JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Zebrafish embryos are used for evaluating the toxicity of chemical compounds. They develop externally and are sensitive to chemicals, allowing detection of subtle phenotypic changes. The experiment only requires a small amount of compound, which is directly added to the plate containing embryos, making the testing system efficient and cost-effective.

Abstract

The zebrafish is a widely used vertebrate model organism for the disease and phenotype-based drug discovery. The zebrafish generates many offspring, has transparent embryos and rapid external development. Zebrafish embryos can, therefore, also be used for the rapid evaluation of toxicity of the drugs that are precious and available in small quantities. In the present article, a method for the efficient screening of the toxicity of chemical compounds using 1-5-day post fertilization embryos is described. The embryos are monitored by stereomicroscope to investigate the phenotypic defects caused by the exposure to different concentrations of compounds. Half-maximal lethal concentrations (LC50) of the compounds are also determined. The present study required 3-6 mg of an inhibitor compound, and the whole experiment takes about 8-10 h to be completed by an individual in a laboratory having basic facilities. The current protocol is suitable for testing any compound to identify intolerable toxic or off-target effects of the compound in the early phase of drug discovery and to detect subtle toxic effects that may be missed in the cell culture or other animal models. The method reduces procedural delays and costs of drug development.

Introduction

Drug development is an expensive process. Before a single chemical compound is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) several thousand compounds are screened at a cost of over one billion dollars1. During the preclinical development, the largest part of this cost is required for the animal testing2. To limit the costs, researchers in the field of drug development need alternative models for the safety screening of chemical compounds3. Therefore, in the early phase of the drug development, it would be very beneficial to use a method that can rapidly evaluate the safety and toxicity of the compounds in a suitable model. There are several protocols that have been used for the toxicity screening of chemical compounds involving animal and cell culture models but there is not a single protocol that is validated and is in common use4,5. Existing protocols using zebrafish vary in length and have been used by individual researchers who evaluated the toxicity as per their convenience requirement6,7,8,9,10,11,12.

In the recent past, the zebrafish has emerged as a convenient model for the evaluation of the toxicity of chemical compounds during embryonic development6,7. The zebrafish has many in-built advantages for the evaluation of chemical compounds13. Even large-scale experiments are amenable, as a zebrafish female can lay batches of 200-300 eggs, which develop rapidly ex vivo, do not need external feeding for up to a week and are transparent. The compounds can be added directly into the water, where they can (depending on the nature of the compound) diffuse through the chorion, and after hatching, through the skin, gills and mouth of larvae. The experiments do not require copious amounts of chemical compounds14 due to the small size of the embryo. Developing zebrafish embryos express most of the proteins required to achieve the normal developmental outcome. Therefore, a zebrafish embryo is a sensitive model to assess whether a potential drug can disturb the function of a protein or signaling molecule that is developmentally significant. The organs of the zebrafish become functional between 2-5 dpf15, and compounds that are toxic during this sensitive period of embryonic development induce phenotypic defects in zebrafish larvae. These phenotypic changes can be readily detected using a simple microscope without invasive techniques11. Zebrafish embryos are widely used in toxicological research due to their much greater biological complexity compared to in vitro drug screening using cell culture models16,17.  As a vertebrate, the genetic and physiologic makeup of zebrafish is comparable to humans and hence toxicities of chemical compounds are similar between zebrafish and humans8,18,19,20,21,22. Zebrafish is, thus, a valuable tool in the early phase of drug discovery for the evaluation of toxicity and safety of the chemical compounds.

In the present article, we provide a detailed description of the method used for evaluating the safety and toxicity of carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitor compounds using 1-5-day post fertilization (dpf) zebrafish embryos by a single researcher. The protocol involves exposing zebrafish embryos to different concentrations of chemical inhibitor compounds and studying the mortality and phenotypic changes during the embryonic development. At the end of the exposure to the chemical compounds, the LC50 dose of the chemical is determined. The method allows an individual to carry out efficient screening of 1-5 test compounds and takes about 8-10 h depending on the experience of the person with the method (Figure 1). Each of the steps required to assess the toxicity of the compounds is outlined in Figure 2. The evaluation of toxicity of CA inhibitors requires 8 days, and includes setting up of mating pairs (day 1); collection of embryos from breeding tanks, cleaning and transferring them to 28.5 °C incubator (day 2); distribution of the embryos into the wells of a 24-well plate and addition of diluted CA inhibitor compounds (day 3); phenotypic analysis and imaging of larvae (day 4-8), and determination of LC50 dose (day8).  This method is rapid and efficient, requires a small amount of the chemical compound and only basic facilities of the laboratory.

Protocol

The zebrafish core facility at Tampere University has an establishment authorization granted by the National Animal Experiment Board (ESAVI/7975/04.10.05/2016). All the experiments using zebrafish embryos were performed according to the Provincial Government of Eastern Finland, Social and Health Department of Tampere Regional Service Unit protocol # LSLH-2007-7254/Ym-23.

1. Setting Up of Overnight Zebrafish Mating Tanks

  1. Place 2-5 adult male zebrafish and 3-5 adult female zebrafish into mating tanks overnight. (Breeding is induced in the morning by automatic dark and light cycle overnight).
  2. Set up several crosses to obtain enough embryos for assessing the toxicity of more than two chemical compounds. For the evaluation of toxicity, each concentration needs a minimum of 20 embryos23.
  3. To avoid handling stress to the animals, allow the animals to rest for 2 weeks before using the same individuals for breeding.

2. Collection of Embryos and Preparing Plates for Exposure to the Chemical Compounds

  1. Collect the embryos, the next day before noon, using a fine-mesh strainer and transfer them onto a Petri dish containing E3 embryo medium [5.0 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4, and 0.1% w/v Methylene Blue].
  2. Remove debris using a plastic Pasteur pipette (e.g., food and solid waste). Examine each batch of embryos under the stereomicroscope to remove the unfertilized/dead embryos (identified by their opaque appearance).
  3. Keep the embryos at 28.5 °C in an incubator. Examine the embryos, the next morning, under a stereomicroscope and remove any unhealthy or dead embryos. Also, replace the old E3 medium with fresh E3 medium.
    NOTE: Zebrafish embryos are always maintained at 28.5 °C under laboratory conditions. 
  4. Carefully transfer 1 embryo into each well of a 24-well plate containing enough E3 medium to cover the embryos.

3. Preparations of the Stock Solution of Chemical Compounds and Distribution of Diluted Compound into the Wells

  1. Take out the vials containing inhibitor compounds stored at 4 °C.
    NOTE: Depending on the properties of the compound, these are stored at different temperatures.
  2. Weigh the compound(s) using an analytical balance that can weigh a few milligrams (mg) of the compound accurately.
  3. Prepare at least 250 μL (100 mM) of stock solution for each compound in an appropriate solvent (e.g., E3 water or Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), based on the solubility properties of the compounds.
    NOTE: The above steps can be done a day before the start of the experiment at a convenient time and stored at 4 °C).
  4. Make serial dilutions of the stock solutions (e. g., 10 μM, 20 μM, 50 μM, 100 μM, 150 μM, 300 μM and 500 μM) using E3 water in 15 mL centrifuge tubes.
    NOTE: The concentrations and number of serial dilutions vary from one compound to another compound depending on their toxicity levels.
  5. From the 24 well plate containing embryos, remove E3 water from the wells using a Pasteur pipette and a 1 mL pipette (containing 1 dpf embryos) one row at a time.
  6. Distribute 1 mL of each diluent in each well (starting from lower and moving to higher concentration) into the wells of 24-well plate.
  7. Set up a control group from the same batch of embryos and add the corresponding amount of diluent.
  8. Label 24-well plates with the name and concentration of the compound and keep the plates at 28.5 °C in an incubator.

4. Phenotypic Analysis and Imaging of the Embryos Using a Stereomicroscope

  1. Examine the embryos under a stereomicroscope for parameters 24 h after exposure to the chemical compounds.
    1. Note the parameters such as mortality, hatching, heartbeat, utilization of yolk sack, swim bladder development, movement of the fish, pericardial edema, and shape of the body23.
    2. Take the larvae exposed to each concentration of the compound and lay them sideways in a small Petri dish containing 3% high molecular weight methyl cellulose using a metal probe.
      NOTE: The 3% methyl cellulose (high molecular with) is a viscous liquid needed for embedding the fish with a required orientation for microscopic examination. For orienting the fish in this liquid, a metal probe is needed.
    3. Take the images using stereomicroscope attached to a camera. Save the images in a separate folder each day till the end of the experiment.
    4. Enter all the observations in a table each day either in an online table or on a printed sheet.
    5. If the compounds are neurotoxic, the 4 to 5 dpf larvae may show altered swim pattern, make a record of such changes either by capturing a short (30 s to 1 min) video of the larvae exhibiting abnormal movement pattern.
    6. After 5 days of exposure to the chemical compounds, note the concentration at which half of the embryos die for calculating the half maximal lethal concentration 50 (LC50) of each chemical.
      NOTE: The LC50 is the concentration at which 50% of the embryos die at the end of 5 days of exposure to a chemical compound. Use a minimum of 20 embryos for testing the toxicity of each concentration of a compound23.
    7. Construct a curve for mortality of embryos for all the concentrations using a suitable program.

Results

The critical part of the evaluation of toxicity is testing different concentrations of one or multiple chemical compounds in a single experiment. In the beginning, select the compounds for evaluation of toxicity, the number of concentrations to test for each compound, and accordingly, make a chart (Figure 3). We used a unique color for each compound to organize the samples (Figure 3). The use of solvent resistant marker and label...

Discussion

In vitro toxicity test using cultured cells can detect survival and morphological studies of the cells providing limited information about the toxicity induced by the test compound. The advantage of toxicity screening of chemical compounds using zebrafish embryos is rapid detection of chemically induced phenotypic changes in a whole animal during embryonic development in a relevant model organism. Approximately 70% of protein-coding human genes have orthologs counterparts in the zebrafish genome

Disclosures

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by grants from Sigrid Juselius Foundation (SP, MP), Finnish Cultural Foundation (AA, MH), Academy of Finland (SP, MP), Orion Farmos Foundation (MH), Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation (SP, MH and MP) and Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation (SP and MP). We thank our Italian and French collaborators, Prof. Supuran, and Prof. Winum, for providing carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for safety and toxicity evaluation for anti-TB and anti-cancer drug development purposes. We thank Aulikki Lehmus and Marianne Kuuslahti for the technical assistance. We also thank Leena Mäkinen and Hannaleena Piippo for their help with the zebrafish breeding and collection of embryos. We sincerely thank Harlan Barker for critical evaluation of the manuscript and insightful comments.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
24-well platesNuncThermo Scientific
Balance (Weighing scale)KERNPLJ3000-2CM
Balance (Weighing scale)Mettler ToledoAB104-S/PH
CaCl2JT.BakerRS421910024
Disecting ProbeThermo Scientific17-467-604 
DMSOSigma Aldrich, GermanyD4540
Falcon tubes 15 mLGreiner bio-one188271
High molecular weight methylcelluloseSigma Aldrich, GermanyM0262 
Incubator for zebrafish larvaeTermaksB8000
KCLMerck1.04936.0500
Methyl BlueSigma Aldrich, Germany28983-56-4
MgSO4Sigma Aldrich, GermanyM7506
Microcentrifuge tubesStarlabS1615-5500
NaClVWR Chemicals27810.295
Paraffin Histoplast IMThermo Scientific8331
Pasteur pipette Sarstedt86.1171
Petri dishThermo Scientific101R20 
Petri platesSarstedt82.1473
Pipette (1 mL and 200 μL)Thermo Scientific4641230N, 4641210N  
Plates 24-WellThermo Scientific142485
Steriomicroscope/CameraZeissStemi 2000-C/Axiocam 105 color
Vials (1.5 mL)Fisherbrand11569914
Zebrafish AB strainsZIRC   ZL1 

References

  1. Amaouche, N., Casaert Salome, H., Collignon, O., Santos, M. R., Ziogas, C. Marketing authorization applications submitted to the European Medicines Agency by small and medium-sized enterprises: an analysis of major objections and their impact on outcomes. Drug Discovery Today. 23 (10), 1801-1805 (2018).
  2. Garg, R. C., Bracken, W. M., Hoberman, A. M., Gupta, R. C. Reproductive and developmental safety evaluation of new pharmaceutical compounds. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology. , 89-109 (2011).
  3. Lee, H. Y., Inselman, A. L., Kanungo, J., Hansen, D. K. Alternative models in developmental toxicology. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 58 (1), 10-22 (2012).
  4. Gao, G., Chen, L., Huang, C. Anti-cancer drug discovery: update and comparisons in yeast, Drosophila, and zebrafish. Current Molecular Pharmacology. 7 (1), 44-51 (2014).
  5. Brown, N. A. Selection of test chemicals for the ECVAM international validation study on in vitro embryotoxicity tests. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 30 (2), 177-198 (2002).
  6. Selderslaghs, I. W., Van Rompay, A. R., De Coen, W., Witters, H. E. Development of a screening assay to identify teratogenic and embryotoxic chemicals using the zebrafish embryo. Reproductive Toxicology. 28 (3), 308-320 (2009).
  7. Brannen, K. C., Panzica-Kelly, J. M., Danberry, T. L., Augustine-Rauch, K. A. Development of a zebrafish embryo teratogenicity assay and quantitative prediction model. Birth Defects Research Part B Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology. 89 (1), 66-77 (2010).
  8. Hermsen, S. A., van den Brandhof, E. J., van der Ven, L. T., Piersma, A. H. Relative embryotoxicity of two classes of chemicals in a modified zebrafish embryotoxicity test and comparison with their in vivo potencies. Toxicology in Vitro. 25 (3), 745-753 (2011).
  9. Lessman, C. A. The developing zebrafish (Danio rerio): a vertebrate model for high-throughput screening of chemical libraries. Birth Defects Research. Part C, Embryo Today: Reviews. 93 (3), 268-280 (2011).
  10. Lantz-McPeak, S., et al. Developmental toxicity assay using high content screening of zebrafish embryos. Journal of Applied Toxicology. 35 (3), 261-272 (2015).
  11. Truong, L., Harper, S. L., Tanguay, R. L. Evaluation of embryotoxicity using the zebrafish model. Methods in Molecular Biology. 691, 271-279 (2011).
  12. Rodrigues, G. C., et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of hydroxamic acid derivatives as promising agents for the management of Chagas disease. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 57 (2), 298-308 (2014).
  13. Kanungo, J., Cuevas, E., Ali, S. F., Paule, M. G. Zebrafish model in drug safety assessment. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 20 (34), 5416-5429 (2014).
  14. Peterson, R. T., Link, B. A., Dowling, J. E., Schreiber, S. L. Small molecule developmental screens reveal the logic and timing of vertebrate development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97 (24), 12965-12969 (2000).
  15. Stainier, D. Y., Fishman, M. C. The zebrafish as a model system to study cardiovascular development. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 4 (5), 207-212 (1994).
  16. Aspatwar, A., et al. Nitroimidazole-based inhibitors DTP338 and DTP348 are safe for zebrafish embryos and efficiently inhibit the activity of human CA IX in Xenopus oocytes. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 33 (1), 1064-1073 (2018).
  17. Rami, M., et al. Hypoxia-targeting carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors by a new series of nitroimidazole-sulfonamides/sulfamides/sulfamates. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 56 (21), 8512-8520 (2013).
  18. Spitsbergen, J. M., Kent, M. L. The state of the art of the zebrafish model for toxicology and toxicologic pathology research--advantages and current limitations. Toxicologic Pathology. , 62-87 (2003).
  19. Teraoka, H., et al. Induction of cytochrome P450 1A is required for circulation failure and edema by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in zebrafish. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 304 (2), 223-228 (2003).
  20. Zon, L. I., Peterson, R. T. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 4 (1), 35-44 (2005).
  21. Hill, A. J., Teraoka, H., Heideman, W., Peterson, R. E. Zebrafish as a model vertebrate for investigating chemical toxicity. Toxicological Sciences. 86 (1), 6-19 (2005).
  22. Kari, G., Rodeck, U., Dicker, A. P. Zebrafish: an emerging model system for human disease and drug discovery. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 82 (1), 70-80 (2007).
  23. Gourmelon, A., Delrue, N. Validation in Support of Internationally Harmonised OECD Test Guidelines for Assessing the Safety of Chemicals. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 856, 9-32 (2016).
  24. Aspatwar, A., et al. beta-CA-specific inhibitor dithiocarbamate Fc14-584B: a novel antimycobacterial agent with potential to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 32 (1), 832-840 (2017).
  25. Kazokaite, J., Aspatwar, A., Kairys, V., Parkkila, S., Matulis, D. Fluorinated benzenesulfonamide anticancer inhibitors of carbonic anhydrase IX exhibit lower toxic effects on zebrafish embryonic development than ethoxzolamide. Drug and Chemical Toxicology. 40 (3), 309-319 (2017).
  26. Howe, K., et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature. 496 (7446), 498-503 (2013).
  27. Granato, M., Nusslein-Volhard, C. Fishing for genes controlling development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 6 (4), 461-468 (1996).
  28. Bambino, K., Chu, J. Zebrafish in Toxicology and Environmental Health. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 124, 331-367 (2017).
  29. Goldsmith, P. Zebrafish as a pharmacological tool: the how, why and when. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 4 (5), 504-512 (2004).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

ToxicologyChemical CompoundsZebrafish EmbryosToxicity TestingOff target EffectsRapid EvaluationPhenotypic ChangesPreclinical TestingBreeding ProtocolEmbryo ScreeningExperimental MethodologySafety Assessment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved