A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol presents a step-by-step methodological approach of exposing bone metastatic cells lines and primary bone tumors to 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT). The effects on cell migration potential/invasiveness, viability, apoptosis, and senescence potential are also analyzed following PDT exposure.

Abstract

Bone metastases are associated with poor prognosis and low quality of life for the affected patients. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) emerges as a noninvasive therapy that can target local metastatic bone lesions. This paper presents an in vitro method to study the PDT effect in adherent cell lines. To this end, we demonstrate a step-by-step approach to subject both primary (giant cell bone tumor) and human bone metastatic cancer cell lines (derived from a primary invasive ductal breast carcinoma and renal carcinoma) to 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-mediated PDT.

After 24 h post 5-ALA-PDT irradiation (blue light-wavelength 436 nm), the therapeutic effect was assessed in terms of cell migration potential, viability, apoptotic features, and cellular growth arrest (senescence). Post 5-ALA-PDT irradiation, musculoskeletal-derived cell lines respond differently to the same doses and exposure of PDT. Depending on the extent of cellular damage triggered by PDT exposure, two different cell fates-apoptosis and senescence were noted. Variable sensitivity to PDT therapy among different bone cancer cell lines provides useful information for selecting more appropriate PDT settings in clinical settings. This protocol is designed to exemplify the use of PDT in the context of musculoskeletal neoplastic cell lines. It may be adjusted to investigate the therapeutic effect of PDT on various cancer cell lines and various photosensitizers and light sources.

Introduction

Therapeutic options for bone metastases are still limited and challenging despite ongoing developments in oncological treatment. The current standard method is radiotherapy, which is associated with complications such as local erythema, toxicity to inner organs1, and insufficient fractures2. There is a need for alternative antineoplastic therapies as patients with bone metastases often suffer from pain, hypercalcemia, and neurological symptoms that result in impaired mobility and reduced quality of life3. Recent findings demonstrate that PDT provides a promising, alternative, antineoplastic treatment option to directly target bone lesions, which can be used alone or supportively to radiotherapy4.

The mechanism of PDT is essentially based on an energy transfer from a light-excited photosensitive compound (photosensitizer) to tissue oxygen. This photosensitizer works similarly to a capacitor on a nanoscopic level. It can store energy in a ground state when irradiated with an appropriate wavelength of light and releases stored energy when it returns from an excited state to the original ground state5. The released energy leads to two photochemical reactions: one is the transformation of oxygen to reactive oxygen radicals by transferring hydrogen or an electron. The second is the production of singlet oxygen particles by horizontal energy transfer from the photosensitizer substrate to local triplet oxygen particles6. Reactive oxygen radicals and singlet oxygen molecules have highly cytotoxic effects on local tumor cells and induce vascular occlusion and local inflammatory response by apoptosis of endothelial cells of tumor blood vessels7.

Conventional photosensitizers are derivatives of the porphyrin family such as hematoporphyrins and benzoporphyrins8. Applying photosensitizer substances with higher affinity to tumor tissue can increase the selectivity of PDT9 y. In particular, 5-ALA, which is a biosynthetic precursor of protoporphyrin IX, can accumulate in tumor cells such as actinic keratosis, basal cell carcinoma, bladder tumor, and gastrointestinal cancer5. Different delivery approaches using 5-ALA can also vary the efficiency of PDT in relation to tumor localization. Thus, topical use of 5-ALA with the application of PDT became the first-line dermatologic therapy against actinic keratosis10. Recent results for bone metastases of invasive ductal breast cancer cell lines indicate possible inhibition of cell migration and induction of apoptosis after exposure to PDT with 5-ALA11. However, using PDT in subfascial human tissue such as bone tissue is still in its preclinical to experimental clinical stage as the efficacy needs to be improved. Applications of nanoparticles with light-based therapy already show great impact in dentistry12. Thus, it is likely that combining the use of nanoparticles with PDT will expand its application range towards orthopedic oncology.

The following protocol describes how to prepare both cells originating from primary bone tumors and bone metastases cell lines and subject them to 5-ALA-mediated PDT for a predefined time exposure. A detailed description of how to perform and assess the cellular migration potential, vitality, and senescence post 5-ALA-PDT irradiation is also included. Step-by-step instructions provide a straightforward and concise approach to acquire reliable and reproducible data. The advantages, limitations, and future perspectives of the PDT approach for bone neoplastic lesions are also discussed.

Protocol

Three different types of cell lines were employed: "MAM"-a cell line originating from bone metastases of renal cell carcinoma, "MAC"-bone metastases of an invasive ductal breast carcinoma, and "17-1012"-a giant cell tumor of bone. Marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were used as a control group. Institutional and ethical approval was obtained before the commencement of the study (project number: 008/2014BO2-for the cancer cell lines and project number: 401/2013 BO2 for MSCs).

1. Cell culture

NOTE: Culture media can be prepared beforehand. The culture medium for MAM and 17-1012 consists of RPMI supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM L-glutamine. The culture medium for MAC and MSCs consists of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with glutamine substitute (see the Table of Materials), 4.5 g/L D-glucose supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS.

  1. Harvest and passage cells until 80% confluence is achieved.
  2. Wash the cells with 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and aspirate the PBS from the flask using a pipette.
    NOTE: This step ensures the removal of residual complete medium containing protease inhibitors.
  3. Add 3 mL of 0.05% (v/v) trypsin-EDTA to dissociate the adherent cells from the bottom of the flask in which they are cultured.
  4. Incubate the flasks for 5 min at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
  5. Observe the cell detachment under a phase-contrast microscope.
    NOTE: The incubation time must be adjusted for each cell type. Prevent cell exposure to trypsin solution for longer periods (>10 min).
  6. Stop the trypsinization by adding add 3 mL of culture medium.
    NOTE: Make sure to add the appropriate culture medium for each cell type containing 10% (v/v) FBS.
  7. Transfer the detached cells to a centrifugation tube and centrifuge them for 7 min at 350 × g at 7 °C.
  8. Discard the supernatant.
  9. Resuspend the cells pellet in 1 mL of culture medium and count the cells using a hemocytometer as described previously13.

2. PDT setup and exposure

  1. Prepare the PDT device (see the Table of Materials) by plugging in all the cables and accessories.
  2. Dim the light in the room to avoid unnecessary light dissipation.
  3. Position and stabilize the light fiber with the aid of duct tape directly on top of the well plate.
    NOTE: A uniform distribution of the light fibers on top of the wells is desired to ensure that all cells are irradiated and receive the same amount of energy (Figure 1).
  4. Make sure not to severely bend or damage the light fiber as this might lead to a reduction in the light intensity.
  5. Cover the well plates with aluminum foil to minimize light dissipation.
  6. Switch on the PDT device by pressing the ON/OFF switch button.
  7. Insert the metered card into the slot in the front of the PDT device.
    NOTE: One metered card is provided with the device corresponding to 300 s exposure time. An additional 2,000 s program is automatically integrated within the PDT device. For both exposure times, the light is delivered in a continuous output mode for the indicated periods.
  8. Ensure the timer on the PDT lightbox display changes to the prescribed time indicated on the metered card.
  9. Start the PDT treatment by pressing the incorporated foot pedal.
    ​NOTE: An automatic stop function is incorporated into the device, and the system runs automatically. Do not stop the light process or remove the light fiber prior to the completion of the cycle. At the completion of the light cycle, the light source shutter is closed, and no further light is delivered.

3. Migration assay

  1. Seed cells as follows: 2 × 104 cells - MAC, 1 × 104 cells - MAM, 3 x 104 - 17-1012, and 2.5 × 104 - MSCs into each 2-chamber culture insert integrated into opaque F-bottom, 6-well plates.
  2. Incubate the cells at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h. Remove the inserts afterward.
    NOTE: To have a starting reference point for the migration and the initial unbiased gap size, a separate plate, which will not be subjected to further 5-ALA-PDT exposure (steps 3.3-3.4) but instead directly stained and quantified (steps 3.5-3.12), is employed.
  3. Replace the medium with fresh FBS-free medium containing 1 mM of 5-ALA.
  4. Incubate the cells at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 4 h.
    NOTE: As controls, additional wells should concomitantly be covered with medium without 5-ALA.
  5. Subject the cells to PDT with blue light (436 nm, 36 J/cm2) in a continuous output mode for predefined time frames of 300 s or 2,000 s, as indicated in section 2.
    NOTE: Plates that are not subjected to PDT exposure should be employed as controls.
  6. Incubate the cells at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h.
    NOTE: Check the cells periodically to assess the degree of migration for each cell type. This must be optimized for each cell line.
  7. Wash the cells with 1.5 mL of PBS and completely remove the PBS afterward.
  8. Fix the cells by adding and incubating the cells with 1.5 mL of 4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min.
  9. Add 1.5 mL of 70% (v/v) ethanol and incubate for 10 min.
  10. Discard the ethanol and allow the plates to air-dry at room temperature for 10 min.
  11. Incubate the cells with 1.5 mL of 0.2% (v/v) Coomassie blue dye in 90% (v/v) ethanol for 20 min.
  12. Wash the plates with double-distilled water.
    NOTE: To thoroughly wash the plates and remove the remaining debris, fully immerse the plates 2-3 times in clean, double-distilled water.
  13. Allow the plates to air-dry at room temperature for 24 h.
    NOTE: At this stage, the dried plates may be stored at room temperature for at least several weeks.
  14. Visualize and photograph the migration of cells into gaps with an inverse phase-contrast microscope at 10-fold magnification.
    NOTE: Observe and photograph the migration of live cells for up to 24 h after 5-ALA-PDT exposure. However, fixed cells can be stored and photographed later.
  15. Export the images in the desired format and quantify the gaps using software for processing and analyzing scientific images as described previously14.

4. Viability assay

  1. Seed all the cells at a density of 1.5 × 104 in 96-well plates in 50 µL of culture medium.
  2. Incubate the cells at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h in a standard cell culture incubator.
  3. Add an additional 50 µL of FBS-free culture medium containing 5-ALA at a final concentration of 1 mM.
  4. Incubate the cells at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 4 h in a standard cell culture incubator.
    NOTE: Use 2x concentration as the cells are already covered with 50 µL of culture medium. A control with culture medium should be included.
  5. Subject the cells to PDT exposure with blue light (436 nm, 36 J/cm2) in a continuous output mode for predefined time frames of 300 s or 2,000 s, as indicated in section 2.
    NOTE: A negative control that is not subjected to PDT exposure should also be included.
  6. Incubate the irradiated cells at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 24 h in a standard cell culture incubator.
  7. Add 15 µL of MTS reagent onto the cells and incubate the cells for 90 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
  8. Measure the absorbance with a spectrophotometer reader at a wavelength of 490 nm.

5. Cellular growth arrest/senescence assay (β-Galactosidase( β-Gal) activity)

NOTE: All reagents and buffers used here were provided in the assay kit (see the Table of Materials).

  1. Seed the cells at a density of 1.5 × 104 in 96-well plates in 100 µL of culture medium. Incubate the cells for 24 h, 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a standard cell culture incubator.
  2. Add 100 µL of fresh FBS-free medium with 5-ALA at a final concentration of 1 mM and incubate for 4 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2.
    NOTE: As controls, separate wells should concomitantly be covered with fresh medium without 5-ALA photosensitizer.
  3. Subject the cells to PDT exposure with blue light (436 nm, 36 J/cm2) in a continuous output mode for predefined time frames of 300 s or 2,000 s, as indicated in section 2.
    NOTE: A negative control plate that is not exposed to PDT should also be included.
  4. Incubate the cells for 24 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in a standard cell culture incubator.
  5. Discard the medium and wash the cells two times with PBS.
  6. Cover the cells with 100 µL of 1x cell lysis buffer and incubate for 5 min at 4 °C.
  7. Centrifuge the lysate at 350 × g 1 for 10 min at 4 °C and collect the supernatant.
  8. Pipette 50 µL of the supernatant to a new 96-well plate and add another 50 µL of 2x assay buffer.
  9. Place the new 96-well plate in a 37 °C incubator for 1.5 h.
    NOTE: The pates should be protected from light to avoid photobleaching.
  10. Transfer 50 µL of the mixture into an opaque-walled 96-well plate and add 200 µL of stop solution.
  11. Measure the absorbance with a fluorescence microplate reader at 360 nm excitation/465 nm emission.

Results

Following 5-ALA PDT exposure, the MSC-control group showed no notable effect in terms of migration following 5-ALA PDT irradiation (Figure 2A, i, v, ix). In contrast, MAC cells (Figure 1B and Figure 2A, iii, vii, xi) and 17-1012 (Figure 1B and Figure 2A, ii, vi, x) cells exhibited a decrease in migration potential for both ...

Discussion

Despite current treatment options, cancer therapeutic response is variable, advocating in favor of novel approaches or even combination therapies to treat bone metastases while preserving the initial tissue structure. In this context, PDT is a promising alternative. From a simplistic point of view, PDT is comprised of two basic components: (1) a nontoxic light-sensitive dye termed photosensitizer (PS) and (2) an external light source of the appropriate wavelength that matches the absorption spectrum of the PS and activat...

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank our co-authors from the original publications for their help and support.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
300 s metered card for PDTIlluminOss Medical Inc., East Providence, Rhode Insland, USAn/ahttp://www.illuminoss.com
5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) photosensitizerSigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USAA779310 mg
6 Well platesGreiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany657160
8 Well Chamber SlidesSARSTEDT AG & Co. KG, Munich, Germany94.6140.802
96 Well plates (F-buttom)Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany655180
CellTiter 96 Aqueous One
Solution Cell Proliferation
Assay (MTS-Assay)
Promega, Fitchburg,
Wisconsin, USA
G3580
Cellular Senescence AssayBiotrend Chemikalien GmbH, Köln, GermanyCBA-231Quantitative senescence-associated ß-galactosidase assay
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA350550.5% (w/v)
Culture-Inserts 2Wellibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany80209
DMEM (1x) + GlutaMax-ILife Technologies, Carlsbad, Kalifornien, USA31966-021
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USAF7524
Fluorescence microplate readerPromega, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGlowMAx®,
GM3510
HemocytometerHecht Assistent, Sondheim, Deutschland4042
ImageJNational Institutes of Health, Be-thesda, Maryland, USAImageJ (version: 1.53a)Software for processing and analyzing scientific images; https://imagej.net/
Inverse phase-contrast microscopeLeica, Wetzlar, GermanyDM IMBRE 100
Methanol AnulaR NormapurVWR, Fontenay-Sous-Bois, France20847.307
ParaformaldehydSigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USA158127Powder, 95% purity
PDT device (light box and accesories)IlluminOss Medical Inc., East Providence, Rhode Insland, USAn/aBlue light 436 nm, 36 J/cm2 http://www.illuminoss.com
Penicillin-StreptomycinThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA15140-12210,000 U/mL Penicillin
10,000 μg/mL Streptomycin
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA10010-015
RPMI 1640Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA21875034
Spectrophotomete/ microplate readerBioTek Instruments GmbH, Bad Friedrichshall, GermanyEL800
Trypan Blue dye 0.4%Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USAT8154
Trypsin-EDTA 10xSigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, USAT4174

References

  1. Milano, M. T., Constine, L. S., Okunieff, P. Normal tissue tolerance dose metrics for radiation therapy of major organs. Seminars in Radiation Oncology. 17 (2), 131-140 (2007).
  2. Higham, C. E., Faithfull, S. Bone health and pelvic radiotherapy. Clinical Oncology. 27 (11), 668-678 (2015).
  3. von Moos, R., et al. Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Supportive Care in Cancer. 21 (12), 3497-3507 (2013).
  4. Stewart, F., Baas, P., Star, W. What does photodynamic therapy have to offer radiation oncologists (or their cancer patients). Radiotherapy and Oncology. 48 (3), 233-248 (1998).
  5. Dolmans, D. E. J. G. J., Fukumura, D., Jain, R. K. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer. 3 (5), 380-387 (2003).
  6. Kwiatkowski, S., et al. Photodynamic therapy-mechanisms, photosensitizers and combinations. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy. 106, 1098-1107 (2018).
  7. Huang, Z., et al. Photodynamic therapy for treatment of solid tumors--potential and technical challenges. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment. 7 (4), 309-320 (2008).
  8. Kou, J., Dou, D., Yang, L. Porphyrin photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy and its applications. Oncotarget. 8 (46), 81591-81603 (2017).
  9. Josefsen, L. B., Boyle, R. W. Photodynamic therapy: novel third-generation photosensitizers one step closer. British Journal of Pharmacology. 154 (1), 1-3 (2008).
  10. Dragieva, G., et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of topical photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratoses in transplant recipients. British Journal of Dermatology. 151 (1), 196-200 (2004).
  11. Sachsenmaier, S. M., et al. Assessment of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy on bone metastases: an in vitro study. Biology. 10 (10), 1020 (2021).
  12. Mitsiadis, T. A., Woloszyk, A., Jiménez-Rojo, L. Nanodentistry: combining nanostructured materials and stem cells for dental tissue regeneration. Nanomedicine. 7 (11), 1743-1753 (2012).
  13. Ricardo, R., Phelan, K. Counting and determining the viability of cultured cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (16), e752 (2008).
  14. Nunes, J. P. S., Dias, A. A. M. ImageJ macros for the user-friendly analysis of soft-agar and wound-healing assays. BioTechniques. 62 (4), 175-179 (2017).
  15. Dai, T., et al. Concepts and principles of photodynamic therapy as an alternative antifungal discovery platform. Frontiers in Microbiology. 3, 120 (2012).
  16. Chen, X., Zhao, P., Chen, F., Li, L., Luo, R. Effect and mechanism of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic therapy in esophageal cancer. Lasers in Medical Science. 26 (1), 69-78 (2011).
  17. Bacellar, I. O., Tsubone, T. M., Pavani, C., Baptista, M. S. Photodynamic efficiency: from molecular photochemistry to cell death. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 16 (9), 20523-20559 (2015).
  18. Song, Y. S., Lee, B. Y., Hwang, E. S. Dinstinct ROS and biochemical profiles in cells undergoing DNA damage-induced senescence and apoptosis. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 126 (5), 580-590 (2005).
  19. Faber, J., Fonseca, L. M. How sample size influences research outcomes. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 19 (4), 27-29 (2014).
  20. Anker, H. S. Biological aspects of cancerby Julian Huxley. Review. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 2 (2), 246 (1959).
  21. Alizadeh, A. A., et al. Toward understanding and exploiting tumor heterogeneity. Nature Medicine. 21 (8), 846-853 (2015).
  22. McGranahan, N., Swanton, C. Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future. Cell. 168 (4), 613-628 (2017).
  23. Dai, Z., et al. Research and application of single-cell sequencing in tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance of circulating tumor cells. Biomarker Research. 8 (1), 60 (2020).
  24. Barron, G. A., Moseley, H., Woods, J. A. Differential sensitivity in cell lines to photodynamic therapy in combination with ABCG2 inhibition. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. 126, 87-96 (2013).
  25. Perry, R. R., et al. Sensitivity of different human lung cancer histologies to photodynamic therapy. Cancer Research. 50 (14), 4272-4276 (1990).
  26. Choi, B. -. H., Ryoo, I. -. G., Kang, H. C., Kwak, M. -. K. The sensitivity of cancer cells to pheophorbide a-based photodynamic therapy is enhanced by NRF2 silencing. PLoS One. 9 (9), 107158 (2014).
  27. Du, K. L., et al. Preliminary results of interstitial motexafin lutetiuç mediated PDT for prostate cancer. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 38 (5), 427-434 (2006).
  28. Gunaydin, G., Gedik, M. E., Ayan, S. Photodynamic therapy-current limitations and novel approaches. Frontiers in Chemistry. 9, 691697 (2021).
  29. Fisher, C., et al. Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of vertebral metastases: a phase I clinical trial. Clinical Cancer Research. 25 (19), 5766-5776 (2019).
  30. Cochrane, C., Mordon, S. R., Lesage, J. C., Koncar, V. New design of textile light diffusers for photodynamic therapy. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 33 (3), 1170-1175 (2013).
  31. Wen, J., et al. Mitochondria-targeted nanoplatforms for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxia tumor. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 19 (1), 440 (2021).
  32. Li, W. -. P., Yen, C. -. J., Wu, B. -. S., Wong, T. -. W. Recent advances in photodynamic therapy for deep-seated tumors with the aid of nanomedicine. Biomedicines. 9 (1), 69 (2021).
  33. Ozdemir, T., Lu, Y. -. C., Kolemen, S., Tanriverdi-Ecik, E., Akkaya, E. U. Generation of singlet oxygen by persistent luminescent nanoparticle-photosensitizer conjugates: a proof of principle for photodynamic therapy without light. ChemPhotoChem. 1 (5), 183-187 (2017).
  34. Abrahamse, H., Hamblin, M. R. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. The Biochemical Journal. 473 (4), 347-364 (2016).
  35. Kim, M. M., Darafsheh, A. Light sources and dosimetry techniques for photodynamic therapy. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 96 (2), 280-294 (2020).
  36. Saravana-Bawan, S., David, E., Sahgal, A., Chow, E. Palliation of bone metastases-exploring options beyond radiotherapy. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 8 (2), 168-177 (2019).
  37. Wise-Milestone, L., et al. Local treatment of mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic spinal metastases: is photodynamic therapy effective. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 133 (3), 899-908 (2012).
  38. Dentro, S. C., et al. Characterizing genetic intra-tumor heterogeneity across 2,658 human cancer genomes. Cell. 184 (8), 2239-2254 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

5 aminolevulinic AcidPhotodynamic TherapyBone MetastasesPrimary Bone TumorCell LinesNoninvasive TherapyPDT EffectCell MigrationViabilityApoptosisSenescenceMusculoskeletal derived CellsCancer Treatment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved