Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
We provide protocols for evaluation of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from dental pulp and prostate cancer cell interactions based on direct and indirect co-culture methods. Condition medium and trans-well membranes are suitable to analyze indirect paracrine activity. Seeding differentially stained cells together is an appropriate model for direct cell-cell interaction.
Cancer as a multistep process and complicated disease is not only regulated by individual cell proliferation and growth but also controlled by tumor environment and cell-cell interactions. Identification of cancer and stem cell interactions, including changes in extracellular environment, physical interactions, and secreted factors, might enable the discovery of new therapy options. We combine known co-culture techniques to create a model system for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and cancer cell interactions. In the current study, dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) and PC-3 prostate cancer cell interactions were examined by direct and indirect co-culture techniques. Condition medium (CM) obtained from DPSCs and 0.4 µm pore sized trans-well membranes were used to study paracrine activity. Co-culture of different cell types together was performed to study direct cell-cell interaction. The results revealed that CM increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis in prostate cancer cell cultures. Both CM and trans-well system increased cell migration capacity of PC-3 cells. Cells stained with different membrane dyes were seeded into the same culture vessels, and DPSCs participated in a self-organized structure with PC-3 cells under this direct co-culture condition. Overall, the results indicated that co-culture techniques could be useful for cancer and MSC interactions as a model system.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), with the ability of differentiation and contribution to regeneration of mesenchymal tissues such as bone, cartilage, muscle, ligament, tendon, and adipose, have been isolated from almost all tissues in the adult body1,2. Other than providing tissue homeostasis by producing resident cells in case of chronic inflammation or an injury, they produce vital cytokines and growth factors to orchestrate angiogenesis, immune system, and tissue remodeling3. The interaction of MSCs with cancer tissue is not well-understood, but accumulating evidence suggests that MSCs might promote tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis4.
The homing ability of MSCs to the injured or chronically inflamed area makes them a valuable candidate for stem cell-based therapies. However, cancer tissues, "never healing wounds", also release inflammatory cytokines, pro-angiogenic molecules, and vital growth factors, which attract MSCs to the cancerogenous area5. While there are limited reports showing inhibitory effects of MSCs on cancer growth6,7, their cancer progression and metastasis promoting effects have been extensively reported8. MSCs directly or indirectly affect carcinogenesis in different ways including suppressing immune cells, secreting growth factors/cytokines that support cancer cell proliferation and migration, enhancing angiogenic activity, and regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)9,10. Tumor environment consists of several cell types including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and/or myofibroblasts, endothelial cells, adipocytes, and immune cells11. Of those, CAFs are the most abundant cell type in the tumor area that secrete various chemokines promoting cancer growth and metastasis8. It has been shown that bone marrow-derived MSCs can differentiate into CAFs in the tumor stroma12.
Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), characterized as the first dental tissue-derived MSCs by Gronthos et al.13 in 2000 and then widely investigated by others14,15, express pluripotency markers such as Oct4, Sox2, and Nanog16 and can differentiate into various cell linages17. Gene and protein expression analysis proved that DPSCs produce comparable levels of growth factors/cytokines with other MSCs such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin, fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-6, IL-10, and stem cell factor (SCF), as well as fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 ligand (Flt-3L) that might promote angiogenesis, modulate immune cells, and support cancer cell proliferation and migration18,19,20. While the interactions of MSCs with cancer environment have been well-documented in the literature, the relationship between DPSCs and cancer cells has not been evaluated yet. In the present study, we established co-culture and condition medium treatment strategies for a highly metastatic prostate cancer cell line, PC-3, and DPSCs to propose potential action of mechanism of dental MSCs in cancer progression and metastasis.
Written informed consent of the patients was obtained after the approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee.
1. DPSC Isolation and Culture
2. Characterization of DPSCs
3. Preparation of Condition Medium (CM)
4. Treatment of Cancer Cells with CM
5. Cell Migration by Indirect Contact of Cancer Cells and DPSCs
6. Co-culture Assay and Flow Cytometry Analysis
Figure 1 depicts the general MSC characteristics of DPSCs under culture conditions. DPSCs exert fibroblast-like cell morphology after plating (Figure 1B). MSC surface antigens (CD29, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166) are highly expressed while hematopoietic markers (CD34, CD45, and CD14) are negative (Figure 1C). Changes at the morphological and molecular level related to osteo-, chondro-, and adipo-geni...
Contribution of MSCs to tumor environment is regulated by several interactions including hybrid cell generation via cell fusions, entosis or cytokine and chemokine activities between stem cells and cancer cells28. Structural organization, cell-cell interactions, and secreted factors determine cancer cell behavior in terms of tumor promotion, progression, and metastasis to surrounding tissue. Proper ex vivo model systems to investigate the mechanisms behind the interactions of res...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This study was supported by Yeditepe University. All data and figures used in this article were previously published34.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
DMEM | Invitrogen | 11885084 | For cell culture |
FBS | Invitrogen | 16000044 | For cell culture |
PSA | Lonza | 17-745E | For cell culture |
Trypsin | Invitrogen | 25200056 | For cell dissociation |
PBS | Invitrogen | 10010023 | For washes |
Dexamethasone | Sigma | D4902 | Component of differentiation media |
β-Glycerophosphate | Sigma | G9422 | Component of osteogenic differentiation medium |
Ascorbic acid | Sigma | A4544 | Component of osteo- and chondro-genic differentiation medium |
Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (ITS −G) | Invitrogen | 41400045 | Component of chondrogenic differentiation medium |
TGF-β | Sigma | SRP3171 | Component of chondrogenic differentiation medium |
Insulin | Sigma | I6634 | Component of adipogenic differentiation medium |
Isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX) | Sigma | I7018 | Component of adipogenic differentiation medium |
Indomethacin | Sigma | I7378 | Component of adipogenic differentiation medium |
MTS Reagent | Promega | G3582 | Cell viability analyses |
TUNEL Assay | Sigma | 11684795910 | Apoptotic analyses |
24-well plate inserts | Corning | 3396 | For trans-well migration assay |
PKH67 | Sigma | PKH67GL | For co-culture cell staining |
PKH26 | Sigma | PKH26GL | For co-culture cell staining |
Paraformaldehyde | Sigma | P6148 | For cell fixation |
von Kossa Kit | BioOptica | 04-170801.A | For cell staining (differentiation) |
Alcian blue | Sigma | A2899 | For cell staining (differentiation) |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone