagent | Sigma-Aldrich | 1.09033 | |
Sodium metabisulfite | Sigma-Aldrich | 161519 | |
Sodium phosphate dibasic | Sigma-Aldrich | S9763 | |
Sodium phosphate monobasic | Sigma-Aldrich | S5011 | |
Soil / Substrate | Compo Sana | ||
Stainless Steel Tweezers | Sigma-Aldrich | 22435-U | |
Sucrose | Duchefa Biochemie | S0809 | |
Toluidine Blue O | Sigma-Aldrich | 198161 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved