JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Mitochondria contain several flavin-dependent enzymes that can produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Monitoring ROS release from individual sites in mitochondria is challenging due to unwanted side reactions. We present an easy, inexpensive method for direct assessment of native rates for ROS release using purified flavoenzymes and microplate fluorometry.

Abstract

It has been reported that mitochondria can contain up to 12 enzymatic sources of reactive oxygen species (ROS). A majority of these sites include flavin-dependent respiratory complexes and dehydrogenases that produce a mixture of superoxide (O2●-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Accurate quantification of the ROS-producing potential of individual sites in isolated mitochondria can be challenging due to the presence of antioxidant defense systems and side reactions that also form O2●-/H2O2. Use of nonspecific inhibitors that can disrupt mitochondrial bioenergetics can also compromise measurements by altering ROS release from other sites of production. Here, we present an easy method for the simultaneous measurement of H2O2 release and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) production by purified flavin-linked dehydrogenases. For our purposes here, we have used purified pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC) and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (KGDHC) of porcine heart origin as examples. This method allows for an accurate measure of native H2O2 release rates by individual sites of production by eliminating other potential sources of ROS and antioxidant systems. In addition, this method allows for a direct comparison of the relationship between H2O2 release and enzyme activity and the screening of the effectiveness and selectivity of inhibitors for ROS production. Overall, this approach can allow for the in-depth assessment of native rates of ROS release for individual enzymes prior to conducting more sophisticated experiments with isolated mitochondria or permeabilized muscle fiber.

Introduction

The ultimate goal of nutrient metabolism is to make adenosine triphosphate (ATP). In mammalian cells, this occurs in mitochondria, double-membraned organelles that convert the energy stored in carbon into ATP. The production of ATP begins when carbon is combusted by mitochondria forming two electron carriers, NADH and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2)1. NADH and FADH2 are then oxidized by multi-subunit respiratory complexes I and II, respectively, and the liberated electrons are ferried to the terminal electron acceptor molecular oxygen (O2) at complex IV1. The thermodynamically favorable "downhill" transfer of electrons to O2 at the end of the chain is coupled to the export of protons into the intermembrane space by complexes I, III, and IV. This creates a transmembrane electrochemical gradient of protons (proton-motive force), a temporary form of Gibbs free energy that is tapped by complex V to make ATP2. Electron transfer reactions in mitochondria are not perfectly coupled to ATP production. At various points in the Krebs cycle and the respiratory chain, electrons can prematurely interact with O2 to form ROS3. The most biologically relevant ROS generated by mitochondria are O2●- and H2O2. Although O2●- is often considered the proximal ROS formed by mitochondria, it is now evident that sites of production form a mixture of O2●- and H2O2, which is associated with the free radical chemistry of flavin prosthetic groups4,5. At high levels, ROS can be dangerous, damaging biological constituents required for cell function resulting in oxidative distress6. However, at low amounts, mitochondrial ROS fulfill vital signaling functions. For instance, H2O2 release from mitochondria has been implicated in controlling T-cell activation, stress signaling (e.g., induction of Nrf2 signaling pathways), the induction of cell proliferation and differentiation, insulin signaling and release, and feeding behavior7. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the signaling function of ROS. However, important questions still remain in regard to which enzymes in mitochondria serve as the most important sources and how production is controlled.

ROS release by a site of production depends on several factors: 1) the concentration of the electron donating site, 2) the redox state of the electron donating site, 3) access to oxygen, and 4) the concentration and type of oxidation substrate3,8,9. In mitochondria, other factors like the concentration of NADH and membrane potential strength also influence ROS production8,10. For example, the rate of O2●-/H2O2 production by purified PDHC or KGDHC increases with increasing NADH availability5,11. In this scenario, electrons are flowing backwards from NADH to the FAD center in the E3 subunit of PDHC or KGDHC, the site for O2●-/H2O2 production12. Similarly, the provision of NAD+ has the opposite effect, decreasing ROS release from KGDHC12. Thus, controlling entry or exit of electrons from sites of ROS production can alter how much O2●-/H2O2 is formed. For instance, blocking the E2 subunit of PDHC or KGDHC with CPI-613, a lipoic acid analog, results in an almost 90% decrease in O2●-/H2O2 production13. Similar results can be obtained with the chemical S-glutathionylation catalysts, diamide and disulfiram, which almost abolish O2●-/H2O2 production by PDHC or KGDHC via the conjugation of glutathione to the E2 subunit14. The trade-off for blocking electron flow through the E2 subunit of PDHC and KGDHC is a decrease in NADH production which diminishes ROS formation by the electron transport chain (e.g., complex III). This can also decrease ATP output by the electron transport chain. Overall, blocking electron entry to sites of ROS production can be a highly effective means of controlling O2●-/H2O2 production.

Mitochondria can contain up to 12 potential O2●-/H2O2 sources6. Most of these sites are flavin-containing enzymes which generate a mixture of O2●- and H2O2. Use of different substrate and inhibitor combinations have allowed for the identification of which respiratory complexes and mitochondrial dehydrogenases serve as high capacity O2●-/H2O2 forming sites in different tissues3. PDHC and KGDHC have been shown to serve as high capacity O2●-/H2O2 emitting sites in muscle and liver mitochondria13,15. However, some difficulties remain in regard to the examination of the O2●-/H2O2 forming potential of individual sites in mitochondria and the impact that different substrate and inhibitor combinations have on the activities of the enzymes. This is due to the presence of unwanted side reactions (e.g., formation of O2●-/H2O2 by sites other than the enzyme of interest), contaminating endogenous nutrients (e.g.,fatty acids) or organelles (e.g., peroxisomes which also form O2●-/H2O2), and use of inhibitors that lack selectivity, and/or use of compounds that do not fully inhibit ROS production. Certain inhibitors can also alter the mitochondrial bioenergetics and direction of electron flow, and this alters ROS release from other sites of production and confounds results. Absolute rates for O2●-/H2O2 release from individual sites in mitochondria are also difficult to quantify due to the high concentration of O2●- and H2O2 eliminating enzymes in the matrix and intermembrane space. Therefore, elimination of any competing reactions that can interfere with O2●-/H2O2 release measurements can be useful when identifying high capacity O2●-/H2O2 forming sites.

Here, we present a simple method that allows for the simultaneous examination of O2●-/H2O2 production and NADH formation by purified flavin-dependent dehydrogenases. By using purified enzymes, unwanted ROS forming side reactions and ROS degrading enzymes can be eliminated allowing for a more accurate measure of native O2●-/H2O2 production rates for individual flavoenzymes. This method can be used to directly compare the O2●-/H2O2 forming capacity of different purified dehydrogenases or to screen potential site-specific inhibitors for O2●-/H2O2 release. Finally, measuring O2●-/H2O2 and NADH production simultaneously can allow for a real-time assessment of the relationship between enzyme activity and ROS release capacity.

Protocol

1. Chemicals and Purified Enzymes

  1. Procure the following materials: PDHC and KGDHC of porcine heart origin (or another purified mitochondrial flavoenzyme); H2O2 (30% solution), pyruvate, α-ketoglutarate, NAD+, NADH, CoASH, thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), mannitol, HEPES, sucrose, EGTA, 3-methyl-2-oxo valeric acid (KMV), superoxide dismutase (SOD), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), 10-Acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine reagent (AUR), and CPI-613.

2. Planning the Assay and Reagent Preparation

  1. Set up the assay according to Table 1 in a 96-well plate.
    NOTE: The total volume for each reaction is 200 µL. Stock concentrations are adjusted such that 20 µL of reagent is added to each well. This ensures rapid addition of cofactors and substrates to each reaction well prior to starting the assay.
  2. Prepare reaction buffer containing 220 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 1 mM EGTA, and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4 with HCl).
    NOTE: This could change depending on the physical properties of different purified enzymes.
  3. Examine the purified KGDHC or PDHC for contamination using enzyme activity assays14,16,17 or by immunoblot or Coomassie stain5.
  4. Prepare all reagents in the reaction buffer as per the working solution concentrations in Table 1.
  5. Store all reagents as 1 mL aliquots at -20 °C. Store pyruvate and α-ketoglutarate at -80 °C in 100-µL aliquots to prevent spontaneous degradation due to auto-oxidation and repeated freeze-thaw.
  6. Prepare the AUR reagent master stock in 1 mL of DMSO and then dilute to 100 µM in reaction buffer. Store protected from light.
    NOTE: Here, the 100 µM working solution is made fresh every 2 to 3 weeks and protected from light.

3. Setting Up the Assay Template

  1. Set up the assay procedure on a monochromatic microplate reader with dual measurement capabilities.
  2. Define the reading procedure by selecting "PROTOCOL". Then click "PROCEDURE".
  3. Set "TEMPERATURE" to 25 °C (Figure 1A).
  4. Click "START KINETIC" to set read conditions (Figure 1A). Set the time and number of read intervals/experiments.
  5. Click "READ" (Figure 1B).
    NOTE: Samples are read from TOP position with a gain of 50. Time: 5 min, read at 30-s intervals. Channel 1: Resorufin fluorescence - excitation/emission = 565 nm:600 nm, wavelength width of 13.5 nm. Channel 2: NADH autofluorescence - excitation/emission = 376 nm:450 nm, wavelength width of 20 nm.
  6. Under "READ", select wells to monitor (e.g., A1-A4 and B1-B4).
  7. Select "END KINETIC".

4. Standard Curves

  1. Thaw the reagents and store on ice until needed.
  2. NADH standard curve (Figure 2A)
    1. Prepare the working solutions for NADH in the concentration range of 0.5-10 mM in reaction buffer.
    2. Add 20 µL aliquots from each NADH working solution concentration to wells containing 180 µL reaction buffer. The final concentration of NADH in each well is 0.05-1 mM.
    3. Click "READ" and set excitation/emission = 376 nm:450 nm, wavelength width of 20 nm.
      NOTE: This is an endpoint read only - kinetic parameters are not required.
  3. AUR standard curve (Figure 2B)
    1. Prepare the working stocks of hydrogen peroxide in reaction buffer; stock concentrations range from 200-4,000 nM.
    2. Add 120 µL of the reaction buffer to each well.
    3. Add 20 µL of HRP (working stock concentration = 30 U/mL, final concentration in the well = 3 U/mL), 20 µL of SOD (working stock concentration = 250 U/mL, final concentration in the well = 25 U/mL), and 20 µL of AUR (working stock concentration = 100 µM, final concentration in the well = 10 µM) to each well containing reaction buffer.
    4. Add 20 µL of each H2O2 working stock solution to each well containing buffer and assay reagents. The final reaction volume is 200 µL and the final concentration of H2O2 in each well is 20-400 nM.
    5. Incubate the plates for 1 min in the plate reader at 25 °C.
    6. Click "READ" and set excitation/emission = 565 nm/600 nm, wavelength width of 13.5 nm. Note that this is an endpoint read only - kinetic parameters are not required.

5. Measuring O2 ●- /H2 O2 Release and NADH Production by KGDHC and PDHC

  1. See Table 1 for the order of addition of the different reagents, the concentration of each working solution, and the volume added to each well.
  2. Add 40 µL of reaction buffer to each well. For assays using KMV or CPI-613, add 20 µL of buffer to each well.
  3. Add 20 µL of PDHC or KGDHC (working stock of 1 U/mL, final concentration per well = 0.1 U/mL) to each well.
  4. Incubate PDHC and KGDHC at 25 °C for 2 min.
  5. Add 20 µL of KMV (working stock = 100 mM, final concentration = 10 mM) or 20 µL of CPI-613 (working stock concentration = 1.5 mM, final concentration = 150 µM) (Table 2).
    NOTE: This step can be excluded if inhibitors are not being used for the assays.
  6. Incubate for 1 min at 25 °C.
    NOTE: This step can be excluded if inhibitors are not being used for the assays.
  7. Add 20 µL of HRP (working stock concentration = 30 units/mL, final concentration in the well = 3 units/mL) and 20 µL of SOD (working stock concentration = 250 units/mL, final concentration in the well = 25 units/mL) to each well.
  8. Add 20 µL of coenzyme A (working stock concentration = 1 mM, final concentration = 0.1 mM), 20 µL of TPP (working stock concentration = 3 mM, final concentration = 0.3 mM), and 20 µL of NAD+ (working stock concentration = 10 mM, final concentration = 1 mM) to each well.
  9. Remove the AUR reagent from protective tinfoil covering and add 20 µL to each well.
  10. Add 20 µL of pyruvate (working stock concentration ranging from 1-100 mM, final concentration for assays = 0.1-10 mM) to wells containing PDHC and α-ketoglutarate (working stock concentration ranging from 1-100 mM, final concentration for assays = 0.1-10 mM) to wells containing KGDHC.
  11. Click "READ" to start kinetic measurement.

6. Data Analysis

  1. Hold down the 'CTRL' button on the keyboard and click wells to generate one graph containing all kinetic measurements corresponding to channel 1 (Figure 3A).
  2. Click "data" in the view icon in the upper right corner for raw values for relative fluorescence units (RFU) measured at the different time points (Figure 3B).
  3. Export the values for analysis (Table 3).
  4. Click the "Graph" drop down menu on top right (Figure 3B) to access RFU values associated with the fluorescence channel 2.
  5. Repeat steps 6.1 to 6.3 for channel 2.

Results

Figure 3A provides a representative trace for the RFU collected during the simultaneous measurement of H2O2 and NADH production by purified KGDHC. The raw RFU data for each time interval is depicted in Figure 3B. The raw RFU data are then exported for analysis. By extrapolating from standard curves presented in Figure 2, the absolute amount of NADH and H2O2...

Discussion

This protocol is advantageous since, 1) it eliminates any competing reactions that may otherwise interfere with H2O2 detection (e.g., antioxidant systems or other sources of ROS), 2) provides a direct assessment of the native rate of ROS release by a flavin-containing mitochondrial dehydrogenase, 3) allows the comparison of the native ROS release rates of two or more purified flavin-based dehydrogenases, 4) can allow for a direct comparison of the rate of ROS release and enzyme activity, an...

Disclosures

There is nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Video production was carried out in collaboration with the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning (CITL) at Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Pyruvate dehydrogenase complexSIGMAP7032-10UNpurified flavoenzyme
alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complexSIGMAK1502-20UNpurified flavoenzyme
30% hydrogen peroxide solutionSIGMAHX0640-5reagent, standard curves
NAD+SIGMAN0632-1Greagent, activity/ROS release assay
NADHSIGMAN4505-100MGreagent, standard curves
pyruvateSIGMAP2256-5Greagent, activity/ROS release assay
alpha-ketoglutarateSIGMA75892-25Greagent, activity/ROS release assay
CoASHSIGMAC3019-25MGreagent, activity/ROS release assay
thiamine pyrophosphateSIGMAC8754-1Greagent, activity/ROS release assay
mannitolSIGMAM4125-100Gbuffer component
HepesSIGMAH3375-25Gbuffer component
sucroseSIGMAS7903-250Gbuffer component
EGTASIGMAE3889-10Gbuffer component
KMVSIGMA198978-5Greagent, ROS release inhibitor
CPI-613Santa Cruzsc-482709reagent, ROS release inhibitor
SODSIGMAS9697-15KUreagent, ROS release detection
horseradish peroxidaseSIGMAP8375-1KUreagent, ROS release detection
Amplex Ultra RedThermofisherA36006reagent, ROS release detection
Biotech Synergy 2 microplate readerBioTek Instrumentsmicroplate reader for assays
Gen5 softwareBioTek Instrumentssoftware, used for collection of raw RFU
Graphpad PrismGraphpad softwaresoftware, data analysis
Microsoft EXCELMicrosoftsoftware, data analysis

References

  1. Mailloux, R. J. Teaching the fundamentals of electron transfer reactions in mitochondria and the production and detection of reactive oxygen species. Redox Biol. 4, 381-398 (2015).
  2. Nicholls, D. G. Forty years of Mitchell's proton circuit: From little grey books to little grey cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1777 (7-8), 550-556 (2008).
  3. Brand, M. D. Mitochondrial generation of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide as the source of mitochondrial redox signaling. Free Radic Biol Med. 100, 14-31 (2016).
  4. Massey, V. Activation of molecular oxygen by flavins and flavoproteins. J Biol Chem. 269 (36), 22459-22462 (1994).
  5. Mailloux, R. J., Gardiner, D., O'Brien, M. 2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase is a more significant source of O2(.-)/H2O2 than pyruvate dehydrogenase in cardiac and liver tissue. Free Radic Biol Med. 97, 501-512 (2016).
  6. Sies, H., Berndt, C., Jones, D. P. Oxidative Stress. Annu Rev Biochem. 86, 715-748 (2017).
  7. Kuksal, N., Chalker, J., Mailloux, R. J. Review. Progress in understanding the molecular oxygen paradox - function of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in cell signaling. Biol Chem. , (2017).
  8. Murphy, M. P. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J. 417 (1), 1-13 (2009).
  9. Wong, H. S., Dighe, P. A., Mezera, V., Monternier, P. A., Brand, M. D. Production of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide from specific mitochondrial sites under different bioenergetic conditions. J Biol Chem. , (2017).
  10. Harper, M. E., Green, K., Brand, M. D. The efficiency of cellular energy transduction and its implications for obesity. Annu Rev Nutr. 28, 13-33 (2008).
  11. Ambrus, A., et al. Formation of reactive oxygen species by human and bacterial pyruvate and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase multienzyme complexes reconstituted from recombinant components. Free Radic Biol Med. 89, 642-650 (2015).
  12. Tretter, L., Adam-Vizi, V. Generation of reactive oxygen species in the reaction catalyzed by alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. J Neurosci. 24 (36), 7771-7778 (2004).
  13. Slade, L., et al. Examination of the superoxide/hydrogen peroxide forming and quenching potential of mouse liver mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1861 (8), 1960-1969 (2017).
  14. O'Brien, M., Chalker, J., Slade, L., Gardiner, D., Mailloux, R. J. Protein S-glutathionylation alters superoxide/hydrogen peroxide emission from pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Free Radic Biol Med. 106, 302-314 (2017).
  15. Quinlan, C. L., et al. The 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complexes in mitochondria can produce superoxide/hydrogen peroxide at much higher rates than complex I. J Biol Chem. 289 (12), 8312-8325 (2014).
  16. Mailloux, R. J., Craig Ayre, D., Christian, S. L. Induction of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production by GSH mediated S-glutathionylation of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase. Redox Biol. 8, 285-297 (2016).
  17. Mailloux, R. J., Gardiner, D., O'Brien, M. 2-Oxoglutarate dehydrogenase is a more significant source of O2(.-)/H2O2 than pyruvate dehydrogenase in cardiac and liver tissue. Free Radic Biol Med. 97, 501-512 (2016).
  18. Ambrus, A., Adam-Vizi, V. Human dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (E3) deficiency: Novel insights into the structural basis and molecular pathomechanism. Neurochem Int. , (2017).
  19. Young, A., Gardiner, D., Brosnan, M. E., Brosnan, J. T., Mailloux, R. J. Physiological levels of formate activate mitochondrial superoxide/hydrogen peroxide release from mouse liver mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 591 (16), 2426-2438 (2017).
  20. Fisher-Wellman, K. H., et al. Mitochondrial glutathione depletion reveals a novel role for the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex as a key H2O2-emitting source under conditions of nutrient overload. Free Radic Biol Med. 65, 1201-1208 (2013).
  21. Kussmaul, L., Hirst, J. The mechanism of superoxide production by NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) from bovine heart mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103 (20), 7607-7612 (2006).
  22. Huang, L. S., Borders, T. M., Shen, J. T., Wang, C. J., Berry, E. A. Crystallization of mitochondrial respiratory complex II from chicken heart: a membrane-protein complex diffracting to 2.0. A. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 61 (Pt 4), 380-387 (2005).
  23. Yeh, J. I., Chinte, U., Du, S. Structure of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, an essential monotopic membrane enzyme involved in respiration and metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105 (9), 3280-3285 (2008).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Mitochondrial DehydrogenasesSuperoxide hydrogen PeroxideNADH ProductionFlavin containing EnzymesPyruvate DehydrogenaseAlpha ketoglutarate DehydrogenaseMicroplate FluorometryReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntioxidantsInhibitorsSimultaneous Measurement

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved