JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Engineering

Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Polyhedrons via Origami-Like Self-Folding

Published: September 23rd, 2018

DOI:

10.3791/58500

1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States

Here, we present a protocol for fabrication of 3D graphene-based polyhedrons via origami-like self-folding.

The assembly of two-dimensional (2D) graphene into three-dimensional (3D) polyhedral structures while preserving the graphene's excellent inherent properties has been of great interest for the development of novel device applications. Here, fabrication of 3D, microscale, hollow polyhedrons (cubes) consisting of a few layers of 2D graphene or graphene oxide sheets via an origami-like self-folding process is described. This method involves the use of polymer frames and hinges, and aluminum oxide/chromium protection layers that reduce tensile, spatial, and surface tension stresses on the graphene-based membranes when the 2D nets are transformed into 3D cubes. The process offers control of the size and shape of the structures as well as parallel production. In addition, this approach allows the creation of surface modifications by metal patterning on each face of the 3D cubes. Raman spectroscopy studies show the method allows the preservation of the intrinsic properties of the graphene-based membranes, demonstrating the robustness of our method.

Two-dimensional (2D) graphene sheets possess extraordinary optical, electronic, and mechanical properties, making them model systems for the observation of novel quantum phenomena for next-generation electronic, optoelectronic, electrochemical, electromechanical, and biomedical applications1,2,3,4,5,6. Apart from the as-produced 2D layered structure of graphene, recently, various modification approaches have been investigated to observe new functionalities of graphene and ....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

CAUTION: Several of the chemicals used in these syntheses are toxic and may cause irritation and severe organ damage when touched or inhaled. Please use appropriate safety equipment and wear personal protective equipment when handling the chemicals.

1. Preparation of Aluminum Oxide and Chromium Protection Layers on a Copper Sacrificial Layer

  1. Using an electron-beam evaporator, deposit 10 nm thick chromium (Cr) and 300 nm thick copper (Cu) layers (sacrificial layer) on the silicon (S.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Figure 2 displays optical images of the lithographic processes of the 2D graphene and GO net structures and subsequent self-folding process. The self-folding process is monitored in real-time via a high-resolution microscope. Both types of 3D graphene-based cubes are folded at ~80 °C. Figure 3 lays out video captured sequences showing the self-folding of 3D graphene-based cubes in a parallel manner. Under an op.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

For the cubes fabricated with CVD graphene, because each face of a given cube is designed with an outer frame surrounding a ~160 × 160 µm2 area of free-standing graphene, a single sheet of monolayer graphene does not have the necessary strength to permit parallel processing of the cubes. For this reason, graphene membranes consisting of three layers of CVD graphene monolayer sheets are produced via three separate graphene transfers using multiple PMMA coating/removal steps. On the other hand.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

This material is based upon work supported by a start-up fund at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities and an NSF CAREER Award (CMMI-1454293). Parts of this work were carried out in the Characterization Facility at the University of Minnesota, a member of the NSF-funded Materials Research Facilities Network (via the MRSEC program. Portions of this work were conducted in the Minnesota Nano Center, which is supported by the National Science Foundation through the National Nano Coordinated Infrastructure Network (NNCI) under Award Number ECCS-1542202. C. D. acknowledges support from the 3M Science and Technology Fellowship.

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Acetone Fisher Chemical A18P-4 N/A
Aluminium oxide Kurt J. Lesker Company EVMALO-1-2.5 99.99% Pure
APS Copper Etchant 100 Transene Company, Inc. N/A N/A
Camera (for 3D image) Nikon D5100 1080p Full HD, Effective pixels: 16.2 million, Sensorsize: 23.6 mm x 15.6 mm
CE-5 M Chromium Mask Etchant Transene Company, Inc. N/A N/A
Chemical deposition growth (CVD) system Customized N/A Lindberg/Blue Tube Furnace
Chromium Kurt J. Lesker Company EVMCR35J 99.95% pure
Chromium Etchant 473 Transene Company, Inc. N/A N/A
Copper Kurt J. Lesker Company EVMCU40QXQJ 99.99% pure
Developer-1 (MF319 developer) Microposit 10018042 N/A
Developer-2 (AZ developer) Merck performance Materials Corp. 1005422496 N/A
Developer-3 (SU-8 developer) MicroChem NC9901158 N/A
Digital Hot Plate Thermo Scientific HP131725 Super-Nuvoa series, maximum temperature: 370 °C
E-Beam Evaporator System Rocky Mountain Vacuum Tech. N/A RME-2000
Graphene oxide Goographene N/A Purity: ~ 99%; Single layer ratio: ~99%;  0.7-1.2 nm in thickness.
Isopropyl Alcohol Fisher Chemical A416-4 N/A
Mask Aligner Midas MDA-400LJ N/A
Microscope Omax NJF-120A N/A
multiple polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) MicroChem 950 PMMA A9 N/A
Oxygen plasma  Technics Inc. SERIES 800 Microscale reactive ion etching (RIE)
Photoresist-1 (S1813 Photoresist) Microposit 10018348 N/A
Photoresist-2 (SPR220 Photoresist) MicroChem SPR00220-7G N/A
Photoresist-3 (SU-8 Photoresist) MicroChem SU-8-2010 N/A
Profilometer Tencor Instruments N/A Alpha-Step 200
Raman WITec Instruments Corp. Alpha300R Confocal Raman Microscope
Silicon Wafer Siltronic AG N/A 100mm diameter, N-type, one-side polish, resitivity: 560-840 Ω•cm
Spinner Best Tools S0114031123 SMART COATER 100
Titanium Kurt J. Lesker Company EVMTI45QXQA 99.99% Pure
Ultrasonic Cleaner Crest Ultrasonics N/A Powersonic series

  1. Geim, A. K., Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nature Materials. 6 (3), 183-191 (2007).
  2. Singh, V., et al. Graphene based materials: Past, present and future. Progress in Materials Science. 56 (8), 1178-1271 (2011).
  3. Bonaccorso, F., Sun, Z., Hasan, T., Ferrari, A. C. Graphene photonics and optoelectronics. Nature Photonics. 4 (9), 611-622 (2010).
  4. Wang, C., Li, D., Too, C. O., Wallace, G. G. Electrochemical Properties of Graphene Paper Electrodes Used in Lithium Batteries. Chemistry of Materials. 21 (13), 2604-2606 (2009).
  5. Bunch, J. S., et al. Electromechanical resonators from graphene sheets. Science. 315 (5811), 490-493 (2007).
  6. Menaa, F., Abdelghani, A., Menaa, B. Graphene nanomaterials as biocompatible and conductive scaffolds for stem cells: impact for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative. 9 (12), 1321-1338 (2015).
  7. Han, M. Y., Özyilmaz, B., Zhang, Y., Kim, P. Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Physical Review Letters. 98 (20), 206805 (2007).
  8. Son, Y. W., Cohen, M. L., Louie, S. G. Half-metallic graphene nanoribbons. Nature. 444 (7117), 347-349 (2006).
  9. Yan, Q., et al. Intrinsic current− voltage characteristics of graphene nanoribbon transistors and effect of edge doping. Nano Letters. 7 (6), 1469-1473 (2007).
  10. Fei, Z., et al. Gate-tuning of graphene plasmons revealed by infrared nano-imaging. Nature. 487 (7405), 82-85 (2012).
  11. Joung, D., Zhai, L., Khondaker, S. I. Coulomb blockade and hopping conduction in graphene quantum dots array. Physical Review. B. 83 (11), 115323 (2011).
  12. Bacon, M., Bradley, S. J., Nann, T. Graphene quantum dots. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. 31 (4), 415-428 (2014).
  13. Blees, M. K., et al. Graphene kirigami. Nature. 524 (7564), 204-207 (2015).
  14. Michael Cai, W., et al. Mechanical instability driven self-assembly and architecturing of 2D materials. 2D Materials. 4 (2), 022002 (2017).
  15. Shenoy, V. B., Gracias, D. H. Self-folding thin-film materials: From nanopolyhedra to graphene origami. MRS Bulletin. 37 (9), 847-854 (2012).
  16. Zhu, S., Li, T. Hydrogenation-Assisted Graphene Origami and Its Application in Programmable Molecular Mass Uptake, Storage, and Release. ACS Nano. 8 (3), 2864-2872 (2014).
  17. Zhang, L., Zeng, X., Wang, X. Programmable hydrogenation of graphene for novel nanocages. Scientific Reports. 3, 3162 (2013).
  18. Vickery, J. L., Patil, A. J., Mann, S. Fabrication of Graphene-Polymer Nanocomposites With Higher-Order Three-Dimensional Architectures. Advanced Materials. 21 (21), 2180-2184 (2009).
  19. Yang, X., Zhu, J., Qiu, L., Li, D. Bioinspired effective prevention of restacking in multilayered graphene films: towards the next generation of high-performance supercapacitors. Advanced Materials. 23 (25), 2833-2838 (2011).
  20. Choi, B. G., Yang, M., Hong, W. H., Choi, J. W., Huh, Y. S. 3D macroporous graphene frameworks for supercapacitors with high energy and power densities. ACS Nano. 6 (5), 4020-4028 (2012).
  21. Niu, Z., Chen, J., Hng, H. H., Ma, J., Chen, X. A leavening strategy to prepare reduced graphene oxide foams. Advanced Materials. 24 (30), 4144-4150 (2012).
  22. Li, Y., et al. Growth of conformal graphene cages on micrometre-sized silicon particles as stable battery anodes. Nature Energy. 1 (2), (2016).
  23. Cho, J. H., Gracias, D. H. Self-Assembly of Lithographically Patterned Nanoparticles. Nano Letters. 9 (12), 4049-4052 (2009).
  24. Cho, J. H., Azam, A., Gracias, D. H. Three Dimensional Nanofabrication Using Surface Forces. Langmuir. 26 (21), 16534-16539 (2010).
  25. Dai, C., Cho, J. H. In Situ Monitored Self-Assembly of Three-Dimensional Polyhedral Nanostructures. Nano Letters. 16 (6), 3655-3660 (2016).
  26. Joung, D., et al. Self-Assembled Multifunctional 3D Microdevices. Advanced Electronic Materials. 2 (6), 1500459 (2016).
  27. Joung, D., Gu, T., Cho, J. H. Tunable Optical Transparency in Self-Assembled Three-Dimensional Polyhedral Graphene Oxide. ACS Nano. 10 (10), 9586-9594 (2016).
  28. Joung, D., et al. Self-Assembled Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Polyhedrons Inducing Volumetric Light Confinement. Nano Letters. 17 (3), 1987-1994 (2017).
  29. Lian, K., Ling, Z. G., Liu, C. Thermal stability of SU-8 fabricated microstructures as a function of photo initiator and exposure doses. Proceedings of SPIE. 4980, 209 (2003).
  30. Winterstein, T., et al. SU-8 electrothermal actuators: Optimization of fabrication and excitation for long-term use. Micromachines. 5 (4), 1310-1322 (2014).
  31. Syms, R. R. A., Yeatman, E. M., Bright, V. M., Whitesides, G. M. Surface tension-powered self-assembly of microstructures - the state-of-the-art. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. 12 (4), 387-417 (2003).
  32. Xie, X., et al. Controlled fabrication of high-quality carbon nanoscrolls from monolayer graphene. Nano Letters. 9 (7), 2565-2570 (2009).
  33. Ferrari, A. C., Basko, D. M. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nature Nanotechnology. 8 (4), 235-246 (2013).
  34. Childres, I., Jauregui, L. A., Park, W., Cao, H., Chen, Y. P., Jang, J. I. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and related materials. New developments in photon and materials research. , (2013).
  35. Polsen, E. S., McNerny, D. Q., Viswanath, B., Pattinson, S. W., Hart, A. J. High-speed roll-to-roll manufacturing of graphene using a concentric tube CVD reactor. Scientific Reports. , 5 (2015).
  36. Wu, T., Shen, H., Sun, L., You, J., Yue, Z. Three step fabrication of graphene at low temperature by remote plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. RSC Advances. 3 (24), 9544-9549 (2013).
  37. Liu, C., Schauff, J., Joung, D., Cho, J. H. Remotely controlled microscale 3D self-assembly using microwave energy. Advanced Materials Technologies. 2 (8), 1700035 (2017).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved