Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
* Wspomniani autorzy wnieśli do projektu równy wkład.
The protocol presented here shows a technique to create a rodent model of brain injury. The method described here uses laser irradiation and targets motor cortex.
A common technique for inducing stroke in experimental rodent models involves the transient (often denoted as MCAO-t) or permanent (designated as MCAO-p) occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) using a catheter. This generally accepted technique, however, has some limitations, thereby limiting its extensive use. Stroke induction by this method is often characterized by high variability in the localization and size of the ischemic area, periodical occurrences of hemorrhage, and high death rates. Also, the successful completion of any of the transient or permanent procedures requires expertise and often lasts for about 30 minutes. In this protocol, a laser irradiation technique is presented that can serve as an alternative method for inducing and studying brain injury in rodent models.
When compared to rats in the control and MCAO groups, the brain injury by laser induction showed reduced variability in body temperature, infarct volume, brain edema, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Furthermore, the use of a laser-induced injury caused damage to the brain tissues only in the motor cortex unlike in the MCAO experiments where destruction of both the motor cortex and striatal tissues is observed.
Findings from this investigation suggest that laser irradiation could serve as an alternative and effective technique for inducing brain injury in the motor cortex. The method also shortens the time for completing the procedure and does not require expert handlers.
Globally, stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability1. Stroke also leads to severe disability, often requiring extra care from medical staff and relatives. There is, therefore, a need to understand the complications associated with the disorder and improve the potential for more positive outcomes.
The use of animal models is the initial step to understanding diseases. To ensure the best research outcomes, a typical model would include a simple technique, affordability, high reproducibility, and minimal variability. The determinants in ischemic stroke models include brain edema volume, infarct size, the extent of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, and functional impairment generally evaluated via neurological severity score2.
The most widely used stroke induction technique in rodent models occludes the middle cerebral artery (MCA) transiently or permanently3. This technique produces a stroke model similar to the ones in humans: it has a penumbra surrounding the stroked area, is highly reproducible, and regulates ischemia duration and reperfusion4. Nevertheless, the MCAO method has some complications. The technique is prone to intracranial hemorrhage and injury to the ipsilateral retina with a dysfunction of the visual cortex and common hyperthermia that often lead to additional outcomes5,6,7. Other limitations include high variations in induced stroke (arising from the probable extension of the ischemia to unintended regions, like the external carotid artery region), insufficient occlusion of the MCA, and premature reperfusion. Also, rats of different strains and sizes exhibit various infarct volumes8. In addition to all the disadvantages mentioned, MCAO model cannot induce small isolated strokes in deep brain areas, because it is limited technically in terms of its requirement of minimum vessel size for catheterization. This makes the need for an alternative model all the more critical. Another method, photothrombosis, provides a possible alternative to MCAO procedures but does not improve on the efficiency9. This technique targets stroke with light and offers some improvements on the previous models. However, photothrombosis requires an invasive craniotomy that is associated with secondary compications9.
In the light of outlined shortcomings, the protocol presented here provides a capable alternative laser technique for inducing brain injury in rodents. The mechanism of action of the laser technique is based on the laser’s photothermal effects imparted on living tissues, which leads to the absorption of light beams by body tissues and their conversion into heat. The advantages of using a laser technique are its safety and ease of manipulation. A laser’s ability to produce heat to stop bleeding makes it very important in medicine, while its ability to amplify different beams at a given meet point ensures that lasers avoid destroying healthy tissues that stands in the way of the target point10. The laser beam used in this protocol can pass through a low liquid medium, such as bone, without emitting its energy and/or causing any destruction. Once it reaches a high liquid medium, such as brain tissues, it uses up its energy to destroy the target tissues. The technique, therefore, can induce brain injury only in the appropriate area of the brain.
The technique presented here showed a tremendous amount of ability to regulate its levels of irradiation, producing the chosen variations of brain injury intended from the start. Unlike the original MCAO that impacts both the cortex and striatum, the laser technique was able to regulate the impact of brain injury, inducing injury only on the intended motor cortex. Herein, the laser-induced brain injury protocol and a summary of representative results for the procedure performed on the cerebral cortex of rats are provided.
The following procedure was conducted according to the Guidelines of the Use of Experimental Animals of the European Community. The experiments were also approved by the Animal Care Committee at the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
1. Animal selection and preparation
2. MCAO procedure
3. Laser-induced brain injury experimental procedure
4. Neurological severity score (NSS)
5. Post-injury manipulations
6. Evaluation of the brain injury
No deaths or SAH were registered in either the control or experimental groups (Table 1). The MCAO group had a 20% rate of both mortality and SAH.
The relative body temperature changes in the rats of both groups were also similar, despite a difference in the variability of both groups (Table 1).
There was a significantly worse NSS in both the laser (16 ± 1.1) and MCAO (20 ± 1.5) models, compared to the sham-operated control...
It is fair to assume that the laser technique is minimally invasive, given that no deaths or SAH occurred in the laser group. The primary cause of death and SAH is the damage to blood vessels that leads to an elevation of intracranial pressure (ICP), as shown in the original MCAO techniques10. The absence of death and SAH in the laser group is likely due to the specific effects of lasers: they do not have direct impact on blood vessels and can induce coagulation in case of leakage. Low infarct vol...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We would like to thank the Department of Anesthesiology of Soroka University Medical Center and the laboratory staff of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev for their help in the performance of this experiment.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride | SIGMA - ALDRICH | 298-96-4 | |
50% trichloroacetic acid | SIGMA - ALDRICH | 76-03-9 | |
Brain & Tissue Matrices | SIGMA - ALDRICH | 15013 | |
Cannula Venflon 22 G | KD-FIX | 1.83604E+11 | |
Centrifuge Sigma 2-16P | SIGMA - ALDRICH | Sigma 2-16P | |
Compact Analytical Balances | SIGMA - ALDRICH | HR-AZ/HR-A | |
Digital Weighing Scale | SIGMA - ALDRICH | Rs 4,000 | |
Dissecting scissors | SIGMA - ALDRICH | Z265969 | |
Eppendorf pipette | SIGMA - ALDRICH | Z683884 | |
Eppendorf Tube | SIGMA - ALDRICH | EP0030119460 | |
Ethanol 96 % | ROMICAL | Flammable Liquid | |
Evans Blue 2% | SIGMA - ALDRICH | 314-13-6 | |
Fluorescence detector | Tecan, Männedorf Switzerland | model Infinite 200 PRO multimode reader | |
Heater with thermometer | Heatingpad-1 | Model: HEATINGPAD-1/2 | |
Infusion Cuff | ABN | IC-500 | |
Isofluran, USP 100% | Piramamal Critical Care, Inc | NDC 66794-017 | |
Multiset | TEVA MEDICAL | 998702 | |
Olympus BX 40 microscope | Olympus | ||
Optical scanner | Canon | Cano Scan 4200F | |
Petri dishes | SIGMA - ALDRICH | P5606 | |
Scalpel blades 11 | SIGMA - ALDRICH | S2771 | |
Sharplan 3000 Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) laser machine | Laser Industries Ltd | ||
Stereotaxic head holder | KOPF | 900LS | |
Sterile Syringe 2 ml | Braun | 4606027V | |
Syringe-needle 27 G | Braun | 305620 |
An erratum was issued for: Laser-Induced Brain Injury in the Motor Cortex of Rats. The Authors section was updated.
One of the author names was updated from:
Dmitri Frank
to
Dmitry Frank
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone