JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Peptide adsorption to plasticware during traditional tip-based serial dilutions can significantly impact potency determination and confound the understanding of structure-activity relationships used for lead identification and lead optimization phases of drug discovery. Here methods for automated acoustic non-contact serial dilution of peptide samples are described.

Streszczenie

As with small molecule drug discovery, screening for peptide agonists requires the serial dilution of peptides to produce concentration-response curves. Screening peptides affords an additional layer of complexity as conventional tip-based sample handling methods expose peptides to a large surface area of plasticware, providing an increased opportunity for peptide loss via adsorption. Preventing excessive exposure to plasticware reduces peptide loss via adherence to plastics and thus minimizes inaccuracies in potency prediction, and we have previously described the benefits of non-contact acoustic dispensing for in vitro high-throughput screening of peptide agonists1. Here we discuss a fully integrated automation solution for non-contact acoustic preparation of peptide serial dilutions in microtiter plates utilizing the example of screening for peptide agonists at the mouse glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R). Our methods allow for high-throughput cell-based assays to screen for agonists and are easily scalable to support increased sample throughput, or to allow for increased numbers of assay plate copies (e.g., for a panel of more target cell lines).

Wprowadzenie

The GLP-1R is an established drug target in the treatment of type 2 diabetes2. The native peptide agonist for this receptor, GLP-1, has an in vivo half-life of 2-3 min3. The binding of GLP-1 to its G protein coupled target receptor results in the downstream production of the second messenger cAMP through native G protein coupling to the activation of adenylyl cyclase. Measurement of the accumulated cAMP provides a robust assay to monitor receptor activation and to screen for active GLP-1 analogues with preferred physicochemical properties. Such an assay requires the serial dilution of test samples to construct concentration-response curves, and this is particularly complicated when handing peptide samples. Potential errors from tip-based serial dilution preparation have been described previously1,4,5. Peptides will adsorb to plasticware, resulting in unreliable potency estimations. Peptide loss can be minimized through the inclusion of bovine serum albumin (BSA) in buffers and the use of siliconized plasticware, yet protein binding remains unpredictable. In particular, the variation in binding of GLP-1 to experimental containers has been described6. There is a further complication in that stabilization agents used in laboratory plasticware can leach from tips and microtiter plates into aqueous assay buffers and interfere with protein function7, 8. Therefore, methods to reduce exposure to plasticware are necessary to increase the accuracy of measurements.

Acoustic liquid dispensers focus a high-frequency acoustic signal onto the surface of a fluid sample, resulting in the ejection of precise nanoliter droplets into an adjacent assay plate9. The use of acoustic ejection is standard in the pharmaceutical industry for the preparation and screening of large synthetic compound libraries, and the technology has been well validated for small molecules10. To our knowledge, we are the first group to describe acoustic dispensing for the preparation of recombinant and synthetic peptides and we have previously reported the improved accuracy compared to conventional tip-based methods1.

This article describes the integration of the preparation of peptide serial and direct dilutions by non-contact acoustic transfer onto a fully automated plate handling robotics system. A number of methods encompassing acoustic transfer of samples have been described previously11. We utilize a two-step method to prepare intermediate stock concentrations and to serially dilute peptide analogues for the generation of the full dose-response curve. The prepared peptides are incubated with cells expressing the target mouse GLP-1R, and we use a commercially available homogenous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay to measure cAMP accumulation within these cells as a readout of peptide agonist activity. The assay is robust and amenable to a high-throughput 384-well format and routinely applied to both assay development and drug screening projects12.

Protokół

1. Peptide Serial Dilution

  1. Prepare assay buffer: Hanks buffered salt solution (HBSS) supplemented with 25 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA and 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), pH 7.4.
  2. Use a bulk reagent dispenser to systematically add 5 µl of assay buffer to each well of five 384-well low volume assay plates.
    1. Use internal software to create a dispensing program for 5 µl volume addition to every well of a 384-well plate as per manufacturer's instructions.
    2. Immerse dispensing cassette tubing in assay buffer and prime fluid.
    3. Place 384-well low volume assay plate on plate carrier.
    4. Press start.
  3. Dilute all peptide samples, regardless of storage vehicle, into assay buffer to produce a 100x peptide stock.
    NOTE: Peptides requiring screening may be provided in Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as is deemed appropriate (e.g., DMSO will have a deleterious effect on peptides with secondary modifications such as PEGylation).
  4. Dispense 25 µl 100x peptide stocks into columns 1-5 of an acoustically qualified 384-well polypropylene microplate. This plate is designated 'source plate A'. Ensure that source plates, but not destination plates, are flat bottomed and conform to specific acoustic tolerances as defined by the manufacturer of acoustic instruments.
  5. Dispense 25 µl 100x reference control into wells A23 and A24 of source plate A.
  6. Dispense 10 µl assay buffer into columns 11-15 and 30 µl assay buffer into columns 21-22 of source plate A.
  7. Dispense 10 µl assay buffer into columns 6-10 and columns 16-20 of a second acoustically qualified 384-well polypropylene microplate. This plate is designated 'source plate B'.
  8. Centrifuge source plates A and B at 300 x g for 1 min. Include an appropriate balance plate.
  9. Use acoustic fluid dispensers integrated into an automated robotic system to prepare three sequential 1:100 intermediate dilutions (in assay buffer) of the 100x peptide stocks from column 1 in source A.
    NOTE: Programming requires plate reformatting and dose response software (as provided by the manufacturer of the acoustic fluid dispenser) to allow three acoustic transfers between source A and source B (see Figure 1 for plate layouts). Step 1.9 details specifically the use of fluid dispensers used in this laboratory under automated robotic control (see Materials Table):
    1. Load source plates and assay plates into plate hotel section of robotics.
    2. Open automated robotic software and load plate reformatting and dose response program expansion protocols. Click 'Run'.
      NOTE: Automation instructs an acoustic fluid dispenser to transfer 250 nl from columns 1-5 of source plate A into columns 6-10 of source plate B, and a second acoustic fluid dispenser capable of handling larger fluid volumes to backfill with 15 µl assay buffer to mix. Automation then transfers source plate B to integrated centrifuge and centrifuges at 300 x g for 1 min (an appropriate balance plate is included for all centrifugation steps). Source plate B is returned to the acoustic fluid dispenser for the transfer of 250 nl from columns 6-10 of source plate B into columns 11-15 of source plate A and backfill with 15 µl assay buffer to mix. Automation transfers source plate A to integrated centrifuge and centrifuges at 300 x g for 1 min. Source plate A is then returned to the acoustic fluid dispenser for the transfer of 250 nl from columns 11-15 of source plate A into columns 16-20 of source plate B and backfill with 15 µl assay buffer to mix. Automation then transfers source plate B to integrated centrifuge and centrifuges at 300 x g for 1 min.
      NOTE: Finally the dose response protocol directs acoustic dispensing to transfer the required volume from each of the 4 serially diluted source plate wells (in both source plate A and source plate B) to construct a full 11-point curve in duplicate in assay plates (pre-filled with 5 µl assay buffer in step 1.2 above). Automation transfers assay plate to integrated centrifuge and centrifuges at 300 x g for 1 min.

2. Cell Preparation

  1. Thaw cryopreserved Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the target mouse GLP-1 receptor rapidly in a 37 ºC water bath and resuspend in 20 ml assay buffer.
  2. Centrifuge cell suspension for 5 min at 200 x g at room temperature (RT). Include an appropriate balance.
  3. Discard supernatant and resuspend cell pellet in 10 ml assay buffer.
  4. Dilute cell stock 1:1 in Trypan blue and determine viable cell density using an automated cell counter. Resuspend cells in assay buffer at 1.6 x 106 cells per ml (equivalent to 8,000 cells per well of assay plates).
  5. Use a bulk reagent dispenser to add 5 µl of cell suspension to each well of the assay plates (containing serially diluted peptides in 5 µl assay buffer) and incubate at RT for 30 min.

3. HTRF cAMP Detection Assay

  1. Bring HTRF cAMP assay kit to RT for 30 min prior to use.
  2. Prepare each HTRF reagent (cryptate and d2) separately at 1:20 dilution in lysis buffer (proprietary formulation, provided by manufacturer of cAMP detection assay).
    NOTE: CAUTION: Lysis buffer contains potassium fluoride (KF) which is toxic and a teratogen13. For disposal, assay plates containing KF should be sealed and incinerated, and any liquid waste must be diluted to <1 mmol/L with water prior to disposal down the sink.
  3. Use a bulk reagent dispenser to add 5 µl cryptate reagent to all wells of the assay plates.
  4. Use a bulk reagent dispenser to add 5 µl d2 reagent to columns 1-22 of the assay plates.
  5. Immediately manually pipette 5 µl lysis buffer into wells A23-D24 of the assay plates to give non-specific binding (NSB) control wells, and 5 µl of d2 reagent into wells E23-P24.
  6. Centrifuge the assay plates for 1 min at 200 x g at RT to mix the wells.
  7. Cover the assay plates to minimize evaporation and photo-bleaching and incubate at RT for 1 hr.
  8. Measure fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) signal using excitation at 320 nm and emission at 620 nm and 665 nm using a plate reader.

4. Data Analysis

  1. Use mean NSB to subtract background from all wells.
  2. Calculate %Delta F from the 665 nm/620 nm ratio as follows:
    Ratio = (A665nm/A620nm) x 104
    Delta F = ((Sample Ratio - RatioNSB)/RatioNSB)) x 100
    where RatioNSB = wells with no d2 reagent.
  3. Calculate % activation between unstimulated cells and cells stimulated with maximum GLP-1 ligand as follows:
    % activation = (%Delta Fsample - %DeltaFunstimulated cells)/(%DeltaFGLP-1 stimulated cells - %DeltaF unstimulated cells) x 100
  4. Analyze concentration-response curves via 4-parameter logistical analysis, and graph as % activation as defined by reference control1.

Wyniki

We routinely use a two-step method to dilute peptides via acoustic transfer. For the first step, an acoustic dispenser aligned with automation is used to create four stock peptide intermediate dilutions across two source plates (Figure 1a, b). For the second step, we use an acoustic dispenser to further dilute stock dilutions from source plates A and B to create an 11-point concentration range for each test peptide (Figure 1c). Each pepti...

Dyskusje

This protocol describes the successful application of automated acoustic dispensing to serially dilute peptide samples over a concentration range of 3 x 106 requiring less than 1 µl of sample. The major advantage of this method is to increase data quality through minimizing peptide adsorption to plasticware via reduced exposure of samples to experimental containers and plasticware (such as pipette tips) that are normally required for reagent transfer and mixing. While acoustic dispensing does not complete...

Ujawnienia

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Podziękowania

None.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Hanks’ Balanced Salt solutionSigma-AldrichH8264
HEPESSigma-AldrichH3375
Bovine Serum AlbuminSigma-AldrichA9418
3-Isobutyl-1-methylxanthineSigma-AldrichI7018Prepared as a 0.5 M stock in DMSO
GLP-1 (7-36) amideBachemH-6795Prepared as a 1 mg/ml stock in PBS, referred to as '100x reference control'
Test peptidesProduced in-house at MedImmuneSupplied at various concentrations in DMSO or PBS as appropriate
100x peptide stockProduced in-house at MedImmuneTest peptide diluted into assay buffer to 100x final required concentration
Trypan Blue Solution, 0.4%Thermo Fisher Scientific15250-061
Cedex XS Cell AnalyzerInnovatis
Corning 384 well plates, low volumeSigma-Aldrich4514
Echo Qualified 384-Well Polypropylene MicroplateLabcyte Inc.P-05525
Echo Qualified ReservoirLabcyte Inc.ER-0055
Echo 550 Liquid HandlerLabcyte Inc.Droplet transfer volumes in increments of 2.5 nl
Echo 525 Liquid HandlerLabcyte Inc.Droplet transfer volumes in increments of 25 nl
ACell Benchtop Automation HighRes BiosolutionsMC522
Cellario Lab Automation Scheduling software for Life Science RoboticsHighRes Biosolutions
MultidropCombi Reagent DispenserThermFisher Scientific5840300Referred to as 'bulk reagent dispenser'
HTRF cAMP Dynamic 2 kitCisbio Bioassays62AM4PEJ
EnVision Multilabel ReaderPerkinElmer

Odniesienia

  1. Naylor, J., Rossi, A., Hornigold, D. C. Acoustic Dispensing Preserves the Potency of Therapeutic Peptides throughout the Entire Drug Discovery Workflow. J.Lab.Autom. 21 (1), 90-96 (2016).
  2. Campbell, J. E., Drucker, D. J. Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of incretin hormone action. Cell.Metab. 17 (6), 819-837 (2013).
  3. Hui, H., Farilla, L., Merkel, P., Perfetti, R. The short half-life of glucagon-like peptide-1 in plasma does not reflect its long-lasting beneficial effects. Eur.J.Endocrinol. 146 (6), 863-869 (2002).
  4. Harris, D., Olechno, J., Datwani, S., Ellson, R. Gradient, contact-free volume transfers minimize compound loss in dose-response experiments. J.Biomol.Screen. 15 (1), 86-94 (2010).
  5. Ekins, S., Olechno, J., Williams, A. J. Dispensing Processes Impact Apparent Biological Activity as Determined by Computational and Statistical Analyses. PLoS ONE. 8 (5), 62325 (2013).
  6. Goebel-Stengel, M., Stengel, A., Tache, Y., Reeve, J. R. The importance of using the optimal plasticware and glassware in studies involving peptides. Anal.Biochem. 414 (1), 38-46 (2011).
  7. McDonald, G. R., et al. Bioactive Contaminants Leach from Disposable Laboratory Plasticware. Science. 322 (5903), 917 (2008).
  8. Belaiche, C., Holt, A., Saada, A. Nonylphenol ethoxylate plastic additives inhibit mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I. Clin Chem. 55 (10), 1883-1884 (2009).
  9. Sackmann, E. K., et al. Technologies That Enable Accurate and Precise Nano- to Milliliter-Scale Liquid Dispensing of Aqueous Reagents Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection. J.Lab.Autom. 21 (1), 166-177 (2016).
  10. Grant, R. J., et al. Achieving accurate compound concentration in cell-based screening: validation of acoustic droplet ejection technology. J.Biomol.Screen. 14 (5), 452-459 (2009).
  11. Turmel, M., Itkin, Z., Liu, D., Nie, D. An Innovative Way to Create Assay Ready Plates for Concentration Response Testing Using Acoustic Technology. J.Lab.Autom. 15 (4), 297-305 (2010).
  12. Butler, R., et al. Use of the site-specific retargeting jump-in platform cell line to support biologic drug discovery. J.Biomol.Screen. 20 (4), 528-535 (2015).
  13. Panchal, S., Verma, R. J. Effect of sodium fluoride in maternal and offspring rats and its amelioration. Asian Pac.J.Reprod. 3 (1), 71-76 (2014).
  14. Hanson, S. M., Ekins, S., Chodera, J. D. Modeling error in experimental assays using the bootstrap principle: understanding discrepancies between assays using different dispensing technologies. J.Comput. Aided Mol.Des. 29 (12), 1073-1086 (2015).
  15. Harris, D., Olechno, J., Datwani, S., Ellson, R. Gradient, Contact-Free Volume Transfers Minimize Compound Loss in Dose-Response Experiments. J.Biomol. Screen. 15 (1), 86-94 (2010).
  16. Chan, G. K. Y., Wilson, S., Schmidt, S., Moffat, J. G. Unlocking the potential of high-throughput drug combination assays using acoustic dispensing. J.Lab.Autom. 21 (1), 125-132 (2016).
  17. Roberts, K., et al. Implementation and challenges of direct acoustic dosing into cell-based assays. J.Lab.Autom. 21 (1), 76-89 (2016).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Automated Acoustic DispensingSerial DilutionPeptide AgonistsPotency Determination AssaysPeptide AbsorptionPlasticwareDrug DiscoveryAssay BufferAcoustic Fluid DispensersIntermediate Dilutions

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone