Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This paper describes a method for modeling total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) during cancer resection surgery in mice. The goal is to replicate key features of anesthesia delivery to patients with cancer. The method allows investigation of how anesthetic technique affects cancer recurrence after resection surgery.

Abstract

Anesthesia is a routine component of cancer care that is used for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The anesthetic technique has recently been implicated in impacting long-term cancer outcomes, possibly through modulation of adrenergic-inflammatory responses that impact cancer cell behavior and immune cell function. Emerging evidence suggests that propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) may be beneficial for long-term cancer outcomes when compared to inhaled volatile anesthesia. However, the available clinical findings are inconsistent. Preclinical studies that identify the underlying mechanisms involved are critically needed to guide the design of clinical studies that will expedite insight. Most preclinical models of anesthesia have been extrapolated from the use of anesthesia in in vivo research and are not optimally designed to study the impact of anesthesia itself as the primary endpoint. This paper describes a method for delivering propofol-TIVA anesthesia in a mouse model of breast cancer resection that replicates key aspects of clinical delivery in cancer patients. The model can be used to study mechanisms of action of anesthesia on cancer outcomes in diverse cancer types and can be extrapolated to other non-cancer areas of preclinical anesthesia research.

Introduction

More than 60% of patients with cancer receive anesthesia for surgical resection1. Currently, there are no specific clinical guidelines that determine the choice of anesthesia used in cancer patients. Surveys of anesthesiologists indicate a preference for volatile-based anesthesia, including during cancer surgery2,3. However, there is a growing body of evidence that the use of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) during cancer surgery may associate with improved postoperative outcomes (progression-free survival, overall survival) when compared to volatile anesthesia

Protocol

All animal studies were undertaken under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Monash University. In this study, female Balb/c mice aged 6-8 weeks were used.

1. Prepare cancer cells

  1. Culture tumor cells in medium. Culture 66cl4 murine mammary cancer cells in alpha-MEM containing 10% FBS and 200 mM glutamine. Cells should text negative for mycoplasma. OPTIONAL: Use cells that are stably transduced to express firefly luciferase for bioluminescence ima.......

Representative Results

This method describes a model of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol during cancer resection surgery in mice. Propofol is delivered in this mouse model through an intravenous catheter using a syringe pump (Figure 1A,B) to replicate delivery of TIVA in the clinical setting of anesthesia for cancer surgery. Use of the syringe pump minimizes exposure to volatile anesthesia by allowing rapid conversion from initial induction by inhalational anesthesia to intravenou.......

Discussion

This study reports on a protocol for administering total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol in a mouse model of breast cancer that replicates key aspects of clinical practice for TIVA in patients requiring cancer surgery. The protocol allows investigation of both short-term and long-term clinically relevant outcomes after cancer surgery in a mouse model of cancer progression, including measurement of cytokine levels and cancer recurrence (Figure 2, and Figure 3<.......

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank members of the Cancer Neural-Immune Laboratory and Dr. Cameron Nowell at Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville. This work was supported by grants from National Health and Medical Research Council 1147498, the National Breast Cancer Foundation IIRS-20-025, the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA), Perpetual and CTC for Cancer Therapeutics.

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0.9% salineFresnius KabiAUST R 197198
Artery forcepsProscitechTS1322-140
BuprenorphineTemgesicTEMG I
Heated surgical matCustom-
Hypodermic needle (30 G, 1 mL insulin syringe)TerumoNN3013R
IVIS LuminaPerkinElmer126274
LuciferinPromegaP1041/2/3
Polyurethane catheterIntramedic427401
Povidone IodineBetadineAUST R 29562
Propofol Lipuro, 2%Braun3521490
SevofluraneBaxterANZ2L9117
Sevoflurane vaporiserVetquipVQ1334
Sterile gauzeMultigate Medical Products11-600A
Surgical scissorsProscitechTS1044
Sutures, 5-0 nylonDynekV504
Syringe pumpHarvard Apparatus70-4500
Syringes (1 mL)TerumoSS+01T

References

  1. Sullivan, R., et al. Global cancer surgery: delivering safe, affordable, and timely cancer surgery. Lancet Oncology. 16 (11), 1193-1224 (2015).
  2. Lim, J. A., et al.

Explore More Articles

In Vivo Mouse ModelTotal Intravenous AnesthesiaCancer Resection SurgeryPropofol Anesthesia66 CL4 Mirai Mammary Cancer CellsLuciferaseMammary Fat Pad InjectionPrimary Tumor GrowthTumor ResectionAutomated Syringe PumpSevofluraneIsoflurane

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved